The Mail Bag
Moyes & his super subs
Comments (36)
Well another match passes, we get another 3 points, allways nice, but how many are happy with the drivel that we are constantly being fed?
Our motto of nil satis nisi optimum should be hidden off our crest at the moment, as what we are being subjected to is nothing more than a disgrace. WE DESERVE BETTER, a better run club, a better new stadium within the city boundaries, better management & better performances from a load of overpaid prima donnas.
For too long now, we have sat back & watched Moyes make mistake after mistake, be it team formations, team selections, but to watch the match on saturday v Fulham & see the pitiful way our subs pan out (Saha excluded, he should of been on from the start), how in the world can you take off Pienaar, a wide midfield player & replace him with a centre forward who in my opinion is nothing more than a poor-man's Heskey is beyond me.
I don't know what Baines has done to upset the Moyesiah, but wouldn't it have made more sense to swap Arteta to the right as he was totally ineffective on the left & to play Baines as an out-and-out left winger. But surely this is too simple, surely the groans of 31,000 when the change was made should have told Moyes that he hasn't got a clue what's going on.
Now I know there's going to be fellow blues who will read this & will state that 2 clean sheets & 6 points is all that matters, but translate our motto ? "nothing but the best will suffice" ? seems a long long way away from recent performances. As I've already stated, WE DESERVE A LOT MORE THAN THE DRIVEL THAT WE ARE CONSTANTLY BEING SERVED UNDER MOYES!
Gary Lawler, Posted 04/11/2008 at 23:17:21
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
But you are right, I don?t know how we still serve up poor football when you look at the players we have. Or that subs are always a desperate throw of the dice. I?d love to see a game of 90 mins of good football and a resounding win, we seem to get one of those once a season, and we need one now to pick up everyone's spirits.
I was with you all the way until the bit about the overpaid prima donnas. Sadly these are the reason throughout the game that you will never again get your wishes.
Now that way of playing and the staff that he recruited to play it have been made redundant by the heightened expectations, which are there solely because of how well Moyes has done to this point.
Now, you can call me a Moyes apologist if you like, but up to the end of last season he has arguably been one of the best managers in the Premiership.
Now, we sustained pressure for 2 seasons on the top 4/6 and we’re looking to improve, as is normal. Moyes’ challenge is a new one. Suddenly, UEFA qualification and a bit of a cup run is no longer appreciated, but it is expected. We’re waiting to see how Moyes is going to break Everton into the top-4. It’s the next step and something we all want and expect Moyes to be working at, which again is completely normal.
However, this new challenge is a massively different one from that of the past 3 or 4 years. Moyes has produced a side which don’t play nice football, but get results. I’m not going to argue the point here, between entertainment and results, people want different things. I personally like to see us play good passing football like the middle 3rd of last season. But I will most certainly settle for flat-out commitment and a battling, unattractive performance if it gets us the points, when necessary.
Moyes is going to need a year or 2 to adjust to his new task. We have playing staff that are not up to the job of breaking the top-4 spots. Moyes, in general, has been doing things right. We have Yakubu, Arteta, Pienaar, Cahill, Yobo, Jags, Lescott, Hibbert and Howard all coming into what should be the ’peak’ years of their careers. We have Vaughan, Victor, Fellaini, Baines and Baxter with many years ahead of them and a few old heads to supplement that.
In signing his 5-year contract, Moyes is very likely to be here for a while to come and it is likely that the next couple of years might not be the best, while he reshuffles his deck in order to begin the assault on the CL spots. Very few teams are capable of making a steady transition even when at the top, look at Arsenal, since their unbeaten season.
Personally, I’ll give Moyes until the end of next season to shift things around and prove that he can make the step up. Though I might not be happy about what happens before that and I want us to provide some form of achievement this year, these things take time and I’m realistic about that.
You obviously didn't go on Saturday or you?d know what I said was accurate. I noticed you couldn't challenge any of the points I made. Why doesnt that surprise me?
Shane
Everyone's entitled to an opinion and my opinion is Gary is talking shite. I?m getting sick to death of people who never go near GP criticising kids they clealy know nothing about.
The reason we play shite football is down to ONE man & ONE man only....DAVID MOYES !!
The manager of any/every team dictates the tactics and pattern of play...that’s his job...and if he doesnt then he shouldnt be there.
In the last 3yrs his tactics have ruined 2 proven goalscorers and he is well on the way to ruining a third.
He was a journeyman centre half as a player and his management style and tactics reflect this in our style of play....it’s called percentage football I believe.
Constantly playing people out of position and never admitting when you’ve made a mistake will never lead to a settled football playing team.
FFS he’s now trying to get us to believe that Osman is a holding midfield player....what’s that all about !!
Despite the 6pts from the last two games the performance in both games was absolutely DIRE !!! ( as have all but 45 mins against Man U)....but get used to it cos that’s all you’re gonna get for the next 5yrs.....HOOOOOFFFF !!
Pienaar was having a mare on Saturday and deserved to be pulled.
Why should Saha have been on from the start?, by all reports he was gash on Wednesday.
Why do we derseve better? especially fans who don?t even offer any financial aid to the club.
Totally ridiculous title aswell, if Saha hadn?t have scored the winner on Saturday it would have been better. The fact that the change made by Moyes resulted in a win just completely negates the dig at his subs.
Just another one in the long line of posts issued because we are pissed off with the start of the season, but ironically we seem to be moaning more now since we have had two wins on the bounce......funny fans we have.
Playing people out of position to ?do a job for the team? and aimlessly punting the ball upfield to no-one in particular can be seen in any park on every Sunday morning up and down the country..... now we get it EVERY Saturday/Sunday/Monday/Thursday whenever Everton are palying.
The majority of you are obviously happy with the way Moyes plays the game... unfortunately I?m not.
Don?t you think you?re being a bit hard on a Blue who can?t get to the game? Let?s be honest, you see far more of the game on television than you do going to the match where the biggest benefit is the atmosphere. When there is one, that is.
You also say "Pienaar is one of my favourite players, but face facts, he was having one on Saturday and deserved to be dragged off" " I think that is not the general opinion of his performance, I think Pienaar's biggest problem is that he?s mentally too quick for some of his teamates, witness the ball inside the fullback on a couple of occasions when Arteta, Osman etc. where caught out by his quickness of thought. In an attacking side full of movement he would be an outstanding player.
Gary Lawler makes some valid points, I suggest YOU re-read HIS comments again before putting the boot in. And before you say it, I WAS at the match watching that shite, in my usual season ticket seat in Gwladys St, where I first started 50 years ago.
Absoutely brainless stuff.
Looks like I will be on a fact finding mission again today. There was a good post sent yesterday detailing the Yaks last 5 seasons....and guess what? Last season he scored the most he has ever scored in a season....hmmmm ruining him you say?
Beattie was a crap forward who has one good year with the Saints and AJ, as we were constantly reminded by his detractors on this site, was also apparantly shite with no first touch and terrible at one-on-ones (which he was), he was brought up from the Fizzy Drink league and didn?t make it... but if you want to blame Moyes for it I will lose no sleep.
What exactly has going to the game got to do with being able to give a decent analysis?
Are you another one of these twats who thinks that an obscure view of the back of some imbecile's head makes you qualified to dismiss other people's opinions?
It’s not a dig at Cahill, it’s a dig at his misuse.
For practical reasons Everton will re-name themselves Kirkby Town. EFC will sell all the better players to pay off their debts. For good measure and to be totally pragmatic they will cease to be a Football Club and play another sport where the competition is not so fierce and difficult.
The motto is not an albatross to be dismissed when it doesn?t suit; it is a maxim to attempt to live up to and no amount of revisionist historians can take away the great football that this club has served up in the past... if not the present.
If ever a post revealed what the ?Everton Way? really means then yours is the most accurate and the one most likely to lead to the total demise of what Everton Football Club has been and what it should be.
If Baines is going to play, play him at left back where he’s a very effective player. That’s the only gripe I have with Moyes at the moment. Lescott is lacking confidence and Baines deserves a go.
The groans just proved how clueless alot of Evertonians are, how easily they are willing to turn on there own without diving them a chance to prove themselves. In Moyes’s case prove he can change a game and revert to a different system.
We where struggling in a 4-5-1 and a 4-4-2, that was quite obvious. We couldn’t boss Fulham as we simply don’t have the midfielders. It’s a shame but that’s the truth.
So what do you do? Do you try and play through midield or do you get as many people forward and go for a direct route? We went for the direct route. We went for it and it worked, the players who came on changed the game.
He can’t really win to be honest. No matter what his subs where like against Fulham. The crowd where getting restless at the players inibility to break down Fulham and they took it out on Moyes.
I have a go when there’s something to have a go at. At the end of the day we won the game and Saha changed the game.
I remember the 1969-70 Champions and whilst for the majority of games they were a joy to watch, I can recall some not so attractive games e.g. 1-0 v Nott?m Forest and a couple of 0-0 draws in Jan or Feb 1970 v Newcastle and Coventry. The point is sometimes you have to "win ugly" as some of the TV pundits would put it.
A mate of mine who is into Aussie Rules (he has actually written a book on the subject ? The Full Points Footy Encylopedia) was telling me of the recent Grand Final where it seems that the better team lost (apologies if you like Hawthorn!!).
In any team sport, there are times when you just have to keep plugging away and win even when not at your best. At least the last 3 results, v Man Utd, Bolton and Fulham, should go some way to boost the teams? confidence ? hopefully the attractive football will follow.
It really winds me up when people moan about Moyes - it doesn?t matter who we get, we ain?t got the cash. Another manager might take us down and that would deffo be the fuckin? end of that. Think of it from that perspective lad.
Go and put some snags on the bar-b....!!!!!!!!!!!
It's lucky our motto isn?t that of Rangers or Villa as this season, yet again, we were not "ready" or "prepared".
Last time I checked you weren’t the editor of this website. Whether someone has been to the game, watched it on tv, listened to it on the radio or read the match report in the ’effin paper, they are entitled to their opinion.
I’d be interested for you to fully explain how going to the game, which I did, gives me more of a right to comment than someone who watched it on tv?
It’s always worth stepping back and looking at the bigger picture for a second, DM has one of the most limited budgets in terms of expenditure and wages in the Premier League and yet he has assemebled, in my eyes, what is a very talented squad of players albeit who aren’t on top form at the moment. So ask yourself this: if, 5 years ago, when he was first appointed he said he could guide us to 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th placed finishes, would you have believed him or would you have collapsed laughing into your unbelievably hot half time pie? Further more, would you have been willing to put a tenner on it? Because I’m telling you, given the state we were in that would have been one hell of a set of odds.
Jesus Christ, give the guy a break.
So, in summing this up, I believe I get a better view of the football we play than you do. As for talking shite, you might want to read some of your posts & take a chill pill pal!
Let me get this straight, so there can be no misunderstanding: I have no doubt in my mind you are entitled to an opinion, at no stage have I said you're not ? despite what the post-twisting rewriters that populate these pages have said ? read my post.
My problem with your article is you don't just disagree with the substitution, you go on to attack one of our youngsters ? Big Vic ? which is talking shite in my book. I don't think you?ve seen enough to make such a statement. I actually tell you this clear as day.
One point I would pick you and others up on is that you say you get a better view of the game than me... you don't. I see all of the pitch, all of the time, I see people drifting offside, I see forwards making intelligent runs ? or not in the Yak's case ? I see injuries, I see subs warming up, I see crowd reactions, feuds develop between players, possible passes, opportunities to create opportunities, the list is endless. I can actually see all of these things at the same time.
When I watch it on the telly, I see what a cameraman allows me to see, I might see it in slow mo, I might see it from 5 different angles, I might see it 20 times, but the TV companies dictate what I get to see and they can only show me one thing at a time.
Btw, I took the trouble to read your article again, Garry, and if I put aside my annoyance ? the bit where you talk shite about Big Vic ? I think you're pretty much on the money, for what it's worth.
And on the subject of the quality of football - I didn?t see too many moans from Man Utd fans after a 4-3 win over Hull, with Hull coming back from 4-1 down to give them a bit of a fright. Sometimes you have to "win ugly " - NO team plays brilliant attacking/attractive/entertaining football every match.
While you?re watching something else is it not possible that you miss something others might see?
Of course not... but then again, everyone?s entitled to an opinion... as long as it doesn?t run contrary to yours.
ps: Televisions have inventions nowadays where amazingly you can see the whole of the pitch... FROM A HELL OF A BETTER POSITION THAN YOU?RE IN!
I see all of the playing area all of the time. It's not as you keep saying, an obstructed view, nor do I look at the back of some imbecile's head, as you?ve also convinced yourself. I sit in the front row and the guy infront of me is 25ft below me.
While you're watching some fat Geordie chairman drink a pint in one, I have a panoramic view of a captain bollocking some lazy midfielder for not tracking back.
While you're watching SAF chewing his gum I?m watching feuds develop between players, arguments between team mates, tactical discusions etc . . No camera man is dictating what I watch.
While you're driven mad by some biased git of a comentator as you watch your deodorised snapshot of the game, I?m witnessing everything.
And while I?m watching Lescot play left back for a total of 900 minutes you don't even know he was playing.
Enjoy MOTD by all means but don't delude yourself that you have a better view than me.
What wrong? You don?t like presumptions on how people see the match? Surprising revelation, considering your posts are littered with them.
MOTD eh! Never watch it, never will.
ps: The day you hear me commenting on something I don?t see is the day you can call me uninformed.
pps: Astute? Perhaps you should have a word with your cat.
You commented on Lescott's appearances, well there are 10 games there that you didn't see, so yes your uninformed. Perhaps Lineker, Lawrenson or Hansen just glossed over them...


1 Posted 05/11/2008 at 05:48:10
Report abuse
I love it when people who don't even go to the game start slagging off our kids, especially as Vic did more in a few minutes than the two "superstars" did all afternoon, give them a chance or go and watch Aussies rules.
The footbal is dire, but try to understand the reason for that instead of talking shite.