The Mail Bag

Left out, not left back

Comments (23)

Having breathed a long sigh of relief that we finally made a significant signing in Fellaini, I ? like most blues ? have spent most of today trying to work out our new first-choice team. One issue I can't get to grips with though from reading other posts is the obsession with putting Lescott in at left back.

Joleon is a good central defender, bought as a good central defender and drafted into the England squad as a good central defender. Our deficiencies at the back at the start of this season have been, in my opinion, mainly due to the lack of midfield cover in front of him and Yobo. However, there is an element of shakiness in his game shown in the two home defeats so far.

Yet a lot of writers seem to think that the best way of shoring up the defence is to bring Jags back into the centre and shunt Lescott to left back. Why?

He was used there out of necessity rather than choice last season when Baines and Valente were injured. OK, he did a fair job, but if we are to make the most of our season, we need all our players playing at the top of their games in their natural positions where they can make the most of their talents.

If, as many people seem to think, Lescott's form is shaky, then isn't it better to drop him and bring Jags in to replace him ? with Moyes getting hold of him and bringing him back to top standard on the training pitch before playing him again?

After all, we do have a decent player in Baines who ? given a decent run ? will, I think, prove why he was rated so highly when we signed him.

Shifting Lescott around to mask poor form seems to me the actions of a manager happy to have a player be bigger than the team. And while beggars can't be choosers, I'd still rather we had players in form in the team - and those not on form working their arses off to prove they deserve to get back in.
Chris Brown, Somerset     Posted 02/09/2008 at 22:10:15

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Jason Lam
1   Posted 03/09/2008 at 07:02:29

Report abuse

I believe Lescott was originally drafted in the England squad by McClaren (or was it the taboids putting pressure on the then England manager?) at left-back, as Ashley Cole was injured. Capello has kept him in, though judging the past 3 games I don’t know why.

Still, 10 goals a season is too good to miss. My day’s worth as a blue:

Howard
Neville - Yobo - Jags - Lescott
Castillo
Arteta - Cahill - that Fella bloke - Pienaar
Yakubu
mick wrende
2   Posted 03/09/2008 at 07:36:58

Report abuse

The answer to your question Chris Brown is very simple. Our defence last season was most solid with Jags and Yobo in the centre and Lescott at left back. And as for Baines he is dreadful defensively. His first tackle came after 85 minutes last Saturday. No way is he good enough to wear a first team shirt.
chris kelly
3   Posted 03/09/2008 at 07:29:13

Report abuse

Chris, I agree with a lot of what you said...Joleon is not an England International by accident. And he gives our team a very important thing: Exposure internationally.

...I do, however, have to disagree with you My Good Man, on your first sentence of the final paragraph.

"Shifting Lescott around to mask poor form seems to me the actions of a manager happy to have a player be bigger than the team."

That to me is the action of a good manager who has to cover the teams deficiencies with an outside the box idea...Players were injured or underperforming, Something’s gotta give.

Jason, I agree with your lineup except for Neville. I’d put in the Dane...couldn’t possibly be worse than Phil "The Thrill"
Tony part
4   Posted 03/09/2008 at 08:03:22

Report abuse

To be honest I am genuinly excited about the Fellaini signing and cant wait to see him in action...Action being a word that I think will closely follow this guy around..
He has a great reputation for being here there and everywhere and is technically good which is a bonus obviously but the thing that we have been missing out on for years is the fact he is a big powerful and domineering midfielder..
I had first heard about him just before last season ended when Everton were linked with him but since the months past I forgot about him until Standard played Liverpool..
I was so impressed with Fellaini that I instantly mentioned the fact as to why we never pursued an interest in him because he simply dominated Liverpools midfield and I havent seen Gerrard kept so quiet for a long time..
Another thing that was impressive was the amount of headers Fellaini won against their defence, Carragher in particular..
Too often last season when we played against the top four we were easilt muscled out of things and bullied and that has snowballed into this season especially against Pompey..
But the arrival of Fellaini and also I am told Castillo is far from being a slouch and has 33 caps for Ecuador so he has sampled playing aginst the likes of Brazil and Argentina time and time again.. The arrival of these two gives me some real hope of us having a bit of muscle and athletism in the middle of that park that so often lets us down..
Fingers crossed we can get all our best players fit and firing and I hope we can get Saha fit also as he can be a fantastic striker if we can get and keep him 100%..
Heres hoping to a big upturn in fortunes..
Anj Stama
5   Posted 03/09/2008 at 08:22:09

Report abuse

Anyone know or have any sources/links about this supposed done-deal we made concerning Vagner Love as reported by the Daily Mirror? Or is this more tripe for us to swallow? I’m kinda bloated here,on tripe ie.
Kirk McArdle
6   Posted 03/09/2008 at 08:47:03

Report abuse

Whilst I agree that Moyes did buy Lescott as a centre half, when Baines arrived and was injured Lescott was asked to step up and do a job at left back as he is left footed. I don’t even think Moyes would have expected the impact Lescott would have made playing there most of last season. Yobo had a calming figure in Jags next to him and saw Yobo delivering his (IMHO) best season in the royal blue jersey since he arrived. Lescott adds height in the left back position with free reign to run that left and overlap with peanuts and get into advanced areas in the box. Hence double figures from a defender. No other premiership team had a defender with more goals than Lescott. Baines, as had been said before, is not the best defensivly and I feel should be seen more as either a wing back in a back 5 with 3 central defenders or a left mid for his crossing ability. Whilst on the subject of players in position where would we play Arteta? Wide right or try to move him more central as the playmaker with Osman more wide right. Thoughts..........
Steven Astley
7   Posted 03/09/2008 at 09:24:39

Report abuse

Chris, I totally totally disagree with you.

The reason why Lescott should be moved to left back again is because he excelled there last season - he even notched 10 goals.. before we had Yak, how many other players have we had in the past 10 years that have scored into double figures??

John Doyle
8   Posted 03/09/2008 at 10:29:29

Report abuse

Rik Astley - 04/05 cahill scored more than 10 -
05/06 - beattied got mor than 10goals
06/07 - Andy Johnson got more than 10goals

So before we had Yak 3 out of the 3 previoyus seasons we had a player who scored 10 or more.
Seamus Murphy
9   Posted 03/09/2008 at 10:30:27

Report abuse

The main reason everyone wants to get Lescott to LB is to get Jags out of midfield - add to that Lescotts shaky start at centre back and Baines/Valente’s even worse start at LB and you have your reason.
I for one agree totally. Lescott to LB, Jags to CB.
Richard Harris
10   Posted 03/09/2008 at 10:40:34

Report abuse

Lescott was at his best for us at left back so why change a winning formula? He may have said that he is a centre back but most of that experience was at Championship level and as he excelled at left back in the Premier League then time for a permanent change?
Dan Walshe
11   Posted 03/09/2008 at 11:14:21

Report abuse

Chris, I have to say I agree with you, was going to write a similar post myself. The lack of midfield cover can?t be blamed for Defoe?s first last weekend or the goal against Blackburn; Lescott should be left on the bench for the next game with Jags at centre half and Baines at left back. I thought Baines was one of our better players on Saturday and I think we need an overlapping left footed left back if we are going to progress. Lescott was bought as a centre back and Baines as a left back each of them should try to nail down those positions
Jason Lam
12   Posted 03/09/2008 at 11:21:11

Report abuse

Chris, what’s the point of mentioning Cahill if you’re playing him.

Similarly, what’s the point for playing Saha if he’s never to return.
Jason Lam
13   Posted 03/09/2008 at 11:22:58

Report abuse

I meant to say ’not playing Cahill’.. Cheers! COYB
Jim Slade
14   Posted 03/09/2008 at 11:56:20

Report abuse

People forget that we will always have a player or 4 injured and often one of them is either Jag ,Yobo,Lescott or Baines, Yobo at the moment! so having 3 centre backs is essential. Baines will prove one of the best 3 left back in the country if he gets a full injury-free season under his belt.
Alan Clarke
15   Posted 03/09/2008 at 12:32:12

Report abuse

Baines is not good enough, that’s why Lescott should be moved to left back. I can’t understand why Moyes signed him when we had 3 players who could already play left back - Lescott, Neville, Valente.

Last summer we needed to strengthen our midfield and Moyes spent £6million on another bloody defender. We are still short of numbers in midfield despite signing Felaini and Castillo and in my opinion Moyes should be looking to sell Baines to bring in another decent midfielder.
Trevor Lynes
16   Posted 03/09/2008 at 13:36:26

Report abuse

Baines was EASILY our best player against Pompey. A lot of the others were below par including Jags, Lescott and even Arteta, who has not been at his best so far this season. Peanuts will not be able to play for at least another month and Cahill will not be match fit either.

The team for me would be for the IMMEDIATE future: Howard; Neville, Yobo, Jagielka, Lescott; with a midfield of Arteta, Fellaini, Castillo or Osman, Baines; and Vaughan and Yakubu up-front. Castillo was signed as the natural replacement for Carsley and Fellaini would take the weight off Arteta and maybe provide protection too...

Baines deserves his place at the present time. I agree defensively Lescott is better but Baines put more decent crosses in than I've seen from anyone playing on the left... unfortunately we had no one to convert them. Let Cahill and Peanuts fight for their place and not just move back as soon as they are fit ? they should start on the bench as subs until they are proven match-fit.

Paul O'Hanlon
17   Posted 03/09/2008 at 13:51:35

Report abuse

Yobo?s pulled out of the Nigeria squad with an injury.

Apparently he?s been playing through the pain barrier, so I?m sure our ?problem? will be solved now with Jags taking his place at CB whilst Yobo recovers.

Whilst Baines impresses me going forward I?m not convinced he?s strong enough defensively, but let?s wait and see eh?
Guy Wilkinson
18   Posted 03/09/2008 at 15:19:50

Report abuse

Baines only looks good on the front foot. His best game was against Man U last season where he kept Ronaldo in his pocket.
Defensively he is poor, his positioning is shit and he got bummed by Johnson last weekend. I would play him left midfield but work on the final ball.
Richard Harris
19   Posted 03/09/2008 at 16:54:23

Report abuse

Guy Wilkinson wrote " Baines only looks good on the front foot. Defensively he is poor, his positioning is shit and he got bummed by Johnson last weekend.
No wonder he had a bad game, it must have been distracting with Johnson?s attentions :0)
Vijay Nair
20   Posted 03/09/2008 at 16:50:47

Report abuse

I think we need to cut Baines some slack. He’s been out for an extended period of time and just finding his way back into the team. We’re only 3 games in so give the boy a chance. When he’s at his best, i believe he can hold his own against some of the greatest (i.e Cristiano Ronaldo).
Ray Lupton
21   Posted 03/09/2008 at 16:59:28

Report abuse

You cant argue with the fact that we are much tighter at the back when Yobo Jags and Lescott play there. I like Baines though but I think until we have a naturally left sided midfielder playing in front of him he will always be exposed.

My thinking is while the midfield is light keep the back four solid and at least get some draws or cagey one-nils instead of getting pumped.
Connor Rohrer
22   Posted 03/09/2008 at 17:15:58

Report abuse

Leighton Baines has been as terrible as Lescott defensively this season. The only player who’s been decent at the back is Joseph Yobo.

Lescott has been making some indivual errors but his defending throughout the 90 minutes hasn’t been bad, he kept Defoe and Crouch quiet for alot of the game. Concentration has let him down at key times.

Baines on the other hand hasn’t made any indivual mistakes that have led to goals but he is unsettling the back four. He’s small, his positioning is poor and he gets left for dead by half decent wingers, he really does need to work on his defending as we are getting hit and miss performances, excellent going forward and very poor defensively.

Lescott at left back gives you the full package, defensive quality and drive going forward. His crossing isn’t always great but other than that he’s top notch, the best left back at the club without a doubt and he fits into our system.

It’s should be back to basics really, Neville, Yobo, Jagielka and Lescott should be the back four. Simple as really.
Gary Hughes
23   Posted 05/09/2008 at 02:26:54

Report abuse

Chris,

Couldn’t agree more. I would certainly agree that Yobo & Lescott have been far from convincing so far but the complete absence of a midfield has been a major factor in their poor showings. The back four that started against Portsmouth is our strongest, Jagielka should be no more than cover for the centre of defence & should be kept as far away from the middle of the park as possible.

© ToffeeWeb