COLUMNIST JOHN HOLMES
From a different seat
In no way an attempt to usurp Ken Buckley's excellent column, but as an Everton fan of 24 years, I had not visited Goodison before Sunday. Living on the Yorkshire coast, and born into a family with more interest in tennis and fishing, the odd away game was the limit of my match-going experience and even that was denied after the Yorkshire footballing contingent contrived to evacuate the Premiership en masse around the turn of the millennium. So, having left student ?poverty? for the relatively lucrative world of postgraduate subsistence, I had promised myself a few trips across the Pennines this season to visit the home of the blues.
Arriving early, despite nearly shunting someone on the Liverpool ring-road (looked like a Red to me) whilst foolishly following the signs for ?Everton and Anfield? instead of ?Everton FC and Liverpool FC, I had time to reflect on the sad fact that with the move to Kirkby seemingly sealed, stadia like Goodison will soon be a thing of the past. Having previously visited modern grounds like the Riverside and Stadium of Light (the former drab the latter impressive but superficial) grounds like Goodison, where the stands look like they were built for four different stadia and the bowels of the stadium feel like your treading through history, will be a great loss to the English game. There is nothing so impressive as driving through a non-descript, slightly run-down area only to round a corner and be greeted by a massive structure with immense symbolism. The rights and wrongs of moving are debateable but the loss is unquestionable.However, the football was what we went to see. The game was a strange one to sum up. From one perspective Everton played some pretty good stuff, created a number of chances and, having secured the winning margin, shut up shop to prepare for Thursday. Nice, professional job done. On the other hand, the defence remained shaky, we relied (too?) heavily on Arteta, were lucky to be 2-0 up and spent the last half-hour aimlessly hoofing the ball forward without ever approaching something which could be described as football. Both perspectives have merit and, having actually paid my money and made a relatively long journey, I can understand why those who attend matches week in, week out get so frustrated by our tactics. The experience of watching such futility live is far more soul-destroyingly frustrating than the experience of watching it on the TV. Perhaps because you can see the full-backs are unmarked as Howard lumps another goal-kick forwards to little effect, or perhaps because you can see Lescott is under little pressure as he punts it up to no one in particular. Somehow it felt so much more irritating and unnecessary when able to fully see the alternatives.
Overall however, I think those who wish to criticise Moyes, whilst provided with ammunition by this match, would do well to pick their battles. From the team selection through to the tactics, this match reeked of get the job done and then make sure things are ok for Thursday; a not unreasonable approach given the significance for the club, and the manager, of the Ukrainian holiday. Surely having one eye on Thursday can be the only explanation for leaving Hibbert at right-back after Neville?s outstanding and managerially praised contribution in mid-week. With Carsley the only viable option to take Neville?s place in midfield, the assumption must be he is not up to 3 matches in a week and is being preserved for the European test ahead. Van Der Meyde coming in on the wing with one of Arteta or Pineaar moving into the middle was a possibility but, frankly, we have absolutely no idea where his fitness or performance levels are at and, hard a time as he?s had, those disappointing performances and prior professional lapses must still count against him when Moyes comes to pick his team.
As for Moyes? tactics. I actually thought the first half was anything but typical Moyes. The lack of creativity in the central midfield may have been typical but there were few long-balls and those played were justifiable and often effective. The full-backs were advanced (to our defensive cost at times), with Hibbert pinging in a couple of decent crosses from the bi-line, and Arteta was certainly not constrained to any rigid formation. Indeed he didn?t seem to be playing any position other than whatever he fancied at the time. Nominally starting on the right, he spent most of his time between the left-wing and the inside right position. Credit to Hibbert therefore for his sterling defensive work in keeping the Boro left-flank quiet. The much-maligned right-back probably had his best game of the season with Downing reduced to laying it back to his full-back time and again as Hibbert refused to take his eye off the ball or dive into the challenge.
The paucity of our tactics was only exposed after the match was effectively won by the second goal. Everton?s Achilles heel, counter-attacking, will haunt us ad finitum until we find some midfield pace and can therefore do something other than pump balls to a target-man when we want to, as we justifiably should, sit back on a two goal lead. Moyes needs to find some way round this as the interminable boredom of watching Howard and Lescott (prime suspects despite good performances) pumping pointless long-balls to isolated strikers will come back to haunt us against better teams; just as it did last season. The job of getting us in front was mostly well-executed but the tactics once in front need a lot of refining if we?re to challenge the upper echelons. There are ways to play safe, controlled football with the ball as well as just safety-first clearances. It is possible to frustrate the opposition without frustrating the fans, for the briefest minute there were ?Ole? calls ringing from the Paddock as Everton stroked it around in the second half; then the rot set in. More work and more ideas needed Mr. Moyes.
So overall Moyes performance was an improvement with a more work to do comment. His substitutions, derided by some as bizarre were actually fairly reasonable. Anichebe for Yakubu (who was ridiculed as a waste of money by his ex-supporters, without riposte by his new fans I might add) was a much-deserved replacement. Yakubu may be effective in the penalty area and he may not be a man for tracking back, but it is not unreasonable to ask an £11m player to break into a run occasionally. There were 50-50s I could have beaten the Boro defenders too from my seat in the Paddock which Yakubu aimlessly trotted towards only to be second to the ball. Yobo for McFadden was probably another move with Thursday in mind. The Scot had a good first half. I?ve been a big critic of his over-elaborate approach to the game but he reigned that in on Sunday and his improved decisions about when to try and beat the man rendered a far higher success rate for his turns and flicks. Several have suggested the substitution left us with a 5-4-1 formation but it was clear to me that Moyes had moved Baines to the left-wing and Lescott to left-back ? an experiment several had called for over the last week. Whether this was a genuine experiment or just a way to fit the team together was unclear. However, Baines is clearly not a left-winger and Lescott is a poor left-back in terms of distribution ? definitely not an experiment to be repeated. Was Arteta replaced just to give him a much-deserved ovation? Could Van Der Meyde have had a run-out? More importantly, does it really matter when it?s a substitution made with the match long-since won and injury time already underway?
The remaining players were a mixed bunch. Baines was off his game but ill-deserving of criticism given his performance this season. Lescott, Anichebe, Yobo and Stubbs were as expected and one can only hope the former gains the international recognition his continuing high-form deserves. Jagielka was abysmal, definitely a game to forget for him with passes, tackles and influence all going missing. Neville was nowhere near as bad as some have painted him. Although ineffective in terms of creativity he was a useful foil for Arteta and Pineaar and filled a role he still looks unsuited to with a decent effort. He did waste a couple of good shooting opportunities however by, bizarrely, trying to work it onto his left-foot.
Pineaar is becoming a more familiar character. He certainly lacks strength and needs the ball played accurately to his feet or space to be able to get involved but once he?s got the ball he?s a real talent with an eye for the right pass and an ability to time his runs into the box. When Cahill returns we could see a lot of goals going in from the midfield. One to be given more games and sent to the gym to build his body up. If Moyes can do to him what he did to a certain little Spaniard we could have flanks to be feared. That Spaniard was the star, however. In all the moaning about the performance, few have mentioned just how good a return to the team, and to form, Arteta had. Every time he touched the ball things happened. His ability to make space for himself set him apart from any other player and with a little more shooting practice he could have grabbed himself more than one goal. It?s a joy to have him back. Turning him into an effective Premiership wide man stands as Moyes? greatest achievement and one in the eye to those who say Moyes can?t nurture or kills flair players.
In summary, a mixed bag, but one which sets us up well for the biggest match of the season so far.
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Al Dugan - I get frustrated with the negativity here as well, but I don’t think a rant like that helps. There’s quite a mixed bag of feedback on TW generally, the moaners tend to shout loudest that’s all. If you get them a mouthful you’ll just get a load back!
In fairness I think the mailbag was better set-up before in terms of keeping things balanced (and civil), although it was obviously too heavy a load for Michael et al so no criticism implied at the changes.
So we all are disappointed that Moyes did not ’push on’ to destroy Boro last weekend, and instead sat on the lead. But that meant that we won - comfortably in the end. Villa, one of our rivals, lost two points.
I suppose all I am saying is that Moyes is one of the very best defensive managers in the league. We all wish he was also one of the best attacking managers, but he isn’t. But we should give him credit where credit is due. And criticism where it is due. Moyes is what he is. We won’t drop points like Villa; but we won’t win handomely either.
Last season, 2-0 up against Man U, final score 2-4. I still haven’t got out from behind the sofa after that one. IAnd I’m afraid we have capitulated in the past, that game is the one that springs instantly to mind.
I notice that your intense dislike of ’negativity’ regarding team members doesn’t apply to former players eg Naysmith, Pistone and Kilbane. Presumably you were equally supportive of them when they played but now they’ve gone its fair game to have a pop? Smacks of hypocrasy to me.
One point I dont think has been made enough was Mcfaddens contribution. From where i was standing he looked fantastic and didnt put a foot wrong. He held the ball up well, showed good footwork and had an eye for a good pass which he seemed to deliver.
On this form either AJ or the Yak will be stating on the bench I feel!
If I recall correctly the following :-
4-1 vs Blackburn
4-2 vs Manchester United
5-1 vs Bucharest
4-0 vs Bolton, West Brom and Aston Villa
7-0 and 4-1 vs Arsenal
5-2 vs Tottenham
5-1 vs Manchester City
2-1 vs Wolves
6-2 vs Newcastle
2-1 vs Shrewsbury
4-1 vs Chelsea
plus many other loses or draws against very average teams.......


1 Posted 01/10/2007 at 17:32:41
Report abuse
Let’s put it on the other foot, and see how it would stack up. If you were a Boro supporter how would you feel after that match? You had just been picked apart by a midfielder who shines with the ball, and they had NO answers for him, even though Boro tried every nasty tactic in the book including on off the ball elbow to the teeth..Hibbert, c’mon folks, he played his BEST game of the year. he didnt give ground, and he had to play up to Mr. Downing, and I thought he did well. We were forced due to limitations from injury to play Phil and Jags in positions that don’t do them justice. where would you have liked them to play? Carsley was rested ahead of the trip to the Ukraine, according to reports, so where exactly should Nevs and Jags have been slotted? Baines is so much better than anything we have had an the left side in years. Have you forgotten Pistone’s contributions the last few years, and Gary Naismith, and I think even Kilbane had a game at left back. This criticism and negativity is so puzzling. You must hate your lives...fifth in the table, a big European match coming, next round in the first cup of the season, a legitimate rotation possible in the forward position...do you not remember when we were forced to use defenders up front a couple of years ago? Do you ever look at the good in the side? Arteta’s and Pinenar’s play on the second goal is highlite reel stuff. A back heel, a little deft move, a no-look side foot pass...in the net..and Moyes decided to hold the lead late against a side that was throughly beaten at that point? And the problem there was what? 2-0 at home against Boro, clinical. At least we aren’t Chelsea 0-0 to Fulham at the bridge, with SWP (arguably their best player of the year) now relegated to the stand. I see where Chelsea is behind us now in the table. Can one of you come up with a reason why that isn’t anygood either? I am starting to really hate this site, as NOTHING this team does satifies any of you. All those complaining about Phil...did you notice who took the full brunt of the Boro free from straightaway in the 2nd half? Yeah, it was Phil, standing tall in the wall. I sometimes wonder if you folks have any understanding of what you are watching or if all of your football knowledge comes from playing Football Manager.