The Mail Bag

What if Fellani Left?

Comments (76)

The big clubs in the Premier Leagues just love to steal our excellent products: Wayne Rooney to Man United, Francis Jeffers to Arsenal, Joleon Lescott to Man City. Abel Xavier and Nick Barmby to Liverpool can be considered as good examples as well.

Now, there is talk of big clubs trying to steal Marouane Fellaini. I say this is not an impossibility. If anything, David Moyes should make preparations from now as to this credible possibility.

But, I believe in my heart that, should Fellaini go, we will still be alright. I believe Fellaini has upped the standard for our midfielders to emulate and anyone wanting the Defensive Midfield position for Everton must either match or exceeds Fellaini’s work rate and ability.

And Fellaini will not have the same support structure that he has at Everton to perform the way he does right now. He definitely will not have the same working spirit he is enjoying at Everton. I believe he will wither into oblivion should he leave Everton now.

I think Jack Rodwell, after witnessing how Fellaini has succeeded in the DM position, will rise up to the occasion when it calls for. Jack already shone in the first part of the season and he is the closest replacement we have to Fellaini.

Also, with the multi-million bucks that we will be forcing the likes of Real Madrid, Chelski, Man U, Barcelona etc to cough up (if it’s anything below £50M then it’s a crime) we can replace and get more good talents to fill up holes in other deparment while keeping Rodwell.

As of now, let's enjoy the rest of the season and hope some rich Arabs will come and pump money into Everton, the only Premier League club worth pumping money into at the moment.
Rahman Talib, Jakarta, Indonesia     Posted 19/01/2010 at 08:08:13

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Ian Tunstead
1   Posted 19/01/2010 at 14:58:48

Report abuse

Hang on, a few months ago people on here wanted to get rid of him even at a loss, how things change. If he were to go, it wouldn't be Rodwell replacing him, it would be Artata. Anyway he must still have about 3 years on his contract.
James Stewart
2   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:12:34

Report abuse

The last thing I would want is for some rich arab to come & pump money into Everton. Is that the kind of hollow success you really want?
Matthew Thompson
3   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:00:22

Report abuse

Wow.
Why talk about the possibility of him leaving!

He has been playing well recently but his form has been up and down since he came.

IF he contines his recent form for the rest of the season.... the only thing Moyes should possibly be preparing for is a new contract.
Ciarán McGlone
4   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:20:23

Report abuse

For a start, they will not be ’stealing him’ — they will be paying a price agreed for a breach of a contract.

Secondly, he doesn’t play defensive midfield.

Thirdly, we’re skint and will continue to be skint for a long time.

Fourthly, the best players go to the best teams... there’s nothing knew in that fundamental of football economics.
Miles Wilson
5   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:19:37

Report abuse

It’s always a problem when a club outside the mega-bucks clubs puts together a decent team. As well as the Big Fella, Pienaar and Rodwell are being sniffed round.

All we can do is try and tie them to a contract that is as long as possible to keep the price high, hope we can match their ambition, and cross our fingers that the players aren’t motivated purely by money and would realise they are better off at a club where they play regularly and are worshipped by real fans and not swallowed up ina squad system elsewhere.

Also, apart from Rooney, it's worth noting that none of the other players mentioned above had any real success at their new "bigger" clubs.

Mickey Dee
6   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:26:39

Report abuse

Hmm... Don’t think it is a breach of contract if both parties agree they are no longer bound by its terms: and if Fellaini hasn’t been playing a starring role as a holding midfielder for the past couple of months, I must be mistaking him for Tim Cahill.
Iain Love
7   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:18:23

Report abuse

If he maintains that level of performance till the end of the season, the summer will be interesting.

Let's say we recieved a big offer for him... £30m, wether we wanted to accept that or not, the key factor will be Fellaini himself. Will he want to go to one of the so-called bigger clubs or will he say "I’ll give it another year with Everton, I’m only 22, I can wait a season and see"?

His performance the other night was as good as Viera at his best (say what you want about Barry & De Jong, they are very good players) and if maintained he could have his pick of teams. The reason he came to Everton was advancing his carreer, playing in probably the best league that suits his style, money and Everton the best team outside of the top 4. Saying that, he would want to go. Hopefully he’ll stay at least another year.

Ciarán McGlone
8   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:37:34

Report abuse

It is a termination based on mutual agreement... technically there is no breach, but the restitution is calculated along similar lines as in damages flowing from a breach — length of contract, importance of the player etc etc..
Gordon Blair
9   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:35:10

Report abuse

At the risk of stating the obvious, we NEED to keep Fellaini.

The future of our first XI needs to be built around the likes of Rodwell, Duffy and Coleman at the back, Mo and whomever makes the grade out of Baxter, Gosling, Wallace, Akpan in the middle and Vaughan (providing neither of his legs drop off) up front.

By phasing out the elder talent and bringing the youth through (particularly retaining our younger ’stars’ ) we can maintain the stability that has allowed us to outperform our spending power in the last few years.

By all means sell on those who have peaked (Lescott, Cahill, Arteta, Pienaar and Bily) once they’ve peaked, but we should never sell those players who are only going to accrue value — we simply can’t afford to if we ever want to hit the heights again.
Ciarán McGlone
10   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:42:05

Report abuse

Oh and he certainly hasn’t been playing holding midfield.

He is playing centre-midfield and is up and down the pitch like a whippet... (relatively speaking).
Tom Bowers
11   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:40:30

Report abuse

Let’s not get carried away with Fellaini. Sure he has played well in recent games... but not before time. Whatever were the excuses for all the games he played before that?

We all hope he is here to stay and continue with this level of play and it can only serve to encourage the others around him to maintain theirs too, thus benefitting the team. Question, would not a smaller afro increase his speed?

Ciarán McGlone
12   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:48:26

Report abuse

Tom,

Very pertinent point...

Now that Fellaini has actually started to move about with more urgency than Howard Marks....it’s obvious that his barnet may actually be affecting his pace...

The way it bends back as he runs indicates it’s a significant impediment to optimum aero dynamics..

The question is one of proportionality...Does the benefit of gaining extra pace outweight the detriment of looking fucking hilarious?

I’m not so sure....
Mickey Dee
13   Posted 19/01/2010 at 15:49:56

Report abuse

No, you are wrong. We have been operating a 5-man midfield with Cahill pressing forward and and Fellaini in a holding role lying deeper in front of the back four. Obviously when in possession and attacking, or at set plays, Fellaini will venture further forward, but his main role is holding a defensive midfield position.
Shaun Brennan
14   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:01:24

Report abuse

"if it’s anything below £50M then it’s a crime"

That's a knee jerk reaction right? To what his father apparently said? If Everton ever decided to sell, it would be to a price both sides agreed on, like Joleon Lescott for £20 odd mill. Now that was a crime.
Andy Crooks
15   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:06:42

Report abuse

Pienaar, Fellaini or Rodwell will go this summer. We sell to survive. Let it be Rodwell and let it be as early as possible. Then, move on.
Gareth Humphreys
16   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:03:32

Report abuse

Abel Xavier? Run that past me again.

Anyway, back to the case in point. A bit of a reality check is needed. He has played really well the last two months. Would I swap him tomorrow for Essien or Fabregas amongst others? You betcha!

Ricardo Humphries
17   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:12:58

Report abuse

Personally i think Lescott was a good deal for us... he is the most overrated player in the league, followed closely by Jamie Carragher!
Gareth Humphreys
18   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:18:03

Report abuse

Ricardo we must be brothers.

Hang on a minute, have you spelt your surname correctly?
Alan Kirwin
19   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:24:06

Report abuse

"Secondly, he doesn’t play defensive midfield." - Oh yes he does.

"Oh and he certainly hasn’t been playing holding midfield." - Oh yes he does.

The fact that he gets up the pitch too does not negate his default position on the team.

The notion that David Moyes, Fellaini himself and all the media are agreed on his position, but that they are all wrong and our venerable Toffeeweb Oracle has yet another piece of pedantic mystery to convey is nonsense.

Fellaini made his name as a holding midfielder and that is where he currently plays. Get used to it. Hopefully there are no further hairs left to split.
Lee Hind
20   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:38:15

Report abuse

Alan Kirwin - +1

Everything I was going to say, eloquently put.
Ciarán McGlone
21   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:43:36

Report abuse

The fact that he comes back to defend does equally - "not negate his default position" in the team...

Which is unequivocally the centre of the park.

He simply cannot be defined as a holding midfielder, because he cannot be pigeon-holed into that position on the basis of where he been playing in the last 6 games.

You’re displaying an acute lack of appreciation of what the holding position requires... the clue's in the name.
Ciarán McGlone
22   Posted 19/01/2010 at 16:47:41

Report abuse

ps: Perhaps you can show me where David Moyes or Fellaini says he is currently playing defensive midfield?

.....or ’the entire media’...??

If you could do it without displaying the bitterness of a scorned child — that would be just fantastic.
Ciarán McGlone
23   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:09:16

Report abuse

"No, you are wrong. We have been operating a 5-man midfield with Cahill pressing forward and and Fellaini in a holding role lying deeper in front of the back four. Obviously when in possession and attacking, or at set plays, Fellaini will venture further forward, but his main role is holding a defensive midfield position."
-------------------------

I disagree. If you watch Sunday’s game again you’ll see that the majority of times we have the ball offensively, Fellaini is in the middle linking up this play and being responsible for the creativity as equally as Pienaar.

There seems to be a tendency to think that someone must be playing a holding role if there’s a five man midfield on show...not necessarily so, and I certainly haven’t seen Fellaini holding back any more than he’s been going forward....

For me, he’s been playing box-to-box traditional centre midfield...
Mickey Dee
24   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:28:47

Report abuse

Any other members of the Flat Earth Society in here?
Steve Edwards
25   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:30:46

Report abuse

Displaying the bitterness of a scorned child.
_____________________________

Ciaran - Thats a bit rich coming from you. Are you a big boy now? Anyway, why are you worried about where Fellaini plays because, according to you, he’s shite. You’ve been saying so on here for the last twelve months.
Andy Codling
26   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:39:38

Report abuse

Ciaran, do you have a job?
If so I suggest getting on with it and stop trying to be the new Tony Marsh.
At least Tony has a point which makes things so much more interesting for the listener or in this case reader.
Mickey Dee
27   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:40:40

Report abuse

"I thought the first half of the season would be the worst for him after his first campaign. He had such a good first season. He scored a lot of goals as a newcomer and I thought the first half of this season would be a struggle for him.

"But I can see signs now that he is beginning to get to top form and be good for the team."

"He has played deeper for the last three or four games and he is getting better at it. He is beginning to understand the duties. He is settling down and not chasing everything all over the pitch.


David Moyes quoted in almost every media before the Burnley game.
Dermot Ryan
28   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:43:40

Report abuse

On the question of selling players who want to leave: I’d like to agree that I think Lescott was good business. I’d love the whole team to stay and I think if they play like they did on Saturday, we could really challenge for a spot in the top 4 next season. But, if someone wants to go and you can get silly money for him, it is good business to sell. Player for player, I’d have our team today (once our injured folks are back of course) over the team we had in August.

And seriously lads, what about the hair? Is it impacting Fellaini’s performances? Should we open a new thread on this one?
Steve Edwards
29   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:49:15

Report abuse

Andy - I don’t know about a job but he may have a paper round. Believe it or not he’s only 13, going on 53 though. He’s packed an awful lot of football knowledge into his 13 years... or so he would have you believe.
Mickey Dee
30   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:48:55

Report abuse

The end of Fellaini’s wait for an extended run in his favoured position has also aided the Belgian’s improvement. His first season in English football was richly encouraging, yielding nine goals and an FA Cup final appearance from an unorthodox role as a second striker and occasionally at centre-forward. But it is in a deeper position where Fellaini sees his future.

"I was bought as a defensive midfielder but because of the injuries we suffered last season I ended up being moved around, so I’m a lot happier now I’m back in my favoured position," he admits. "I’m ­feeling very happy with what I’m doing at this club, although I always think it’s up to others to say how you are playing. But I feel I have adapted and am playing well."


Fellaini. Also direct quotes.
Colin Malone
31   Posted 19/01/2010 at 17:51:59

Report abuse

Ciaran,
He is playing in the holding role.
Patrick Vieira, scored goals for Arsenal, HOLDING MIDFIELDER.

Roy Keane, scored goals for Man U, HOLDING MIDFIELDER.

Felliani, HOLDING MIDFIELDER.
Mickey Dee
32   Posted 19/01/2010 at 18:41:04

Report abuse

On a brighter note... Mikky’s back in training.
Luke Berry
33   Posted 19/01/2010 at 18:47:15

Report abuse

Ciarán McGlone, I have not in a long while read such patronising drivel spouted from an individual as yourself on this thread.

Please go to mysoccerplace.net and watch the match of the day highlights again, then have a think about the deep role that the big Fella is occupying and tell me that is not a holding midfield role.....he seems on nearly every occasion to be our deepest midfielder. I think that is what a holding midfielder ahem does!
Ciarán McGlone
34   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:06:01

Report abuse

Patronising drivel?

Stevie " one joke" Edwards and his 13 quip..?
Get on with your job? Jesus, you guys have really got the hang of this debating and opinions stuff...

Micky, Moyes as you quote says he is playing deeper... considering he was playing the Cahill role before — that means Moyes could just as easily be saying he is playing centre midfield.

What he was bought for and what he is doing on the pitch are two entirely different matters.

Luk Berry, Highlights?
Steve Edwards
35   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:05:59

Report abuse

Luke - If Ciaran decides that black is white, then it's white! Now have you got that? The point is he decided long ago that Fellaini was a waste of space. Now that he has been proved wrong he is just being pedantic. A change of tactics, that's all.
Steve Edwards
36   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:13:32

Report abuse

Ciaran - That wasn’t a joke, young man, it was a fact as well you know.
Ciarán McGlone
37   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:12:58

Report abuse

"Anyway, why are you worried about where Fellaini plays because according to you he’s shite. You’ve been saying so on here for the last twelve months"

You fancy backing this up Mr Edwards? I’ve been consistently saying that Fellaini has potential but needs better players around him before we can judge him...

It’s not like you to make something up.
Mickey Dee
38   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:21:23

Report abuse

I give up.
Ciarán McGlone
39   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:23:02

Report abuse

Give up what exactly? You have an opinion. I have a contrary one. Neither is conclusive.

Mr Edwards Your fascination with 13-year-olds is really a bit disturbing. Do you sign any kind of register?
Steve Edwards
40   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:23:15

Report abuse

You're quite right, it's not like me to make things up, Master McGlone. Oh, he just needed better players around him... is that what you meant? I must have got it wrong.
Geoff Edwards
41   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:22:58

Report abuse

It clearly all depends on what you define as defensive midfield doesn’t it? If you’re idea of a defensive midfielder is someone just there to sit in front of the back 4 and break up play a la Carsley or Makelele then Fellaini hasn’t been def mid. If you think def mid is an all-action ball-winner role a la vieira, keane or peter reid then he probably has.

What is certain is this: our midfield against City was: Donovan, Pienaar, Fellaini, Bily, Cahill.

Fellaini was clearly the most defensive midfielder we had on the park by a country mile.
Steve Edwards
42   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:28:49

Report abuse

Not that old tactic again Ciaran. Nobody could accused me of grooming you.
Ciarán McGlone
43   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:38:02

Report abuse

No-one could accuse you of answering a question either Steve....eh!

Mr Geoff Edwards — I’ll buy that for a dollar.
Dick Fearon
44   Posted 19/01/2010 at 19:43:47

Report abuse

What tactical formation is in use at any moment depends on factors that differ from one second to the next. A good team or player is one that can quickly adapt to those changes.

Moyes may well have told Fellaini to play a defensive role but he would have expected him and anyone else for that matter to respond to whatever team mates and opposition are doing. Against City the big fella continuously switched from defence to attack but was only able to do that because our entire team was ’up’ for it and, after the first few minutes, City were woeful.

Another thing to be considered was City lost a key striker after ten minutes. That surely would have had a detrimental affect on their game.

Dave Southon
45   Posted 19/01/2010 at 20:16:55

Report abuse

For me he’s been playing box to box traditional centre midfield...

Ciaran, I am in complete agreement.
Guy Rogers
46   Posted 19/01/2010 at 20:30:33

Report abuse

To be fair I think Cherry has said previously that Fellaini does need better players around him and hasn’t really slated him as badly as you make out, I think we where all frustrated with him to be honest... However, one thing that is true is that he is only 13 years of age but he has a massive head on him with a big brain and he knows his stuff.... a wonderful boy!
Ciarán McGlone
47   Posted 19/01/2010 at 20:31:42

Report abuse

I’d agree with that analysis Dick...

Our tradiational use of the 4-5-1 didn’t have the fludity that we are getting now.

Because of the limitations of our midfielders, we utilised a rigid 4-5-1 that included planting a player (or sometimes two) right in front of the back four... and they rarely moved from that position, simply breaking up play and little else. This rigidity also led to us defendig very deep as the lack of forward movement from the holding player tended to scare the defence into staying back.

We haven’t been using this rigid structure recently... the creativity and defensive duties have been split pretty evenly between the two central midfield players... and that’s why I don’t think Felllaini can be considered as playing the holding role...

Flat Earth society?

No, simply an opinion based on observation — I suppose I could be lazy and just repeat what the press say...
Ciarán McGlone
48   Posted 19/01/2010 at 20:49:46

Report abuse

Why thank you, Guy —someone who’s actually read what I've said about Fellaini — outside of the critiques of his crappy performances earlier in the season... rather than guessed.

Cherrypicking is a necessity in here...
Mickey Dee
49   Posted 19/01/2010 at 20:59:28

Report abuse

I give up because I have formed an opinion, granted in a very short time, that you are dogmatic.

It is impossible to conduct a debate with a dogmatist. Therefore, on that basis, I give up.

I have produced to you prima facie evidence of the role and position of Fellaini as expressed by the player himself and his manager, yet you still deny it. There is no hope for you.
Peter Moore
50   Posted 19/01/2010 at 20:35:35

Report abuse

Although undeniably an annoying pudding head, Ciarán is probably right. Now it’s my turn to be pedantic.

Fellaini was up and down all through the game, hence, not a ’holding’ midfielder. Yes, he defended more than he attacked, but you can’t class him as a holding midfielder! A holding midfielder never gets ahead of the ball. Think of Claude Makelele. Never got ahead of the ball.

The main reason Fellaini managed to get forward so much was due to our defence being positive and squeezing play and getting a foot in up the pitch, rather than backing off towards our own goal, which we do so often. I think Heitinga and the return of Neville to be the main reason for this positivity in defence.

Anyway, why is it fans assume that a team has to have a holding midfielder? The greatest Everton team of all time had no holding midfielder. Watch any footage of Peter Reid and Paul Bracewell dovetailing together, both box-to-box for 90 minutes. Awesome!
I can’t wait till Saturday!

Mickey Dee
51   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:15:00

Report abuse

Peter, tactics have developed a long way since the 1980s.
Ciarán McGlone
52   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:14:05

Report abuse

Mr Dee, If you think there’s no room for debate beyond Moyes saying he’s playing deeper (than the Cahill role he was playing) or Fellaini saying he’s in his favourite position... then I think your use of the word 'dogmatic' is very... er... interesting. By the way, these are not conclusive evidence — it's anecdotal —- and the Moyes quote isn’t even that!

By the way, cut out the latin. The crusades are over...
Ciarán McGlone
53   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:20:58

Report abuse

"Peter, tactics have developed a long way since the 1980’s"
--------------------------
Have they really?
Mickey Dee
54   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:21:19

Report abuse

Why do you feel the right to tell me how I should respond to your inanity?
Mickey Dee
55   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:27:02

Report abuse

By the way, here is your reponse earlier: ’it is a termination based on mutual agreement... technically there is no breach, but the restitution is calculated along similar lines as in damages flowing from a breach — length of contract, importance of the player etc etc..’

The use of 'et cetera' at the end there!! Have you only just remembered that the crusades are over? Or are you a complete idiot?
David McKenna
56   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:42:30

Report abuse

Ciaran, what is this obsession you have with believing Fellaini does not play holding midfield?

He sits in front of the defence, wins tackles and headers, break up play and picks the ball up off the defence... Thats' holding midfield.

Fellaini has come out and said “this is my best position, I prefer defensive mid”. Moyes and the rest of the squad have all come out and said the same thing: “Fellaini is finally playing well 'cos he is back in the holding role.”

He plays holding midfield.
Rob Hope
57   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:42:21

Report abuse

I hate to take sides but to say Felliani isn’t playing defensive midfield role is just bizarre! Seems as his manager and all the players are singing his praises as a defensive midfielder.

Also he says it himself, he might get forward but his main role is to cut out attacks which he did superbly against Bellamy.

I don't no maybe he can do nothing right in some people's eyes like defy his manager with a MotM performance, in defensive attacking Cahill midfield role.

To be frank, what does it matter if he plays like that — maybe it should be renamed the Fellaini role...

Ciarán McGlone
58   Posted 19/01/2010 at 21:52:38

Report abuse

Yes, I am a complete idiot. Your cogent debating technique has fairly highlighted it...
Mickey Dee
59   Posted 19/01/2010 at 22:02:37

Report abuse

Cogent, would that be from the latin ’cogens’?
Will Leaf
60   Posted 19/01/2010 at 23:32:26

Report abuse

I think Ciaran has shaded the argument as Fellaini was running box to box the whole game. Fluidity is the key as he was not shackled in front of the back four by any means.

Also, when decent teams are bossing a match, Total Football tends to come to the fore and Fellaini exemplified this on Saturday. Now as we fell back in order, maintaining shape, Fellaini was most often anchoring the midfield, sat in front of the back four.

If we are getting pumelled in a match, I am sure Fellaini would be less able to maraud forward in a box-to-box fashion, and will more obviously be shielding the back four.

I think the problem was with Ciaran denying Fellaini was a defensive midfielder and at first offering no qualifying statement.

As to tactics advancing since the 80s, and no doubt they have, don’t forget Ramsey’s "Wingless Wonders" were essentially a 4-4-2 diamond formation with Nobby the destroyer deployed in front of the back 4, and B Charlton linking the midfield and the front 2.
Chris Leyland
61   Posted 19/01/2010 at 23:58:23

Report abuse

Ciaran - I appreciate that you know better than David Moyes where he is playing Felli and that Moyes will indeed be mistaken but ust incase here is a direct quote from Davod Moyes freom the Guardian:

Besides, the Everton manager, David Moyes, did not buy with goals in mind and is now satisfied Fellaini is fit for his original purpose.

"Last season I was playing him further forward and that was because he wasn’t disciplined enough in the defensive midfield role at the time. A lot of the things went on around him very quickly and he wanted to be involved in everything," said Moyes. "I think the fans were probably wondering ’What is he?’ But undoubtedly he is a really talented football player and we’re beginning to see the fruits of that now."
Seamus Murphy
62   Posted 19/01/2010 at 23:50:23

Report abuse

Ciaran - you asked the man to provide quotes of where he said he was playing defensive midfield and he provided one but it’s not good enough for you. You regularly end up in these pedantic cyber altercations due to your complete dismissal of other people's opinions when delivering your definitive judgement on random discussions -
e.g "secondly, he doesn’t play midfield."

You think you debate but you don’t, you regularly dismiss peoples opinions as if you are some authority on the subject, no matter what the subject, then get into pedantic arguenents about wording rather than accept any valid counter arguments.

Anyway, my two cents. Carry on.

Pete Gunby
63   Posted 20/01/2010 at 01:10:00

Report abuse

Not quite sure of any positions anymore. Severe headache setting in. Whatever position Fellaini played last weekend - the lad did well.
Comparing Ciaran to T Marsh is off the mark. Ciaran states his opinions and presents his case. Isn’t that the purpose of the TW.
Peter Bradshaw
64   Posted 20/01/2010 at 06:59:02

Report abuse

What was the question again??

ffs guys get a grip, and move on
Stan Sheppard
65   Posted 20/01/2010 at 09:51:53

Report abuse

So what if he left?.....
Ciarán McGlone
66   Posted 20/01/2010 at 09:54:46

Report abuse

Seamus,

He didn’t provide any quotes of Moyes saying he was playing a holding position... he did however provide one of Moyes saying he was playing deeper.

Hardly the same thing I think you’ll agree — especially considering his previous role was Cahill’s advanced midfield position...

I hope this satisfies your point too, Mr Leyland.
Geoff Edwards
67   Posted 20/01/2010 at 10:04:47

Report abuse

I think this whole debate stems from the way in which the role of the defensive midfielder has changed over the years. Traditionally it was a box-to-box ball-winner such as Paul Ince, who would hare around putting in tackles but also getting forward on occasion and bagging the odd goal.

It was more in this decade that pioneers such as Lee Carsley rose to the fore as ’holding midfielders’, sitting and screening the back 4 and never really going beyond the ball. Carsley then passed the ’holding midfielder’ baton onto lesser, mainly gallic, men such as Didier Deschamps and Claude Makalele, who have performed the role with equal effectiveness but less panache.
Ciarán McGlone
68   Posted 20/01/2010 at 10:16:33

Report abuse

No room for debate here Geoff....

The whole things been called off because Moyes said he’s been playing deeper...
Ciarán McGlone
69   Posted 20/01/2010 at 10:23:56

Report abuse

I think I’ll leave before I get told off by the editors for inciting the natives ...

To summarise the two threads...getting annoyed at newspapers is really a bit silly. Those who didn’t criticise the team when we were playing well, are not the chosen ones -

And in my opinion we are not playing with a five man midfield that is employing a rigid holding player...

Oh and the boys were superb on Saturday... a point which seems to have been lost in all of this.

I can’t wait to watch the Birmingham match on Saturday.
Mickey Dee
70   Posted 20/01/2010 at 10:49:52

Report abuse

Ciaran

Take a look at TW own comments on the player.
Stan Sheppard
71   Posted 20/01/2010 at 11:13:57

Report abuse

Again, no direct quote of playing defensive midfield.

However, I think we can all agree he is playing better, he’s happy, the team is playing better and long may it continue!

Everton midfielder Marouane Fellaini believes it is no coincidence that his recent upturn in form has come with a move back to his favoured defensive midfield position.

"I’ve always said that this is my best position,"

the £15m record signing, who has been used as a second striker at times this season, said.

"I’m enjoying playing here again. I just do my job out there on the field. I try to do my best."
Mickey Dee
72   Posted 20/01/2010 at 11:18:32

Report abuse

QED Stan. I hope that ends the debate.
Tony Finn
73   Posted 20/01/2010 at 12:07:08

Report abuse

FFS sake before Makele came on the scene no one mentioned "holding" midfielders , you were just a centre mid. Now all the FM types and cyber tacticians spout about "holding midfielders" like they are Alf Ramsey. The lad just plays centre mid. He attacks, he defends. That's what centre mids do.

He's gonna say "oh its my best position" in the press cos hes being poked for soundbites and hes playing well so he's gonna go along with it.
If he's strictly a "holding" midfielder, what was he doing on the byline crossing for Vaughan to score against Burnley! (It was him wasnt it!?)

Michael Brien
74   Posted 20/01/2010 at 12:56:08

Report abuse

Hopefully Fellaini will stay at Everton for a long while. However, the reality of the situation is that there are several mega-rich clubs in the PL — well although they have mega-debts, they seem to be able to provide their managers with mega-sized transfer budgets!!! There will of course be the possibility that the "usual suspects" will be interested in trying to sign Fellaini.

However, what’s the difference between this and Everton sigining Lescott from Wolves and Cahill from Millwall? At the time, both these clubs were in the Championship and I am sure their fans were not overjoyed at the prospect of losing these players.

I hope that Fellaini stays with us for many more seasons, at 22 he has yet to reach his peak. I am sure when he does, the money we paid for him will seem to have been a very good investment. Should the "unthinkable " happen, then I would hope that the powers that be at Goodison would make sure that the transfer fee was a good one and just as important I feel, that we have a replacement lined up.

Not too many Gooners were happy at the thought of losing Henry, but then Wenger gets Adebayor - now he has gone then AW has other alternatives. Team building is an on-going process after all. But hopefully we shall be seeing Fellaini at Everton for many more years to come.

James Stewart
75   Posted 20/01/2010 at 16:00:46

Report abuse

Tony Finn - Spot on!
Jason Lam
76   Posted 21/01/2010 at 08:35:15

Report abuse

They all leave in the end, they’re heartless bastards all of them. Get rid and profit whilst their stock is high.

Moyes’s replacements aren't half bad anyway as we got Jonny, Bily and Distin from the Lescott robbery.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb