The Mail Bag
More important than that.....
Comments (33)
Whilst most of us continue to believe that funds for new signings are comprehensively tied up with the decision on Kirkby, I heard last night that something altogether more important hangs on the outcome. Someone VERY close to The Club dropped out to me that David Moyes`s signature on that new contract is totally dependent on the scheme getting the go-ahead.All the terms are agreed and the signature will follow the green light; if it`s a `call-in` then the manager will sit out his existing contract pending further developments.
Apparently, he is aware that future income projections show clearly that the Club will be in BIG trouble soon if the move does not go through and partisan/sentimental considerations have become irrelevant.
Was this said to influence me, a NO voter? I don`t think so, I`m not that important ? but it`s certainly given me food for thought.
Colin Tunstall, Posted 25/07/2008 at 08:52:39
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
There?s IS an Everton without Moyes.
There?s NO Everton without the fans.
I?m with Roy.
(By the way, I?m a big supporter of DM and would hate to see him go.)
Are you saying that fans be given a SAY on a ground move or the DECISION ?
For all we know,Everton could be on the verge of bankrupsy as we write and if only DK can save them its a no brainer!
Therefore I can’t see why it would affect Moyes’s decision to sign a new deal.. Much more likely to be the board messing him about that is making him stall. Surely they wouldn’t lie to him too.. er...
A say in the decision IS the decision!
What’s the difference?
You either have a ’say’ or not.
You don’t have a say in NOT the decision.
Pretty clear what I’m saying.
One can have a say in a decision or there can be a sole arbiter. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the fans should be the sole arbiters.That is what I say is wrong. The decision whether or not to move should be the Board’s and the Board’s alone.
If so...
1. how badly run must we be in a medium awash with Sky/TV money and loyal fan bases?
2. why do we not hear of other PL clubs in such dire straits?
3 who is to blame?
And ,Peter, nor should a supermarket
On the other hand I think "Black Bill" will see his pension fund evaporate and sell up immediately if Kirkby does not go ahead.
I suppose it would be too much to expect him to do the honourable thing and resign,
IMO Moyes is only stalling because like us he is struggling to see his way through the mist.
If you had a shedload of money and a club needed investment. Would you wait until they had moved to an out of city, mid range stadium before investing. Or would you make a move early so that you could study the options for yourself thus making sure that you made the most out of your money.
I’m sorry people but to say that people are waiting until after the move before investing in the club flies in the face of good business sense.
I don’t think they are expecting new investors if we move, I think it’s more a case of current investors jumping ship if they don’t get their payout from the move. Or is it libellous to suggest that?
If Kirkby gets the go-ahead to move to the next stage, trying to implement the move, and Moyes signs..how does that prove he’s in favour?
If, as some believe, the OK means money for transfers will be borrowed and made available to Moyes, all that proves is he’s in favour of having money for his next phase of team-building
It really would be lovely to believe this. I would like to believe it myself, and to tell myself such nice stories. It’s all mad Bill’s and bad Keith’s fault; if only they went things would be fine; investors are just waiting to pump money into the club; GP can be turned into a world class revenue generating stadium, or we can build our own in the city to rival the RS’s...
Where have you guys been for twenty years? Are you like Rip van Winkle and you’ve only just woken up?
Let me hit you with a monstrous dose of reality. We have been in financial decline for twenty years at least and are now very poor. We are financially increasingly outmuscled by everyone from Chelsea down to Portsmouth. We are not generating nearly enough revenue. We are not an attractive investment for anyone in our current state. We need urgently to break out of this financial trap or we are in certain futher decline. Kirkby is the best possible deal for a brand new revenue optimised ground that we could ever imagine getting. If we are ever going to get a major new owner and new investment, securing this new ground is vital (that is why Moyesie is not signing).
Yes, it must be comfortable to believe that we are still the Mersey Millionaires (or could easily be again), and that it is 100% Bill’s and Keith’s fault. But IT IS NOT TRUE. The situation is FAR worse than anything that could be simply solved by Bill and / or Keith departing the scene. It is not importantly about Bill and Keith - it is about the fundamentally weak position the club is in after twenty years of decline, in a world in which all the other clubs around us are increasingly stronger and better positioned.
It is no service to the club we all love to keep on comforting yourself with soothing stories.
your post fails the minute you start to believe that its not 100% the fault of Kenwright and Wyness.
At a time when the Premier League is awash with money and the likes of Spurs with a capacity of only 36,000 get more than double our income ? yes thats right, double because of the amount they get from commercial operations ? while our 2 clowns have had operating losses of £10 million for the last 2 years and less than £1 million from commercial activities.
It summed it all up for me when our supposed leader said "I dont know what's going on at the club I?m only a fan".
If you think we can't do better then you?re wasting your time as a business consultant and as I?ve said before I would expect somebody with your intelligence to see through the Kirkby debacle but I do respect that you defend your opinion steadfastedly.
If it?s not the grey men who preceded this current Board and Kenright and Wyness for making matters worse, then whose? What?s so different about EFC that we have some sort of financial paralysis that doesn?t, obviously, effect other PL clubs? Does your monstrous dose of reality apply only to Everton?
In any other ?business? this Board would have been hounded out and the CEO dismissed on financial performance alone.
Just read your post you say "In a world in which all the other clubs around us are in a increasingly stronger and better position" I?d like to point out a few things,
Blackburn NO NEW STADIUM
Portsmouth NO NEW STADIUM
A.Villa NO NEW STADIUM
West Ham NO NEW STADIUM
Spurs NO NEW STADIUM
Fulham NO NEW STADIUM
Man City, Newcastle, Middlesbrough, Sunderland, Wigan, Bolton out performed them all. Success does not depend on a new stadium, as the above shows; it depends on a good manager and steady investment like we have done over the last five years.
One last point, if the stadium design was to be what we were promised, ie a world class stadium and not a B&Q warehouse look-alike, there may be more support for it.
As I have said before, the judgement on the business success of the Bill / Keith reign remains unknown at this stage. What will determine it is if they can transition the club successfully to a new and richer owner. If this is precisely what they are doing by securing Kirkby - the picture will look very different.
You guys all simply assume that (a) the lack of serious new owner interest is an inexpilcable mystery of the universe and has nothing to do with the need for a new ground; and (b) Kirkby will be a financial disaster (despite obviously being a very good deal for a brand new stadium).
So you are writing Bill’s and Keith’s obituaries already. I would wait and see if I were you. If DK is secured, Moyes signs up again, a new owner emerges, new investment comes in to the club, Kirkby is a success on the back of a successful team on the pitch... things will look a little different.
Your alternatives appear to be either to sit about and hope for the best; or to sling out the owner and management when there is actually no one else coming in who wants to take us over. I do admire your persistence on sticking to what are - to me - such desperately unfounded and optimistic views.
Let it lie, man! You’re becoming a pompous windbag with delusions of infallibility
One obvious difference between EFC and the other PL clubs who appear to be solvent is that we are run by Kenwright and Wyness
QED


1 Posted 25/07/2008 at 14:43:28
Report abuse