Coleman and Naismith handed starts

, 26 March, 19comments  |  Jump to most recent
Belgian duo come on as second-half subs
Seamus Coleman was handed his second successive start for the Republic of Ireland in their World Cup qualifier against Austria this evening and Steven Naismith also played the full 90 minutes for Scotland against Serbia but neither were on the winning side.

Ireland were denied three points when Austria grabbed a very late equaliser in a 2-2 draw in Dublin while the Scots went down 2-0 to the Serbs to remain bottom of their group.

Elsewhere, Kevin Mirallas played the second 45 minutes for Belgium as they beat Macedonia for the second time in four days; Marouane Fellaini also came on as a last-minute sub to help wind the clock down for the Red Devils' 1-0 win.

Leighton Baines and Leon Osman, meanwhile, were named as subs for England but didn't see action in the 1-1 draw with Montenegro. Neither did Nikica Jelavic who was an unused substitute for Croatia as they came from behind to win 2-1 in Wales.  



Reader Comments (19)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


James Flynn
1 Posted 26/03/2013 at 20:18:31
Stay healthy gents.
Phil Sammon
3 Posted 26/03/2013 at 20:51:42
Could do with Naismith picking up a knock.
Phil Sammon
4 Posted 26/03/2013 at 20:54:34
Have to say, Coleman has played very very well so far.
James Flynn
5 Posted 26/03/2013 at 21:28:40
Phil - Haha on Naismith. Be nice Phil.

And Coleman? Named mentioned in the best RBs next season and the best 2 years from now. Can you believe how fast this kid's come along?

Bill Gall
6 Posted 26/03/2013 at 21:59:41
Just finished watching a pathetic performance from England. The previous Number 9s for England must be scratching their heads at Wellbeck, the boy cannot control the ball and goes either backwards or sideways before loosing the ball.

Why Baines never played is beyond me as there was no attacking threat down England's left side without him. If this is the best that England can provide then something is wrong as the only ones that played any good were the two players in central defence who were supposed to be the weak link.

Looks as Everton are not the only ones who struggle to defend corners but you expect more from the national team.

Trevor Lynes
7 Posted 26/03/2013 at 22:30:09
I'm just happy Osman and Baines never played... It was quite a physical match and I'm sure that some players will be nursing knocks.

Scotland are really dire and Naismith fits right in.

Patrick Murphy
8 Posted 26/03/2013 at 22:34:16
Totally agree Trevor, Scotland are a really poor team and Naismith doesn't even stand out in that team.
Sam Hoare
9 Posted 26/03/2013 at 22:37:17
Pretty terrible results all round for the home nations. Can see a World Cup devoid of any of them.
Peter Cummings
10 Posted 26/03/2013 at 23:25:00
I agree with you, Trevor, I really couldn't care less if any of our lads played with this bunch of misfits. The second half was shambolic and I noticed fatso didn't even seem interested after he scored. I mean Montenegro top of the group!! Last 4 for me: Germany, Spain, Holland & France.
Dick Fearon
11 Posted 26/03/2013 at 23:52:02
Last night, I watched Australia play an inglorious 0-0 draw vs Oman. Two players stood out onw was Oman's keeper who plays for Wigan the other was Tim Cahill.

Ex Blue Tim was easily MotM and shone like a beacon in a sea of gloom. He scored one of his 'trade mark' headers and had three other attempts brilliantly saved. On top of that, he worked like a devil all over the field.

Every time I see the likes of Naismith in the shirt I think we could've had Tim loan for the run-in and it makes me sick.

Dick Fearon
12 Posted 27/03/2013 at 00:27:47
Oops! the score was 2-2.
Phil Sammon
13 Posted 27/03/2013 at 01:56:18
Dick

Getting rid of Cahill was the right thing to do. We all love the guy but I really think the decision to let him go was a good one. Any loan would have been a real backward step too, in my opinion.

Don't get me wrong, I'd have him instead of Naismith... but I'd have much rather we used Barkley, Oviedo, McAleny etc rather than just persisting with the same tired few.

I must say, when Naismith first joined I thought we'd signed a bargain. He did look genuinely neat and tidy. Now, like everyone, I've resigned myself to the fact that he is almost certainly a flop. However, being that Moyes clearly likes him, it does surprise me that the lad hasn't been given a chance in his favoured position – just off the striker. He does have a goal in him too. If he's hopeless then ok, at least we tried it.

You just have to look at how long Moyes played Osman out of position for another example of some crazy Moyes management.

It does seem as though the fans have to cry out for months and months before Moyes finally relents on his decisions. He's a really odd bloke, you know.

Dick Fearon
14 Posted 27/03/2013 at 03:32:55
Phil, @ 007, Tim Cahill is twice the player Naismith is or ever will be, no, make that ten times the player.

While I agree with your views on Moyes and the young ones I still believe that in our current situation with so much hanging in the balance it was really stupid not to accept a loan of Tim. He said he would love to get the offer.

Perhaps Moyes thought Leroy Fer was lined up which only goes to show that a bird in the hand is worth two — or, in Everton's case, make that TEN —m in the bush.

Rob Smith
15 Posted 27/03/2013 at 04:23:11
Why get Tim back, we have plenty of cover in that position. Tim scored how many last time he was in a blue shirt? 1 or 2 all season? Fellaini 12 so far... I don't think Tim would do any better on the right wing than Naismith which is really the only position Naismith has got a run in.

Although Naismith is not great, he is being played out of position on the wing. What is Osman's and Neville's excuse playing in their preferred position? How many more goals have they scored than Naismith? It must be a lot, they play every week... Neville not so much now. Oh, that's right: Osman scored a cracker, deliberate as well, he did mean to scuff the ground to gave the ball curve and swerve.

Fuck me right wing is not our problem, strength, guile and a good passing game is what is needed in the middle. Osman is still being played out of position, he is in the run on side ffs.

Mike Webb
16 Posted 27/03/2013 at 06:40:29
Dick #009, firstly the loan would've been only for a few weeks, not for the run in. Secondly one of the reasons Tim's performances dipped for us is the guy was never taking a break, what with the various summer competitions that Australia were involved in, with all the travelling. He'd never turn down the chance to play for them, which you have to respect. If he really wants another couple of years playing he's going to need the rest - and I'm not sure he's physically up to the demands of the Premier League now.
Noel Early
17 Posted 27/03/2013 at 15:12:54
Belgians must be good if Felli is only coming on to wind down the clock... Surely a big blow to his ego.
Clarence Yurcan
18 Posted 27/03/2013 at 16:35:02
Funny how two away draws are viewed so differently in two different countries. Last night was a great one for US Soccer to come out of Mexico with a point. Even with the strides our national team has made in the last 20 years I still feel like we're still at the point where most American fans are just happy to get to the World Cup.

Also, I wonder how good Mexico actually is. Is their stadium such a fortress because they usually play CONCACAF sides, would they be as good in CONMEBOL?

Phil Sammon
19 Posted 27/03/2013 at 22:30:53
A decent acronym should be no more than four letters, five at a push. I think these guys are taking the piss.
Trevor Lynes
20 Posted 28/03/2013 at 23:04:11
Cahill leaving was timed at about the right time. BUT... we have basically brought dross in to compensate. Giving jobs to Hitzlsperger and Naismith was like giving a job to Yozzer Hughes.... Giz a job, I can do that!!

We have wasted enough money to have signed Fer in wages paid for benchwarmers. I'm including McFadden and Hahnemann in that equation.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb