The Mail Bag
A point at Craven Cottage
Comments (42)
I went to Craven Cottage and was pleasantly surprised and very frustrated in equal measures. I thought the away fans, especially in the first half, were excellent while Fulham could barely be heard. Here's my thoughts on the players...
Howard ? quiet first half but coped well with the numerous corners they had in the second half although they were poor up front.
Neville ? he might be an organiser but he cannot organise a decent cross when needed. One after the other was overhit. Their lack of bite meant he wasn't tested defensively.
Distin ? coped well but again was not tested.
Jagielka ? some dreadful balls forward but got some good challenges in.
Baines ? the best of the bunch at the back and their poor right side meant he was given plenty of space. The highlight was his mazy run in the second half where he went past 3 Fulham players before crossing to Cahill who tried an overhead kick.
Coleman ? had a lot of joy down the right and gave them massive problems before fading in the second half.
Fellaini ? did a good job in the middle although looks a little lacking in confidence. Some of his distribution and control was excellent.
Arteta ? poor game by his standards. Plenty of effort but set pieces were frequently wasted.
Pienaar ? was our best player, chasing lost causes down and linking well with Baines and Fellaini. Needs to shoot more.
Cahill ? did not get great service and didn't look fit but gave his best.
Yakubu ? struggled in the first half but began turning his man in the second and, with a better shot and touch, would have bagged a brace.
Subs: Osman on for Cahill ? was bright; Bily on for Seamus far too late to help.
All-in-all, we were far superior to Fulham and, if we took our chances, could have thrashed them. It's going to take a rebound off the Yak's backside and the goals will come. Somebody is gonna get spanked sooner rather than later.
Andrew James, Posted 25/09/2010 at 21:09:11
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
The side we had in the 80s would often keep trying to score to the last minute. Even if we were 3-0 up!
Too often if we nick a goal, we don't push on for the killer 2nd, 3rd etc. Sadly too often it's bitten us in the arse when conceding silly, late, equalisers (not discounting we've also scored late a few times).
And as Michael points out in his editorial piece - our strikers have not scored since April.
Just as winning can become a habit, so can not winning. Too many of our players are playing without confidence, within themselves.
Yes, we might get out of it. But it will be yet another season of what might have been if we'd only got off to a good start.
Now I am depressed. If we were playing shite throughout and not creating anything, I'd be concerned but we've never had a decent goalscoring striker since Sharpy so I'm not surprised by the goalshyness. In 6 games time we'll be writing about something else.
Under DM we have spanked plenty of sides. Stop being so dramatic and cheer the team on.
We continue to play decent football and were again unlucky today. The tide will turn. Form is temporary and class is permanent and our players are in the main in the latter category.
You lot will be waving large minty banners and trying to organise a 70's style sit in next.....
Agree that our shape was good. What did you think of Neville?
i went to the game too. I agree with the most of the comments:
Neville should watch the 2nd Sunderland goal and Nedum Onuoha's fantastic cross.
Howard was also poor with his distribution.
Highlights, were Distin (yes I know) who won everything at the back and Felliani who bossed the midfield and who was always an outlet for a pass.
Chris - you're absolutely right, there was almost always one pass too many instead of getting the ball in the box quicker.
Andrew James; so a team that has 2 players who dribbled 3 past players ONCE in a game cannot possibly go down? Thats an interesting methodology!
My methodology is actually logic. If you watched the world cup or the champs league you will know that speed and guile down the flanks is back in vogue.
Think Neville does bring something to the defence- good communication and leadership. Not technically the greatest player, but worth his place in the side
Are you suggesting Everton have "rampaging wingers and fullbacks" then? Last time I looked we didn't have a single genuine wide player at the club and Neville or Hibbert at right back are about as rampant as an eighty year old with erectile dysfunction. Admittedly both Baines and Coleman like to get forward but to suggest that in itself is enough to guarantee a team survival is not "actually logic" at all.
Generally, teams who struggle to score and regularly concede goals far too easily are the ones flirting with relegation. Oh fuck...
Let's hope this winless run doesn't go on for much longer because things are looking very bleak at the moment.
Most worrying of all, was Moyes after match comments. When Coleman's performance was complemented, Moyes reply was less than complimentary. He's not really a wide player but he did alright, we've tried a few out there. We didn't think Osman could go the ninety so we gave him a run out, or words to that effect. God almighty, what planet is he on?
Does this mean he will be resorting back to Osman for the Birmingham game? If so, it suggests he is yet to be convinced that Coleman is a better option than Osman out wide. Presumably he's also still of the opinion Osman should be in Capello's plans.
Talk of relegation is premature. However, on the basis of some of his comments, I wouldn't take too much for granted.
Then he hit a long streak when the goals dried up and he looked as if he couldn't care less. This created a great deal of debate and conjecture on Toffeeweb. His general fitness, doubts were raised about his weight his age and his attitude.
I agreed with a commonly suggested hypothesis that he was that angling for another big transfer payout.
Then came the injury and all such rumours were put on the back burner.
I do not agree with those who believe it is only that injury stopping him from being as effective as he once was. Whether or not he had ulterior motives there is no doubt he was crap leading up to it.
If Everton learned anything from the Andy v d Meyde debacle it should be how futile and expensive it is to carry injury prone players. I would accept any offer that is made for the Yak.
Better team performance - positive (effort in places at least)
Poor penetration etc - Negative - we just can't finish or get that final ball ih.
Bottom of League - An absolute disgrace - Don't ever say anything other than this is a huge embarrassment that should be made clear to manager and players that is totally unacceptable!
Get real folks - we are in a relegation battle NOW! 10-12 wins needed? So who the hell are we likely to beat? Answers on a postcard please!!!!
His link-up play and ability to hold the ball is far superior to Cahill, Saha or Beckford and but for a couple of good saves by Schwarzer could have bagged a couple today.
The only negative about today apart from the lack of goals was the constant hoofing to nowhere by Jags, Howard, Neville and to a lesser extent Distin.
We have to start playing through MF or at least find a man with a long ball rather than just hoof it forward.
1. Great to see Fell playing in his natural position as defensive midfielder. Was not his best game but it will come. Andrew: I agree with your confidence remark. I think this may well be a result of Moyes moving people around so much. Leave players in their natural positions!
2. We can certainly pass and many of our players look really comfortable on the ball in tight situations.
3. Coleman on right-mid indicates that Moyes may have realized that he may be the one player who can play out of his traditional position. He is not the solution to our problems but I love his energy and his directness. Someone who is naturally attracted to the opposite team's goal (something which cannot be said of some our great players--Baines, Peanuts, and Arteta who seem more interested in holding onto the ball)
4. We generally bossed the game in midfield and in defense. We were away from home against a bogey side and we looked like the home squad.
If that were the first game of the season I would be really happy with that performance.
Negatives:
1. Obviously, it isn't the start of the season and we are bottom of the league.
2. Moyes reverted to type and made really cautious and stupid substitutions. Bringing Bily on in 86 minutes is demoralizing for him and indicates that he was happy with a draw. Bringing Osman on was maddening.
3. Apart from bringing Bily on late, Moyes again played him out of position.
4. Yak looks crocked. I thought he tried and he showed real touches of skill, but I was really concerned by the way he walked around off the ball. We may get 5-6 goals off him over the course of a season (and I doubt he will be with us after January), but he is not the answer to our goal woes.
1. Great to see Fell playing in his natural position as defensive midfielder. Was not his best game but it will come. Andrew: I agree with your confidence remark. I think this may well be a result of Moyes moving people around so much. Leave players in their natural positions!
2. We can certainly pass and many of our players look really comfortable on the ball in tight situations.
3. Coleman on right-mid indicates that Moyes may have realized that he may be the one player who can play out of his traditional position. He is not the solution to our problems but I love his energy and his directness. Someone who is naturally attracted to the opposite team's goal (something which cannot be said of some our great players--Baines, Peanuts, and Arteta who seem more interested in holding onto the ball)
4. We generally bossed the game in midfield and in defense. We were away from home against a bogey side and we looked like the home squad.
If that were the first game of the season I would be really happy with that performance.
Negatives:
1. Obviously, it isn't the start of the season and we are bottom of the league.
2. Moyes reverted to type and made really cautious and stupid substitutions. Bringing Bily on in 86 minutes is demoralizing for him and indicates that he was happy with a draw. Bringing Osman on was maddening.
3. Apart from bringing Bily on late, Moyes again played him out of position.
4. Yak looks crocked. I thought he tried and he showed real touches of skill, but I was really concerned by the way he walked around off the ball. We may get 5-6 goals off him over the course of a season (and I doubt he will be with us after January), but he is not the answer to our goal woes.
As for the striker we can only hope DM has somthing up his sleeve come Jan, as for formation, its over to you DM.........38,000 can't be wrong.
Quick point about the 4-5-1 myth. We don't play 4-5-1 - Cahill doesn't play in midfield he plays off the front man. Would people be moaning if it was Rooney, Tevez, Keane etc who all play deeper than the centre forward? Nope. Sometimes Cahill pushes on to their back line, other times he harasses their deep lying midfielders - it's a 4-4-1-1 and it DOES work when he's the man playing there. When it fails it's normally someone else e.g. Felli who's in there - that's where Moyes DOES get it wrong.
1. bit of width on the right (Colemen) and we looked better balanced... however, a genuine right winger there (Donovan, N'Zogbia etc) and we would be much more potent.
2. Arteta is not at the races, his play is sideways and his set piece stuff is woeful.
3. Our passing from the back is also woeful; we just bring it back in our faces by playing long diagonal balls to no-one.
We also have players who cannot perform at this level: Bily, Osman, Beckford, and a couple of others... are we saving them for when we go down?
DM get a striker sorted, kick Arteta up the arse and put Heitinga where Jags is so we can pass out of defence... please!
Personally I thought the Yak played well, he held the ball and linked well with Coleman and Pienaar. I'm fully aware is shooting boots are not firing but his two shots in injury time were both inches wide, additionally the Fulham GK had an excellent game.
We bossed the game both in midfield and on both flanks, yes I know we are lacking up front but Moyes picked Cahill, who obviously was not fit, probably more to battle with their back line rather than actually "play footy".
If you watched yesterday's game then you will know that a win is just around the corner. Fulham away is tough, the top four often lose or draw there and we have not won there this decade.
Lets go to Brum, and get behind the team, it's a game I believe we can win.
I was still expecting a Fulham goal in the last 10 mins or so, so piling on further misery. But, taking into account it's a ground where we have lost 8 out of 9, a point and a clean sheet will hopefully add some confidence to the defence. Incidently i think Jagielka has only had two decent games this season and they were in white shirts...
Heitinga just doesn't look right this season (as confirmed by Round last week) but I'm sure he will step into the back four as soon as he is ready. Fellaini looked much more comfortable in front of the defence and is still a powerhouse threat when going forward.
A postive move from Moyes in starting Coleman on the right and he never disappointed anyone (faded slightly on the hour mark). But I'd definitely carry on playing Coleman there. With Neville or Hibbert behind him it will be a good learning curve to see how they defend but it will give Seamus time to bolster forward which is obviously his first noteable talent ? I think Coleman will win lots of pens bombing past players in the box.
I was surprised that Yak played 93 mins... looked ok - but this time 2 years ago he would've converted all those chances. But, if the Yak is going to have to play 90 mins when he ain't match fit, what does that say about our squad ? which is apprently "the strongest in years"? I just hope when Saha returns he can finally stay fit; when he's fit and scoring, there ain't too many better forwards around... pity that only happens about 20% of every season.
Thought the Yak did ok but he has played (please correct me if I am wrong) over 30 games since his injury and is still not back to his best. I am inclined to think he won't reach this level again. I'd still rather play a crocked Yak than fit Beckford thou. Personally I'd drag Vaughan back from Palace if we could.
One question though, and I am not sure the answer. Can we blame the strikers or is it the midfield, or both, for not putting teams to bed? The Yak did have a few half chances and one clear chance but overall we didn't create too many clear cut chances. Is this because of Yak's lack of movement? Or just not enough creativity?
Also does anyone else think we are too predictable? We seem to take everything through the wings, we don't seem to be able to pass through teams like good sides do.
Last season we lost 2-1 in September conceding an unlucky deflected free kick and a wonder strike from Duff after Tim Cahill had headed us in front.
Some of the negative comments are derived from 6 games in and no win.
If this was game one of the season then we'd be pleased.
The side looks well balanced and much stronger now.
Yep, 2 years back we did win 2 nothing - last game of the season as I now recall and as you say Osman getting both goals - now that's not something you forget in a hurry.
Obviously I'm going to blame that memory lapse on David Moyes, fuck all to do with the fact I'm getting old.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 25/09/2010 at 22:16:23
Report abuse