The Referee's a Wanker
I sent Keith Hackett the email below earlier this evening not expecting a reply. But to my surprise he replied within the hour. Maybe this (former) referee's not a wanker...Dear Mr HackettI am writing to you with regard to the refereeing display by Mr Clattenburg on Saturday 20th October 2007.
Whilst I can accept that in a modern, fast-flowing, passionate game of football a referee can make an honest mistake, what I cannot accept is to see such a one-sided inconsistent and blatantly poor performance from a professional referee.
I have watched a number of the incidents back again on several occasions and would appreciate a response to the following questions:
1. Was the initial contact made by Tony Hibbert for the incident that led to a penalty kick for a foul on Steven Gerrard outside the penalty box?
2. Why did Mr Clattenburg produce a yellow card for Mr Hibbert only to then change it to a red card after Mr Gerrard spoke to him?
3. Why was Dirk Kuyt not sent from the field of play for violent conduct for a two footed off the ground lunge at Phil Neville?
4. Why was Jamie Carragher not penalised with the award of a penalty kick to Everton after his foul on Joleon Lescott in the last minute of the game?
Incidents like all of those described above only serve to bring into question the reputation of referees. There is already serious concern about the so-called "Big Four" Premier League Clubs receiving favourable treatment from Pgmol employees, and all of the above happening in the space of 45 minutes only serve to add to those concerns.
Whilst I am not expecting the courtesy of a response to this email, I would remind you that the wages of Pgmol are effectively paid for by ordinary people like myself who pay week-after-week to attend football matches. Displays like Mr Clattenburg's on Saturday will only serve to destroy the game of football and hasten the departure of fans who quite frankly are disgusted by such performances.
Yours in disgust.
Chris Leyland
His response is posted below. To be fair to him, he has at least tried to answer the questions I asked him.
Chris,Many thanks for your email. I am still awaiting receipt of the Assessors Report, Match Delegate report and ProZone.
These are the three ways in which the performance of the match official is analysed.
The Match Assessor is a former top class referee
The Match Delegate is appointed by the Premier League independent of the Professional Game Match Officials Ltd. ProZone looks in detail at every decision. I have attached details of the ProZone system for you to look at.
Now to your points which I am answering on one view through MOD [Match of the Day]
- Need to have another look
- Mr Clattenburg had not alternative other than to dismiss the player for a clear act of the denial of an obvious goal scoring opportunity. The criteria for a red card clearly fulfilled.
Some referees keep a record of the sanctions they have applied on their yellow card. This is poor practice and I am frankly going to issue a new directive where they will adopt the use of a book to record the names and then having ascertained the players name they will then show the card. I can assure you that Mr Gerrard had NO INFLUENCE ON THE RED CARD.
- I agree a two footed challenge is reckless endangering the safety of an opponent. This challenge also used excessive force therefore a red card should have been issued.
- I will have another look at the Penalty incidents when I receive the prozone disk to look at proximity to play, viewing angles etc.
Chris I fully understand your disappointment which I share. Please be assured that accountability for inadequate performances results in lost appointments and therefore this effects what the official earns
Thanks for your email.
Regards,
Keith Hackett
General Manager
PGMOL
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Big thumbs up to you too Chris for instigating the correspondance. Now just lets all up some adequate form of punishment is given to Clattenburg once all the official reports are in.
Well done again to Chris and Mr Hackett.
Imagine if Ian Ross was the man in the FA.
We need to concentrate our efforts on what’s within our control, like why we dont create chances, rather than harping on about something we cant change.
Hi reply No. 2 was flawed in that he suggests Clattenberg was recording Hibbert’s details on the yellow card. No such action took place and he replaced the card, swapping it for a red immediately upon Gerrard’s comments. This denial from Hackett is blatantly inaccurate or blinkered, albeit I understand his obvious need to refute the allegation.
The point in my first paragraph is the one that bothers me most of all. Keith Hackett agreed last year that nine out of the ten claims for a penalty the had been denied and the other one claim was arguable either way. We believed this would introduce a littel more balance from his staff when considering our claims for the remainder of the season. We all know that was not the case and we continued to suffer arguably more than any other team in the entire division from refereeing decisions over the course of the season. As a result, I don’t expect any more than for this to be a talking point that may rear it’s ugly head in the return game and then forever forgotten by all but us.
The one shining light was David Moyes. I got so tired of his being nice to referees who had robbed us last year and just wanted him to be honest and make them accountable - as far as the FA will allow. He tried a new tactic of being nice last year hoping to win them around and it failed by, in my opinion, allowing us to be walked over. It is long overdue now that Moyes comes out and says, "That referee cost us points, potentially a place in Europe or the Champion’s League (as would have been the case last year were decisions correct) and millions of pounds. Bring on the fine, it has to be said!" At last he did this, albeit in a more measured fashion. For that I am grateful but how long will it be until we get a bloody break?
Lets hope Hackett is true to his word above; when the reports are in, the facts support a one match ban at least - if not then all is lost!
There is a petition (likley pointless) if anyone wants to sign:
http://clattenburg.epetitions.net/
sign it and pass it on.
"Lets get over it.There?s been plenty of occasions when we?ve had a rub of the referee?s green."
Just remind me when that was.....
Clive Thomas, Hansen ’84, Nevin at Analfield, Don Hutch, Alan Wiley, Jeff Winter, Poll ... Riley... need I go on?
I too have read that Clottenburg’s [deliberate mistake] wife is a Liverpool supporter and he is a life long Liverpool supporter. He was invited to join Liverpool F.C.’s Asian Cup Tour. Speaks for itself doesn’t it? One could not expect him to be completely unbiased if he tried. I do believe that when referees are registered they should be asked which team they follow and are not then given a match to referee with that team playing in. Graham Poll was a prime examjple - another self-confessed Liverpool supporter. Don’t any of them support EFC?
Oh and by the way, Lyndon, Patty is my real name - it stems from all my Belfast family calling me "little patty" as a child instead of Patricia and Patty I have always been known as.
"As captain I view refs in a different light.
Its handy to build a decent relationship with a ref, to get him on your side.
Im quite cynical about that.
Its gamesmanship, a tight decision in the ninetieth minute may go my way if ive spent all game being friendly to the ref, hes only human.
an official like Poll or Clattenburg is likely to be sympathetic if I work with them than if im in their face all game like a cheeky scouser"
Think this says it all!!
Otherwise what is the penalty of having a day off
http://www.eufootball.biz/print/4428.html
They are also the official sponsors of Manchester United football club, and call themselves the Manchester United airline. Can they also sponsor referees???
One thing has to be asked is if a Liverpool win would benefit Air Asia in any way, and this answer is obviously and emphatically yes.. The aim of AirAsia is to open up all European airports and cheap flights, similar to Easy Jet to all Eastern locations, Thailand, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore. Liverpool are by far the biggest supported team in all these areas with a following of millions. If Liverpool and Man Utd are in Europe then this guarantees them business. Surely this needs to be looked into. The OFT are set up to look into these aspects. It may be worth someone approaching them, as there are serious grounds for corruption.
I posted a previous comment about this company, and they are so corrupt you would not believe. It is part of the reason the new chairman of Man City is being investigated. I also posted a link to a letter from the human rights association to the FA regarding corruption, and abuse. I would suggest everyyone read this because it highlights how unconcerned the FA is about these matters.
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/07/31/thaila16544_txt.htm
. This is also no conspiracy story. You can freely check all the details on the internet.


1 Posted 23/10/2007 at 05:25:35
Report abuse
But alway remember the golden rule...
Those with all the gold make the rules!!