The Mail Bag

Penalty decisions again

Comments (33)

After the Aston Villa game, I was surprised that no one complained about the referee's decision not to give Victor Anichebe a penalty after he was clearly tripped up by James Milner and then mugged by Martin Laursen.

I watched the game live on Fox Soccer Channel in New York and did not know the names of the match commentators, but whoever they were, they shouted out straight away that Martin Atkinson had made the right decision. They did not change their opinions even after it was replayed several times on the TV, they actually said that he went down too easy and was looking for a penalty. I myself thought it was a penalty right away and the replays shows it was clearly a foul in the box.

This past weekend against Man City, it happened again; Michael Ball clearly fouled Ossie in the box ? not surprisingly, no penalty. There seems to be no consistency from game to game, week to week with match officiating.

The number of handballs last week by Villa players that went unpunished and again this week was astonishing. I remember seeing Robinho clearly and deliberately handle the ball and no yellow card. Ronaldo was sent off for a deliberate handball two weeks ago by Howard Webb against City and I remember Hull getting a penalty late in the game with the Boro when Geovanni was fouled, when I first saw it, I didn't think it was a foul and after watching the replays it clearly wasn't a penalty, the referee was Steve Tanner.

I've heard that Mark Halsey has given out the fewest cards of the season from the match commentators of our game against City and was a little bemused by that. Surely consistent fouling and bad tackles warrant bookings (yellow cards) does this mean that Mark Halsey only gets the matches where these events don't occur? I'm not mandating that every little thing should stop play but what happened to the rules of football? The referee is supposed to enforce the rules of football unbiased and not interfere with the outcome of the game. This clearly happened when the referee allowed extra time over the time already added on and Villa went on to score the winner.

Maybe this piece sounds like sour grapes from me, but it really isn't, I watch as many Everton matches I can and maybe I'm biased, but I see this in other non-Everton games also. I just pay more attention to our games and want us to get treated fairly, that's all.

Clearly something has to change; one referee cannot decide to play extra time, another not to book people, yet another let his linesmen make refereeing decisions and so on. The integrity of the game is being ruined. They say it is a difficult job but saying that is really a cop-out, they shouldn't be doing the job if they cannot be fair and decisive.

They seem to be getting support from Keith Hackett and the FA but to what end? I feel that if they are not going to suffer the consequences of their actions on matchday, why should they change or improve? In any walk of life, if there aren't any checks and balances the whole thing goes belly up.

I believe that there should be a referee review board and several matches each week (selected randomly like a drug test) should be examined each week by a committee of ex-footballers, managers, referees, regular people independent of the various leagues. Maybe even appoint a Commissioner to police these referees and various entities to keep to the rules and basic principles of the game of football and least of all, to keep them on their toes.
Matthew Hickey, New York, NY, USA     Posted 15/12/2008 at 18:10:44

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Steve Pendleton
1   Posted 16/12/2008 at 06:31:14

Report abuse

The only decision that I can see consistent amongst the ref is we get no fucking penalties!!

Time for Moyes to collate the questionable decisions and send them off to the governing body again. I think we can now safely say that it?s not the player being victimised (Andy Johnson) but the player wearing our beloved strip.

Gerrard falls over his own feet with no one around him and he gets the bloody penalty!
Patty Beesley
2   Posted 16/12/2008 at 08:59:52

Report abuse

What do you expect?? We are Everton ? we only got one penalty last season in the last game and we have had our one this year. My guess ? no more!!
Graham Eaves
3   Posted 16/12/2008 at 09:17:58

Report abuse

Not to mention the two clumsy blatant handballs in the box by Curtis Davies. Did you see his face the second after he did them, like he got caught with his hand in the till. Even he thought he was fucked.
Ciarán McGlone
4   Posted 16/12/2008 at 09:21:18

Report abuse

We win and this inferiority complex still raises it?s ugly head.

Regarding Vic - Milner came in from the side and got the ball - no penalty.

The Osman one was certainly more of a penalty shout but it wasn?t given. Get over it. We get away with them too on occasion.
Jason Lam
5   Posted 16/12/2008 at 09:25:08

Report abuse

FIFA and UEFA are content with human referees as they want football to remain having a ’human’ element to the game. Advanced computer linesman and instant-reply refereeing (a la US cousins) would remove the human factor, it would be akin to PES. Who’s to say whether there’s a crime syndicate in alliance with the bookies and refs to control the outcomes? Why is it when one top4 side draws, the other 3 do in the same week?
Nick Entwistle
6   Posted 16/12/2008 at 09:48:14

Report abuse

If a penalty should be given in any game, it's now down to luck of the draw. Maybe you can?t blame refs too much what with all the diving that goes on. Also the majourity of pundits (espacially the insanely dull Alan Shearer) say things like ?if he has contact he?s going down, and that to me is enough for a penalty?. NO! THAT?S A FUCKING DIVE!

Video evidence perhaps?
Anthony Dyer
7   Posted 16/12/2008 at 09:47:47

Report abuse

Claire, there is no inferiority complex, in fact it has become almost funny. Every time we score, many of us are waiting to see if the referee will find a fault with the play and disallow the goal. Referees are human and therefore can be forgiven the odd mistake from time to time. But, game-in, game-out, strange and questionable decisions are made, especially so when it affects the top end of the table.

Since the advent of individual matches being open to free betting and the governing bodies being beholdent to sponsors (one sponsor in particular) the game has ceased to be a game. The FA, Uefa and Fifa are not interested in the sport itself, they are interested only in the power that it gives them as individuals.

I suppose all those teams in the Italian league who were on the wrong end of decisions week-in, week-out were also considered to have an inferiority complex. Most fans want their teams to win, but most fans want to see them win in a fair and honest manner. Some clubs and their sponsors cannot afford to lose and the pressure they put on the governing bodies and therefore the Refs must be considerable.

It's not good enough, and ultimately it is those of us who love the game as well as our club who pay the price for their failures.
Also, Claire tell me another club who have been on the wrong end of so many important decisions over the last 30 years and then name me a club who have had to thank the Ref for at least five major trophies.

Colin Potter
8   Posted 16/12/2008 at 09:59:30

Report abuse

You said it yourself, Mathew, your?e biased. It happens to every team in the football league, except the RS, because I think they spend more money on brown envelopes than anybody else in the history of bribery.
Steve Pendleton
9   Posted 16/12/2008 at 10:19:16

Report abuse

Ciaran, can you name the occasions when we get away with it?

Why is it Moyes felt the need to approach the FA last year about the issue?

Does he need to get over it?
Dominic Duerden
10   Posted 16/12/2008 at 10:33:10

Report abuse

Ciaran

It was an obvious penalty.

Have you ever thought about being a ref? With your general lack of football knowledge you’d be perfect.
Neil Humphrey
11   Posted 16/12/2008 at 11:27:38

Report abuse

This is an old example but in the 3-0 win against the shite we got away with the most nailed on penalty in history. Gerrard hit a cross-shot and Hibbert slid in to push the ball out of play with his arm. I remember immediately assuming there would be a pen but the ref and linesman missed it. So it does work the other way sometimes.
Alex May
12   Posted 16/12/2008 at 11:43:20

Report abuse

Most nailed on penalty in history Neil? Wind your neck in. Even without pointing to Ablett on Nevin in the cup in 1990, that is obviously bollocks. Hibbert slid across to block and his arm, naturally enough, went with him. There was no deliberate movement of the arm and the law states that there must be. I’ve heard plenty of nonsense thrown at Hibbert, but being unable to detach a limb before blocking a cross ranks as the most unreasonable one yet.
Stefan Tosev
13   Posted 16/12/2008 at 11:38:55

Report abuse

Fact is for the last 2-3 seasons we never got an important decision in our favour, there were disallowed goals, as many as 9 out of 10 not given penalties - admitted by the ref?s boss. Even the penalty we got last season was in the 80 min in the last game when the 5th spot was already decided.

We keep not getting rightfully game-winning decisions at crucial games in our favour and this cost us points, a lot of points.
Alan Clarke
14   Posted 16/12/2008 at 12:12:13

Report abuse

There is obvious protection of the sky 4. I see Clattenburg is being investigated for a betting scam and financial irregularities. He’s just stupid enough to get caught but I’m sure he’s not the only one.

Where such huge amounts of money are involved there is always massive corruption and to think otherwise is niaive. We’re skint and have no input or influence hence we never get any decisions.

Remember two season ago when we were 2 up against Man U and Fergie obviously said something to the ref. From that point on the ref gave every decision Man U’s way. I’m pretty sure now Villa are threatening the sky 4 you’ll see some shocking decisions go against them too.
Tony Williams
15   Posted 16/12/2008 at 12:37:03

Report abuse

The main issue here is that we obviously view our games so closely and not others. It happenes everywhere but because we are not paying attention it seems that it effects us more.

That said, the Blackburn game last year when Oojer assaulted Johnson is mind boggling, whereas the counter balance was when the ball hit the Watford?s defenders face and we got a pen two seasons ago.
Lynn Thorne
16   Posted 16/12/2008 at 12:49:41

Report abuse

Nothing to do with penalties but you mentioned Mark Halsey being lenient with cards. I couldn?t believe the treatment Pienaar was getting on Saturday, I think every Man City player fouled him at some point, yet not 1 card was given. Yet who got booked ? Fellaini!
Typical...
Mike Allison
17   Posted 16/12/2008 at 13:22:08

Report abuse

Lynn, you’ve got a point about Fellaini, he must have bad breath as he gets booked for breathing on people. Or maybe all my ’he should get booked for that hair’ jibes at various opponents over the years have come back to haunt me...

And Jason, above, I get bad decisions on PES...!
Joe McMahon
18   Posted 16/12/2008 at 13:30:46

Report abuse

Guys I?ve sussed it. We pinch the Kop one night and drag it to Goodsion and replace Gwladys St with it. We then take it with us to Kirkby.
Damian Wilde
19   Posted 16/12/2008 at 14:13:37

Report abuse

Ciaren, can?t agree there.

The ref?s in this country are really, really shite. You expect some mistakes (human error), but why is it when we can spot stuff in the stands and they are 3 yards away and can?t spot stuff?

I think other clubs also get a bad deal when it comes to decisions, so it isn?t just Everton. But the amount we get going against us is ridiculous. Ye, there will be occasions when we get one in our favour, but we?ve had far more bad decisions than good. These cost us points.

Hackett does fuck all. Refs are supposed to be monitored. They consistently have awful games, what happens? Fuck all. Hackett?s a complete waste of space.

It gets to the stage where my Dad says he won?t go to as many games because he is sick of refs ruining them. They make me so angry, them and First TransPenine Express.

Something has to be done because the standard is a farce. Sooner or later one of the refs will get filled in.

We wouldn?t mind so much if they gave interviews, explained their decisions and apologised for the ones they got wrong. But no, they?re cowards and stay away from the tv cameras. They deserve NO RESPECT, ONLY ABUSE, ESPECIALLY MIKE REILLY, WILEY, OH ACTUALLY, ALL OF THEM.

I used to think Webb was the best of a bad bunch, but even he?s turned utterly shite now. Bastards.
Matthew Hickey
20   Posted 16/12/2008 at 14:42:54

Report abuse

When I sent in the post, I tried to highlight some of the recent refereeing decisions made over the last couple of weeks. I think there should be an independent body that review matches and the performance of match officials and club officials on matchdays. There are a lot of red flags here with the officiating and trying to put it down to human error doesn?t do it for me.

Remember when the goalkeepers constantly got back passes from defenders and blatantly wasted time. Somehow this was changed and back passes were eliminated except for headers. How did this happen?

I think we?ve now reached the point when the referee loses his time piece and an official match clock is posted around the stadiums for all fans to see and appoint an official timekeeper. It works for professional basketball, why wouldn?t it work for football? I remember when I played that it used to drive me mad not knowing how much time was left especially when the match was close. The clock stops when the ball goes out of play and on again when the ball comes back in play, the game would be played for ninety minutes as in the rules and everybody knows where they stand.

This gives the referee one less thing to do and in doing so he can keep his main focus on the play. This is one solution I?m know there are more areas that need addressing, but you have to have the will to do it in the first place. Football is entertainment for the masses and it makes no sense having football supporters pissed off and yelling obscenities at referees. You paid good money to attend a football match, watch football and support your team and be entertained. The bad decisions with offsides and constant fouling only ruin the spectacle.

With regard to Fellaini, that guy worries me, he?s booked a lot and I cut him some slack because he is big and awkward looking. He?s only 21 years old and he?s elbowing players in the face, I like tough play but I don?t think that was done in self defence. Football is a man's game and has a lot of give and take in it, I hope he is not a thug like Barton or Bowyer.

Ciarán McGlone
21   Posted 16/12/2008 at 15:39:46

Report abuse

"Also, Claire tell me another club who have been on the wrong end of so many important decisions over the last 30 years"



That?s a pretty absurd attempt to prove an point, Margaret.

No inferiority complex eh!

Thanks for the proof.
Tony Williams
22   Posted 16/12/2008 at 16:20:39

Report abuse

Matthew the "Game Clock" wouldn?t work, on Sky there was a section showing how long the ball was in paly for each half and it is usually something as low as 22-25 mins, that would end up each game being about 3 hours.

I do believe though, as in Rugby, there should be a hooter for the end of the game, instead of letting a team continue an attack and have a shot or wait until they lose possession, when the allotted time is up it blows, so none of this favouritism for the Sky 4 playing 6 minutes over when it should have been 3.

I think the biggest example of shite refereeing this season was the Baggies game, when a penalty was given then the ref was overuled by his lino who was in a impossibly position to see if the foul occurred in the box but the ref was right there and clearly saw it.
Ciarán McGlone
23   Posted 16/12/2008 at 16:24:10

Report abuse

Damian Wilde...nail hit squarely on the head with the words ?so it isn?t just Everton?..

To read the garbage on here you?d think Keith Hackett owned an Everton dart board.

But then again... could you name any club in the last 30 years...... blah,blah fuckin blah.
Matthew Hickey
24   Posted 16/12/2008 at 17:03:28

Report abuse

Fair enough Tony I wondered if someone had already timed an actual match. The hooter or sounding of a horn works, for me.

Ciaran: with all the drama and negativity?
Neil McKinney
25   Posted 16/12/2008 at 17:33:41

Report abuse

Just a quick point regarding the hooter idea. Don’t forget that the hooter does not end the game there and then in rugby. When the hooter sounds the game ends the next time the ball is dead, not immediately.

Not sure how you would work that in football as possession is defined differently in the two games.

The rest of the stuff about penalties is a little paranoid for me, although we have generally come out worse from decisions for and against. Don’t think there’s a conspiracy just the usual toffee luck.

COYB
Anthony Dyer
26   Posted 16/12/2008 at 17:40:12

Report abuse

Sorry for the improper nomenclature Ciarán McGlone, it was a genuine mistake on my part.
How many major games have Everton won with dubious refereeing decisions? How many have they lost due to the same reason? Would our neighbours have won so many Semi Finals and Finals without the help of the referee sending opponents off or awarding dubious free kicks and penalties?
If you believe the game is fair and just then good luck to you ? I happen to disagree with that viewpoint.
Andy Crooks
27   Posted 16/12/2008 at 17:45:37

Report abuse

I?d hate Everton to become a club who whinge about referees. Some are better than others, all of them make mistakes, some of them are influenced by crowds, none are deliberate cheats. Let Everton remain a club with class. Alex Ferguson is proof that money can?t buy it.
Paul Lally
28   Posted 16/12/2008 at 17:55:31

Report abuse

As said higher up the thread, to believe that corruption does not exist in football is very naive.
Money talks.
Ask Pierluigi Collina.
Ray Roche
29   Posted 16/12/2008 at 18:06:18

Report abuse

Alan Clarke
I thought Twattenburg was being investigated for financial irregularities regarding his electrical business, not a betting scam.He was also in the news when his girlfriend trashed his Porsche.....

Just a couple of other points raised on this thread worthy of a response.
All the world and his dog are aware that Andy Johnson, because of his undeserved "diver" tag, didn?t get many penalties playing for us. I?ve seen two nailed on penalties not allowed in the time he?s been at Fulham when he?s been fouled, so it seems it?s the man, not the club in this particular case.

Because of TV schedules it wouldn?t be possible for a match to be stopped and then re-started every time the ball went out of play.

How did Ronaldo NOT get charged after he clearly kicked out at the Spurs defender? I saw it, did anyone else?

And did anyone else see an embarrassed Shearer when he was asked about Rooney stamping on an Aalborg player? Who can forget Shearer getting off with the outrageous kick on Neil Lennon? Don?t anyone try to tell me that there is not "one law for some, another law for others".....

Adam Wightman
30   Posted 16/12/2008 at 22:12:30

Report abuse

Yeh there have been a fair few dodgey decisions against us over the years. No one really remembers but I recall one time Adrian Mutu handballing the ball into the goal for Chelsea and the goal standing?!?! For me, the Villa player who handballed it was no different to the penalty given against Neville v WBA earlier in the season. If that was a pen then this should have been to. Nevermind, can?t dwell on it, roll on Chelski
Si Kirwan
31   Posted 16/12/2008 at 23:42:37

Report abuse

Theres a site which shows the Premier League with the results that should have been... eg, somebody gets penalty which replays show isn't; take the goal off.

Last season or the season before, we where deemed the most "robbed" / "Unlucky" with something like 14 points less!!

Hard enough crashin the top 4 without pathetic luck like ours.
David Moore
32   Posted 17/12/2008 at 00:39:38

Report abuse

The website is rightresult.net.
Ciarán McGlone
33   Posted 17/12/2008 at 10:25:36

Report abuse

Rightresult.net... of course is the brainchild of an ex-ref who shall not be mentioned...

The conclusion being that for every refereeing decision, there is a definitive and unanimous answer as to what the decision should have been...

A more than slightly flawed premise that ignores subjectivism....

© ToffeeWeb