Is Investment the Immediate Solution?

Ian Maxwell 08/08/2015 22comments  |  Jump to last
Today, most football fans awakened like a young child on Christmas morning. After 76 days, football was back. The prior season, for many clubs, was consigned to history as optimism spread across the terraces across England. As I made my way into Liverpool, I admit to having mixed emotions. My heart was full of excitement and enthusiasm for the new season but my head was offering me a niggling counter-argument which would ultimately be proved by the end of the day.

Before the game, there were murmurings of a number of anti-board meetings to protest against the lack of investment in the summer. Everton would be starting the season with only Tom Cleverley and the returning Gerard Deulofeu added to the ranks of a team who limped to a lacklustre 11th position in the prior season. This was a modest outlay of circa £4m taking into account two first team central defenders had also left over the summer without replacement and subsequent doubts had been placed over Arouna Kone’s ability to challenge Lukaku over a poor pre-season. Notwithstanding, my opinion of the board is not the immediate concern at this point. The biggest problem currently lies within the four corners of the football field.

Let’s pull no punches; the starting line-up at 3pm against Watford contained ten full internationals, with a further four lying in wait on substitute bench if required. With all due respect to Watford, who outfought Everton throughout the afternoon, this was a game that Everton should not be losing on paper. Rewind around three months and go back to the 9th May when an Everton team containing eleven internationals failed to break down a poor Sunderland side. Neither of these instances suggest that performances of this nature are a one-off, I could name further examples. This is why I have an issue with certain fans who are blaming a lack of investment as the primary reason for our struggles. If players of the quality that we currently have cannot inspire better performances, why would further reinforcements make better results any more likely? In order for reinforcements to be effective, we must first address the tactical deficiencies we have been showing for the past twelve months.

I fail to accept that the Everton players have devolved into poor, untalented performers. The issue here is not of their abilities, it is quite evident that the issues are inherently tactical. My neighbour in the Gwladys Street observed how much Heurelho Gomes seemed to enjoy making long throws up the pitch. My observation was that upon every throw being challenged for, each loose ball appeared to fall directly to the feet of an unmarked Watford player. There was no luck about this, the positional location of Cleverley, McCarthy and Barry was all wrong. This is not a criticism of those players, they are undertaking the positions they have been instructed to. I can’t believe that they are so poor as to not understand where they should be standing based on their manager’s instructions.

Everton’s attacking play was worryingly predictable. Watford appeared to have worked out what Everton would do before Everton even knew. Movement was poor, players were static and were reluctant to commit themselves forward and get into the penalty area. On a number of instances in the first half, young Galloway galloped forward only to have to check back with no target in the penalty area. In contrast, Watford were free to express themselves. Everton’s lack of pressing has so often been their downfall and, again, Watford were in shooting range for their second goal before any meaningful attempt at closing the striker down was made. At which point, two last ditch lunges were made as our defence sold themselves to Ighalo who slammed home. Not good enough.

The biggest concern is that the once billed “Fortress Goodision” is rapidly giving out more points than the local traffic police. In David Moyes’ last season, Everton went through the 2012-13 season with only one home league defeat. I am reluctant to dwell too much on the Moyes era as I do not want to turn this into a Moyes vs Martinez debate which would be wholly inappropriate. However, a crucial factor in our “relative” success from 2006-2013 was our ability to make the Grand Old Lady a stronghold where no team would relish coming. Now, teams appear to be motivated and optimistic in their styles when they come to Goodison and we have seen Crystal Palace, Sunderland, Stoke City, Leicester City, Swansea City, Hull City and WBA all take points from Goodison in 2014-15. Add to that, being held by Watford on the opening day, this worrying trend appears to be continuing.

Personally, I pride myself in being not optimistic or pessimistic when analysing and discussing Everton. I prefer to attempt to take emotion out and come to a realistic conclusion in my considerations. Under Moyes, I would approach Goodison on match day with positivity and a belief that we wouldn’t be beaten. This isn’t to say that we didn’t capitulate on occasions (think Wigan) but the reason defeats often upset me so much back then was because it was unexpected and relatively rare. Sadly, as I mentioned earlier, I approached Goodison at half past two today with a niggling doubt that we would struggle and was ultimately proven right. I now have learned to take defeats and other poor results on the chin because they are becoming more and more frequent.

Roberto has to quickly stop this rot. Irrespective of investment concerns, the squad that played vs Sunderland in May, or Watford today should be doing better. Everton seem to be steadily regressing month on month. It is impossible to argue that we haven’t taken massive steps backward since August 2013 despite making such a considerable step forward initially. He has had all summer to address the tactical issues that were so evident towards the end of last season, but they are, seemingly, as prevalent as ever. A blistering first season has allowed him time and patience from the Everton fans but how long can we continue to afford him time. A successful first season does not mean anything in the long term. The true test of a manager’s ability is consistency over a number of years. I fear 2013-14 was successful due to the structures and attitudes embedded by the previous regime still resonating through the squad. As Martinez, has had more and more opportunity to influence, we seem to have worsened. I may be wrong and I may be unfair with that statement, but surely it is only a matter of time if this form continues that this opinion can be more and more strongly supported.

Despite how this piece may read, for the time being I am still firmly behind Roberto. I do not want Everton to become one of the many teams who change managers at the first sniff of trouble. But dark clouds have been gathering for a long while and our first match of the season left me with a deflated feeling. It is not enjoyable heading to Goodison these days and I am facing the upcoming season with a concerning sense of trepidation. Things need to change and fast. I do not believe throwing cash at the squad, however bare it is, is the solution to the root cause of our issues. The squad does indeed need padding, but we must learn how to play effectively first.

Share this article

Reader Comments (22)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Dan McKie
1 Posted 09/08/2015 at 08:31:51
Agree with all of this, except I am not behind Martinez. We are becoming Wigan but with better players meaning rather than hanging around 17th, we will likely hang around 12th. I'd describe our football as pointless most of the time. We knock it around with no real purpose until we give it away cheaply.

Martinez often puts out a side with 1 or 2 creative players, so opposition stop them and stop us. Moyes fired the team up by playing the underdog card, sometimes more often than warranted but it got results. Martinez has the arrogant notion that his way is the only way to play, and that the players you have are irrelevant, the system will work regardless.

We have become as dull a team as I've ever witnessed, and I cant wait until we sack the manager. I just hope we don't leave it too late.
Steve Hogan
2 Posted 09/08/2015 at 08:39:10
Good piece Ian, but it took you an awful long time to reach the conclusion that the buck really does stop with Martinez.

I’ll take it a step further and actually offer the opinion that in some cases, he is actually making matters worse, by actually continually playing players out of position.

Barkley on the wing, Lukaku on the wing, too many of the same type of players in midfield, Cleverley, Mcarthy, Barry, the list is endless.

Sharabi Singh
3 Posted 09/08/2015 at 09:13:03
He does play players out of position but I think his hand is forced. We have alot of injuries (which is another thread I am sure). Hopefully bringing in the players he knows we need and getting injured players back should mean no players out of position. Lets wait and see what August brings. Once the transfer window is closed is the time to judge. He should have no excuses
Anthony Purcell
4 Posted 09/08/2015 at 10:18:08
I agree with you on that we should be beating teams like this on paper. I just hope we are not playing football like this all season. Four tough games now coming up. More shall be revealed, I think.
Rob Teo
5 Posted 09/08/2015 at 10:23:33
Agree with all your points, Ian, except the bit about still being behind Martinez. For me, he's overstayed his welcome and should have moved on during the summer. Unfortunately, our board accepts mediocrity, so he's not going anywhere in the near future.

To your question about whether investment is the answer, I'd say yes and no. Yes because we need to get quality players in the right positions. While we may have a number of internationals, they aren't necessarily up to premier league standards. Naismith is the prime example. But while Martinez is manager, any investment thrown into the squad would most likely go down the drain. We spent £28 million on Lukaku, but he's nowhere near half as good as many others who cost half that. I blame the board for paying an inflated price for someone who was worth less, but also Martinez for not knowing how to play to his strengths.

Dave Ganley
6 Posted 09/08/2015 at 10:58:25
Yeah I agree with you Ian but, as others have said, my patience with Martinez has run out. Sorry Sharabi #3 you have your head in the sand.

Injuries and lack of transfer activity is no excuse for the performance yesterday and in fact most of last season. Any team we put out should be capable of dispatching Watford at home comfortably.

The only other thing I disagree with Ian is that I never get used to getting beat at GP (maybe I'm a masochistic supporter) but I do expect it now. It is going to be a very long season if Martinez continues as manager. No idea, no planning, no hope.

Winston Williamson
7 Posted 09/08/2015 at 11:23:31
He's got to go. The sport is supposed to be entertaining as a minimum standard.
Football under RM is fucking boring!
Clive Rogers
8 Posted 09/08/2015 at 11:30:32
What is most worrying is that we all knew it was coming. There have been countless posts saying we need a CB, attacking mid and a striker. Even RM himself has said it unbelievably. Yet here we are mid August and not one of those deficiencies has been addressed.

This policy of ours to buy late to save a few weeks wages (which Kenwright has bragged about) is a joke. Every other club has done their business early. This season it may well backfire. By the end of the window, we will be desperate, and clubs will know it and screw us accordingly.

The current squad is week, unbalanced and will struggle all season and do well to avoid relegation. Watching MOTD last night showed how teams like Leicester, Crystal Palace and Swansea have strengthened and moved past us. Leicester in particular moved the ball about so quickly. Not looking forward to playing them.
Eric Myles
9 Posted 09/08/2015 at 11:33:33
The problem with not investing in better quality players is that other teams DO invest so you end up effectively going backwards
Trevor Lynes
10 Posted 09/08/2015 at 12:32:21
Eric #9 yours is the shortest answer and I fully agree with your comment.

Talk of 10 or 11 internationals is rubbish. Most are over the hill in that respect and that is why we still have them. Out of the side that started the match against Watford only about four would command a decent transfer fee.

Every other club in the league bought players and had them bedded in before the season began. We are the bottom of the spending division and yet this board are not castigated for it and fans are directing all their bile at the manager who is a well paid fall guy for this inept board.

Before we went into Europe Martinez said we needed 6 or 7 extra players to be able to compete on all fronts. Nothing happened, the squad remained at the same strength in numbers. This season it has been accepted publicly that we need three new players and that was before Baines got injured to add to the growing list of injured players. Leaving the transfer activity to after the season begins is suicidal and criminally insane IMO and a lot of other former players opinions too.

Jay Harris
11 Posted 09/08/2015 at 18:49:51
Some very good points Ian but I am of the opinion that the buck stops with the manager.

He has had far more backing than Moyes ever did including being allowed to pay 28 million for a player that wouldnt get a game for a top 6 club.

Martinez tactics, Training regimes and player selection and motivation is not even good enough for a top championship side never mind the Premiership.

No wonder he said he wasnt the man to bring Wigan back up having relegated them with a record number of goals against.

The man is painfully out of his depth and is gradually breaking up all the good routines and practices Moyes put in place.

It has been painfully obvious to many supporters that we struggle to contribute goals from MF after Fellaini was allowed to go.

We replace that with a pair of defensive mids that are lucky if they get 3 goals a season between them.

For the last 2 years Ossie and to an extent Pienaar who were our only other sources for goals have both been aging/deteriorating.

A good manager would have seen this and addressed it but Martinez keeps getting inferior players not befitting a top six club.

Ross Barkley for all his natural ability has not been developed since Martinez took over.

As other posters have said the players look confused with no sense of purpose.

I could go on and on but no amount of investment will improve us while this man is in charge.

James Newcombe
12 Posted 09/08/2015 at 19:11:13
I actually think we have a really talented squad these days, which is certainly something to be pleased with. An ageing team, but a good one nonetheless.

Our problems are tactical - the fans all know exactly what the gameplan is going to be (more of the same), so any opposition manager is only going to have to do two minutes ’homework’ on us. Whoever our defensive coach is these days, should frankly be embarrassed to collect a salary. Southampton will tonk us next weekend.
Andy Crooks
13 Posted 09/08/2015 at 19:45:15
Good article, Ian. This, however, is not the "first sniff of trouble". That stench has been around for quite a while.
Steve Carse
14 Posted 09/08/2015 at 21:42:33
The point made about the positional placements of our MF is spot on. I'd love to know the stats on winning the second ball at each end of the park. We rarely do it in the opponents half and so rarely build up momentum. We rarely do it in our own half, so failing to clear danger and pressure efficiently. Martinez might be a student of the passing game but unfortunately he's completely uneducated in winning the ball in the first place.
Dave Pritchard
15 Posted 09/08/2015 at 21:55:56
Agree with Steve at 2 about midfield. Although McCarthy had a poor game yesterday I would give him and the very promising Cleverly the central midfield positions. Leave Barry at left back in Baines' continued absence. He has played there in his younger days. Pace would be a worry but he has the know how to play there. Mirallas would have to play, probably on the right but we are really struggling for a left-sided midfielder.
Andy Codling
16 Posted 10/08/2015 at 00:34:50
Funny how McCarthy and Mirallas have just signed before the season opener. Nothing like a bit of spin to satisfy the masses. I guess they are like two new signings!
John Aldridge
17 Posted 10/08/2015 at 22:26:39
You can invest as much money as you like on players at the moment - it will make no difference. Our predicament is down to training and tactics. We're at the mercy of the charlatan we call Bobby Brownshoes. While he's at the helm, nothing will change.
Gavin Johnson
18 Posted 10/08/2015 at 22:55:27
Jay Harris - you make some good points and while I respect that you don't rate Martinez, a lot of your posts focus on the need to hold onto our best players to show ambition because you rightly view Everton as a massive club.

But what I don't understand with your posts and some of the others who always hark back to Moyes, is what would happen if Martinez was sacked and we brought back Moyes. Would he suddenly have us challenging for the top 4 in league where he'd only have 4m to spend and being outspent by every other club?!

Yes, Martinez was backed last season but it wasn't money the board invested. it was the Fellaini and Jelavic money and he spent it on player we can sell for profit. Moyes's big buys were very hit and miss in players like Bilyaledinov. Why are you so sure Moyes would have done any better. He was on a slow decline after the 2009/10 season.

Yes, we were a top 8 side when he left.. but is that good enough for Everton??

If the way this club is being run into the ground means the best we can all hope for is another 11 years like we had under Moyes then we've got very low expectations based on our past history you often allude to Jay.

Should Martinez be Everton manager?! Maybe not, but the bigger picture is where can this club go while it's being run by BK.

Eugene Ruane
19 Posted 10/08/2015 at 00:10:42
Ian there are a lot of things that are 'wrong' at the moment, that can and will be debated (as being wrong/right).

The manager, the manager's team selection, the players he buys, the players he doesn't buy, plus the ineptitude and minge-baggery of the board etc etc.

However at the moment, it's this that interests me - "If players of the quality that we currently have cannot inspire better performances, why would further reinforcements make better results any more likely? In order for reinforcements to be effective, we must first address the tactical deficiencies we have been showing for the past twelve months"

This is undoubtedly true, but it's not (imo) just in tactical deficiencies that these players appear to be..um...deficient.

There is also (and yes you could definitely argue that this is down to the manager too, as he buys/selects) something more basic lacking, something to do with (for want of a better word) 'character.'

Something I believe, no matter how average a player, I should be able to expect from every Everton player.

Will, determination, fight and 100% effort for every minute of every game (I've seen enough football to prefer an average player who'll give 100%, to a good player who'll give you 40%).

Did we have this from every player against Watford?

I don't believe we did - I don't believe there was enough* battle or 'will to win.' (*I think they 'wanted' it more).

I could be wrong of course, but if I'm right, this is a big problem.

The reality is there are four or five teams (the wealthiest sides) in the PL with 'better' players than the rest - players with a level of touch, pace, awareness and invention that (over a full season) will guarantee their teams a higher level of success.

(West Ham had a good win yesterday, but will anyone be betting on them to finish above Arsenal?)

As we know, we're not one of those sides (we're more Will Ferrell and Mark Whalberg in The Other Guys).

Regarding the relative success of all these other sides (including us) the margins between success and failure are slim (and getting slimmer), so it is vitally important that every single advantage that can be utilised, is.

And imo, most of these advantages are down to effort, imposing your will and what I'd like to call 'doing the fucking basics'

Firstly, we are far too quiet. Everton don't pay me a bean and I pay for a season-ticket, yet it appears it's my job to tell Lukaku when he's got a man on.

(you don't have to be Costa to open your bleeding mouth).

And effort covers just about everything else we need to do (but don't).

Win more headers, have more shots, get tighter for throw-ins, stop more crosses, stop more shots, basically (as my old Sunday League manager used to tell us) 'get fuckin' tighter!'

Plus we must make playing at Goodison an advantage against all sides but particularly against none top-5 sides.

If we were to use every weapon at our disposal, we could finish 5th/6th.

If we don't, this season could be worse than last year.

Of course it's ultimately down to Martinez, but those selected (whoever they are) need to 'up their game.'

As I've said in other posts, with the present bums in charge of the club, I don't expect trophies or proper success, but 100% effort and the basics shouldn't be asking too much.

Should it?

Adam Luszniak
20 Posted 13/08/2015 at 10:16:35
Anyone posting one here that investment in the squad will make no difference due to the ineptitude of the manager is living in cloud cuckoo land. In the premier league, the wage table dictates the league table. If you sit 8th in the wages paid league, you'll finish there or there abouts in the league proper. This trend continues regardless of who is at the helm.

Like Martinez or not, and it's clear that many posters on this thread have had their fill, to castigate him whilst ignoring the above fact is to disregard half the argument. This is all the more pertinent when you consider The fact that we currently top the league in terms of injuries. Top of the league for injuries and bottom for spending on players. What can any manager do with that?

I also agree that whilst we have a talented squad, there are few player who would get a starting spot in the teams who traditionally bag the top four spots. Mirallas possibly, Lukaku maybe. Barkley is another one. The rest of the squad is too young or too old or simply not good enough. Neither Moyes not Martinez can be expected to achieve their potential under circumstances where this is zero investment in a squad which needs it to compete.

Laurie Hartley
21 Posted 13/08/2015 at 11:32:35
Gavin @ 18,

In answer to your question:

"But what I don't understand with your posts and some of the others who always hark back to Moyes, is what would happen if Martinez was sacked and we brought back Moyes. Would he suddenly have us challenging for the top 4 in league where he'd only have 4m to spend and being outspent by every other club?!"

He would put a rocket up the backside of this lot.

Within 4 weeks he would have them as fit as a fiddle or in the reserves.

He would stop them leaking goals.

He would have them competing for every ball.

In other words what Eugene @ 19 (and me) is looking for :-

"Will, determination, fight and 100% effort for every minute of every game".

Martin Reppion
22 Posted 17/08/2015 at 12:11:35
The issue with how we play at home was emphasised with the contrast at Southampton. Hitting teams at pace on the break is okay if they are attacking you. If not, you have to do more than pass around the ball on the half way-line and wait for a gap to appear.

Too often, the front three are isolated because the back SEVEN get a nosebleed if they support them. Criticism of Barkley giving the ball away too often against Watford ignored the fact that he was outnumbered with nobody from midfield giving him options. Not so strangely, once we sent on Kone and actually got players forward, we battered Watford.

We need to back ourselves more and not play this slow waiting game. Yes, we may get beaten occasionally by good sides. But we would also win more against all teams if we attacked when we had the ball and defended when we didn’t. Instead of defending all the time.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads



© ToffeeWeb