The Mail Bag

We need a win

Comments (52)

We have totally dominated Birmingham and now Sunderland. Battered both. Sunderland hardly got out of their half at home in the second 45 minutes.

The problem is obvious — we are not doing it upfront. Cahill is off form, Saha lost his touch, Yakubu nowhere. Maybe Donovan can save us, and Vaughan looks worth a bit of a run now.

Positives? Fellaini is excelling in his proper role in midfield. Heitinga, Pienaar, Hibbert. Bily has the talent but looks lost at the moment. And the spirit is certainly there. But we need a win very soon.
Neil Pearse,     Posted 26/12/2009 at 14:51:16

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Matthew Salem
1   Posted 26/12/2009 at 16:57:27

Report abuse

A righly deserved draw. But what was wrong with Louis today? And Bainsey, I love you to death, but your corners were woeful! Anyhow, this 1-1 feels a lot better than last week’s...
Dermot Ryan
2   Posted 26/12/2009 at 17:11:45

Report abuse

Dominated for most of the game. But totally wasteful in their last third. Seem to run out of ideas. And in every game we seem to have some passengers which just won’t be forgiven in this league.

I think the right move was to go for another attacking midfielder (in Donovon). Our defense is poor but there is no point endlessly trying to plug holes there. I think we have to hope that Jagielka gets better and stick with Heitenga and Neill until then. Do not miss Yobo and Distin at all. Wish our right was more effective.

Overall I think we would be pleased enough with our last number of results if we hadn’t fucked ourselves by losing to Hull, etc earlier in the season.

Gavin Ramejkis
3   Posted 26/12/2009 at 17:57:10

Report abuse

A few things stuck out today: in the first half, Sunderland closed down every single time we got the ball, a good idea if you want to attack and pretty obvious footballing technique we are missing.

Finishing was piss poor today, Osman was unlucky with his shot that hit the post and Pienaar shooting over but unlucky is worthless, you need to convert your chances. If your strikers aren’t doing the job and you have another on the bench they need more than four minutes to make any sort of impact.

Richard Dodd
4   Posted 26/12/2009 at 17:54:54

Report abuse

From what I saw on a very dodgy website, we need have absolutely no fear that we have turned the corner and have settled on a formation that will see us into the middle regions of the Prem. The back four are following the proven Moyes doctrine of no-nonsense defence and whilst we have little sparkle in midfield this is almost superfluous as long as the forward players can take just a few of the chances that come their way direct from the back. Fellaini showed them all how to do it this afternoon.
I predict yet another storming second half to our season!
Santosh Benjamin
5   Posted 26/12/2009 at 17:54:49

Report abuse

The finishing was lacking as we saw against Birmingham last weekend. Fellaini had another great game and deserved to score.

Is there any point us turning up at games with refs like Martin Atkinson? He allows Cahill, Saha and Fellaini to get climbed on without even a hint of a foul, yet when Fellaini/Cahill collect the ball and start a move... it's deemed illegal coz the Sunderland players aren't tall enough to get the damn ball!

Anyone who thought getting Andy Reid is a good idea, that pixie-eared twit wouldn't solve any of our problems. We need a win and we need one quick.

Back four should have dealt with the Bent easily on the Jones cross that resulted in the goal. I wanted to ask Bily how he manages to show us all his flair and skill (never played hoofball, ever, eh?) for a whole 2 mins in a 90 min game and spend the other 88 mins standing around dreaming of the 2014 World Cup. Saha should have scored today. Anyway guess a loss woulda been worse to digest. See in 2 days...COYB

Andy Hegan
6   Posted 26/12/2009 at 18:18:57

Report abuse

The fact of the matter is Moyes doesn't have it in him to put out an attacking side of any quality. In all his time at the club we have never had the imagination, movement, guile and adaptability to unlock defences. His one and only tactic is to batter defences into making mistakes.

You start with a point and hold what you have first and foremost, attacking being a secondary consideration. He has a defender's mentality and is unable to see beyond this position to the point of not being able to recognise a strikers attributes when on his rare forays into the transfer market ( does anyone remember the Phil Neville interview in which he innocently relates Moyes comments about a scouting mission to watch Jo, "this kid’s got everything", Phil)?

It's almost as though he thinks defence is a position for a specialist whereas any player can do a striker's job, borne out in his 'one up front at home'... supported by a midfielder, a tactic by the way, almost untouched by any other manager in the Premier League.

Richard Dodd
7   Posted 26/12/2009 at 18:31:44

Report abuse

Our success under David Moyes has been based on no-nonsense football and this season’s disappointment has been caused by too many of our players — not only Bily — coming to believe they are above this. ’To thine own self be true’ is a mantra Davey would do well to stick with as he seeks to get Everton back to the hard-to-beat side we all love. Cut out the fancy-dan stuff and get it forward, I say!
Joey Brown
8   Posted 26/12/2009 at 14:00:54

Report abuse

Are we supposed to be happy? 7 points minimum is what we all called for before this 3 game spell. And it was not much to ask against two teams we completely outplayed. But here we are with now a maximum of 5 to snatch and to me it's just not good enough.

Throwing James Vaughan on with 4 minutes left is about as good as throwing me on. I'm pretty quick and about his height. Bily played maybe two balls on the ground the whole game... and the rest we no thought huffs or back to goals crosses. We scored when Saha went off because our team does not do anything but look for him in the box whether or not he's in a good position. And even though he was a few times ago he missed.

I'd rather lose than call this an accomplishment. Call me stubborn.

Andy Crooks
9   Posted 26/12/2009 at 18:38:53

Report abuse

So, Richard, you see the problem as being the reluctance of too many players to endorse the dross that David Moyes has subjected us to for far to long. They won’t commit whole-heartedly to hoofball.

I see it differently: another winnable game has gone and, in my view, we are starting to fit the profile of the unexpected relegation candidate. It seems that Osman is the first name on the team sheet. Why not start Coleman right midfield and give us something different going forward?
I never believed we would ever win anything under Moyes and I think his huge contract was a terrible mistake but I never thought he would see us relegated. Now, I’m not so sure... He and his free-loading partner Kenwright are slowly stifling the life out of this club.

Kevin Sparke
10   Posted 26/12/2009 at 18:51:51

Report abuse

Another good display not reaping its just rewards. We played some excellent build-up football today but that final quality ball into the box is our downfall.

We look a much more potent threat when we have two men up front — Pienaar was given the freedom to run at Sunderland when Yak started taking defenders with him.

I’m not too concerned about relegation — if we continue to control the football for long periods of the game, as we did at times today, better results will come.
Richard Dodd
11   Posted 26/12/2009 at 18:58:29

Report abuse

Andy, this is the season of goodwill so I am loathe to fall out with anyone but the record books prove that David Moyes is our most successful manager ever in the Premier era and before that I class an irrelevance. However, I do have to accept that according to Marshy, Gavram and Christine, EVERY Everton team in those far off days played like Brazil!
Dermot Ryan
12   Posted 26/12/2009 at 18:56:27

Report abuse

Sadly, where we are at the moment, I think I’ll be happy with Wolves losing. Red scum can only score at home against Wolves after Wolves have one man sent off. They’re totally crap.

And I’m certainly not happy with a draw today. At the same time, if I were a Sunderland fan, I would have just watched my side totally dominated at home and felt glad for the final whistle. We certainly didn’t fluke a draw. It’s annoying the equalizer came so late. I wish we could replace Cahill and Osman and that Bily would play for more than 20 minutes.

Dermot Ryan
13   Posted 26/12/2009 at 19:06:25

Report abuse

I am concerned about relegation. And that is not because we are crap but because the league is so competitive (despite some people’s delusion that the league has three great teams and the rest are useless hoffballers). In my opinion, the only truly shit teams are Hull, Wolves, and Bolton. And, sadly, earlier in the season we lost and/or drew with all three.
Gavin Ramejkis
14   Posted 26/12/2009 at 19:24:27

Report abuse

Doddy, percentage football isn’t a success, name me one trophy as a team that DM has won? Erm, is that tumbleweed and a bell tolling? Did you ever watch the team in the eighties? Ever watch them in the seventies? Comparing DM’s style as better than some of that?
Richard Dodd
15   Posted 26/12/2009 at 19:36:58

Report abuse

No Gavin, I didn’t. I was much too young but so were many of our persuasion. Chelsea win things with percentage football and so do the Mancs on many occasions. On our budget, Davey has performed miracles and will have to continue to do so. The man is pure genius and fortunately has a chairman who recognises it. Now I have a son to put to bed.
Gavin Ramejkis
16   Posted 26/12/2009 at 19:41:05

Report abuse

Doddy, I’ve put both of mine to bed already, the Sky only generation can’t possibly remark on what has gone if they haven’t seen it, so don’t compare it if you haven’t seen it.
Alejandro Castellano
17   Posted 26/12/2009 at 20:54:49

Report abuse

Saha had a bad day. To say he is lost his touch is ridiculous, he has been our savior this year.

We need some more finishers in there.
Art Jones
18   Posted 26/12/2009 at 21:42:06

Report abuse

Maybe I’m being too much of an optimist, I always have been as far as Everton were concerned... but I can’t help but think that quite soon we are going to have one of those games where Lady Luck shines on us and we are going to thrash someone comprehensively maybe 6 - 0 or better. We are playing the football good enough for that but just not getting the breaks that a confident team gets. Wishful thinking... but I wouldn’t be surprised.
James Thomas
19   Posted 26/12/2009 at 21:39:50

Report abuse

Here is something that Moyes and the followers he has who see him as infallible have not noticed — we have played far far better when playing 4-4-2 and without Osman.

I’m not trying to make Leon a scapegoat but today, just like against Brum, every time he got the ball he fell over, passed it to the opposition, or got tackled. My father asked only half in jest if Osman has some sort of compromising photos of Moyes and that’s why he gets in the team as the first name on the teamsheet.

4-5-1 has been figured out by every bloody manager in the Prem. We just lump it to Louis hoping he scores. It’s pathetic.

I’ve had enough. He’s taken us as far as we can go. Now he has to go. Of course Bill will never sack him. Fucker!
Iain Love
20   Posted 26/12/2009 at 21:59:02

Report abuse

My view of today's game:
Our central defense needs height; Baines's delivery was poor; Bily needs to eat energy foods and do some strenghtening work; Felliani was excellent today; We need to move the ball faster in the final third; Cahill needs to be dropped for Donovan, for at least the first few games of the New Year.

I’m dissapointed with a draw as we do need 3 points rather than 1, but I thought we played well ...overplayed in their box but were the better team.

Gareth Hughes
21   Posted 26/12/2009 at 22:09:33

Report abuse

People say that we look more potent with 4-4-2 and that we lack a finisher. Well, today we started with 4-5-1 and Tim Cahill in his favoured role, who has always been our best finisher. We only improved when we went 4-4-2 and Cahill was apparently anonymous. So where on earth does that leave him? Some people say form is temporary, class is permanent. But can we be sentimental towards a player who has hardly contributed in a single game this season?
Carl Lee
22   Posted 26/12/2009 at 22:34:04

Report abuse

I totally agree with Gareth on Cahill, he has not contributed enough this season and needs dropping. Another game were he did nothing for us, very disappointing.
John Andrews
23   Posted 26/12/2009 at 23:01:17

Report abuse

Ah... the Doddster has returned!

I have just a couple of things to comment on: Why was Coleman not at right back? Or at the very least right midfield?

Doddy, seeing as you were far too young to see when EFC were a top side, how do you know that much about it?

Incidentally, I listened to the game on Talksport. It was the featured game.

James Stewart
24   Posted 26/12/2009 at 23:27:48

Report abuse

Well, I have been fairly pleased with the performances in the last 3 games and have praised the team and manager where it has been due. I can’t say the same today though.

How you can say we dominated this game is beyond me. Pienaar was the best player on the pitch, however. Substitutions were rubbish again today though. Offered nothing.

I also find the treatment of Coleman despicable. He deserved to start yet didn’t even get on as sub. What kind of message does that send out? While the likes of Cahill in stinking form walk into the team.

James Thomas
25   Posted 27/12/2009 at 00:31:43

Report abuse

Gareth Hughes and James Stewart, spot-fucking-on.

However, it is Moyes’s way. Once you’re his favourite you literally cannot be dropped (Osman, Cahill, Hibbert), regardless of how well you’re playing or if you’re only half fit, and if you’re behind one of these players in the pecking order you have to wait until they are injured or suspended to get in the team and even then will hit the bench once they’re back.

The negativity is infuriating enough but that is his tactical way so you know what you’re getting. However, the favouritism is sickening and can be very detrimental to the team.

Also, whilst I mentioned Hibbert as one of the un-droppables, I would like to make clear that despite that superb performance from Coleman, I think Tony has been our player of season along with Louis.
Alex Kociuba
26   Posted 27/12/2009 at 00:41:00

Report abuse

Aside from our goal, I counted 2 shots on target all game. Although it's obvious you don’t score goals unless you shoot on target! The draw was a fair result.
Pat Finegan
27   Posted 27/12/2009 at 00:58:13

Report abuse

We just can’t finish. We get the ball in their half and keep it there most of the game. We get opportunities on goal but we rarely ever score.

Cahill, as back striker, hasn’t been contributing. I don’t know how many goals he has had but it’s no more than 3. We can’t rely solely on Saha to get it done up front. This is why we need the 4-4-2. Especially with Vaughan back and Donovan coming in on loan.

We tied Chelsea with the 4-4-2, scoring 3 goals, so I don’t see why we keep playing 4-5-1. There are a lot of things I don’t understand, though. Why does Jo play? Where is Seamus Coleman? Why don’t we pass? Why would we hoof it forward when we only have one striker? If anyone can answer these questions, let me know.

James Stewart
28   Posted 27/12/2009 at 01:08:11

Report abuse

James Thomas.

You're right, there the favouritism is sickening. Cahill is a curious one though. In many ways, he doesn’t have much competition in his position as the formation is set up to accommodate him so I feel that is why he is never dropped.

My main concern is the treatment of Coleman though. It just sends out all the wrong messages if players are not picked on form and merit. He changed the game against Spurs and deserved a starting spot.

I don’t share your views on Hibbert, however. Solid he may be but player of the season!? It has been a bad fucking year if that is the case.

James Stewart
29   Posted 27/12/2009 at 01:16:49

Report abuse

Pat – I think it's too easy to blame the formation. Lots of successful teams play 4-5-1. I think Moyes regularly gets tactically confused but I don’t think we have the players to play 4-4-2. Simply because we need two good strikers to do that. Yakubu is a liability at present. Vaughan is a waste of space. Jo ditto.
Pat Finegan
30   Posted 27/12/2009 at 03:39:17

Report abuse

I didn’t think the formation made that much of a difference either. Then we scored 3 goals on Chelsea. As for having enough players, we don’t have enough for 4-5-1 either. If we are going to play the 4-5-1 we need a guy in the central midfield/back striker who can score as Cahill isn’t getting it done. Maybe Bily? He’s been able to find the goal this season better than everyone except Saha. Just a suggestion.
James Stewart
31   Posted 27/12/2009 at 04:34:57

Report abuse

I hear where you are coming from, Pat. The difference against Chelsea was down to getting bodies in the box and causing panic, you're right. I just don’t think we have a good second forward. Bily would be an option. I think I would prefer to see Pienaar there though. This would also free up the right midfield slot for Coleman. I think he would do an excellent job wide right. Or Donovan when he gets here.
Neil Pearse
32   Posted 27/12/2009 at 06:30:39

Report abuse

On 4-5-1: first of all, it is 4-4-2 that has gone out of fashion, not 4-5-1. Playing two strikers who get easily marked by modern defenders is what it old hat. With the players we have who should be able to join the attack and score (Cahill, Felli, Pienaar, Osman, Bily), 4-5-1 is perfectly sensible. The problem is that these players are not scoring. (In any case - what we really played yesterday before Yakubu was much closer to 4-1-3-1-1.)

On Coleman versus Hibbert: could we change the record? Hibbert again had another excellent game defensively yesterday, and actually supplied the cross for the goal. Nothing at all was going on down their left. Coleman has played one game, and is a much less experienced defender than Hibbert. We already have Pienaar, Baines, Bily and Osman to provide something from the flanks.

Dropping our best current defender when we are in a relegation scrap is insane. After Howard, Felli and Pienaar he would be my next name on the team sheet right now.
Ernie Baywood
33   Posted 27/12/2009 at 08:14:58

Report abuse

Not too sure about that Neil. Hibbert is defending well but his forward play against Brum was a big problem and despite his best efforts yesterday he was still the point where a lot of moves slow up or break down. I think Coleman earned another shot with the bravery he showed to take the ball to feet and attack against Spurs and very disappointed in Moyes that he didn’t decide to send that message to the team.

Still, there are good signs that we are settling into a decent team structure. Playing good stuff in spells and it aint so hard to defend when you’re not giving up 60% possession. Sunderland are a good side and Birmingham are a solid side so to completely outplay both shows we are on the right track.

Hard to feel too happy about this season though.
David Denby
34   Posted 27/12/2009 at 08:51:18

Report abuse

With regards Cahill, then yes, he has been way off form but, watching yesterday, I just feel that, rather than rising to the captaincy it is weighing on his shoulders. Wouldn’t be at all surprised to see Neville back in tomorrow and Cahill ’rested’ as Moyes reveals he has been playing through the pain barrier.

The way Moyes shows his own thinking and belief then Cahill, at present, is probably the only one he would rely on to at least try and get his message onto the pitch. I have nothing to back this feeling up other than to say it is just a feeling.

Anyway Blues, stop making me depressed at this time of year and go out and give Burnley a right tonking tomorrow. Please!!!!!

John Crook
35   Posted 27/12/2009 at 11:02:06

Report abuse

It is really depressing ain't it... draws with Spurs, Chelsea and Sunderland feel like wins? It's so fucking frustrating — this was the season I truly believed we would take off. Would we really be in a relegation battle (and we are in one, so let's not deny it) with a fully fit Arteta, Neville, Jagielka, Yakubu etc etc??

This season is effectively a write-off at the half-way stage — even if Moyesie brings in 3 or 4 on loan, then they need time to settle and blend in; it's never ideal to push 3/4 new players straight into a team. And even if Jags and Mikel are back in February, surely they won't reach peak till about April — by that time, we would've probably crawled above the 40-point barrier.

Ian Tunstead
36   Posted 27/12/2009 at 11:53:45

Report abuse

Gavin, how many other managers outside the top 4 have won a trophy? I can count them on one hand and even then, it was a freak one off. Moyes is still a relativley young manager who hasn't had the chance to manage a top 4 side with big money and great players. In time I'm quite confident Moyes’s trophy cabinet will be full.
Ian Tunstead
37   Posted 27/12/2009 at 12:00:36

Report abuse

John Andrew and James Stewart: What is this nonsense about Coleman? Read the Shaun Sparke and Stephen Kenny posts on the “Bily?” article, they are spot on about Coleman.
Gavin Ramejkis
38   Posted 27/12/2009 at 12:57:47

Report abuse

Ian Tunstead, take your Sky goggles off, they didn't invent the game, but seeing as you look to have been suckered into their way of thinking post SKY:

FA Cup
1995 - Everton (top four?)
1998 - Portsmouth (top four?)

Worthless Cup
1994 - Aston Villa (top four?)
1996 - Aston Villa (top four?)
1997 - Leicester (top four?)
1999 - Tottenham (top four?)
2000 - Leicester(top four?)
2002 - Blackburn (top four?)
2004 - Middlesborough(top four?)
2008 - Tottenham (top four?)

Still got a valid argument that only "top four" win trophies since the dawn of Sky reinventing football?
Ian Tunstead
39   Posted 27/12/2009 at 14:49:00

Report abuse

You have mis-understood my question Gavin. I never said no teams outside the top 4 win trophies; I said which managers outside of a top 4 side have won a trophy? And of those managers, how many have won more than 1 trophy, and not just a freak successful one-off cup run?
Ian Tunstead
40   Posted 27/12/2009 at 14:53:27

Report abuse

Gavin, unfortunatly the game has changed. The Sky 4 or the Champions League 4 have more money to spend to buy the best managers, the best stadiums, the best players, the best squads... it's only common sense that any team outside the top 4 is going to have less chance of winning than they did before the Sky era.

Unless the Sky 4 get drawn against each other or a freak result because of poor refereing like the FA Cup Semi final between Portsmouth & Man U the year Pompey won it or even last year in the Everton - Man U semi when we only beat them on penalties.

If Moyes was manging 20 years ago before the Sky 4 established itself, I have no doubt Moyes would be winning trophies like Alex Ferguson has been winning trophies for the past 20 years.
James Stewart
41   Posted 27/12/2009 at 15:49:57

Report abuse

Ian - I read the posts you mentioned. Complete rubbish.

If Hibbert had played like Coleman did against Spurs then I would be calling for him to be in the team. He didn’t and never has. People pay to watch players perform like Coleman did that day, simply because it is very entertaining to watch. I find Moyes's decision to bench him after disgusting. If he wanted Hibbert back in fair enough. Play Coleman on the right of midfield then.

I’d also advise you to re-read your above post.

"If Moyes was managing 20 years ago, before the Sky 4 established itself, I have no doubt Moyes would be winning trophies like Alex Ferguson has been winning trophies for the past 20 years."

I think this is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read on here.

Ian Tunstead
42   Posted 27/12/2009 at 16:10:05

Report abuse

I dont think it is so stupid, James. As far as I'm concerned, the Sky 4 have been in another league to the rest of the teams because of their massive resources. We have finished best of the rest when all is equal with the other teams in the league. We have also done quite well in the cups in the last couple of seasons only to be knocked out by Sky 4 teams. If the Sky 4 had equal resources to ourselves, I believe we would complete much better.

If Coleman was to play right midfield who would you drop for him?
Mike Allison
43   Posted 27/12/2009 at 16:18:09

Report abuse

Coleman playing right midfield is an absolute non-starter. He’s not good enough, his touch is too heavy and he’s not exactly a silky skilfull type. At the moment, and especially against Burnley, I’d give him a go, but he’s a right back and only a right back with very little experience and one good performance when he didn’t have much to lose.
Kevin Mitchell
44   Posted 27/12/2009 at 16:03:38

Report abuse

Neil Pearse, we’ve all got our own views about players but to say Saha has lost his touch is an outrageous comment. Where would we be without him?

Your support of Hibbert as our best defender shows where you are coming from. I don’t profess to be a tactical genius but I know what I see, and I see Hibbert being the weak link almost every game. It’s not good enough to throw in the ocassional decent tackle, the lower leagues are full of defenders who can do the same job.

Once again Neil, don’t settle for mediocrity — it will get us nowhere.

James Stewart
45   Posted 27/12/2009 at 16:29:07

Report abuse

Errr.. Strange comment, Mike. I seem to remember Coleman playing virtually as a winger versus Spurs and his touch was excellent. He continually beat his man and put the ball in the box. Isn’t that what wingers are supposed to do? A lot of the great modern-day full backs would be equally adept at playing as a winger so I’m not sure I understand you there.
James Stewart
46   Posted 27/12/2009 at 17:04:45

Report abuse

To answer Ian’s question, I would play him at right back.
Gavin Ramejkis
47   Posted 27/12/2009 at 18:03:03

Report abuse

Ian, David Moyes wouldn’t have had any more success 20 years ago as he simply doesn’t react to the game and change his tactics, any decent manager can outsmart him.

Any football match is only 90 mins long, give or take stoppages — want me to reel off some of the "top four" results for you this season? Managers can beat them as has been proven this very season if they take their chances and play attacking football.

DM plays percentage football whose uber-defensive ethos is not to concede a goal or goals — rather than relying on scoring more goals than the opposition.

Brian Waring
48   Posted 27/12/2009 at 18:49:11

Report abuse

I listened to the game on the radio, and what was worrying was that, for all the possesion we had, we only managed 1 shot on target, the goal.

Whereas Sunderland, who were under the cosh, managed 4 on target.

James Stewart
49   Posted 27/12/2009 at 21:21:24

Report abuse

Brian your right there. It has been a concern of mine recently. There were two glaring chances to shoot against Birmingham and Pienaar then Saha both opted to pass. Possibly a confidence factor but that seems unlikely as those two players are in form! I think the message from Moyes should be to get shots in quicker.
Ian Tunstead
50   Posted 27/12/2009 at 21:23:05

Report abuse

Gavin, I accept any team can beat any team on a given day, no team is unbeatable. But it would usualy take a top 4 team to have an off day or be because of injuries to key players or poor refereeing for another team to get a result. But the league table doesn't lie, the cream always rises to the top over the course of a season and that is why the top 4 are the top 4 year-in, year-out, bar the odd freak season.

If we try to out-football or out-play a team like Arsenal when their 11 players are better than our 11 players, then it doesn't take a genius to work out the probable outcome. 9 times out of 10 they would beat us. So lesser teams have to try other ways to nulify their threat and prevent them from playing football.

Moyes's use of tactics will improve with time and experience and as I said, he is a young manager and will learn a lot. But in my opinion, tactics are very over rated, the team with the best players will win more often than not regardless of tactics. The only thing that matters is to play your best players in their best positions.
Kiern Moran
51   Posted 27/12/2009 at 22:18:14

Report abuse

Well the title of this board is a massive understatement. Draws, however more comfortable then yet another defeat, just mean the corner we are turning arches into a U-turn to the relegation zone. I don’t think we are actually playing bad football at the moment, we just need goals. My team for tomorrow:

Howard;
Hibber, Neill, Heitinga, Baines;
Neville, Fellaini, Pienaar, Bily;
Yak & Vaughan.

Subs: Nash, Cahill, Osman, Saha, Coleman, Duffy, Baxter.
Neil Pearse
52   Posted 28/12/2009 at 08:53:57

Report abuse

Kevin, I think you misunderstood me on Saha. He seems to have lost his touch over the past few games (is he carrying an injury again?). There were chances against both Birmingham and Sunderland that he was burying earlier in the season. He’s been fabulous this season, no question. Hopefully he will be again. Hopefully today.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb