The Mail Bag

Beckford v Vaughan

Comments (27)

Apparently we are supposed to be cashing in on young James and he will eventually be replaced by Jermaine Beckford in the summer. Vaughan is as yet unproved, but free. (A bit of an ask I know).

As for Beckford, I have watched him play for Carlisle, and he missed bagfulls of chances, and I can't remember him scoring for them, which is why he ended up at Wealdstone.

Leeds signed him from them for all of a grand, and he is villified by the Leeds fans also - I know loads of Cumbrian whites and they hate him.

Simon Grayson has quoted "A bigger club then Everton" may come in for him. He's just playing the sell him now game for as much as he can get, as it doesn't matter to him who would come in in the summer, as he would be free.

Stay well away from this lad, his level is barely the championship, and Moyesie won't be pulling a rabbit out of the hat with him.

To sell Vaughan AND to sign this lad are both acts of madness. Together it is complete insanity.

Unless it is the old skint factor.
Keith Harrison, Cumbria     Posted 21/01/2010 at 14:44:29

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Charlie Percival
1   Posted 21/01/2010 at 20:40:08

Report abuse

Good player, proved against Utd and bags of goals for Leeds.

Vaughan wont be going anywhere.
James Elworthy
2   Posted 21/01/2010 at 20:46:07

Report abuse

Who said we are selling him... apart from a rumour mongering journalist in the Daily Mirror?
Alan Clarke
3   Posted 21/01/2010 at 20:48:44

Report abuse

Beckford isn’t even top scorer in League 1. I hope Moyes has done his homework on him rather than buying into the hype surrounding him. I do get the feeling a lot of Leeds fans though don’t like him because he’s turning his back on them. If he were to sign a new contact with Leeds now they’d all be delighted.

I very much doubt we’ll sell Vaughan. His return from injury, plus Anichebe getting back soon will be the reason Moyes is letting Jo go (and the fact Jo is crap).
Ian Tunstead
4   Posted 21/01/2010 at 21:00:48

Report abuse

Well, we’ve got rid of Jo so I don't see why we can’t have Vaughan and Beckford. If I had a choice, I would rather have Vaughan... even with his injury record. I rate Vaughan highly and appreciate his effort greatly. He is second to none for his level of commitment and determination and is as brave as a lion.
Jamie Barlow
5   Posted 21/01/2010 at 21:25:52

Report abuse

If Vaughan would agree... how about a swap deal involving Vaughan and Beckford till the end of the season? Both teams could then have the option to keep. Works for both parties.

We hold the upper hand obviously as we would probably keep Vaughan and they don’t really have a say what happens to Beckford, but he seems to have gone a bit stale for Leeds and I’m sure they wouldn’t mind having Vaughan for 4 months. We could also check out if he’s a bit of a dick, like some Leeds fans say he is. If he is, send him back.

Charlie Percival
6   Posted 21/01/2010 at 21:52:53

Report abuse

1) You say both teams have an option to keep then say we can keep Vaughan if we want.

2) Vaughan is worth a lot more than a free transfer, which Beckford is.
Jamie Barlow
7   Posted 21/01/2010 at 22:22:37

Report abuse

Yeah sorry. I meant buy in Vaughan case. But only if Everton and Vaughan wanted to of course. Personally i’d keep Vaughan. Just a thought.
Andrew James
8   Posted 21/01/2010 at 23:32:00

Report abuse

Beckford - 26 and scoring hatfulls in League One

Vaughan - 21 and comfortable in the Prem and his problem is injuries. But when he plays he is really effective.

Vaughan everytime.
Brian Williams
9   Posted 22/01/2010 at 06:39:57

Report abuse

IMHO James Vaughan (still only 21 remember) is another one of those exciting prospects that we have come through every now and then. I think if it hadn’t been for the bad luck he’s had with injuries he’d be a really top player already, rather than the top prospect he remains at the moment.

I wouldn’t let him go anywhere. I’d nurture him and make him feel wanted at Everton. His attitude is first class as well!

Lee Kidd
10   Posted 22/01/2010 at 07:57:19

Report abuse

I think Beckford looks like he could either be the next Darren Bent... or the next Marcus Bent.

Not a bad gamble on a free, though. Moyes has a good track record of going into the lower leagues and grabbing little stars like Cahill.
Keith Harrison
11   Posted 22/01/2010 at 07:58:22

Report abuse

A couple of points to the editors here lads - I didn’t post this at 14.44 yesterday - it was done last night @ 20.00, not while I was at work yesterday. The second point is on the editing. While I understand why you might want to omit the Atkinson reference, the rest of the paragraph does not make sense now. My point was that if James remained injury-free (A big ask I know), not simply free, he will be a hell of a player.

The main point however was not missed, leave Beckford well alone, and bring the best out of Vaughan.

As for Jo, we hardly need to replace him, as he wasn’t contributing anyway.
James Boden
12   Posted 22/01/2010 at 10:19:51

Report abuse

I do hope these rumours are not true. Ok credit where it is due he scored at Old Trafford, however the guy is 2nd rate. That is his level. To even suggest he is better than Vaughan is ridiculous. If this is the best we can do then we may aswell sign Jo back.
Paul Joy
13   Posted 22/01/2010 at 11:28:46

Report abuse

Points to consider
1. Moyes will have done his homework re Beckford and he will cost nothing
2. "Leeds fans villify Beckford" - in my experience Leeds fans always have and always will villify everything that isnt from Yorkshire
3. Comparing the 2 players is daft - transfer rumours is all.
James Stewart
14   Posted 22/01/2010 at 13:31:31

Report abuse

This is one of the most idiotic posts I’ve read in a long time!
Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
15   Posted 22/01/2010 at 14:48:51

Report abuse

Sorry about that, Keith, but using Ron Atkinson to get in the pithy comment about Beckford being a "Big Lazy Nigger" seemed like something that would just get everyone’s backs up and send it way off topic.

Now I know in your defence that you will say you didn’t use the word "Nigger" ... but when you put those stupid asterisks in place of the actual letters, what does that actually achieve, cos I’m curious?

"Big Lazy N*****"? What does that mean other than Big Lazy Nigger? Isn’t "Nigger" what you meant? But you can’t actually bring yourself to write it out... even though it is what the man actually said. And what anyone who reads this knows he said.

So, rather than exposing us to all that, I removed it. But since you brought it up again, sure, let’s talk about it!

James Stewart
16   Posted 22/01/2010 at 15:59:49

Report abuse

Keith what on earth has Atkinson got to do with either Beckford or Vaughan? I’m curious now.

I agree with Michael I hate the use of *** — just say what you mean for fucks sake!

You are talking complete rubbish by the way. I live in Leeds and Beckford is regarded as their best player and fans love him.
Mike Allison
17   Posted 22/01/2010 at 17:06:58

Report abuse

Before this becomes a debate about racial slurs, my opinion is pretty clear cut. Vaughan is younger and better than Beckford. He’s quick, strong, enthusiastic (almost to a fault) and scores goals. We should be lauding Vaughan, making him feel important and looking to really develop him. (Basically I’m agreeing with Brian Williams above).

There always seem to be rumours about him being sold, Moyes not really rating him, and posters on here have said they don’t rate him. I just don’t get that. He’s already good, and that’s with having missed much of his development with injury.

Assuming he’s not actually permanently crocked and we’re trying to pull a fast one by selling him on quick, he should be involved at Everton for years to come.

Keith Harrison
18   Posted 22/01/2010 at 17:34:09

Report abuse

I was making the point that I believe Beckford is very lazy, perhaps the Atkinson analogy was wrong. I’m not bothered it was removed Micheal, but you removed some of the details regarding James Vaughan, such as his sick record. It therefore didn’t make complete sense, or if you are James Stewart, no sense at all.

Hvaing both seeen Beckford play on numerous occasions, and having a lot of mates who travel to Leeds for all home and some away games, they concur that he is well overhyped.

My opinion James, but your welcome to yours mate without me calling you an idiot.

James Stewart
19   Posted 22/01/2010 at 18:54:06

Report abuse

That maybe the case Keith but a sweeping statement like, "he is vilified by the Leeds fans" is just plain slander. I live in Leeds and have been to a fair few matches over the years and that is just plain wrong.

As for the Atkinson comment. Well I kind of wish you hadn’t clarified what you meant by it now. Nothing saddens me more than racist comments by Evertonians.
Keith Harrison
20   Posted 22/01/2010 at 19:00:07

Report abuse

James,
It wasn’t meant as a racist comment, but my warped sense of humour obviously got the better of me. It was meant to emphasize Beckford's laziness.

I’ll wake up tomorrow from this bad dream and pen an article consisting entirely of ’Vaughan or Beckford’, and leave it at that.
Davie Turner
21   Posted 22/01/2010 at 20:53:50

Report abuse

Keith, despite editing, your post isn’t overly up with the times.

Leeds bought young Beckford from Wealdstone then loaned him out to Carlisle for a month (and he did score, just once mind in that month), he also had a loan spell at Scunthorpe. So to say " which is why he ended up at Wealdstone", is not true; his loan ended, simple as.

I feel also that Beckford would quite possibly do well in the Championship with his records for Leeds ands Scunthorpe.

So would he be good enough for the Prem? Simple fact is there have been a few late comers to professional football that have gone on to do very well in their careers and Beckford may be one. He is on a free... so, if Moyes wants him, fair enough, though I am not overly convinced that this isn’t just a load of made-up paper talk.

My personal worry isn’t that Leeds fans vilified him — some have mainly over the transfer request (proud bunch) but not all have — but that my friends down that way aren’t that worried if he goes. Normally, a striker with his scoring record leaving would worry fans, but then maybe it just that Yorkshire make do attitude.

As for Vaughan the question is always going to be can he play more than a handful of games a season, if he can I think he will turn out to be a good Prem player. I hope he is over his injuries as I don’t feel he can afford anymore.

Another thing is I don’t feel Vaughan will ever be the sort of striker Saha is. I can’t see him as a striker who could fit in 4-5-1 which we play. Should we sell Vaughan? Probably not, but I don’t think he will become a really top striker.

Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
22   Posted 23/01/2010 at 05:13:45

Report abuse

Keith, nothing else was removed. Nothing about Vaughan’s sick record.
Keith Harrison
23   Posted 23/01/2010 at 10:36:02

Report abuse

Micheal,
It says Vaughan is unproved but free.
I’m sure I wrote unproved, but if he stays injury free.

No matter. The Leeds fans Davie Turner and me know are certainly not the ones James Stewart knows.

br />What is your take on the two of them anyway?
Keith Harrison
24   Posted 23/01/2010 at 10:44:19

Report abuse

I just read the above, I don’t mean your take on Davie and James !!!
John Daley
25   Posted 23/01/2010 at 11:16:50

Report abuse

Although Vaughan has had a wretched time with injuries over the last 3 yrs or so, he still has the potential to go on and become a quality centre forward. He is pacy, brave, good in the air, is a constant pain in the arse for defenders and has a decent goal scoring record in the premier league when you look at the number of games he’s actually started. Remember when he got a run of games alongside Andy Johnson in the latter stages of the 06/07 season, scoring against Fulham, Bolton and Chelsea and generally putting the little £8m slaphead to shame? Beckford, on the other hand, has pace and goal scoring instinct but that is the sum total of his talents. His first touch, approach play and passing ability are nowhere near the standard required for the top flight. Think of all the ’hot-shot’ strikers from the lower leagues tipped to make the step up to the premier league over the last few years: DJ Campbell, David Nugent, Kevin Doyle, David Healy, Michael Chopra, Sylvian Ebanks-Blake. Fancy any of them in a blue shirt? Me neither. Beckford will just be another name added to this illustrious shit list.
Gavin Harris
26   Posted 23/01/2010 at 13:41:48

Report abuse

Linking us with Beckford is an insult to our club end of story.

We are above that now.
Graham Jones
27   Posted 24/01/2010 at 10:46:10

Report abuse

Guys I’m one of those rarities. An Everton and Wealdstone fan.

To put the record straight on the original article re Jermaine Beckford. Signed directly to Leeds from the Stones. Leeds loaned him out to Carlisle and Scunthorpe, where he scored the goal of the season in that division in their promotion that season.

Whilst I understand your doubts, Jermaine is a natural goalscorer and if he misses chances he doesn’t let it get to him. An attitude... but not always a bad one. I’d like to think if he signs for the Toffees, Lord Moyes will work his magic. Remember Ian Wright only played top level from 26 years old.

The only doubt I have is he needs to play regularly to be on top form.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb