The Mail Bag

£30M or shut up...

Comments (49)

By which Bill means offer us £20M(ish) and the man is all yours! (This is of course based on the Rooney deal of a few years ago). Makes me wonder if we've already done a deal regarding Joleon as we seem to be bidding money we don't have for Cana and Naughton, and Jo came back with a little too much fuss hanging around on that loan deal.

Something just sits at the back of my mind that BK has agreed to keep it lowkey so City can chase Terry...?

Paraniod, in Surrey
Adam Carey, Surrey     Posted 19/07/2009 at 15:05:22

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Dan Walker
1   Posted 19/07/2009 at 21:12:11

Report abuse

Lescott wouldn’t have played on Saturday if a deal had already been done.

If he does end up leaving, then it’s in our interest to make a few signings before then anyway. If it’s common knowledge that we’ve had a big windfall then other clubs will just hold us to ransom over any players we try to sign after that.
Andy Mack
2   Posted 19/07/2009 at 21:17:58

Report abuse

The Jo loan deal is a bit of a coup, since Fulham made an offer to buy outright and I don’t think City will find any room in the squad for him anytime in the future with their rate of purchasing of strikers...

Leads me to believe that the £30mill tag will end up being £15mill plus Jo somewhere along the negotiation line, maybe in the next window when Jags will be back? I’d like to say "gentlemen’s agreement" but City have shown little of that conduct in their behaviour recently.

I’d be OK with that. A striker we couldn’t afford and were chasing a year or so back, and money and time to get another CB (or money to the banks).

Mark Pendleton
3   Posted 19/07/2009 at 21:28:12

Report abuse

Let’s not have the BK haters jump on this one whatever the outcome. The fact is that, despite the club’s debts (let’s put aside the potential investor issue), BK has given Moyes perhaps more cash than we can realistically afford in the hope we’ll achieve, which we have been.

If Lescott goes it will be because he does want to go to City for the cash / because they may well be chasing honours this season given the cash they’re throwing at it. If that happens then it looks like we’ll get a simply massive profit on him, which I firmly believe BK will allow Moyes to pump straight back into the squad. And if it does happen, I firmly believe Moyes will have the final say.

Alan Clarke
4   Posted 19/07/2009 at 21:30:19

Report abuse

Andy, where did you hear Fulham made a bid for Jo? I heard a very unsubstantiated link once in the press. I think we did that deal with no reference to Lescott.

Like Dan said why would Lescott have played and travelled out to the US? Why would Moyes have said on Wednesday night that he won’t be selling any first team players? Why did Hughes remark on Radio 5 this morning that City had only "made contact with Everton" and things were similar to the Terry situation in that we had rejected the bid?

It’s all a conspiracy and they’re all out to get me! The level of paranoia amongst some Blues is unbelievable, I’m not sure some of you don’t need to see a psychiatrist.
Matthew Lovekin
5   Posted 19/07/2009 at 21:42:25

Report abuse

Adam,

Give Bill a break. There has been no deal done and we are trying our best to keep Lescott. If we get £30m for Lescott, then Bill will still get slated for selling him. If we get a billionaire investor, Bill will get criticised for the investor being foreign, or having no interest in Everton. If we win the Premier League and FA Cup this season, Bill will still get criticised for not spending money.

Stop finding petty and pathetic reasons to criticise him. Who would you rather have in charge, Peter Johnson? Mike Ashley?
Adam Carey
6   Posted 19/07/2009 at 21:43:43

Report abuse

I’m not a BK hater but it just feels kind of de ja vu-like since this statement regarding Lescott’s value has hit the press.
A £15M profit on a player is not to be griped at and I’d happily accept it if we built up the squad with 2 or 3 good players in return.
John Martin
7   Posted 19/07/2009 at 22:28:08

Report abuse

When we rejected the official Lescott bid, it was on the club's website. Where can anybody show me Kenwright saying we’ll accept £30 million? If offered, I would also but just because it is in the papers doesn't make it true.
Dick Fearon
8   Posted 19/07/2009 at 23:31:43

Report abuse

I am with those who hope JL stays but, should he decide to go, then £20mil plus Jo is not a bad deal. If anything is to happen on that front, the sooner the better.

By the way, a mini tornado has just flattened my front and side fence. Damn that Blue Bill!

Andrew Fair
9   Posted 20/07/2009 at 00:16:59

Report abuse

Adam Carey! Please stop smoking weed! The paranoia is getting too you far too much. Why would BK want do a deal on the quiet for the benefit of city? Pass the dutchie on the left hand side! And do not take it back!
Garry Corgan
10   Posted 20/07/2009 at 00:47:45

Report abuse

Let’s face it. Lescott will only go if he wants to go. And if he wants to go then I say good riddance anyway. I only hope, if that is the case, that we milk City for top dollar.
John Roberts
11   Posted 20/07/2009 at 05:15:27

Report abuse

What I can’t understand is why, on one hand, the powers that be have repeatedly stated that we will not be selling any of our existing squad and then, on the other, started quoting required transfer prices — doesn’t seem to gel.
Brian Lawlor
12   Posted 20/07/2009 at 07:48:56

Report abuse

I don’t think it's paranoia at all and I’m surprised so many people are so naïve to think that’s it's not possible. I’m surprised how trusting people are of the club and of BIll Kenwright.

Buying and selling of players, particularly those with high values, is like a game of chess with each club trying to outwit each other and get the best possible result for their respective clubs. Alex Ferguson said they wouldn’t sell Real Madrid a virus and that Ronaldo was going nowhere. Lescott is going and the club is involved in playing a game to try and get the best possible price.

At the recent Shareholders Forum, Moyes said we didn’t have any money to purchase first team players yet we’ve been bidding for Naughton, Cana and allegedly Defour. We all know City have been interested. For a club like ourselves with no money, selling an asset for 4 times what we paid for it will be too good to turn down.

Something strange happened with the Jo loan deal. It was confirmed on official site then removed then confirmed again 5 days later. Kenwright has been getting a lot of criticism from fans so he will do all he can to demonstrate to supporters that he is doing the best he can for the club. I expect a package to be agreed at around £20 million. Whether that includes another player remains to be seen. I wouldn’t be surprised if a deal was already agreed.

Tony Williams
13   Posted 20/07/2009 at 08:54:48

Report abuse

The one concern I have is the magazine with the new kits: as like with the Rooney scenario, Lescott is not in there. Coincidence? I hope so.

John Roberts, that statement, unfortunately again, is like the Rooney deal; Kenwright comes out and says he wouldn’t sell Rooney for £50m... he was right; he sold him on the cheap but the biggest difference here is that the little scumbag wanted to go and started spreading untruths to help it along.

Moyes has said that he does not want to sell; Kenwright has placed the ball clearly in Moyes’s court by saying, the sales are down to Moyes. Moyes stated specifically again at the Shareholders Forum that he will not be selling players and Kenwright has never forced him to sell any; he would look a very stupid man and a compete liar if a deal had already been done.

I hope he doesn’t go but... god forbid it... watch this space!!!!
Colin Potter
14   Posted 20/07/2009 at 08:59:07

Report abuse

The really sad thing about this whole Lescott saga is that there are still a number of fans thinking that Kenwright wouldn’t stab us in the back if needs be. How naive can these people get?
Alan Clarke
15   Posted 20/07/2009 at 09:32:51

Report abuse

I don’t doubt Kenwright is a bullshitter and I don’t trust him not to sell Lescott just to fund Kirkby but my belief is that it hasn’t happened yet. We all fear the worst with this one, especially after Kenwright’s handling of the Rooney transfer, but some people’s belief that this is a done deal is paranoia.

Lawlor, alledgedly bidding for Cana and Defour doesn’t actually constitute a formal bid for these players. Defour’s agent even denied a bid from Everton. You’re just reacting to newspaper talk. Moyes also said he wouldn’t be buying first team players. Naughton would not be an automatic first choice first-team player so I don’t know why you have so little trust for what our manager has said.
Tony Williams
16   Posted 20/07/2009 at 09:43:08

Report abuse

Colin, once again, if you watch Moyes's speech at the Shareholders Forum, it confirms that Moyes will not sell and that Kenwright has never made him sell. Do you honestly think a man like Moyes would come out and openly lie to the public, with a TV camera in his face?

The only way that Lescott will be sold is if the player himself asks for a transfer. He was very dismissive of the question on sales and stated that he has already said more than enough and he is fed up giving the red tops more column inches.

This "intense" man has integrity and I don’t believe it is in him to openly lie to the public; Kenwright.... not so much but I trust Moyes’s word.
Mike Allison
17   Posted 20/07/2009 at 10:21:25

Report abuse

"Moyes also said he wouldn’t be buying first team players."

Is this a mistake or have I missed something? When did he say this?
Eric Myles
18   Posted 20/07/2009 at 11:10:30

Report abuse

"He would look a very stupid man and a compete liar" — Well that describes somebody I know, Tony Williams, and someone a lot of Everton supporters know too.
Danny Jones
19   Posted 20/07/2009 at 11:05:20

Report abuse

The thing that is missing here is that if Everton (Kenwright/Moyes/Elstone) value Lescott at £30million, then the guy has every right to ask why he isn’t being paid the wages of a £30million palyer.

Who, hand on heart would do the job of somebody more senior and not want a pay rise? This I think will be where the problems start and finish. As a club, we are in no position to pay those sort of wages, so for the player it’s simple: go where you can get them.

Having said all that, does it make good business sense to sell an asset for £30 million, to one of your main rivals for Champions League money and give them the advantage? In the past, when Rooney was sold, we were no way near this close to the money tree... but now, losing a player like Lescott would set us back and also hand over an advantage to a probable rival.

Tony Williams
20   Posted 20/07/2009 at 11:23:00

Report abuse

"Well that describes somebody I know, Tony Williams, and someone a lot of Everton supporters know too."

If you are referring to Kenwright then fair enough but it has been made abundantly clear that Moyes will be dealing with the buying/selling of players so the Kenwright barb is a pointless one in this scenario.
Dan McKie
21   Posted 20/07/2009 at 11:36:41

Report abuse

I'd snap their hand off if they came in with anything close to £30 million. There are replacements out there that we could get in, as well as bolstering the overall squad numbers. Lescott is and has been excellent for Everton, but players do move on, and so does the club!

I just hope that they don't mess about until the end of the transfer window and end up with a Spurs and Berbatov situation, where we have no replacements, a weakened team, and cash to sit on that will probably miraculously disappear by January!

Peter Griffin
22   Posted 20/07/2009 at 11:50:44

Report abuse

Dan — just wondering who you had in mind as replacements for JL?
Tony Williams
23   Posted 20/07/2009 at 11:53:04

Report abuse

Danny, I know where you are coming from but Lescott is not doing a more senior job, he is doing eactly the same one which he already gets paid over the odds for.

Senior management have more jobs to do, more pressure. Lescott plays football for a living and, no matter where he goes, he will be doing the same job.

Yes, his agent may press for a pay rise but that’s what happens every season and Everton do reward good players with better contracts. It’s not a case of "I am worth X amount so you have to pay me Y."
Dan McKie
24   Posted 20/07/2009 at 12:04:14

Report abuse

Peter, players like Steven Taylor, Matthew Upson, David Wheater — all with Premier League experience and good defenders. Or go for somebody like Sean St Ledger from Preston. That wouldn't be any more of a chance than we took on Lescott. I'm just saying that, for that kind of money and providing all or most of it was given to Moyes, then a lot of good could be done with it.
Dick Fearon
25   Posted 20/07/2009 at 12:53:07

Report abuse

To illustrate the complete stupidity of this particular get Bill topic, it's worth noting that bot even Jay Harris nor Marshy or Gavin are bothering to put the boot in.
Er... or have I spoke too soon?
Brian Lawlor
26   Posted 20/07/2009 at 13:20:30

Report abuse

Clarke, you've missed the point completely. I do believe Moyes and the fact he said we wouldn’t be signing any first team players to our shareholders makes it even be reliable. It's because we’ve got no money. However, if we sell a player for £20 mill means we will buy players. The fact that we've reportedly bid for various players suggests we’ve got some money to spend, ie, Lescott sale.

By the way, spending £6 million on a defender is most certainly a first team player (Naughton)? When do we have millions to spend on squad players?

Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
27   Posted 20/07/2009 at 13:56:06

Report abuse

"The FACT that we’ve reportedly bid for various players..." (emphasis added).

Brian, it’s silly season: there are no facts...
Alan Kirwin
28   Posted 20/07/2009 at 14:05:03

Report abuse

Thanks Michael Kenrick for reminding the gullible about what’s actually going on.

Conversations & "enquiries" go on all the time. Even what-ifs occur daily. Formal bids are few & far between, because most clubs have to weigh up many factors before entering into a formal offer for a player.

The relentless attacks on Kenwright are malicious, groundless crap. The moronic recounting of what he said about Rooney just beggars belief. So a chairman said "I wouldn’t sell for £50m. Then the player (and his utter slime ball of an agent) stir up a complete hornet’s nest to engineer a big pay day, even going as far as libelling our manager with ridiculous accusations.

Despite Rooney’s own moronic behaviour, Moyes and Kenwright did everything they could to stop Rooney leaving. But he, and his agent, weren’t having any of it. The situation was insoluble and we are not so flush as to leave Rooney rotting in the reserves.

So then clubs start bidding for him and we basically end up with one serious bid and one joke bid. In the end we got a total of almost £30m for an 18-year-old. And any halfwit can see that, given the player’s completely uncooperative and aggressive position, we got the very best we could.

And yet we still need to read the pedants recounting the precise wording of Bill Kenwright and completely ignoring the circumstances. I mean, who needs context when you apparently have words that suit your purpose?

As per usual, vaccuous, meaningless drivel. Lescott may go, he may not. If he does then Moyes will have decided he can work without him or Lescott will have made it perfectly clear he wants out. For what it’s worth, I fully expect Joleon Lescott to start, and end, this season in Royal Blue.

Aside from the obvious pleasure that will bring me and many others, it might also be a sobering exercise for all those who prefer to believe any old crap about Everton and, when there isn’t any, just make it up themselves.

Is there no bottom to this pit of endless garbage?
Alan Clarke
29   Posted 20/07/2009 at 14:24:15

Report abuse

Brian, the purchase of Naughton would be the same as Baines. Baines was not immediately put into the first team and it was only this past season he’s established himself. The plan with Naughton would be to ease him into the first team. (That’s if we even sign him.) So I take your point he’s not a squad player but he’s not an automatic pick for the first team. I completely trust Moyes with the Lescott situation and don’t think he’ll be sold along with any other first teamers.

Any speculation is just guesswork unless you’re actually privvy to any of the conversations that goes on between players, managers, agents, chairmen, CEOs etc.
Guy Hastings
30   Posted 20/07/2009 at 15:31:33

Report abuse

Does Lescott really want to spend the next three seasons covering Terry’s back? That seems to be role for anyone playing alongside the most overrated lunkhead to ’grace’ the top flight for the past ten years. It would certainly concrete JL’s no 3 spot for England centreback with Terry having access to Cappello’s shell-like. If JL does go, and I’d much rather he didn’t, then Carvalho, ironically enough, would do for me.
Colin Potter
31   Posted 20/07/2009 at 16:11:49

Report abuse

Tony, It doesn’t matter what Moyes has said about transfers, the last word rests with Kenwright, unfortunately.
Brian Lawlor
32   Posted 20/07/2009 at 16:42:26

Report abuse

Michael Kenrick — so our offical bid of at least £6 million for Naughton is not a FACT?

With regards to the other two players I used the words allegedly and reportedly. Mark my words, Lescott is going to City.

Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
33   Posted 20/07/2009 at 16:53:00

Report abuse

Damn, you got me there, Brian. Allegedly.

I’ll give you Naughton. Now, who are these "various players"? No, don’t tell me. I’ve seen far too many lists of stupid names so far this summer...
Dennis Ng
34   Posted 20/07/2009 at 18:32:03

Report abuse

Anything in the range of £25M or more for Lescott is good money for any team, so I think it's definitely a good idea to try to hold out on this.

I think some of the players in the rumors don’t cost that much, so I really doubt we need to sell Lescott for it. One or two players for under £10M is really like what we have been doing for years now...
Alex Kociuba
35   Posted 20/07/2009 at 18:49:16

Report abuse

£25M?!!
Dennis Ng
36   Posted 20/07/2009 at 19:19:14

Report abuse

What other price would you reckon him for?
Dan Brierley
37   Posted 20/07/2009 at 19:40:06

Report abuse

Sorry to piss on people’s chips, but JL has just travelled to the US to continue his pre-season preparations. If it was really a ’done deal’ as some people are claiming, then why on earth would he be traveling to the States?

Could it be a possibility that EFC’s stance about not letting him go is... true? But let me guess: it's just a smokescreen to try and cover Black Bill’s secret agenda of selling all our top stars before he comes out of his secret underground lair, and sells EFC to the highest bidder.
Dennis Ng
38   Posted 20/07/2009 at 20:22:21

Report abuse

Eh, possible, but wouldn’t it fetch more money to at least manage it properly for now? Moyes had always hoped for a billionaire owner, right?

I don’t think it's a done deal since, unlike a decade ago, we are in Europe now, have a decent squad and a good run for a few years. The debt servicing hasn’t been in the news for some time now, so I can only assume all is well on the books.
Dave Wilson
39   Posted 20/07/2009 at 20:08:22

Report abuse

Am I the only one feeling increasingly uncomfortable and embarrassed at the level of hysteria the slightest criticism of our chairman seems to provoke?
Dennis Ng
40   Posted 20/07/2009 at 20:58:57

Report abuse

Is there? I haven’t seen such replies as yet. I think things are going fine as of now for the club and all, although I cringe every time some other club gets a billionaire, but well, I'd rather have Moyes than any other right now, even if a new owner comes around.
Brian Waring
41   Posted 20/07/2009 at 20:59:53

Report abuse

Dave, no mate.
John Carter
42   Posted 20/07/2009 at 21:55:16

Report abuse

Dave, I have to say the opposite. It still astounds me the lengths to which many blues will travel to have a pop at our chairman, and the selective memories that they all seem to share, missing any good he’s ever done and trying to find conclusive evidence that he’s a martian Nazi out to eat the soul of every Evertonian.

Yet, despite all this, there’s still a outcry when our poorly resourced team doesn’t trample all opposition and win the league.
Jimmy Hacking
43   Posted 21/07/2009 at 01:03:44

Report abuse

It's always been pretty obvious to me, ever since City first showed an interest several weeks ago, and based on the irrefutable evidence (Rochdale, the USA) that this decision will rest with the player. I certainly haven’t got the impression that the club are trying to engineer a payday. But then, unlike most of you lot, I am just an ordinary supporter, without the use of a bug planted in Moyes’s tracksuit or a direct psychic portal into BK’s brain.
Dennis Ng
44   Posted 21/07/2009 at 03:19:33

Report abuse

Well, fortunately he has not handed in a transfer request, which will usually make him unpopular anyway, so there's not much to worry about other than the right price.

He’s young, talented and everyone knows it, so I think every supporter should just look at the worthiness of the deal.

With £x millions, we could groom another good player or even build a stronger team. That’s my call at least.

Of course, whatever the reason to sell Lescott, top dollar will suit BK well anyway.
Alan Clarke
45   Posted 21/07/2009 at 08:45:28

Report abuse

Well said Jimmy, I’m still looking for this magic portal that some people seem to have found.
Gary Mortimer
46   Posted 21/07/2009 at 11:31:41

Report abuse

It is incredible that BK is still getting criticised about the sale of Rooney. As far as I am concerned, if Rooney had not put in a transfer request then he would still be at the club. As soon as a player puts in a request then he should be sold at a high a price as possible. £30m for him was a good deal.

I hope that Roger doesn’t request a move and at least he isn’t getting the "Come and play at Utd — coz you’ll win loads" whispers in his ear like Rooney did while playing for England. Hopefully Jo’s experience will make Roger stay at a friendlier (if poorer) club.

I am worried that he will be swayed by the ridiculous sums of money being bandied about. Roger is not a lifelong Evertonian, so how loyal is going to be? I’d hope he’d give us another year to break into the top 4 — especially as City cannot even offer him Europe this year.

I must admit that there appears to be so many wild stories around — Spurs appear to buying everyone!
Si Harwood
47   Posted 21/07/2009 at 11:06:11

Report abuse

Just read a report on the Independent site caliming Lescott will ask the management for permission to speak to City and find out their plans.... one reason being moving to City would boost his chances of getting in to the World Cup squad next summer.

WTF!?! Last I looked City were not in Europe, had not won a trophy for centuries and although had spent a scary amount of cash have from my point of view a medioce team with a few "names" sprinkled in.

No disrespect but Sant Cruz is NOT a "name", nor is Adebayor. OK, he has scored well at Arsenal but he is not a world class striker, and I am sure if Sir Alex wanted Tevez at Man Utd, he would have had no problem keeping him there.

The fact is, bar Barry (whom I do like), City are poor — so why would Lescott want to leave the stable environment of Goodison!?

Tony Williams
48   Posted 21/07/2009 at 17:30:26

Report abuse

Si, probably may have something to do with the 120,000 spondoolys he would get in his arse pocket a week.

However it is a rumour in a paper, I bet it starts off with "A close source..."

I would imagine that if he had asked that he would not have been on the plane to the US of A.
Mike Grundy
49   Posted 21/07/2009 at 13:46:23

Report abuse

If Sky Sports News are to be believed, Elano could be on his way to those giants of German football - FC Koln (Cologne)

Would he be worth a punt? Or would you stay as far away from doing any sort of business with Man City because of the Lescott saga....

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb