The Mail Bag

Pienaar for Bayern Munich?

Comments (33)

I just read this online. Please, please tell me this could not be? I doubt Stevie would go back to the league that almost destroyed his career.

David Moyes needs to answer some questions. Why has Pienaar signed a new contact yet? According to what I've read Pienaar will need to take a pay cut if he extends his Toffee contract, why?

Come on guys, what's your take on this one?
Ricardo Humphries, CPT     Posted 27/01/2010 at 01:53:05

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Lyndon Lloyd
The latest murmurings in the press suggest that what Everton have offered him would effectively amount to a paycut under new UK tax laws.

No idea if it's true or whether there's anything to similarly uncorroborated reports that he's holding out for £100K either. And I suspect it's Mr Kenwright who would need to answer your questions because Moyes must know Pienaar's value to his team.

Shaun Brennan
1   Posted 27/01/2010 at 08:53

Report abuse

"I doubt Stevie would go back to the league that almost destroyed his career."

I wouldn’t doubt that he’ll move to a club that could match his ambitions.

Lyndon, is that annother reason not to vote Labour, or is it a Government conspiracy against Everton. Just as I had always suspected — all of Whitehall are Kopites.
Kevin Spencer
2   Posted 27/01/2010 at 08:40

Report abuse

If he leaves, he will be standing next to Joleon Lescott in a long line of players to betray this club.

But there is no need to speculate. I try to think that all players at Everton are here for the love of the club. Not for the love of themselves. They put the club above all. No contract in the world would tempt them away.

I do accept when fringe players leave in order to play first team football or if the transfer benefits both parties. But when good first team players leave and that don’t benefit the club, then they are just plain assholes.

Playing for this club is an honour and a privilege. They earn enough money here to be happy enough. Looking for other clubs, when playing for Everton, is like looking for other girls when you are married.

Peter Bradshaw
3   Posted 27/01/2010 at 09:24

Report abuse

Can't agree with the comment about betraying the club if he leaves; UK tax laws are 50% and in Spain are 23% — where would you work? No-brainer really.

Pienaar has been a great servant to the club and if his transfer brings us £10 million to reinvest, as it will be his last contract year, why not?

Kevin Spencer
4   Posted 27/01/2010 at 09:42

Report abuse

I have heard about rich and wealthy people having foreign bank accounts to get away from high taxes. I mean that everything is possible if you just have the will to do it. And if taxes were the problem, he could always try to get an account in Switzerland or Monaco. By the way, I have seen pictures of Phil Neville's house, so I don’t really think that Pienaar suffers from the financial crisis either.
Marcus Choo
5   Posted 27/01/2010 at 09:53

Report abuse

Betrayal is way too harsh a word to use. It’s not like he’s gone on record to say that he will definitely sign a contract no matter what. Nor has he said anything bad about the club (ref. Mr Lescott). Neither is he a boyhood fan or anything like that. He’s a professional football player and for that I think we have respect that he’d want to secure the best for his future and family.
Jason Lam
6   Posted 27/01/2010 at 10:03

Report abuse

Get rid. We need someone to put in a manly tackle in midfield. Him and Baines pussy footing around the left wing drive me nuts. Put a fucking early cross in lad there’s Cahill checking his watch waiting for it. What’s all this moaning and ohh I missed that impossible pass or I missed that 20 yarder. Fucking hell play the percentage game.
Eugene Ruane
7   Posted 27/01/2010 at 10:13

Report abuse

Lam Allardyce?
Nick Entwistle
8   Posted 27/01/2010 at 10:23

Report abuse

Taking 50% of a pay packet is immoral, but, those who have accountants and the such should easily set themselves up with an offshore account.
Kevin Spencer
9   Posted 27/01/2010 at 10:19

Report abuse

As I said before, if a transfer benefits the club, yes, get rid. Jason Lam had a point there in getting a good cross in for Cahill. I have thought about this for a long time. How would a team make it, if it was put together as a unit of set-piece masters. Do you think this Premier League dreamteam would make it?

Southall
R Delap D Watson R Gough Hinchcliffe
Beckham Cahill Fellaini Staunton
Ferguson Rideout

Just a thought, even though it’s pretty off topic =)... But, if these were playing together at their prime, they would surely be more dangerous than a team full of flair players.
Keith Skidmore
10   Posted 27/01/2010 at 10:35

Report abuse

It’s just one of those issues that “we fans” will never really understand, or we understand but just don’t like the reality.

I personally think that the best way to repay someone (Everton) who shows faith and belief in you, is by showing good old fashioned loyalty. In football (possibly the modern world) it seems to be to turn your back on those that give you a chance when the first signs of something better turns up.

Our club in its current financial situation is forced to bring in players on loan, out of contract, untried lower league punts or out of favour players who have lost their form.

As I understand it, Pienaar falls into the lost his way/form bracket. He showed huge potential early on in his career, had a large value move which heaped pressure on him. When he came to us, like so many players find, the pressure is somewhat lifted and he regained form, confidence and a value.

Lescott moved on, Cahill and Arteta are (I feel) replaying with loyalty as they recognise the belief shown in them and what it means to the fans to wear the shirt.

I think more money and a chance of CL football top-trumps what we can offer so it boils down to the type of character he is? or what we can recoup?

In short, I guess I see us as a kind of “rehab club”.

Paul Gladwell
11   Posted 27/01/2010 at 10:57

Report abuse

I see good ole Saha was the man who informed him on the training pitch about Bayern's interest, just like he bleated on Sky about Lescott doing nowt wrong despite a few players thinking quite the opposite.

I would love to have heard that conversation as both appear to be engineering a move from the club who dragged them from oblivion... fuck them, I say. I saw Saha straight down the tunnel when subbed on Saturday; no matter how good he can be, players like him mean nothing to me.

David Hallwood
12   Posted 27/01/2010 at 11:25

Report abuse

What’s all this "he betrayed us"? Footballers are paid employees and, like all paid employees, will work for a firm that gives the best prospects and of course the best wages. So what if someone’s a boyhood fan of a club? He’s a man now making his way in the world.

I don’t want to lose Pienaar, but that’s football. But I think the 50% tax bracket could be killer of the prem with teams already drowing in debt, how many agents will be banging on the doors for a substantial rise in player’s wages, and do you think that agents or players give a toss how their wage demands impact on a club?

Dave Whitwell
13   Posted 27/01/2010 at 11:36

Report abuse

Just to set the record straight ,merely setting up an off-shore account would not prevent tax being due. Tax is due at source i.e. when they are paid by the club and there Domicile & Residency status will determine how both there UK & foreign earnings are taxed.

The tax laws are fairly complicated but, as a general standard, anyone who is physically present in the UK for more than 183 days in the year is deemed to be a UK resident and therefore taxed as such.

A potential albeit, silly way around it would be for the club to relocate Finch Farm to say Spain and just jet players in for matches.

Needless to say, this is going to have an impact on UK clubs' ability to attract the best players, but if that means less foreign players and more development of young domestic players, is it such a bad thing?
James Byrne
14   Posted 27/01/2010 at 11:41

Report abuse

Don’t get me wrong the tax on super earners is a joke; footballers, unlike F1 Drivers are snookered as they have to remain in the UK throughout the season therefore they are liable for tax on all earnings. It doesn’t matter how many offshore accounts a player might have he has to pay up.

I don’t however believe all the speculation and think Peanuts will stay with us; he’s a great player and knows how the club and fans feel about him.
Mike Allison
15   Posted 27/01/2010 at 11:48

Report abuse

Could he live on the Isle of Man...?!
Ken Buckley
16   Posted 27/01/2010 at 11:50

Report abuse

Players come, players go. All have their reasons. Managers,Chairmen, Board likewise. Leaving only the supporters as constants to regale ToffeeWeb and the like on the merits of the hand we are dealt through time itself.
Tony Finn
17   Posted 27/01/2010 at 12:08

Report abuse

Please can it not be said that Pienaar has been a "great servent to our club". In this day and age, footballers are not "servents" by any stretch of the imagination. They are rewarded ridiculously for their (non?) efforts and a couple of hours of footie a day. If you think that makes them a servent then you are deluded. The servents are fans, the ones who stump up hundreds and thousands a year often for little or no reward in terms of results or enjoyment. Maybe in the 40s 50s and 60s when players seemed to give a shit and often played through injury , crippling them selves in later life cos they played when they shouldnt have, maybe tey could be regarded somewhat as "servents".
Mickey Dee
18   Posted 27/01/2010 at 13:51

Report abuse

Every player has his price and will endeavor to get the price for his labour. Loyalty is a thing of a bygone age when the difference in reward offered to a player to move was only marginal and he may have opted to stay at the club he loved, whereas nowadays, as in the Lescott saga, he was offered a contract that almost tripled his wage. It is not hard to figure out why he wanted to leave.

I’d hate to see Pienaar go but you have to face reality. If a player places demands on a club that it cannot afford or is at odds with its wage structure, then if no compromise can be agreed, there is only one solution.

Having said that, we have no idea what Pienaar’s position is... therefore this discussion is purely speculative.
Alan Clarke
19   Posted 27/01/2010 at 14:37

Report abuse

And all said Mickey without one swear word!
Patty Beesley
20   Posted 27/01/2010 at 15:45

Report abuse

You guys are always jumping the gun and running down the players. Why not wait and see if it happens, then you can slag them off if you want. You are worse than a load of prima donnas ... you enjoy torturing yourselves.
Nick Entwistle
21   Posted 27/01/2010 at 16:30

Report abuse

Aren’t there Arsenal players with off-shore accounts, or something allowing them to pay less tax?

Either way, I have friends who do it, but they’re Aussies who are agency staff so maybe it's different.

Unlike Lescott, who left for a non CL team that had finished below us for years, Bayern are a huge club who play in the top tier of Europe normally, so, there’s a difference.

Now, if he’s not signing a contract which expires this summer, should Moyes sell now??
Ciarán McGlone
22   Posted 27/01/2010 at 16:47

Report abuse

Firstly,

The Spanish top rate of tax is not 23% — it is 43%.

Secondly, Does anyone know Pienaar’s address so I can send him a food parcel...He must be starvin’ after having all his money stole by the tax man..

Thirdly, If it true that he’s after £100k, then he’s got an opinion of himself that I certainly don’t share... We all know what a £100k-a-week footballer plays like — he’s good, he’s not that good.

God is great — but only on a 40% tax rate.....
Geoff Edwards
23   Posted 27/01/2010 at 17:08

Report abuse

Kevin Spencer, are you trying to break the record for the most nonsensical posts by one person in one thread?
Brian Waring
24   Posted 27/01/2010 at 17:28

Report abuse

I know I’m being naive, but I would like to think that a player leaves to go to a better club,and a chance to win things. If Pienaar were to move to Bayern he would be doing both those things.
Alasdair Mackay
25   Posted 27/01/2010 at 17:22

Report abuse

I am no tax expert, but my understanding is that the tax rate in Spain was 23% until this month when it went up to 43%.

The UK rate was at 43% already (possibly even 46%(??)) but the tax rate was much lower in Spain. Because Alonso/Ronaldo etc etc signed 5 year deals before January 2010 they are only liable for 23% tax, but any Spanish based player who signs a new contract from this month will suffer a massive tax hike.

How does this effect Everton? It doesn’t yet, but a whole host of Spanish based players will be running their contracts down to minimise the amount of time they are taxed the higher amount, meaning that in the coming 2/3 years there will be a number of players available from Spain on pre-contracts/for nothing or for a nominal fee as they will all be letting their contracts run down - even of they are happy where they are.

I don’t think Pienaar is moving for money. 46% or 43% tax is not an earth-shattering difference. He is holding out because he is about to be among the highest profile players on the planet (star player of host nation in a world cup). If there was ever an ideal opportunity for him to be in the shop window for a mega-club like Real Madrid or Barcelona than this is it. If he leaves it will be for football reasons and we will get £12-15million after the world cup.
James Stewart
26   Posted 27/01/2010 at 18:05

Report abuse

Quite right, Ciaran. For him to be worth £100k per week he would have to be a lot more deadly with his final execution. Until he is, I don’t think a really top club will go for him. He knows he has it pretty sweet here I would be surprised if he left. The World Cup will be a chance for him to showcase his talents but I think he knows the dangers of a big move turning sour already. Saha, on the other hand, I think will be leaving us...
Jonathan Field
27   Posted 27/01/2010 at 18:10

Report abuse

I don’t think we’d get any more than £6-7 mill for him this summer. We’re skint and everyone knows it so they will drive a bargain. However, I do feel that we’ll let Saha go to free up some cash for his wages.

The problem of making him the highest paid player at the club could potentially piss off Arteta, Cahill, Jags, Howard, Felli, Nev. I also feel Pip would pay good money just to play football. I love him.
Lyndon Lloyd
Editorial Team
28   Posted 27/01/2010 at 18:18

Report abuse

Here you go, Ricardo: http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/09-10/rumour-mill/index.asp#100127f

Of course, that doesn’t mean Bayern aren’t interested (though it sounds like paper nonsense to me) or that Peanuts wouldn’t be interested :)
Kevin Spencer
29   Posted 27/01/2010 at 18:33

Report abuse

Geoff Edwards - Yes, I thought I would have a go. But nevertheless I said it was off topic. I made my point clear in my first post at the top of this thread (third post).

By the way, I still think that Mike Riley looks like one of the mutants from "Wrong Turn 3".

Back to topic!
Eugene Ruane
30   Posted 27/01/2010 at 18:06

Report abuse

Unless he hits a staggeringly bad run of form (ie: one that lasts from tonight until the World cup), I can’t see ANY way he’ll be with us, once his contract runs out. Tax, wages, whatever - he’ll be offered more by someone else and offski. WHY we can’t compete financially is still our number-one problem. And until that is ’sorted’, ANYONE who wants ANY Everton player and can pay more (fee and/or wages) can simply take them. Under this ’administration’ the future is loans, kids, journeymen and the odd decent buy, who if REALLY good, stays a couple of years before moving to someone who pays more.



Ste Blundell
31   Posted 27/01/2010 at 14:42:19

Report abuse

Apparently Louis put down his Heat Magazine just long enough to let Steven know that Bayern Munich were very interested. How thoughtful of him.

http://uk.soccerway.com/news/2010/January/27/pienaar-cools-bayern-link/?

Geoff Edwards
32   Posted 27/01/2010 at 19:58

Report abuse

Bayern’s chances of winning things will deteriorate severely if they replace Franck Ribery with Steven Pienaar
Derek Thomas
33   Posted 27/01/2010 at 22:58

Report abuse

Short version...If you want loyalty buy a dog.

I think his agent (and, for all I know, Pienaar himself) seem to think they are in a bit of ’strong’ bargaining position.

There well may be others, but Pienaar is the only one we know about that can tick a lot of the boxes outlines below. In no particular order;

Contracts, as we have seen, are sometimes not worth the papar they are written on.

Pienaar’s is running out, not quite Bosman stage but on the downward slope.

He, Pienaar is the man of the moment, form-wise.

The potential for a good showcase at the World Cup.

Plus the added complication of the tax thing.

We are not awash with money to basically pay his tax for him AND give him a rise in real terms.

Agents are the cause of all evil

Going, going...???

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb