The Mail Bag

Neill, and The Madness of Moyes

Comments (52)

Lucas Neill and Johnny Heitinga are one of the main reasons why Everton have made a mini revival of late and to sell Neill now when we are still close to the relegation zone (points wise) is another piece of reckless management.

The pairing of Neill and Heitinga has been so effective in recent weeks (during very difficult times) I wouldn't have broken it up just now even if Jags was fit. But Moyes doesn't even realise what he has.

We have also played more football from the back in recent weeks than we have seen for a very long time and Neil is one of the main reasons for this. Why break up such an effective partnership now when we should be thanking our lucky stars that it has worked so well, especially when we don't have much cover?

It's another piece of Moyes madness and I only hope we don't regret this by the end of this season.
Ged Dwyer, Liverpool     Posted 14/01/2010 at 16:21:08

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Declan O'Shaughnessy
1   Posted 14/01/2010 at 20:56:45

Report abuse

Have to disagree with you on this one Ged. I had high hopes for Neill, and thought he was an astute signing at the time. However, everything that I have seen of him in an Everton shirt since has disappointed me in the extreme. His reading of the game seems suspect, the way he loses players is shocking, the way he attempts to block shots is bizarre (especially the second goal against Arsenal last weekend). The only thing I would say in his favour is that he should probably be playing at right-back, not centre-back. But personally, I’m glad to see the back of him.
Pat Finegan
2   Posted 14/01/2010 at 20:53:09

Report abuse

Jagielka, Distin, Yobo, Heitinga, Duffy. With everyone healthy we can afford to offload someone and make a profit. I don’t understand the timing because we need him now. Especially with Coleman doing well, that gives us 3 right backs.
Alan Kirwin
3   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:09:33

Report abuse

Erm, you kind of overlook the part Neill and his agent played in this Ged didn’t you?

Putting aside your appraisal of Neill for now (I think you overstate the case), he is renowned as a mercenary bastard. He cancelled joining Liverpool at the last minute to go and take silly money at West Ham. He’s not in this game for glory other than his own.

I think we’ve done him a favour, getting him fit and even in the public eye. Clearly Harry Sicknote Kewell has had a few words on Neill’s behalf and, between him & his agent, they’ve engineered the deal.

I would expect that Moyes has seen the form of Heitinga, impending return of Distin & Jagielka, promise of Duffy, and thought he can well get by. So if someone wants to chuck a quick million into our pot then that’ll be fine.

Your criticism of Moyes is, I suggest, miles wide of the mark.
Andrew Bentley
4   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:12:36

Report abuse

Ged - how can you say this is Moyes madness? Do we know that this was Moyes decision to let him go? How do you not know that the deal was sanctioned by the board? How can you criticise Moyes without knowing all the facts on this deal.

By selling Neill it frees up about £40k in wages pw (allegedly) which could be used to cover the wages for 2 new signings (either Loans or actual purchases). Why not wait till the end of the transfer window when we all know what is what before you start criticising.

If no-one is signed then I may be inclined to agree with you when we know all the facts. But until then lets not bother speculating.
Pat Finegan
5   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:29:08

Report abuse

Alan and Declan, I haven’t been completely disappointed with Neill. I think he has done well at centre back. I just don’t think we need him.
Keith Glazzard
6   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:34:42

Report abuse

As Heitinga has settled into the position he has always played best, Lucas Neill has done a good job alongside him. He also carries the ball out of defence in preference to hitting it long. He has gained our respect.

He is never going to sign a contract with another club unless he wants to, for reasons best known to himself.

I suspect that an awful lot of money comes into it.

If you want an informed comment on this, wait for anything - and I suspect it will be nothing - that Tim Cahill says about the transfer.
Brian Waring
7   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:45:37

Report abuse

Maybe Moyes has told him that at the end of the season he won’t be needed anymore, so Neill has chosen to move.
Dermot Ryan
8   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:37:42

Report abuse

I think selling Neill isn’t a disaster, although I will really miss having two center backs who actually play the ball out of their box rather than mindlessly hoof it (a la Hibbert and Yobo). I think the key to our success recently has been having (nearly) 10 outfield players who can defend AND bring the ball forward intelligently. I think that is why Hibbert and Neville, although both excellent tacklers/defenders at the back, are weak links.

If you watch the Arsenal game, you will see that Donovan regularly tries to link up with Neville who then launches it awkwardly into the box or passes back. If our right-sided centre-back hoofs the ball out, this will only contribute this unbalance.

Also, I’m concerned about timing. Everyone is firing off names of defenders, but who is going to step in RIGHT NOW (or just after the Man City game) to play center back? Hibbert?

And for the rest of the season? We can’t rely on Jags being match fit anytime soon. So are we going to go with Distin and Heitenga? I’d be really interested in hearing people thoughts on these questions.

Mike Gaynes
9   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:49:04

Report abuse

Ged, looks like you’re outvoted, everybody-to-one.

I wasn’t thrilled with the Neill signing in the first place... I’ve always considered him a reckless right back and predicted that sooner or later he would give away a penalty that would cost us a game.

Of course, when Distin went down the signing looked like genius, and Neill has provided vital cover and played decently. But he’s not a CB -- as Declan pointed out, he loses his mark -- and they certainly don’t need him at RB.

So we’ve made a bit of a profit, gotten some good games from him, and dodged the bullet because he didn’t cost us anything with mistakes. Granted we’ll be a little thin in the middle without him, but I think it’s a fine move.
Mike Gaynes
10   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:51:25

Report abuse

Dermot, I think we’ll see Hibbert and Heitinga in the middle against City, because like it or not, Hibbert’s our best tackler, and against City we need that more than aerial strength. I’m hoping we’ll see Coleman on the outside for speed to deal with Bellamy and link up better with Donovan. But I suspect it’ll be Pip.
Alan Clarke
11   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:54:58

Report abuse

How many clean sheets did we keep with Neill in the team? 1 against Burnley and we were lucky that Nugent missed that sitter in that game. He did okay but I don’t think our season will be derailed by him leaving.
Dick Fearon
12   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:57:59

Report abuse

I wonder who will be the first to moan about hoofball again and just when we seemed to be moving away from that rubbish?
Gary Tudor
13   Posted 14/01/2010 at 21:57:49

Report abuse

I think this article should be called the Genius of Moyes.

A reported £800,000 for a player with 5 months left on his contract, who came on a free.

Let us judge him when the window ends. I’m certain however, we willl get improvement in the long run, by using the £800,000 on another great signing with a rumored £40k a week wages to play with.

Trust in Moyes.
Ciarán McGlone
14   Posted 14/01/2010 at 22:14:56

Report abuse

Mr Clarke beat me to it... Our revival is based upon improvement in midfield... our defence is still less than convincing... and that doesn’t involve an assessment of their offensive threat.


No great loss.
Miles Wilson
15   Posted 14/01/2010 at 22:41:14

Report abuse

Neill will play against Man City then bugger off. He was always a stopgap and Distin will be back for the next game with Hibbert covering. Jags will be back soon and I think he will slot in alongside Heitinga who has been superb.
Ged Dwyer
16   Posted 14/01/2010 at 23:01:05

Report abuse

Pat Finegan - I take it you agree with me that the timing is wrong.
Alan Kirwin - It was Moyes who agreed to let him go first!
Andrew Bentley - How do I know it was Moyes who agreed to let him go? He’s the manager!
Gary Tudor - Having Neill available for the City game is genius isn’t it. Lescott genius!
Alan Clarke - Oh of course 6-1 and 5-0 defeats are much better aren’t they? Neill came in at a very difficult time or don’t you follow Everton?
Frank Nolan
17   Posted 14/01/2010 at 22:55:16

Report abuse

Ged Dwyer, I wouldn’t have broken up the Neill/ Heitinger duo even if Jags were fit. There are times I wonder whether I’m on the same planet as some of the people on here.

Is this guy saying he’d play Neill ahead of Jags ???????????? I can only conclude that this is a post from DownUnder, great to see the Aussies getting involved, but PLEASE get a grip.
Michael Parrington
18   Posted 14/01/2010 at 23:04:19

Report abuse

Ged, I cant agree with you on this one. Everton’s defense has still been leaking goals left right and centre, and Neill has been lapse in his marking at set pieces in particular. It’s a good job that Heitinga has been there to clean up some of the close marking errors that are so clearly a problem of Neill's game nowadays. There are good signs that Distin will be back very soon and Jags isn't all that far off, even if he’ll only play a bit part role to the end of the season, so letting Neill go shouldn't hurt.

I’m not sure that its a great idea to play Neill against City this weekend as his heart probably wont be in it, so would prefer to see the youngster Duffy given the nod rather than Hibbert on the weekend with Neill on the bench.

Hopefully the £800k from the sale (not bad for 4 months) will help to secure the expected extra income that will be demanded by Saha’s agent owing to his form.

The most impressive part of Everton's play recently has been the link up play and breakdown of the oppositions play in the midfield. Full marks to Moyes for putting Fellaini back in the holding midfield role and bringing Donovan in to give us 2 genuine attacking options down the wings. It’s also given Cahill a chance to start to look like the dangerous player that we all know he can be.

It's great to see Pip back in the team, even though his skills are questionable, his ability to lead and to push every player on the park is a fantastic asset to the team.
Michael Parrington
19   Posted 14/01/2010 at 23:29:06

Report abuse

Sorry and just for a laugh.

I have to add that my wife is most unimpressed that Everton have sold Lucas Neill. She reckons he’s the only decent looking bloke in a team of ugly looking buggers.

That's great news for me as I can now watch the games in piece again.
Ged Dwyer
20   Posted 14/01/2010 at 23:32:38

Report abuse

Michael Parrington - I can’t believe you are now already talking about bringing Duffy into the team. It just shows how desperate all this is.

Neill and Heitinga is a good partnership and they have formed a good understanding over recent weeks (seeing us through a very tricky time after being thrown together when the team were already leaking goals) and you are happy to see that broken up and gamble on Duffy. Do me a favour!

Howard Don
21   Posted 14/01/2010 at 23:36:06

Report abuse

Sorry, Ged, I think you’re way wide of the mark there. Reading between the lines, Neill seems pretty delighted at the way things have turned out. I suspect Moyes had little choice.
Charlie Percival
22   Posted 14/01/2010 at 23:44:47

Report abuse

Senderos on way
James Stewart
23   Posted 15/01/2010 at 00:29:56

Report abuse

I have to agree with Ged on this one, I think it is madness.

Just as we run into a little form, someone is sold. Regardless of position he has been 1/11th of a team which has finally shown some form.

It will be for purely financial reasons which makes it all the more pathetic. Penny pinching over £800k. It’s hardly like we are getting anything out of it. Neill has been playing better at CB than Distin/Yobo/Duffy so I’m sorry I can’t see the benefit at all for EFC in this.

I dearly hope we do not sign the Swiss Titus Bramble, Senderos, to futher rub salt into the wounds.
Peter Roberts
24   Posted 15/01/2010 at 00:59:03

Report abuse

Michael Parrington.

I think your wife under-appreciates the aesthetic virtues of some of our players. The two Tims, Howard and Cahill, are rather pleasing on the eye (from a female perspective). Not to mention the sexy Spaniard when he eventually gets back.

And when my Dad reads this, I’d just like to re-assure him that I am perfectly straight and have no male infatuations...
Alun Jones
25   Posted 15/01/2010 at 01:45:00

Report abuse

I think Ged is correct and I don't agree with selling Neill at this point in time, as we are still competing on three fronts and will need all the cover we can get in the months ahead. I lost count of the posts on this site bemoaning our injury problems and the smallness of our squad so it doesn't make sense.

I think Neill has done ok since his time here, nothing spectacular, I admit but solid enough and worth his place in the squad However, if he engineered his departure then the club should come out and state this to be so... otherwise it is confusing to fans as to the timing.

There has also been a lot of criticism on here for both Yobo and Distin and I for one would have preferred to see Neill and Johnny continue their pairing during this revival of fortunes on the pitch. Even with all our players fit we still have a small squad...

Pat Finegan
26   Posted 15/01/2010 at 02:14:49

Report abuse

Here’s a thought. Is Moyes banking on Nigeria not going through in AfCoN? We have Neill this week and Nigeria’s last group match in January 20. If they don’t make it through, We should have Yobo back for the next game.
Steve Carter
27   Posted 15/01/2010 at 04:32:01

Report abuse

I loved your post, Alan Kirwin. ’He’s not in this game for glory other than his own.’ They’re few and far in the Prem. And ’Harry Sicknote Kewell’. What, as an Australian, I always loved about that is that when Harry was with the Shite, he would, without fail, always crawl out of his sickbed to put in a great 85 minute shift for the Socceroos, get taken off for the last 5 having exacerbated the injury, then fly back to recuperate at Anfield for the rest of the season on full darg.
Michael Parrington
28   Posted 15/01/2010 at 07:57:08

Report abuse

Ged, it just represents good business to sell Neill now. Duffy’s the natural centre back that is left in the club until the others return to fitness. Playing Neill on the weekend is a big risk vis a vis Lescott against the Gooners.

Peter, i’m just glad the misses will now leave me alone to watch the games in piece so i can curse and swear at the players, the refs, the commentators without being distracted into some conversation about tom and joan and how there kids are doing.
Ged Dwyer
29   Posted 15/01/2010 at 09:01:21

Report abuse

Michael Parrington - I’m not saying we should play Neill on Saturday even though he’s leaving; I’m saying we shouldn’t be selling him at this time.
Jamie Rowland
30   Posted 15/01/2010 at 10:04:26

Report abuse

£1m in the pot. A mercenary on umpteen thousand a week off the books... makes perfect sense to me.

He wouldn’t have got a game in February onwards and would have just be milking his wages.

Good business I think. It also means that we can concentrate on getting Saha to sign a deal.

We needed Neill (and thanks for the service) when Yobo, Distin, Jags where unfit. Now they are on the return and Yobo will be back for Feb, Moyes has risked a move now rather than seeing out his deal and costing the club and extra £1m.

I can’t see the issue here — it's a brilliant bit of business.

Got him for nothing; paying him good money — get £1m for him and get him off the books... and you call that madness? Please!
Neil Steele
31   Posted 15/01/2010 at 10:19:37

Report abuse

Ged, I'm with you 100% mate. Lucas has done a brilliant job for us and his sale is just another indication of the smalltime mentality that now runs through our club. The money we have received is a pittance and what really irks me is we still have absolute deadwood like Hibbert and Yobo on the books.

It’s a shocking show show of short-termism and a shocking piece of ’judgement’ by Moyes. I fully expected the responses you have got though, many of our simple fans just bleat like sheep and follow the leader now. They’d follow him into the fires of hell....

Steve O'Malley
32   Posted 15/01/2010 at 10:31:09

Report abuse

I often read this column and wonder about the football sense of some that draft comments, I have been an Everton fan more than 40 years and as one would understand have seen the good and bad and some very bad. I cannot believe that anyone who has watched the performances of Neill over recent weeks does not appreciate the role he has played.

Whilst understandably there are divided opinions about Neill on a personal level due to his apparent lack of loyalty and money-hungry approach, his football ability is a different matter. At 33 he is obviously lacking a bit of pace and can get caught out as a result but his overall composure on the ball, his ability to pass to another Everton player rather than just kick the ball upfield, and his ability to use two feet, leave him in a class of his own when compared with Hibbert, Yobo and Distin.

I would not go as far as suggesting that he play rather than Jagielka but at the moment, when we are desperate for points and Jagielka is not available, Neil is far and away the best option.

As far as Senderos goes, Arsene Wenger is as good as it gets in recognizing football ability when he sees it and if he would sooner break his golden rule of not resigning players and sign an over the hill Campbell in lieu of playing a young Senderos, there is a message there for all to see.

Ged, whilst not in full agreement with you, you are on the right track as far as I am concerned.

Michael Parrington
33   Posted 15/01/2010 at 10:58:36

Report abuse

Yeah, no probs, Ged. We all want the best for the team and unfortunately these transfer windows create this type of issue.

Let's just hope we win against Man City moneybags this weekend, whatever team Moyes picks.
Ben Jones
34   Posted 15/01/2010 at 11:45:33

Report abuse

Alan Kirwin.. I think you’re harsh on him. I think it was more the club talking rather than Neill engineering the move. I think he did like the club, and obviously he had his good friend with Cahill, so I don’t think he particularly asked to leave.

I thought he did quite well for us, and was quite surprised that he left. But now looking at it, as many people, his high wages and a fee of £800k seems like good business.

Though, Moyes did sell him, I think he must have a replacement in mind for cover. Senderos on loan then Kilgallon at the end of the season would do.

Peter Carpenter
35   Posted 15/01/2010 at 12:55:54

Report abuse

Step forward, Tony ’Der Kaiser’ Hibbert!
Kevy Quinn
36   Posted 15/01/2010 at 13:22:19

Report abuse

Just read Neill wont be joining until after the game tomorrow. Does this mean he will be playing tomorrow? I certainly hope not, its obvious he wont put in 100% as he wont risk injury. Complete madness if we play him as we seen what happened when Lescott’s head wasnt 100% in it at the start of the season.
Allan Williamson
37   Posted 15/01/2010 at 15:00:19

Report abuse

I don’t mind if Neill plays tomorrow, it doesn’t seem like he’s leaving on bad terms, he could put in some good hard tackles without any fear (apart from a red card at the start if the match of course).

I think he’ll be a lot better at keeping Tevez at bay than Hibbert, and I think Hibbert needs to be RB to tackle Bellamy, keep them two quiet and the game is ours

James Stewart
38   Posted 15/01/2010 at 15:29:11

Report abuse

Jamie Rowland wake up man!
"A mercenary on umpteen thousand a week off the books"

You could say that about almost any footballer. You then go on to suggest we should use the money to secure Saha. Another player you could quite easily be branded "A mercenary on umpteen thousand a week".

Neill was sold behind his back, for fuck's sake — it’s not like he demanded a move.
James Stewart
39   Posted 15/01/2010 at 15:41:10

Report abuse

Hibbert now out for a month. Maybe now Coleman will get a chance... albeit unlikely now Neville is back.
Peter Carpenter
40   Posted 15/01/2010 at 15:43:46

Report abuse

Donner und blitzen! Der Kaiser ist kaput!
Mike Allison
41   Posted 15/01/2010 at 16:31:48

Report abuse

The timing is bad but its basically money for nothing. When we do have everyone fit, Neill will be 5th choice. Some people on here are overplaying how well he’s done, the only live game I saw him in was Burnley at home and we were distinctly shaky at times, reliant on misses and Tim Howard.

He doesn’t mark particularly well (Dawson’s header vs Tottenham a criminal example), he’s not great in the air and basically will be no great loss. Jagielka and Heitinga will hopefully develop a fine first choice partnership and Yobo and Distin (who is apparently in full training) will provide back-up. Use the £800k to sign some 17/18-year-old wonderkids.

Ged Dwyer
42   Posted 15/01/2010 at 17:35:38

Report abuse

Frank Nolan - You obviously don’t realise that it takes time for a central defensive partnership to develop understanding between themselves, the full backs and the goalkeeper and Jags, the brilliant player that he is, would need time to re-establish himself and get match fit. So in the short term it would be better to stick with what we’ve got. It’s called planet common sense!
Tommy Gibbons
43   Posted 15/01/2010 at 23:47:40

Report abuse

Galatasaray make a bid of somewhere near a £1m and an offer of an 18-month / 2-year contract. Everton/Moyes allows the player to talk to the club because he only has 5 months left but we can’t guarantee another contract.

The player chooses to talk to Galatasary and HE accepts the offer.. He feels he doesn’t owe Everton any loyalty and Everton/Moyes don’t rate him enough to offer him an extended contract. Deal done, everybody is happy... but....

If you look at Moyes's press conference and listen to what he said, it looks to me that he was hoping Neill would break the mercenary habit of a lifetime... Moyes is an honourable man (albeit a rich one) and he expects the same from others (who are as equally rich)...

Roger Trenwith
44   Posted 15/01/2010 at 19:14:12

Report abuse

Have I been asleep for two and a half months and it's actually April 1st? Nope... Why did we sell Lucas Neill?? We definitely seem to have sold Neill in the middle of a manpower shortage at the back, for a paltry profit of £800k. Are we that desperate for cash?

Can somebody throw some light on this bizarre move? Even the player himself says he was surprised by the move.

Chris Perry
45   Posted 15/01/2010 at 17:42:44

Report abuse

Taken from Sporting Life transfer news!!! 18:01: Everton boss David Moyes earlier revealed that he is unlikely to be allowed to bring in a replacement for Galatasaray-bound Lucas Neill, and the news gets worse on the defensive front for the Toffees as full-back Tony Hibbert requires a hernia operation which will rule him out of action for around four weeks.

Fucking wankers!

Steve Flaherty
46   Posted 16/01/2010 at 05:49:06

Report abuse

This is a fucking stupid move. Neill has done well of late. In his partnership with Heitinga, we have 2 centre backs who pass the ball well and possess better football brains than Yobo and Distin. Love him or hate him, Neill is actually a quite decent footballer. A stupid, stupid move.
Gary Mortimer
47   Posted 16/01/2010 at 10:05:02

Report abuse

I’m with Ged on this one. Now is not the time to be selling Neill, when the only other fit (experienced) centre half is Heitinga

Why did we not say — come back nearer the end of the transfer window? Moyes would have had a clearer idea of who was going to be needed.

BTW is Heitinga cup tied for the Europa League? Or was he registered too late for the group stage?

Neill might play tonight — hopefully because he is an Aussie his ’we hate losing’ attitude will still hold true, unlike Lescott who just didn’t want to play for us ever again and had thrown his toys out the pram.

For the money offered, I just think it’s a risk to our mini revival.
Mitchell Wilton
48   Posted 16/01/2010 at 10:54:59

Report abuse

I for one am not at all surprised that this has happened... Try and think like Lucas Neill for a moment:

1. He will be without an employer in a couple of months and at 33 he’s no spring chicken;
2. Everton only signed him after Pip was crocked (ie, direct replacement) and now Pip is back;
3. The Turkish lira is almost equal with the Aussie dollar (way easier to do the currency conversion thing);
4. He would acknowledge that Heitinga is playing better than he his, and with Jags, Yobo and Distin (almost) back in fray he might be benched before the World Cup;
5. He has a contract to take him through to end of next season.

He engineered this transfer, don’t be mistaken, but do we need to be upset about it? I say definitely not.
Andy Ellis
49   Posted 16/01/2010 at 12:52:12

Report abuse

Same old story — we always look to sell in January in the hope that we’ll muddle through. Fine if the funds are going to be used for new signings but that doesn’t sound likely from Moyes's comments. So now we have no centre-half cover in an already depleted squad with some massive games coming up this month... or perhaps we’ll sign Gardner on loan again!
Ryan Rozenberg
50   Posted 16/01/2010 at 05:07:53

Report abuse

Loyalty is a word that should not describe the world game. Let's face it, the players don't play for the club. They play for the money, they move for the money. The whole fucking Manchester City side moved over for money.

And Lucas Neil? He is just money hungry. You call this loyalty? Captain of West Ham and declining a pay cut at the hinge of his career? Yeah great respect.

When I found out Owen Coyle was moving to Bolton, I felt like the heart and soul of Burnley had been ripped out. He made Burnley into what they are today. My point, is their such thing as loyalty in the EPL?

Mike Allison
51   Posted 16/01/2010 at 16:42:14

Report abuse

Does anyone know a definitive answer to Gary’s question about Heitinga’s eligibility for Europe? I’ve got a feeling he played for Atletico and so will be cup-tied, but you are allowed to rejig your squad and register again so the fact that he was ineligible before doesn’t necessarily mean he still will be at the resumption.
Ged Dwyer
52   Posted 18/01/2010 at 12:08:30

Report abuse

To sum up.
Moyes has publicly said the move was not instigated by Neill. It was Moyes who decided to sell him. Moyes then foolishly plays Distin on Saturday when he is not fully fit and sure enough Distin has to go off after aggravating his injury. That’s twice Moyes has done the same thing with Distin.
Any more proof needed that Moyes just doesn’t have any sense.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb