The Mail Bag
Just like having new signings
Comments (11)
So says the Jag in this article. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=717463&sec=england&cc=4716 Seems the company script hasn't changed.
Eric Myles, Posted 25/12/2009 at 12:22:33
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
He makes an offhand reference to new players (not "new signings") in the last line of the story, and you guys think it’s scripted, appeasement and a stunt by the "company"... like Moyes is standing over his shoulder, telling him what to say. What a load of crapola.
Guess you two must have misplaced your bifocals
Maybe we’ll take back AvDM, he’s without a club, or Pistone? They would’nt be classed as new signings would they?
And I certainly don’t think Moyes is the theatrical kind that would be the one holding the script or doing the prompting.
Who else at the Club might fit that description nthough?
"We’ve not got that many players at the moment, so he’s another body with some quality in there. There’s a few of us who have been out for a while now, and hopefully if we can all get back it will be like having some new players and we can kick on in the league."
I’ll give you a clue it’s the bit that says "like having some new players"
Same old shit churned out, same old names lap it up.
And as for still using the word ’apologist’, please... Its used in religious arguments, for the Nazis or occasionally for oppressive regimes. A little out of place for a guy who sticks up for his football club when people slag it off.
The same old mugs will buy it again and once again I will despair of my fellow Blues.
Apologist is used every time I hear the same lame excuses for the club’s fuck ups being accepted by the same people over and over and berating anyone who dares mention all is not well or criticises the same lame old crap eminating from the club.
Secondly, your criticism of Mike Gaynes is unfounded and shows you fail to understand a distinction he makes. Having new ’players’ in the team (for this season) is what is going to happen as we’ve had people out injured, this can be expected to have an impact on the team, results and performances. Having new ’signings’ suggests investment by the board and has different connotations for where we stand financially. There’s a clear difference and if you can’t see it I can’t make you.
The implications of what you and Eric are saying are different from the implications of what Jagielka was actually talking about.
It aint me that’s been at the drink, and it ain't me that’s unnecessarily angry about a harmless interview with one of our players trying to be positive about our outlook.
Hey Mike this looking up is wonderful, let’s all try this
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apologist
If you look at the left-hand column, you might see nazi apologist which is the term you seem to like but the phrase used is apologist which stems back to 1630-1640, I think you’ll have to admit that the Nazis weren’t about back then.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 26/12/2009 at 01:06:09
Report abuse
The transfer window is just about to open and we are, yet again, skint. So the club puts forward players returning from injury as "just like new signings" to try to appease disgruntled fans.
A very very predictable stunt!