Our defence: What to do?

Paul Derby 01/02/2016 18comments  |  Jump to last

What can we do to improve our defence in the remaining games of this season? This is my take on why we can’t seem to get it right and what needs to change to get to grips with the problem.

There are lots of weaknesses but for me these are the main ones:

A lack of intensity in pressing the ball: Far too often we offer time and space to opponents on the ball in dangerous areas; we fail to win crucial blocks and headers, as witnessed by the third Chelsea goal recently. In other words we don’t work hard enough as a team to close down the opposition because our focus is on what we will do with the ball when someone else wins it back. This is a team failing not just the back four and it starts with the manager’s demands of the team.

ADVERTISEMENT

About these ads

We have players in McCarthy and Besic, plus Cleverley to a lesser extent, who are capable of playing a high energy, pressing game, in our own half when the danger is at its greatest. Rotate these three alongside Barry or play two of them instead, but make it clear that their job is to smother the opposition when we don’t have the ball. We saw with Lennon last season that this extra energy forces other players to follow suit and it means we play with more passion, an attribute sorely lacking for too long.

We allow too many crosses: Again this is about a lack of intensity and there needs to be hard work done on the training pitch to get tighter in wide areas and to improve one-on-one defending. Tony Hibbert was great at this and let’s face it he’s not going to play many more minutes in the first team so he’d be an ideal candidate to work with the full-backs. John Stones will never be a right back, so don’t play him there.

The goalkeeper: Oh boy, enough has been said about this to rival War and Peace. I would just add two bits of context. It’s widely accepted that a quality goalkeeper can add six to 12 points to a team over a season. Now Robles is no Petr Cech but even a six-point margin could mean three places in the league table, or £3.7m in merit payments based on the figures for last season. Secondly, Tim Howard will leave at the end of the season; before then we need to know for sure if Robles is ready to start as number one and the only way to do this is to give him a run of 15 games. “It is the right decision for the long-term development of Everton Football Club.” That’s the only explanation the manager needs to give.

Who plays left midfield?: This is relevant because we have been left exposed through players being used out of position and not understanding the need to track runners, specifically Kone; while Steven Pienaar is coming to the end of his Everton career and Tom Cleverley is wasted wide. I’m going to contradict myself here and say that the best short-term solution is to play Baines left midfield until we sign a naturally left-sided midfielder. He is naturally left-footed, strong going forward and playing him there will give Galloway more time to develop in the team with the support of a second player willing to defend when we lose the ball.

Tactics: Managers and opposing teams spend a lot of time devising ways to drag central defenders into wide areas where they are not comfortable. At the moment we are doing this job for them by giving our centre halves the ball when they are split and our full-backs are on the half-way line. That means 50% of our back four is out of the game if we lose the ball in these areas. Coleman and Baines or Galloway can still support the attack, but not at the same time and in any case we have enough attacking flair in Barkley, Mirallas, Deulofeu, Lennon and Lukaku, without over-committing from full-back. The back four needs to get back to its principal job, which is to stop chances and goals.

There is nothing in any of these suggestions that requires us to move away from a possession-based philosophy, but a strong defence becomes more important every time you step up a level in football. If our goals are trophies, European football and Champions League qualification – the stated objectives of the manager – then these issues need to be addressed urgently. Whether Roberto Martinez has the willingness, the ability and the winning mentality needed to re-balance our tactical approach is very much open to debate. My heart says yes, my head says no. What do you think?

Share this article

Reader Comments (18)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Christopher Dover
1 Posted 02/02/2016 at 21:07:19
The next few games we will see if RM is going to change in his defensive setup starting tomorrow against Newcastle.

I hope he will but unfortunately do not think he will change as he has played more or less the same way win lose or draw.

Andy Crooks
2 Posted 02/02/2016 at 21:34:26
Improve our defence? Get rid of the coach because are defensive ineptitude is down to only one man.
Ognjen Mojovic
3 Posted 02/02/2016 at 22:09:49
I rarely ask questions, but somehow I already have one for readers, about some points from this article: Do you think that first two sentences in bold, are more of a causes, or are they consequences of something other?

That would be enough from me for today. From Bosnia, with love!

Ivan Varghese
4 Posted 02/02/2016 at 22:24:35
Everton needs a really fast central defender. The league has fast and strong attackers. Everton hold a highline and do zonal marking. A good through ball cuts Everton’s defense and a fast forward finishes it off. A Kevin Ratcliffe kind of defender that is fast and strong and when thru passes rip zonal defending apart, can get in front of the ball.

Augero’s goal when the Jags and Howard collided would not have happened if Jags was fast and strong enough. Everton have Baines, Jags, Stones, Coleman and Barry, probably Britain’s best defenders, but we got to stop this zonal defending and play a hybrid.
Danny Broderick
5 Posted 02/02/2016 at 23:00:56
The buck stops with the coach, because our players, especially our defenders, are good players. If we were set up right, you would struggle to find a better back 4 than Coleman, Stones, Jagielka and Baines. However, because our full backs are always bombing forward, we often leave our centre halves exposed. I often see our defenders running back towards their own goal, and that’s exactly what you don’t want to see. But we often leave 2 vs 2, and so we are prone to being opened up.

Another thing is defending set pieces. The keeper stays on his line, there doesn’t appear to be anyone really taking command.

For me, we need a defensive coach, because Martinez isn’t going to suddenly start doing what he has never done before. Arsenal have got Steve Bould, who appears from the outside to complement Wenger’s philosophy. We need something similar. I just don’t see that when I look at our 1st team staff (admittedly from the outside). Our goals against column would indicate that, whatever defensive work we are doing in training isn’t working.

It’s up to Martinez to bring someone in to help with the team’s defensive shape and defending set pieces.

Eugene Ruane
6 Posted 02/02/2016 at 23:19:18
I had no intention of watching 'them' tonight but a (blue) mate said 'fancy a pint?' so I found myself in the alehouse watching their game.

As far as the mighty reds were concerned, the howls all around us in the pub said it all - it amounted to 'you fucking hopeless shower of cun...' well, you get the picture.

But I was very impressed with Leicester and not for the first time this season

Basically it seems to me they are where they are because of a few things that aren't..um..complicated.

They work their plums off - all of them.

There are no slackers at all.

They play at a high tempo, press their opponents for the full 90 mins and concede nothing.

They play a system they all seem comfortable with.

Their side doesn't seem to change.

Every ball is fought for and if they don't win that, the second ball is fought for even harder.

Liverpool were given nothing tonight - sweet FA and consequently, were made to look absolutely clueless.

Oh and Vardy's finishing is very good and Huth is effective and has a presence that can't be ignored

It's funny, any criticisms I've had of Everton in the last couple of seasons haven't involved 'lazy' and I'm not about to revise that and start throwing 'lazy bastards' about.

However I do think we're not working as hard as Leicester (and Swansea, Watford, Stoke etc) in the right areas.

These sides are a defending from the front, I don't think we are.

These sides imo are more difficult to play against than we are.

Our defensive side (or rather 'defenders') absolutely could be be better, but watching Leicester tonight, they took a lot of pressure off their defense, simply by virtue of the fact that their attackers, and attacking midfielders, spent much of the game chasing down (and panicking) Liverpool's defenders.

When I watched us against Swansea, it was incredibly frustrating to see them push us high and get dead close to us and keep our defenders on the move, while we allowed them a lot more time and space in the same positions.

So in answer to 'what to do?' I'd say get our forwards to defend, and our midfield too and don't let the opposition play at a higher tempo.

I accept we can't have (or keep) players who can do what Arguero and/or Sanchez can do, but we should be able to work as hard as Leicester do and play in a way that puts opponents under similar pressure.

I appreciate a fit Besic would help.

Peter Lang
7 Posted 02/02/2016 at 23:29:32
Eugene (6): I agree, Leicester are like a swarm of angry bees when they don’t have the ball. I think it’s no coincidence that the new fella Niasse has a reputation as being a hard worker – we need more with this work ethic in the team.
Anthony Lewis
8 Posted 02/02/2016 at 23:33:47
I don't think it's a simple as you say Paul. I agree with all your points, all of these are contributing to the poor defensive displays on offer with us at the moment.

However, simply asking the two holding midfielders to run around harrying the opposition is not the answer, as for me, they are doing this already. The problem lies in the team as a whole and how every player works to get the ball back. There is no cohesion, we should be hunting in packs, surrounding players on the ball with three maybe four players, one to get in close and make a tackle and the others to put pressure on them giving them little or no options to pass or find a man. This in itself will bleed in to the "stop the crosses" point.

But there's the rub.

We have four players in the team that are incapable of doing this. Barkley, Lukaku, Deulofeu and Kone. They very rarely get close to players, I've hardly ever seen them make a tackle. They stand off, let the players move into space don't think about how they can stop that player from moving the ball on. This puts lots of pressure on the two midfield players to get the ball back and doesn't help the team as it make us look disjointed.

I'm not blaming these four players, I actually think their forward play at times has been sensational. They are only doing what they think is right. And that's a problem, as from that it's evident that they are not being instructed/coached (whatever you want to call it) in how to defend as a team. I put this blame directly on Martinez. And he has said it himself, "I tell my players to go out there and enjoy themselves, to just play football". Okay he didn't actually say that, but it's certainly something along those lines. How incredibly naive... A Premier League manager doesn't know and can't see that players need to understand how to play as a team, not as an individual.

I actually despair, as I can't see how (if he was suddenly to have an epiphany) he can change this round. He will have completely change the mindset of half his players to change how they defend and work as a team.

I certainly hope I'm wrong, however.

John Quilliam
9 Posted 02/02/2016 at 23:36:07
It's not our, 'defence,' that's the problem; it's our defending! All of it. Front to back.
Ivan Varghese
11 Posted 03/02/2016 at 04:02:50
RM should fire his defensive coach, I think the guy is from Wigan and possibly bring back Phill Neville, but I don’t think he’ll work under RM.

But we pile on poor Tim Howard, sure he makes mistakes, but all goalies do. Howard was mostly beaten by deflections or good goals, but I think he has a problem deciding when to run out. Maybe Tourette's syndrome, but he is great when defending his line and makes spectacular saves. Follows the ball really well.

I would give RM and the team a chance, this is the best we have for years, at least we are scoring goals. Under Moyes it was 0-0 galore.

Nathan Cross
12 Posted 03/02/2016 at 06:51:42
Paul – good analysis, and for me, your first point – the "lack of intensity in pressing the ball" – hits the nail on the head, and must be attributed to a leadership failure on the part of the manager. It is apparent that our players realize (whether consciously or subconsciously) that their failure to close down players with the ball will not cost them their place in the team or even earn them any real criticism. Watching the likes of Leicester or West Ham this season, it is obvious their players understand that any failure to close down the ball or track back will cost them their place in the team. Martinez appears to judge his players solely on (and routinely offers gushing praise for) what they do with the ball, not without it.

I may be psychologizing our players too much, but whenever I watch them defending this season, I get the impression that they think they are doing someone a favor by defending, rather than performing a fundamental function of their jobs.

What’s needed is a change in culture and a re-focusing of strategic vision. Martinez has confused means with ends. He seems to believe that pretty passing football is an end, when it is merely one of many means available to a team. Defending with a purpose – with intensity and as a team – is another means available to a manager, one that I would argue is more important. The end – the only end in football or any competitive endeavor – is to win. This is perhaps a simplistic point to make, but it is one that Martinez appears to have lost appreciation for.

Ciaran Duff
13 Posted 03/02/2016 at 09:26:54
Agree with all above, especially about pressing other teams in the same fashion as Leicester etc. The only thing that I would add is that we also need to be wary of our roles and structure when attacking. It is great that we get players forward quickly but committing too many people forward without covering gaps leaves us vulnerable to quick counter attacks.
Rick Tarleton
14 Posted 03/02/2016 at 11:59:19
Funnily enough, the reason why we are so bad at defending lies not with our defenders (goalie excepted) – after all, three of our first-choice back four are England’s first choices too and the other is Coleman, rated one of the best right backs around. Nor does it lie with our defensive mid-fielders, Besic, Barry and McCarthy are good at this.

It lies up front. In the style of play espoused by Martinez and explained superbly by Jim Keoghan in his "Roundheads and Cavaliers" article, it is essential that the attacking players do their share of closing down the opposition. Otherwise the other team have control of the situation moving deep into our half.

We need Lukaku, Kone, Barkley and Deulofeu to press quickly and effectively. They don’t do his, Naismith was the only attacking player who did this effectively. The others are not instinctive "pressers" and the manager doesn’t seem to insist that they perform this function as a mandatory part of their game.

Eugene Ruane
15 Posted 03/02/2016 at 12:20:51
I'm not suggesting this as a solution, but speaking..er..'mathematically' (?) if you are being pressed high up the field by hard-working (opposition) attackers and/or attacking midfielders, it means there is a gap somewhere behind them.

So logically, if you could quickly get the ball into this space behind them (rather than slowly passing it about and letting the opposition regain it's shape) you might be more threatening and force them back a bit.

"But isn't that just hoofing?"

Depends on where your attackers are, if they know where to run and can use the element of surprise to push back and scare the opposition (backwards) it possibly relieves the pressure on your defense.

Jim Knightley
16 Posted 03/02/2016 at 12:33:09
I agree with Eugene. Defending is a team game. We need to replace our goalkeeper, but our defenders are all very good as are the three first choice DM options (Barry, McCarthy and Besic). The problem rests with those further up the pitch. The front 4 simply do not work hard enough, and as a consequence there are far too many gaps in midfield, and far too often CBs and FBs are left one on one. No team with a successful defence let’s this happen. Stones is drawn out of position regularly because our RB is missing, and Deulofeu is not covering. We can’t expect our DMs to cover for so many attacking players and offensive full backs.

Leicester provide a good example for us as Eugene has related. Their defence was an issue, and Raneiri realised that. He tried to address it initially by dropping their best player, Mahrez, in a couple of away games. But Leicester simply were not able to get away with that, because Mahrez is too influential and important offensively. So he came back in but the rest of the side adjusted. Albrighton covered for Mahrez, leaving him with more freedom to attack. Leicester tactically used the Okazaki option, who is a great example of a player who works tirelessly, but the rest of the set up is built around protection and allowing the attacking players to attack. Drinkwater has been an unsung heroes, and one of the best performers in the league. He is a well disciplined and intelligent player. Unfortunately, Barkley is not. Barkley will score more goals and assist more, but he does not hold his position as he should, and does not spot defensive gaps, or makes tackles, as he should.

Leicester, crucially, can sit deep. Even at home there game plan is often based around attacking with speed, and on the counter. They have no issue letting the opposing team play, and we could learn from this.

They are riding on the crest of a wave though, and will come crashing down at some point. Pressure will produce self-doubt, but they are in an envious position and look a good shout for a UCL place. They are top because they have played incredibly efficiently. If there was one word I’d use to describe the Martinez era, it would be inefficient. And some other ruder things things. But principally we are inefficient. Whereas Moyes had us generally playing less than inspiring stuff, he was an efficient manager. He took the points he generally should of, and failed to get the points we were not expected to (Away from home at least). Martinez is his antithesis - his game is based on confidence and risk. Unfortunately it is not melded with defensive pragmatism. The nearest we got to that was his first year in charge, with the inherited set up of the Moyes era. What we need is a mix between Moyes and Martinez - a manager who can attack and motivate the attackers, but who can spot and address the defensive weaknesses. Leicester have managed that, and we have fallen embarrassingly short of it.

I would like Martinez gone, and I would like Eddie Howe in. I believe that he is a manager who has the tactical acumen to succeed, and importantly, to adapt. He demonstrated that this season when he realised that there was a lack of speed in the Bournemouth attack, produced in part by the injury to Wilson. So he addressed that by promoting Stanilas and King to the first 11. He has since moved for Afobe, because Afobe offers exactly what Bournemouth need.

The key to success is the ability to adapt. Martinez has failed to do that successfully at any point. The impotence of last season has simply been replaced with better form, Deulofeu, and a more top heavy attack. But the defensive issues have not been addressed.

We should win tonight. We are a better side than Newcastle, and at home to boot. But I’m fearful again, because they have the pace and power in Sissoko and Wijnaldum to hit the gaps we inevitability leave in midfield. For once I’d like to see Martinez realise both our strengths and weaknesses, and adjust our strategy according to who we are playing. We shouldn't just tinker for the big games, but for every game. If we know a team like Swansea will exploit the channels, why don’t we adjust the strategy to account for this?

The team problem then is a team issue, and the problem behind it all is Martinez. I like his ability to motivate and develop young players, and I think he has done well in the market. But his strategy is flawed, and he cannot see it. The worse points total in over a decade should have given him a clue, but evidently it has not. He is putting the issues down to youth and inexperience, but not to a strategy he wholeheartedly believes it.

James Stewart
17 Posted 03/02/2016 at 12:38:36
All good suggestions but your asking a leopard to change its spots which is never going to happen. If you want Martinez in charge you will have to accept the chaos and shambolic defending.
Brian Harrison
18 Posted 03/02/2016 at 12:41:35
The problem is more about how the manager sees the game being played. We have a back 4 that is as good as any in the league, so why are we conceding so many goals at the back.

Well as many have said defending starts with the forwards, when Rush was leading the line for the other lot defenders never had a minutes peace from him. That caused them to misplace many passes and hand possession away. Were we have Lukaku and Barkley who don't bother to close down their back 4 when they have the ball. So they have the time and space to pick a pass.

I don't think I have seen many who actually go out of their way not to tackle as Barkley and to a lesser extent Lukaku does. So when we are defending we are doing it with 9 men, so no wonder teams get at our back 4 so easily.

Dave Abrahams
19 Posted 03/02/2016 at 12:57:46
I agree with most on here, Leicester and other teams play, work and press together as a team, they all put a shift in for 90 minutes, Everton don’t, we play off the cuff, a lot of hope attached to our play, there is no real plan.

Regarding every player pressing and tackling, Deulofeu is the exception, he just doesn’t know how to tackle, Kone, Lukaku and Barkley are big strong lads and could and should make more of an effort to defend from the front, but I agree that is the managers job to instruct them to play like this.

Tonight I hope Lennon starts; he never lets the team down and Deulofeu can come on any time after 60 minutes when the game has slowed down and players are tiring.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads



© ToffeeWeb