The Mail Bag

Today's attendance

Comments (57)

Just back from today's match, which I was grateful to win despite another dire performance. I was wondering why 4,500 fans made it to the Reebok on an arctic night in midweek but only 31,000 turn up for today's home match.

Now I know it was a 12:00 kick off and live on Sky, i know it's only Fulham and there's a bit of a recession brewing, but why such a poor attendance when the away following is holding up so well? Does it really have anything to do with the style of play ? in which case why do so many continue to travel away?

I'm genuinely perplexed and believe that this trend seriously undermines the case for a new stadium.
Ray Robinson, Warrington     Posted 01/11/2008 at 17:18:52

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Michael Kenrick
I would think it has everything to do with the stye of play, and I see no disconnect in the attendances you mention. I think it says a lot more about the discerning fans' opinions of the dreadful football David Moyes is serving up.

As you can see from the diverse views put forward in our mailbag threads, the 4,500 fans who went to the Reebok represent a large portion of the core fanatic support who will go the game no matter what. And full credit to them ? this club would be nothing without them. But attendance at away games is in large part for the ritual, the camaraderie of the occasion, and least of all in the feint hope of witnessing a footballing feast.

They also, in all likelihood make up a fundamental portion of the less-than 30,000 diehard Evertonians who turned up today for what should have been a home-banker ("mid-table six-pointer, anayone?). It's the less committed so-called "fair-weather" fans if you like who appear to be staying home in droves... and I fully support them in taking a stance against garbage football.

Yes, we tried to play it better today, on the ground ? pass, and maybe move if they can remember ? far less hoofball. But since Moyes has obviously not trained them to play like this, they are strangers to it... and it shows. Fans have every right to vote with their feet, and I think that is exactly what they are doing.

Mike Fisher
1   Posted 01/11/2008 at 18:58:22

Report abuse

Fulham only had about 100 fans there, Everton do have fans that travel too, and maybe the early kick off has prevented them from getting up to Goodison, but I agree 31,000 is poor.
Julie Naybour
2   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:03:46

Report abuse

I think this website is partially responsible for the lower attendances and the quieter support - there is so much negative press and disloyalty spread around these pages, I think it really is having a desperate effect. I really believe all this depressing denegration will have a serious outcome.

Personally I think there were lots of positives from the game today. We are 7th. There is cause for optimism. The fans need to get behind them. I also think the team is showing nerves in front of their own ?too critical? fans. Sometimes they must feel they are amongst enemies when they play at home.

Tony Horne
3   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:21:39

Report abuse

Perhaps it has something to do with "top-flight" football being less of a sporting contest and more of a media and marketing circus?

Still, back in the 70s, 30-odd thousand would have been considered a decent enough crowd even though Goodison would only have been 2 thirds full............
Lee Smith
4   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:22:56

Report abuse

Julie, if you really think that this website has something to do with lower attendances, then you are so so wrong. The reason this website has so much negativity around at the moment is the direct result of the shite we are being served up at the moment. If the football was better, then there would be a lot more optimism on here. The shit football comes first, not the negativity on this site.
Bob Turner
5   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:17:56

Report abuse

Michael

This "garbage football" has been around for last 6 years or so, so unless suddenly several thousand are all, at the same time, becoming disgruntled enough not to go, there must be something more to it.

Personally, I think the turbulent summer and lack of spending (until the last minute anyway) has a lot to do with it.

There was a post earlier this week about "fickleness" and I think we saw some more evidence of it today with the low attendance.

My automatic defence against abuse from the RS has always been to throw back at them about them being "armchair supporters", and that I wouldn’t talk about football with someone who couldn’t be bothered to go to the game - my fear is that we seem to be developing our own army of them....
Of course, it is everyone’s right to spend their money and their time as they wish, but I wonder how many of those who willingly absented themselves today will be posting on here about how rubbish we played today (from what they saw on the TV).

I was brought up on the premise that if I could go to the match, you go to the match - and God knows, I’ve seem some crap over the past 25 plus years. And it might be a controversial viewpoint to post on this website, but I honestly believe that if you choose not to go to the match, but instead watch it on the TV, you forfeit the right to complain about the team. Because you weren’t there.....

No doubt I’ll get lots of abuse, but that is my opinion.
Dave Jeanrenaud
6   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:30:52

Report abuse

Michael Kenrick,

"Yes, we tried to play it better today, on the ground ? pass, and maybe move if they can remember ? far less hoofball. But since Moyes has obviously not trained them to play like this, they are strangers to it... and it shows."

Do you have a season ticket at the training ground? If not then how can you possibly know whether David Moyes trains the players to pass and move?

I’m sure the manager would love it if we went out and passed teams off the park every week but it is not always that easy unfortunately.
Lee Smith
7   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:43:26

Report abuse

Dave, if Michael is wrong and Moyes has been training the team to ’pass and move’, then he obviously isn’t doing a very good job!!!
Trevor Lynes
8   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:40:57

Report abuse

Our football is the worst in the division along with Stoke City?s. I am embarrassed when we are shown on TV because, apart from the 2nd half against Man Utd, we are the worst side to watch. Invariably we are followed or preceded by two teams displaying flair and passing ability which by comparison make us look like a team of spoilers. How on earth we got a draw against Man Utd is a complete mystery, it's the only time we have had a sustained 45 mins of competitive football so far this season.

Against Fulham today we hit the depths and WON... 'nuff said!!

Dave Jeanrenaud
9   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:47:37

Report abuse

Lee,

I?m not saying that we are playing great football right now. We are not.

However, to suggest that the manager "obviously" does not train his players to pass the ball is just stupid.
Nathan Ward
10   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:46:26

Report abuse

As one of the few who did go to Bolton and then chose not to go today I’ll offer my reasons.

Away games are in my opinion much more fun occasions. The atmosphere in an away end is general good and being part of a much more focused support is a good crac.

I then decided against going today on a cost basis. £32 for a ticket ain’t cheap on a midweek to be followed by that again on a Saturday is a lot when money is getting tight and you do have the option of watching at home.

The standard of football makes little or no difference to me - as bad as it has been I’ve seen plenty of worse over the years.
Tony Marsh
11   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:54:01

Report abuse

Bolton was poor... this was just as bad.

We could so easily be in the bottom 3 tonight but we some how manged to get 6 points in the last 2 games despite playing the most horrendous style of football ever seen by Everton fans. We are now in 7th spot but it's a false position alright.

We don't deserve to be up there on this showing and Fulham should've battered us today. The woodwork is still shaking from some of their efforts and Fulham are the worst away team in the world. Lots of work to be done I think.

Dan Moorhead
12   Posted 01/11/2008 at 20:15:44

Report abuse

I don?t think its down to the football were playing although it is pretty poor at the moment. I?m 22 and my dad started taking me the game in about 91-92 and I?ve seen us with much worse teams than this playing worse football yet the United games would always be sell outs. I think the disillusionment started in the summer when we couldn?t push on in the transfer market and the uneven playing field in our league became even more obvious, this shown in the attendance for the PSV game before the season even began.
Dan Moorhead
13   Posted 01/11/2008 at 20:34:42

Report abuse

Little bit of good news though ? Spurs come back to beat the shite!
Vince Rogers
14   Posted 01/11/2008 at 20:32:25

Report abuse

Tony
You seem disappointed that we?ve won the last 2 games???? Yes, the football is not great, but if we can win games when we are playing awful then once we do click, who knows? There might even be some positivity among these pages.
Anthony Dyer
15   Posted 01/11/2008 at 20:34:34

Report abuse

I think there are a myriad of reasons why people are ?opting? not to attend.

First and foremost the product on offer is not exactly first class.

Secondly the areas surrounding Goodison Park have in effect become no parking zones. We have been parking in the same street for over 20 years which is some distance from Goodison, yet that street has now become a residents permit holder only street.

Thirdly, money is tight and I would argue that many more Evertonians are in employment where weekend working is obligatory rather than voluntary.

Fourthly the transport to Liverpool from outlying areas is less frequent and takes longer than it did some ten years ago.

Last and not least, Sky have hijacked the game and who could argue with someone when they refuse to spend 30 quid or more to watch something they can watch for free in the pub

So, if you take all these factors together plus the lack of real competition, it is no surprise that attendances will start to fall. I am a season ticket holder and more often than not that is the only reason I attend every game.

The clubs have to realise that not every fan is a blind follower, especially when the game can be watched in a variety of ways other than going to the match.
Josh Bernard
16   Posted 01/11/2008 at 19:41:22

Report abuse

Maybe 4,791 people were heavily affected by the credit crunch in the space of a week... from the game against Man Utd to the one against Fulham.
Derek Thomas
17   Posted 01/11/2008 at 20:32:17

Report abuse

Ray; In a vague silver lining way anything that undermines the case for a new stadium and I presume here that you mean DK, is all to the good.

Just off the top of my head but I think that Fulham is always at the lower end of the attendance graph.

One tiny bonus about playing crap and winning is that for some time now we have been playing crap and losing, so I suppose I, very reluctantly, will put it ever so slightly into the glass half-full, with the proviso that, while it is half-full it still tastes like cat's piss.

IT IS NOT ALL ABOUT THE RESULT! Whatever some might say. Football is a business yes, but it is part of the entertainment business.

When was the last time, prior to the United game, you came out smiling? And how long is it since you went away saying this is as good as it gets, that was well worth the money... tip, you won?t have to take your shoes and socks off to count them up.
Richard Dodd
18   Posted 01/11/2008 at 20:54:40

Report abuse

Sky TV is to blame. Two of my closest friends who always come to Goodison decided at lunchtime that they were far too comfortable in the Freshy to make the bloody effort. The game was live and they reasoned they could get a skinful for the price of the in money ? and get a better view. The sooner Prem football in pubs is banned, the sooner gates will recover!
Paul Niklas
19   Posted 01/11/2008 at 21:03:45

Report abuse

Richard, 5000 people below our average is not eonough of an argument to stop Premier football in pubs in the UK or around the world, the economics of it would suggest to me that we would have to lose 50% minimum of our gate money before the issue was taken up with Sky.

Unfortunately they have the game by the bollocks so financially Everton losing about £150k in gate money is well compensated for.

Now clubs like Fulham should be penalised by Sky for their lack of support and Everton given the money, what a joke their support is and only marginally worse than the likes of Wigan, Bolton, Blackburn ? it's clubs like these that impact badly on attendances.

We should in future give them a maximum of 1000 and the remaining 2-3,000 to kids for a pound every every time we play one of these clubs... if we converted 25% of them to season ticket holders in the future it would be good business.
Ray Burns
20   Posted 01/11/2008 at 21:02:58

Report abuse

Why didn't we have some sense at the club and reduce the prices for today's game? £20 adults £10 kids, or even cheaper. I was in the main stand and there were gaps everywhere, I don't think there was 31,000 there ? looked more like about 26,000. Outside you couldn't give tickets away, the football is that dire from Everton that people are being turned off in their droves and I can only see more giving it a miss if we keep serving up that shite. The Premier League in general is pissing people off all over the country ? it's too predictable and over-hyped, I?d be made up if the whole thing went tits up financially and some parity was restored right across the football world. If the credit-crunch continues to bite, crowds will soon diminish and hopefully Sky will fuck off and take all the hangers on with them!
Dave Campbell
21   Posted 01/11/2008 at 21:45:30

Report abuse

Russell - I’m with you mate. The sooner the arse falls out of footie the better. EFC will still exist and so will we. The difference being that it will no longer be overrated, overhyped, overpriced and overbiased.
kev woods
22   Posted 01/11/2008 at 21:45:33

Report abuse

At the moment we seem to be a team with no plan.Our defence do not look like they could pass to a midfielder even if one was in a position to recieve it. The best way i can describe us at the moment is keep it tight at the back,hit the ball long and feed on the scraps, is this what they practice all week? we have very good footballers in arteta pinear yak osman but unless we change our style we will rarely see the best in them.
Michael Kenrick
23   Posted 01/11/2008 at 21:51:41

Report abuse

Bob,

While you are right to an extent about 6 years of shite football, I think Moyes has an enjoyed a tremendous honeymoon period of around 5 years ? oodles of time he was given to ’get it right’. A lot of people ? me included ? thought last season had seen him finally break free of his dour, negative, defensive Scottish shackles... Ha! What a joke.

Then came the summer transfers fiasco and the whole contract fiasco... yea there are a lot of factors. But I would not begrudge anyone the decison to go or not go ? for whatever reason ? that is entirely up to them. And on this site we have a very open policy of not requiring any so-called Everton "credentials" before spouting forth about the game.

In fact I discourage that whole issue. We are Evertonians, we are a global family. Only a small percentage of all Evertonians can actually get to the game ? probably far fewer in fact than are confined to their "armchairs" for one reason or another. Only a limited portion are active users of the internet.

We provide this facility for anyone who wants to express their opinion about the game. We frown on making judgements about the right of our fellow Evertoonians to do that. Sermon over!
John Sreet
24   Posted 01/11/2008 at 21:55:21

Report abuse

Someone above said Fulham should have battered us... what the heck is that all about, that?s simply ridiculous. We were disallowed an obvious penalty, hit the post, all in the first half, which if they were converted would have put Fulham to bed. Yeah it wasn?t great but for goodness sake speak sense or don?t speak at all.
As for the attendance, an early kick-off disallows many who might work Saturday morning, or travel a distance, from attending ? especially as it is Fulham and on the telly.
John Martin
25   Posted 01/11/2008 at 22:08:41

Report abuse

The fact that we are in 7th shows how poor the league is outside the top 4 sides. I believe the reason people aren't going is the cost, the style of football is no worse than it has been for 20 years and anybody who thinks under Smith, Royle, Walker & Kendall (2nd & 3rd time) we were better football side should take the rose tinted specs off. In fact most of the football seen this year has been poor. I sat through Boro v Blackburn last weekend ? 2 hours I?ll never get back, there are probably fans of those clubs bemoaning how poor they are and how everybody else is playing "sexy" football when in reality they aren't.
Bob Turner
26   Posted 01/11/2008 at 22:05:10

Report abuse

Michael

I fully accept that there are plenty of people who are unable, for a multitude of reasons, to attend the ground, and I would never suggest that they should be perceived as anything less than an Evertonian - nor would I suggest that they shouldn’t be allowed to offer their opinion.

What I’m really struggling to understand is how anyone could choose NOT to go if they are able to, because they don’t like the football/Bill Kenwright/David Moyes/lack of signings/crap results - particularly if they then complain about what they saw on the TV.

I know if there’s anyone who’s reading this who fits this description won’t lose any sleep over this, but if someone can’t be bothered to go when you’re in the position that, as you say, a lot of people who are Evertonians would love to be in, then I’m not going to treat their comments with the same respect as someone who did go.
Doug Walters
27   Posted 01/11/2008 at 23:32:17

Report abuse

Who cares? No-one remembers the performance, just the result. We are 7th, 3 games unbeaten we are starting to keep clean sheets. The quality will come again with the return in confidence which isn?t helped by low quiet crowds at home. We should just get over ourselves and support our team and maybe they will play better.

31,000 at home is a disgrace no matter how we are playing. Our negative support is affecting the team.

Colin Hughes
28   Posted 01/11/2008 at 23:48:51

Report abuse

The truth is we need to attract more local support; the redshite have it waiting in abundance whilst I'm the only one in my street who ever goes near Goodison despite tickets being readily available. What happened to the days (80s and 90s) when the number 19 bus used to be so chocker it would miss out 3-4 stops ? Now it's empty when I'm on it. Come on fellow scousers we used to be well represented in this city even when the redshite swept all before them.
Ric Wallace
29   Posted 02/11/2008 at 00:13:18

Report abuse

I think your all missing the point, especially Michael.

Our lower attendances are due in the main to the effects of the credit crunch. Tightening of the pursestrings means families now have a lot less to spend ? and so people will make obvious cutbacks. When we are playing shite like today, yes I agree Michael, people will not go, but I?m sure there would have been a couple thousand more if people had anything other than mothballs in their pockets.

Man City have had odd attendances, ranging from the high (Robinho transfer) to the bizarrely low. I have no doubt if we were playing as well as Villa and flying high, the fans would find other cutbacks and come to Goodison, but I think you?ll find in general all attendances will suffer in some form from the current economic climate. The more financially astute (i.e. not Everton) will find ways of still drawing fans in for matches.
Gavin Ramejkis
30   Posted 02/11/2008 at 00:22:14

Report abuse

Well, I didn?t go today, giving up my seat yet again to help my three-year-old son regain confidence at swimming lessons. Do I regret it? Not for a heartbeat, having listened to the commentary after we left swimming, we sounded shite and the 4-5-1 at home against the worst away side in the league strengthened my opinion that dour football and the growing belief that DM simply isn?t a "winner".

Look at Spurs in just two games under a manager who wants his teams to play football... and tell me that today Stoke deciding to go for it against Arsenal after taking the lead isn?t exactly what Everton should have done instead of shitting themselves and being ordered to defend deep and get tonked?

The football is abysmal to watch and the credit crunch is rightly turning many regulars off from watching. Six years and counting to learn from mistakes and play football with the conviction you can and should win games isn?t much to ask for.
Bob Turner
31   Posted 02/11/2008 at 00:32:02

Report abuse

So Gavin, just for the record, the reason you didn’t go was because you don’t approve of the style of football?
Garry Corgan
32   Posted 02/11/2008 at 02:19:10

Report abuse

I?ll offer a couple of slightly different possibilities for the 31,000 crowd against Fulham - just to throw them into the mix.

  • It?s our third game in a week. Second at home. A dear-do and maybe a bit of football burnout for a lot of fans.

  • It?s half term at a lot of schools in the area. Maybe certain parents decided to do something with the kids?

I?m not suggesting either possibility is correct but combine them with most of the above and that?s probably why the ground was 9,000 below capacity.
Clyde McPhat
33   Posted 02/11/2008 at 03:17:17

Report abuse

I?m going for the perfect storm theory here. 3 Matches in a week, MU here last Saturday, Fulham is a horrible opponent, we are unbelievably bad to watch, it was on Sky, and the economy is hurting us. I like the idea of cutting the prices for this fixture next year. I think our marketing is horrible and our ticket management skills are absolutely bottom of the table. Plus, I still can?t believe we went 4-5-1 at home against Fulham.... lower the ticket prices.
Lee Smith
34   Posted 02/11/2008 at 02:15:22

Report abuse

Not strictly Everton related, but with all the recent talk on ToffeeWeb about the Sky influence with regards to attendances at Goodison and other grounds, I thought you may like to see the new advert for Sky Sports, which should be airing sometime tomorrow! Enjoy.....

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6667QeZevg4

Gavin Ramejkis
35   Posted 02/11/2008 at 09:36:14

Report abuse

Bob Turner, for the record I had a choice for the last two weeks: my three-year-old son has swimming lessons on Saturday mornings; having nearly drowned in one, his confidence is shot to pieces so I go in the pool with him then we stay in the pool after his lesson and we keep practicing what he has learnt. Staying in the pool with him makes it difficult to get to pick up my regular passengers and the match so my choice of helping my son or watch the team I love play shite uninteresting football is a no contest. Do you go to the game, Bob?
Kevin Mitchell
36   Posted 02/11/2008 at 09:55:07

Report abuse

The poor attendences this season IMO are due to most of us having a bad feeling of the direction the club is taking. For me, the Kirkby thing is grinding away my love of the club I?ve supported all my life. Put on top of that what didn?t happen in the summer, quality of football and the obvious credit problems.

Why Moyes thinks we can play good football without a functioning midfield who can pass the ball to each other is a mystery. He got out of jail big time yesterday via Saha. To replace Fellaini with Cahill in center mid and Pienaar with Anichebe on the right wing was the act of a man who wasn?t watching the game.

Julie Naybour
37   Posted 02/11/2008 at 10:01:34

Report abuse

Lee, yes - you are right, the terrible football did come first. I think the frustration originating from the summer of discontent transformed to anger when the season started, especially when we were so appalling. And I don?t expect the crowd to act like a family in The Waltons when people are paying a lot of hard earned money to see them. I also agree that freedom of speech is essential. The fans have a right to make thier feelings known.

HOWEVER, I think it?s a question of balance and I think it?s important to say the negativity has gone too far and is in danger of being unfairly detrimental and obscuring the acknowledgement of any positives.

I agree with Tony Marsh (did i really just say that?) in as much as we are lucky to be 7th. But it?s not all luck and who doesn?t need some luck. There has been improvement: The passing has a long way to go but it?s a hell of a lot better than it was, as is the determination to get the ball and desire to win appears far more evident.

But the biggest factor I see in evidence is the lack of confidence and I think they fear their own fans, which is a sad state of affairs. So don?t underestimate the power of this website ? it has a far reaching influence amongst the fans and I?m sure is known to the club personnel be it players, manager or someone from the press office.

This is a very crucial point in the season and we could begin to gain momentum. The fans have their part to play in that and support and positivity could go a long way to helping restore some confidence, some pride and ultimately some level of success.

Ray Robinson
38   Posted 02/11/2008 at 10:58:46

Report abuse

Speaking as someone who rarely misses a game, home or away, I?m probably not the best person to assess why people are staying away but a detached view tells me that:

a) Money is getting tighter and even reduced prices is no consolation to someone who has lost (or is about to) their job ? not that reducing prices is bad thing;

b) We?re not regenerating sufficiently by attracting the support of enough new fans;

c) The close season transfer fiasco highlighted the club?s limited ambition / ability to compete;
d) The style of football is not entertaining;

e) The shadow of Destination Kirkby has disgruntled many traditionalists;
f) Sky is having a massive negative effect ? how about a kick-off at 3pm on a Saturday anyone?
g) People are generally getting disillusioned (Hull City fans apart) with the same old 4 winning things all the time.

There are some things that we can?t influence but b, c, d and e are combining to shroud the club in negativity which is persuading some people to stay away. I offer no answers here but the club needs to address these issues if we?re going to avoid a sub 30,000 home league attendance at some point this season

Rupert Coghlan
39   Posted 02/11/2008 at 11:07:04

Report abuse

I?m just amazed at where all this talk about terrible football has come from ? god knows we?re not spreading it around like Arsenal (where has this got them in the last four years? btw). Some people must have very short memories ? Claus Thomsen, Carl TIler, Marc Hottiger etc etc etc. Thumping the ball up the park in the hope it would hit Campbell and run off to Gemmill or whoever. First half at Arsenal we were the ones playing the football ironically.

On the whole yesterday, we played, or at least tried to play good football. What was lacking was the final pass on every occasion, apart from the goal of course. That comes with confidence, which we still don?t have yet. It also comes from not having any wingers, something we are really paying for this year. One other possible reason? I?ve never heard Goodison so stale and quiet in my life and the only time there is a noise it?s 30,000 groaning at one mislaid pass (yes unfortunately there were a few too many yesterday). However, it?s not helping.

I know it?s been a very poor 6-9 months off the pitch, and not much better on it, but we need to get behind the Blues, realign our expectations (we simply don?t have the players to play Copacabana football) and push on to stay in the top 8/ top 10.
Ed Fitzgerald
40   Posted 02/11/2008 at 10:53:35

Report abuse

Julie
It is ludicrous to blame the fans for the team?s lack of confidence and poor form. A summer of mismanagement at all levels within inside the club left us with the laughable situation of entering a campaign with new players who barely knew each other, never mind fitting into a system of play. How is that the fans fault?

Everton Football Club have enjoyed loyal and consistent support from its fan base over many years, in fact perhaps we have been too loyal because, let?s face it, we have tolerated some awful football over the last 15+ years that would have brought a rain of cushions and more verbal protests had it been served up in the 70s or 80s. If you doubt the loyalty, check out the attendances through the 90s then look at the league position and goals scored column.

Derek is right, football is as much about entertainment as it is about winning and we are one of the worst sides to watch in the Premier League and have always been. I heard a silver-haired gent ranting to himself yesterday in the Park End about it being a disgrace to play 4-5-1 at home against Fulham; he opined why don?t we (the supporters) care more? He was met with a stony silence. The quality of our football is like the ?Elephant in the Room? ? we all know it's dreadful but (in contrast to your opinion Julie) the fans don?t complain loudly enough. Quiet compliance and an acceptance of mediocrity have become defining features of being an Evertonian.

Before you start slating the fans' loyalty, you need to think about Mr Moyes's loyalty ? who prevaricated over signing a massive contract before apparently receiving reassurances over how the club would be run. Some Evertonians (misguided in my opinion) think the world will collapse if David Moyes wasn?t out manager I really don?t believe this would be the case. I want Moyes to be successful at Everton but I also think it?s high time he delivered some progressive ATTACKING football on a consistent basis.

Tony Williams
41   Posted 02/11/2008 at 12:02:01

Report abuse

Many many reasons why the crowd was so low and the two camps (ant & pro Moyes) will use different ones to show why it is.

The fact is that no one except the people who usually go and now don?t will know why.

Fulham is and always has been a crap game; if I didn?t have a season ticket I wouldn?t go to it ? especially with it being on telly and most importantly the fact that Fulham only brought about 150 fans will have a massive effect on the attendance.

Third game in a week; crap opponents and we are not playing well... it?s not surprising the numbers are down, even Marsh has resorted back to type after his unexpected post following the Man Utd game, we have won our last 2 but he still finds time to see the negatives.... "we are lucky to be 7th and it?s a false position"!!!!! ? behave lad, you sound like the bellends from over the park when you talk like that.
Bob Turner
42   Posted 02/11/2008 at 12:08:15

Report abuse

Gavin, I have a season ticket, so yes I go
Ged Dwyer
43   Posted 02/11/2008 at 11:48:47

Report abuse

Even though I went myself, the attendance of just over 31,000 says it all. Evertonians are fed up of watching a team with no balance, no heart, no great individuals, no direction and bit-part players struggling through each game.

Yakubu can put some chances away but his all round game is not good enough. No effort and poor first touch. When Vaughan comes on he instantly puts pressure on the opponents' defence because he's willing to run. Cahill has tremendous enthusiasm and can score but as a midfielder his passing is limited.

Osman is neat on the ball but is in and out all through the game and we can forget about him when we play a big team. Arteta (the latest scapegoat) is still being played out of position and we lack a proper wide man. Lescott doesn't want to be played at left back.

Fellaini has won some of the crowd over with his goals but for £15m his midfield play still looks average and he is not as effective as the likes of Bullard, Sidwell or Malbranque who would have been much cheaper options in the summer. Neville does a decent job at right back but the manager thinks he's a midfielder.

Coupled with the managers lack of tactical ability and overall nouse, too many people now realise we are going nowhere. We'll string together a little run and then, sure as eggs are eggs, there will be another dip/disaster around the corner. And since the chairman gave Moyes 5 more years, some fans have given up. I can't blame them as I think we all now know that Moyes just isn't good enough to be in charge at Everton.

Some of us will admit it; some of us won't... but more and more kids are wearing red shirts. LFC have a bigger waiting list for season tickets each year and we have 30,000 diehards left while our chairmen still wants a ridiculous new stadium in Kirkby. He should be far more concerned about the dreadfull football we play which is driving our supporters away from the club.

What sums Moyes up for me is if he'd kept Carsley by giving him the 2-year contract he wanted and then signed no one in the summer the team would have been stronger. That shows how pathetic his transfer dealings have been.

Even if they haven't got that much money, please please please let there be a buyer of the club out there who has the common sense to end this ridiculous cycle of us going nowhere and stop the worry of what the next disaster will be because me and thousands of other Evertonians are fed up of it.

Tony Williams
44   Posted 02/11/2008 at 14:27:36

Report abuse

So in short Ged we are shit and Moyes is useless?

Moyes?s transfer dealings are pathetic and he has no nouse? Obviously your hatred in Moyes is so entrenched that a debate about this would be meaningless.
Ged Dwyer
45   Posted 02/11/2008 at 15:14:38

Report abuse

Tony Williams - if you can’t understand the point I’m making there’s no hope. If there was something exciting going on at Everton there would have been more than 31,000 at Goodison. The Kenwright Moyes partnership is slowly draining Everton’s support which is not good for our future. I make the point not out of hatred for anyone but because I care about Everton Football Club.
Neil Adderley
46   Posted 02/11/2008 at 15:36:38

Report abuse

There are a myriad of reasons for the (not so steady) drop in attendance at Goodison. Most of which have been thouroughly covered above.

Personally, I am no longer willing to subsidise the tenure of Bill Kenwright.
Tony Williams
47   Posted 02/11/2008 at 15:47:55

Report abuse

Or maybe, just maybe Ged, 3 games in a week means some fans would chose only one.

As I mentioned earlier I wouldn’t have gone to watch us play Fulham yesterday if I didn’t have a season ticket. It is always a boring, skilless game

All your post did was slag of Yakubu, Osman, Fellaini and Moyes (the last one for not giving an ageing midfielder a 2 year contract)

We know what to expect from Everton under Moyes and have done for years now so what makes this season any different?
Gavin Ramejkis
48   Posted 02/11/2008 at 15:55:39

Report abuse

Bob, I also have a season ticket and, like me, you?ve probably had yours for years too but are getting fed up ? sick of bullshit Bill, the ginger misery, and being able to guess nine times out of ten which Everton side I have already paid to go and watch: the start of the season - the reserves and kids... and as we have gotten into the season, a ragtag team with no shape and a manager without the winning edge or ability to make game-changing substitutions until it's too late and the game is already beyond reach.

It doesn?t stop me loving the club ? just not how it is right this moment.
Ged Dwyer
49   Posted 02/11/2008 at 16:47:37

Report abuse

Tony Williams - If we had an exciting team, 3 games (one away actually) in a week would mean 40,000 at Goodison. I went to the Fulham game also because I have a season ticket. The point is I should be looking forward to watching Everton play anyone. I don?t because the football is dreadful.I didn?t slag off the Yak, Osman or Fellaini. I said they all have weakness?s to their game which adds up to an unbalanced incomplete team.

?We know what to expect from Everton under Moyes?. Exactly. It?s not good enough. With just a bit more from the manager we could have finished above Liverpool the last two seasons. Imagine how it would have damaged them financially and helped us no end. Instead we had a manager boosting the squad last January by bringing Gardner to the club. It?s pathetic.

Yes, I would have given the ageing Carsley a 2-year contract as he knew his job and did it well and I would have used £15m to bring in Sidwell, Bullard and Malbranque to strengthen our midfield properly well before the season started.

If you still don?t understand, forget it mate.

Tony Williams
50   Posted 02/11/2008 at 17:17:28

Report abuse

Understand what? That you are pissed off with Moyes and his tactics, or that we have been gash for the last few months? I know that, I know it?s not good enough and it?s a combination of all our "star" players playing like they have just learned about footie from a book and perhaps questionable tactics (however sticking with a system that has brought you Europe in 3 out of 4 years isn?t that questionable and bringing back one of our most influential players into the side isn?t either).

Yes we look crap but as I mentioned earlier, I wouldn?t attend a Fulham game if I didn?t have a season ticket.

Last season's attendence was only 32,743 so not that much of a difference this year, then again a lot of posters here don?t let the facts get in the way of a good moan.
Anthony Newell
51   Posted 02/11/2008 at 18:01:50

Report abuse

Ged, you are absolutely spot on ? I?m completely fed up now and bordering on giving up completely and that says something given the amount of shit I?ve been prepared to tolerate in the past. 5 more years of this dour Moyes shit is a self-imposed sentence of misery with the occasional bright spot. I?m not sure my finances, wife or mental state are prepared to tolerate it. Only a new buyer with the vision to radically overhaul the club from top to bottom can change this situation and until then it?s make do and mend.
Ben Greenwood
52   Posted 02/11/2008 at 19:44:06

Report abuse

Ged,

You say you want an exciting team but you wanted £15m spent on Malbanque, Sidwell and Bullard and wanted Carsley given a two-year contract.

I despair. I really do.

Ged Dwyer
53   Posted 02/11/2008 at 22:38:44

Report abuse

Ben Greenwood - So you wanted last minute signings, a not ready Fellaini for £15m, 3 home league defeats including a Derby humiliation and being knocked out of two cups did you? At least with the players I mentioned we had a realistic chance of having a decent start to the season with the possibility of then having time to look for a decent winger. You should be in despair at what’s gone on for the last 3 months mate.
Ben Greenwood
54   Posted 03/11/2008 at 20:53:41

Report abuse

I am not saying that. The derby was indeed a disgrace BUT those three are not the answer. I don’t know what happened in the summer apart from it being very wrong but to be better than we are we need to aim higher than Sidwell and the rest.

Whether we can get better than Sidwell remains to be seen.
Ged Dwyer
55   Posted 03/11/2008 at 22:53:15

Report abuse

Ben - The point made was that the money available could have been used better. The 3 midfielders I mentioned would have helped us if bought early enough in the summer. There was others we could have gone for but with the injuries we had we needed decent players in early.

It?s obvious to everyone that Carsley hasn?t been replaced so it was best to keep him until a replacement like Sidwell had settled in. He didn?t need to stay for two years but we did need him at the start of this season. We have to be realistic and shape a side and give it the right balance as we don?t have loads of money. Something Moyes doesn?t have a clue about. His fixation on making the ?big? signing cost us dearly at the start of the season and yes players like Sidwell, Bullard and Malbranque would have helped, and they are players who can actually pass to a team mate! Moyes ?aimed higher? as you put it and look what happened. A disastrous start.

Paul Johnson
56   Posted 06/11/2008 at 18:14:06

Report abuse

In response to Michael Kenrick's comments. "Die hard" and "fair weather" can anyone please explain. If you go every game it doesn't mean you don't love the club any more than someone who only goes 5 times a season. I know people who have supported the team for over 50 years who refuse to go now. It doesn't mean they don't love the club any less than the guy who goes every week.

The problem I find is there is a general apathy for the game as a whole that stems from the fact that we are not Everton Football Club now but Everton plc and rather than be a top six side we are a mid-table business. As with all businesses, if you offer a poor level of service you struggle to keep your head above water. If Everton are to become a success, we need to get back to entertaining people/offering value for money, otherwise the club's situation will only get worse. Gates will continue to fall (I have been in Goodison with only 11,000 other "diehards") and we won't be a viable proposition.

Michael Kenrick
57   Posted 06/11/2008 at 20:52:27

Report abuse

Paul, I’m not sure what needs explaining about "diehards" and "fair-weather" fans. They are generalizations at best for what is in reality a wide spectrum of emotions and levels of commitment when it comes to being an Everton supporter.

Not sure I get the relevance of this old hackneyed point about Everton being a business... they have been a business since 1880 or thereabouts and the name of the business is "Everton Football Club Co Ltd." There is no such thing as "Everton plc". They are a business, they need to operate as a business.... some feel they need to, nay MUST operate far better as a business.

I don’t think you can get too hung up on raw attendance numbers to be honest: they are what they are. Plenty of different factors to consider, as this thread shows. It is funny you can’t see the irony in your last sentence though: Everton have had low attendances... and survivied. It’s the old caveat though: past performance is no guarantee of future returns... especially in this day and age!

© ToffeeWeb