In Light of Recent Events
If you allow, create and foster inequity and discrepancy in the application of and access to resources and opportunities in the systems, processes, structures and people in your organisation. You can hardly be surprised if inequity and discrepancy then manifests itself in those same systems, processes, structures and people. Indeed it would be akin to a miracle if they did not.The F.A. and the English Premier League is currently almost a mirror of the above statement. From decision-making bodies to the distribution of monies, some are more equal than others. It isn?t hidden, it?s no secret. We have what is sold as a form of meritocracy, were the successful get rewarded with the resources to be more successful.
This might be all well and good, however as the original statement implies, it would be extremely naive to think that this increased wealth was only that.. an increase in wealth. Systems, processes, structures and people are all influenced by money... are they not ?... isn?t that the point of having it?
Sadly, conspiracy or not what we have witnessed with an alarmingly greater frequency is a manifestation of these inequities . This is what you might expect as the size of the inequities increase. It?s going to get worse if current thinking and behaviour continue.
In the specific case of the EPL/Uefa club football, until very recently, the major structural default was that four clubs had an opportunity to avail themselves to the resources offered, in the main by tv revenues, via the ?champions? league. This was a ?lifestyle? changing amount of wealth and exposure for those successful club brands. A resource to be cherished, fought for and protected.
Despite the ameliorating effects of the new EPL tv deal. the increasingly global marketplace means such exposure remains a glittering prize.
The major question then appears to be is this inequity a good or bad thing and for whom ? From Football in general as a sport in England, Britain and Europe. The large club to the pub team. The fan to the administrator. Who benefits and how ?
The current regime appears to be (in my case) terrifyingly similar to tory political doctrine. with trickle down theories mixed in with the merit ones mentioned earlier.
Ironically the sport administration which offers us possible solutions resides in the USA. American football appears to have identified the benefits of an equal playing field in all aspects of the running of the sport from team recruitment to on field adjudication the aim is for a fairness accuracy equity all ensuring a truly competitive sport one which the fans have faith in and are excited by. I refer specifically to the chances of one team beating another over a number of seasons here, I know some will feel that american football of itself is not particularly exciting. Its probably also worth pointing out that I don?t believe American football is perfect by any means.. this should not be a distraction to the main point.
Just a tiny few of but specific examples of benefits would be..
1) Greater use of technology (would Clattenburg have denied the penalty for Lescott having had the chance to watch it again?) Along with the rest of the interested world.
2) More adjudicators/greater powers. It?s about time the assistant referees lived up to their names.
3) Ability to recruit. By far the most difficult to solve. Salary caps, Youth investment and quotas etc have all been used successfully in Rugby League and other sports.
The fundamental issue once we agree that inequity exists is how much inequity do we believe is acceptable or even good for our sport and whether we should be trying to optimise our resources and systems to create a truly competitive sport where each team has an equal opportunity for success which will be based on its abilities as athletes and athletic stratagems as opposed to its ability to raise and maintain revenues and influence.
We currently have by design, conspiracy or otherwise a bent system, a sick puppy. Perhaps the chosen few have a plan which only includes themselves. Perhaps they are happy with winning every year to the exclusion of the excluded .
I have hope however this is clearly unsustainable in its present state. Platini and Blatter and Uefa are all making noises to this end . The battle has already started between the haves and the administrators.
Perhaps its time for the clubs like Everton to lead the way and be more vocal and public in its hopes and aspirations for football (please god lets hope its not a ?me too? philosophy) . Perhaps the time is coming for fans to say enough is enough . Before you ruin our sport and we watch administrators and referees win games ( we?re already there!).
We want to watch truly competitive fairly refereed games so we can go back to pub, schoolyard knockabout aggressive banter and loathing with at least the semblance of the thought that things will ?even themselves out over the season? because currently we know they will not.
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Or as that nice Mr.Dylan said ’money doesn’t talk - it swears’.
Whichever way you look at the EPL, SKY and the FA have proved that nice Mr. Orwell right where some are more equal than others.
I could go on for ever but the milk needs delivering and the lady at number 43 is wearing the kit tonight!
Let me know which train we’re getting on Saturday please? Dad.
And both are right, Football, or the EPL / CL version can’t go on like this for ever and will, hopefully crash and burn a la Hindenberg, I just hope we arn’t part of the ’Oh, the Humanity ’ quote.
Apparently myself and other toffee supporters were victims of a robbery at Kenilworth Road last night.
£3-20 for a cheese salad roll. I dont know.
Good to see James vaughan get a run out ,and Tiny once more coming up with the goods when it was most needed. Into the last eight for the first time in 20 years i understand. Ironically the last time Luton did win it. The teams remaining look formidable to say the least,but lets show what were made of and go out and win it.
Then again,maybe i,m not getting enough sleep.
Dont slag the lad off just because your illiterate.
ha ha how ironic
Don’t be put off writing another by people who I think are being a bit harsh on your choice of words/style of writing and not concentrating on the message which I think is spot on!
G14 is a cancer that Platini must smash.
Simply put I believe most of us will eventually lose interest in a sport that is uncompetitive and appears to be fixed in favour of a chosen few. I’m heartened that some of my fellow Evertonians and Platini et al appear have similar thoughts.
Sure stubbs and neville may have not of had their greatest game,and the man who advertised John Smiths Bitter moved more than Jagielka did all night.
For that matter,so does John Lennon....
This guy’s either taking the piss, or has grave delusions of the strength of his vocabulary.
Ive rewritten your drivel. It retains some tiresome repetition and incoherence, plus a few dodgy assertations, but maybe this will help people who are nonplussed by your inability to write.
There is nothing cro-magnon about an aversion to pompous verbosity.
cheers
The F.A. and the English Premier League is currently full of inequality. The league appears to be a ?meritocracy? where results on the pitch are rewarded financially, thereby leading to more success. However, it is naïve to suppose that the financial rewards do not lead to influence elsewhere.
We know money influences, the question is ? do the rich clubs have influence where they should not?
Sadly, conspiracy or not, what we are witnessing increasingly is the rich getting richer and leaving the rest of us behind. Sadly, it?s going to get worse if current behaviour continues.
In the case of club football, until very recently the top four clubs entered the champions league and reaped its huge financial benefits ? tv revenues, exposure for their ?brand? etc. This was a prize worth fighting for.
Despite the new EPL tv deal which helps a wider range of clubs the increasingly global marketplace means (champions league football?) remains a glittering prize.
Is this inequity a good or bad thing and for whom? From grassroots to the top, who benefits and how ?
American football appears to have identified the benefits of an equal playing field in all aspects of the running of the sport - from transfers and ’trades’ to refereeing, the aim is for fairness and accuracy which ensures a truly competitive sport that fans have faith in. Despite American footballs shittness, the league still retains the excitement of being winnable by many more teams than the top 3 or 4 as in England.
Just a selection of my ideas for improving the situation:
1) Greater use of technology (would Clattenburg have denied the penalty for Lescott having had the chance to watch it again?)
2) More referees/greater powers. It?s about time the assistant referees lived up to their names.
3) Ability to recruit. By far the most difficult to solve. Salary caps, Youth investment and quotas etc have all been used successfully in Rugby League and other sports.
How much inequity do we believe is acceptable or even good for our sport? Should we be trying to create a truly competitive sport where each team has an equal opportunity for success based on its abilities and tactics as opposed to its ability to make cash?
At the moment, the system is corrupt. Perhaps the chosen few have a self-interested plan. Perhaps they are happy winning every year, at the expense of the excluded.
I hope this is not allowed to continue. Platini, Blatter and Uefa are all making noises to this end. The battle has already started between the ?haves? and the administrators.
It?s time for the clubs like Everton to lead the way and be more vocal about its hopes for football. The time has come for fans to say enough is enough. We won?t tolerate watching referees win games, and the ruining of our game!
We want to watch truly competitive fairly refereed games so we resume our banter and loathing with at least the semblance of belief that things will even themselves out over the season -because currently we know they do not.
footnotes
Administrations do not reside
What exactly is a system?
athletic stratagems ? I?m sure moyes prefers ?gentlemen, we are gathered here today to talk athletic stratagems? to ?lets talk tactics lads?
clubs don?t have lifestyles
We know money influences, the question is ? do the rich clubs have influence where they should not?
Sadly, conspiracy or not, what we are witnessing increasingly is the rich getting richer and leaving the rest of us behind. Sadly, it?s going to get worse if current behaviour continues.
In the case of club football, until very recently the top four clubs entered the champions league and reaped its huge financial benefits ? tv revenues, exposure for their ?brand? etc. This was a prize worth fighting for.
Despite the new EPL tv deal which helps a wider range of clubs the increasingly global marketplace means (champions league football?) remains a glittering prize.
Is this inequity a good or bad thing and for whom? From Football in general as a sport in England, Britain and Europe. The large club to the pub team. The fan to the administrator. Who benefits and how ?
The current regime appears to be (in my case) terrifyingly similar to tory political doctrine. with trickle down theories mixed in with the merit ones mentioned earlier.
American football appears to have identified the benefits of an equal playing field in all aspects of the running of the sport - from team recruitment to refereeing, the aim is for fairness and accuracy which ensures a truly competitive sport that fans have faith in. Despite American footballs shittness, the league still retains the excitement of being winnable by many more teams than the top 3 or 4 as in England.
Justselection of my ideas for improving the situation:
1) Greater use of technology (would Clattenburg have denied the penalty for Lescott having had the chance to watch it again?)
2) More referees/greater powers. It?s about time the assistant referees lived up to their names.
3) Ability to recruit. By far the most difficult to solve. Salary caps, Youth investment and quotas etc have all been used successfully in Rugby League and other sports.
How much inequity do we believe is acceptable or even good for our sport? Should we be trying to create a truly competitive sport where each team has an equal opportunity for success based on its abilities and tactics as opposed to its ability to make cash?
At the moment, the system is corrupt. Perhaps the chosen few have a self-interested plan. Perhaps they are happy winning every year, at the expense of the excluded.
I hope this is not allowed to continue. Platini, Blatter and Uefa are all making noises to this end. The battle has already started between the ?haves? and the administrators.
It?s time for the clubs like Everton to lead the way and be more vocal about its hopes for football. The time has come for fans to say enough is enough. We won?t tolerate watching referees win games, and the ruining of our game!
We want to watch truly competitive fairly refereed games so we resume our banter and loathing with at least the semblance of belief that things will even themselves out over the season -because currently we know they do not.
Administrations do not reside
What exactly is a system?
athletic stratagems ? I?m sure moyes prefers ?gentlemen, we are gathered here today to talk athletic stratagems? to ?lets talk tactics lads?
clubs don?t have lifestyles
I’d have preferred if you had included some intepretation of the inevitability of bent outcomes from bent inputs bit because that for me is most important.
Thanks anyway it was almost very kind of you.


1 Posted 31/10/2007 at 16:52:34
Report abuse