Warning: Attempt to read property "post_type" on null in /app/wp-includes/link-template.php on line 4179 Warning: Attempt to read property "post_type" on null in /app/wp-includes/link-template.php on line 4181 Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$post_author in /app/wp-content/plugins/duracelltomi-google-tag-manager/public/frontend.php on line 295
VIEW FROM THE BLUE

Best Foot Forward

By Lyndon Lloyd :  10/02/2008 :  Comments (19) :

David Moyes is nothing if not proud so his response to Yakubu's late return from the Africa Cup of Nations this past week — whether it was down to visiting his sick mother or honouring an invitation from Nigeria's president — was predictable and commendable. He has painstakingly assembled a squad founded on team spirit and mutual respect so it was only right for him to make an example of a player who seemingly defied the manager's wishes — not to mention an agreement made before he left for Ghana — by failing to report for midweek training on time.

That should be the end of it, though. Point made. Punishment meted out and suspension served. After yesterday's game with Reading, Moyes told inquisitive reporters that he hasn't yet decided whether or not Yakubu will be included in the squad that travels to Bergen this week but Evertonians concerned by the distinct lack of bite in attack in the Nigerian's absence will be hoping that he will be.

Setting aside the "goal" that Andy Johnson should have been awarded at Blackburn, Everton have scored just once in the last four matches in all competitions — to be honest, for an hour of that worryingly poor win over Reading, it looked as though the goal drought that stretched back to the middle of the Wigan game was going to continue. It's debatable whether Yakubu or Steven Pienaar has been missed more but there is no doubt who currently tops the scoring chart this season at Goodison and at this stage of the season, you need to have your best players playing.

That means putting the Yak's transgression in the past and getting on with the business of progressing to the last 16 of the Uefa Cup. Having exited the FA Cup in embarrassing fashion to Oldham and then been denied a Wembley date because they couldn't break through Chelsea's stubborn back line, the Blues have already seen their interest in two cup competitions ended by not being willing (in the former instance) or able (in the latter) to field their first-choice line-up.

Furthermore, Everton are not playing well at the moment and that means that when chances come, they have to be converted. I've been a staunch defender of Johnson, believing that he comes in for an enormous amount of stick despite feeding on precious little service in front of goal, but he undermined his own case with a bad miss yesterday. Of course, he didn't become a worse player in the space of 7 days because he failed to convert a virtual carbon copy of the one he did that was chalked off at Ewood Park but Yakubu's record this season speaks for itself and if he's fit he should be first choice.

There's also the added concern that by omitting Yakubu again at a time when Victor Anichebe is injured Moyes will be leaving himself short of important striking options at a time when he needs every available weapon in his arsenal.

It's possible that Pienaar will be fit enough to play against SK Brann this Wednesday and that will restore one of the most consistent forces in the Blues' midfield this season to the starting line-up. It will also allow Moyes to field the XI that formed the bedrock of that impressive 13-match unbeaten run after the Clattenburg derby, with the added option of Manuel Fernandes who is still settling back into life in the Premier League.

For many, getting that successful nucleus back can't come soon enough which is why the hope is that Moyes will have climbed off his high horse by the time it comes to selecting who gets on that plane for Norway and that Yakubu is among that number. The season to date has been great but it'll count for nought if we don't press home our position of strength in the two competitions in which we're still fighting.

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Kevin Sparke
1   Posted 10/02/2008 at 08:21:25

Report abuse

Insightful commentary as always. Though, I take issue with one phrase - I heard Moyes’ post match comments re Yakubu and saw no evidence of a ’high horse’. I saw a manager fielding a journalists question in a manner which said precisely nothing (Excellent media management actually).

Consider the alternative responses and the messages they’d give out:

1. "Yes, he’s in the squad and will be playing" - Everton are desperate and Moyes is a soft touch

2. "No, he’ll not be playing he’s still serving his time" - Everton will be understrength and the manager is a disciplinarian.

3. "I don’t know" - Moyes is indecisive.

Saying that he’s not decided yet keeps the media at bay and the opponents guessing.

I’m sure Yakubu will play at some stage during the game. I’m glad we’ve a player of his tried and tested goalscoring ability - Moyes must field the best team available on the day and if that means playing Yakubu, then so be it.

sean condon
2   Posted 10/02/2008 at 09:45:13

Report abuse

Agree completely with you, Lyndon. It would be perverse to leave Yakubu out of the team with Anichebe not fit.

The worst case scenario, I suppose, with playing him, is the possibility of dressing-room unrest. Maybe the players would be divided over whether the punishment was harsh enough. Perhaps this would affect their focus and possibly result in poor performances.

But that’s unlikely. I have a hard time imagining that there would be fractious debate over what is, really, a tempest in a teapot.

The worst case scenario with not playing him is, after yesterday,too terrible to contemplate.

Actually, on second thought, it would be perverse to leave Yakubu out even if Anichebe was fit.

We gotta score some goals.
Dave Wilson
3   Posted 10/02/2008 at 10:00:44

Report abuse

Good points raised by Lyndon initially and by Kevin
The next few games will have a huge bearing on the sort of season we are going to have. I am still really angry with the Yaks conduct, especially when we hear DM feared this could happen and sought promises from the Yak even before he left for Africa, however, the Yak has shown he can be a match winner and lets face it, if he nets the winner we’ll all be happy to forgive n forget.
Tough, tough call for DM to make
Neil McKinney
4   Posted 10/02/2008 at 10:29:44

Report abuse

Good article Lyndon. We would always regret it if we went out of the UEFA Cup because we didn’t field our strongest team.

I like Moyes’s stance here though. As Kevin points out, the media always probes for the inside scoop, but Moyes always leaves them hanging. This way everyone’s still guessing, even the Yak.

I would be very surprised if the Yak doesn’t make the team. We need him and Peanut back so that we can put the tie to bed in the first leg!

COYB!!
Arthur jones
5   Posted 10/02/2008 at 10:51:24

Report abuse

Spot on , DM can’t let the Yak get away with this , Big Dunc and franny jugears thought they were bigger than the club , both apologsed and as for that useless twerp from manure , jesper blomquist , he was last seen legging it after the 21 bus on county road . No favourtism shown to anyone , good strong management
Dominic Duerden
6   Posted 10/02/2008 at 11:18:41

Report abuse

Arthur

Big Dunc was superb and Moyes couldn’t of managed him any worse. Good strong management ? Bollux...
Seamus Murphy
7   Posted 10/02/2008 at 11:06:08

Report abuse

As far as i see it Moyes can now put Yak back in the squad (and most probably the starting 11) for Brann safe in the knowledge that he has dealt with the issue and maintained the respect of the other players by doing so. I dont think the punishment needs to be any harsher and doubt any of the players would want it to be.
I would imagine thats the end of it now to be honest.
Michael Hunt
8   Posted 10/02/2008 at 11:35:37

Report abuse

Whether the Yak is back is to a large extent up to him. I.e. Moyes is reasonable and if he has apologised to him and his team mates and his application in training and overall is good then I’m sure Moyes will have him in the squad.
With Vaughan and AJ looking sure to fire in goals when given a start together then Yak should be on the bench for the next game. The dearth of minutes Vaughan has had on the pitch, plus Pienaar’s absence, is the real cause of our recent dip in goals.
stuart Duncan
9   Posted 10/02/2008 at 12:14:10

Report abuse

I agree that Yak should be back in the squad for Brann but I also think we need a bit of ’rotation’ to rest some players and give others time on the pitch. I would rest Carsley and Cahill for sure. Cars has made a couple of bad tackles recently and could have been Sent off a couple of times. Cahill’s back on 12 month, no breaks football - seems to be the Australian way. Vaughn needs to start as does Manny. And Osman, Hibbert and Valente could do with time on the pitch. If all that means that Yak starts on the bench, so be it.
Arthur jones
10   Posted 10/02/2008 at 14:22:47

Report abuse

Dominic , I thought the world of Dunc but the worst thing a manager can do is let a player dictate terms to him , Duncan was put in his place by Moyes when he needed it and it was him who apologised to Moyes , Could you see the Catt , shankley or Clough ever bowing down to a player , no matter who they were ? no chance .
Steve Ferns
11   Posted 10/02/2008 at 14:54:03

Report abuse

Duncan was never superb on a consistent basis and pissed all his talent up the wall. Moyes handled him well, and amazingly squeezed out every last drop of talent from him.
Peter Corcoran
12   Posted 10/02/2008 at 15:49:02

Report abuse

Some good comments and I agree entirely with Dave Wilson.

I think DM got it spot on but will select Yak for Brann - he’s had his punishment and there is no real mileag in punishing the club, the playes, the fans by leaving him out.

Re Duncan F - not a hero, more a villain; I could list a whole load of instances where he let the club down (yes he did some vital things for us but not enough), but that is possibly another subject on its own.

Lyndon Lloyd
Editorial Team
13   Posted 10/02/2008 at 18:28:45

Report abuse

Kevin: "Though, I take issue with one phrase - I heard Moyes? post match comments re Yakubu and saw no evidence of a ?high horse?."

Yeah, that wasn’t perhaps the right phrase to use as that wasn’t what I meant. I think he handled the interview very well, as usual it has to be said.

I guess what I meant was that I hope his view of Yakubu’s actions have softened sufficiently for him to be able to see past them for the good of our prospects in the next couple of games.
Peter Hall
14   Posted 10/02/2008 at 21:09:37

Report abuse

I wrote this last week in response to what I thought a small-minded savaging of the Yak. Given Lyndon’s considered piece on the subject I’m taking the liberty of repeating the post as follows

Life can be cheap in Africa and the opportunity to visit friends & family more valuable in consequence.

Think how we would feel if it were the other way round. You?re playing striker for Lagos United and are dropping in to poor old Britain for the Euro Nations Cup, held every two years to the condemnation of the African Premiership big bosses. You go out of the ENC unexpectedly and you think you have a chance to visit the folks back home. Your Dad’s not too well, after all. OK you?re on a billion rand a day, the contract says you can’t, and the supporters don?t care about your family. But still . . . you might!

If Moyesy is wise he will have a sharp word, remind him how to use his mobile, tell him he?s not ready for tomorrow and that he owes us one. And see a massive difference between the man Yak who would do this and - oh well, for example the man (?) Barton who so many wanted us to sign, who would shame his club, city and country at every opportunity.
Paul Lenehan
15   Posted 11/02/2008 at 09:41:53

Report abuse

I agree. The punishment was a fair one and that should be it. Yak should be in the squad for Norway and it should be put behind us as bad decision by Yak that has been dealt with.
David Gallant
16   Posted 11/02/2008 at 10:24:56

Report abuse

Lyndon, your response to Kevin Sparkes issue with the ?high-horse? comment and the implications thereof speaks volumes for the type of bloke you are and it makes a refreshing change from the men behind the scenes at Toffeeweb Towers (LOL) when on the subject of Moyes.

Some excellent points and pretty balanced opinion on this issue means I don?t have much to add. I will say, however, that the Yak?s inclusion against Brann should be influenced in large part by his attitude during training this week (could be part of what Moyes had in mind when saying he remains undecided).

If it was as blatant a disregard (with prior, specific warning as some have alluded) for Moyes instructions, then surely we must trust Moyes to make the right call here. If he feels the Yak is genuinely repentant then surely he will pick him. If not, then we should accept that Moyes wasn?t satisfied with a mere 1 game ban and trust him to make that call.

Worst case scenario is of course if we lose to Brann and the Yak was left out of the squad. Then the Moyes-bashers will no doubt be out in force yet again. Our attack has looked decidedly toothless of late but I think we are going to be seeing more and more of the young Mr Vaughan in the next few weeks. I would personally love to see us go 4-4-2 with Vaughan and the Yak spearheading our attack, but I just can?t see Moyes doing that ... not from the start of games anyway.
Brian Donnelly
17   Posted 11/02/2008 at 11:37:04

Report abuse

Lyndon,
When you write, ?That should be the end of it, though. Point made. Punishment meted out and suspension served.? I personally don?t agree with this. There is only Moyes who can decide whether the punishment meted out has been sufficient.

Obviously we will be stronger as a team if the Yak plays, but surely this has got to be secondary to how badly Moyes and the rest of the squad feel let down. Also Moyes has to think about the effect on future discipline at the club.

That?s why, in this case, I don?t think any of us are in a position to decide whether there should be further punishment ? I will support Moyes whatever he decides on this issue and I don?t think the Yak should be treated less severely than anybody else would, even if we are desperate for his presence.
Rich Grisdale
18   Posted 11/02/2008 at 17:13:10

Report abuse

david gallent....agree with your point about the Yak and vaughen if moyes does go 4-4-2. For me vaughen is better than AJ, he has got so much more to his game. Also he can hold the ball up and bring others into play better than AJ. You could say that AJ has had to do it alone up front with no support, and given a partner he might do better. I believe moyes will go back to 4-5-1 with yak upfront and cahill behind. That formation saw us play the best football for sometime, aswell as the best run of results for 20 years....
Dave Lawley
19   Posted 12/02/2008 at 09:56:30

Report abuse

Lyndon, nice work, I agree. Also I read a article from jagielka saying tha yak had spoken to the players (apologised?),


© ToffeeWeb