FAB call on Moshiri to communicate amid 'palpable' uncertainty

Farhad Moshiri surely has the responsibility to answer and really clarify especially the takeover situation. Would be good if there were other potential takeover candidates on the horizon. [This was the comment I sent to ToffeeTV´s Everton News Daily on Monday.]

Just read from my mobile that the texts of the three letters have been released. Read the letter to Mr Moshiri. Presented well the feelings and anxieties of Evertonians.

If Moshiri is at all interested how he is deemed in the history annals of Everton; yes the instigator of our new stadium, but otherwise at this point a total failure; he should answer all those questions put to him.

Maybe Jim White has all the answers…

It could be 777 Partners have signed exclusive rights and, until 777 Partners get a yes or no, that could be why other investors have not been able to throw their hat into the ring, until the 777 Partners have been sorted one way or another.

Will the Premier League respond, I ask? Unlikely as that would be a first for them.

Maybe 777 Partners will. But would we believe them?

I think you must be right. I had heard very little of the 'exclusivity stuff' this time around but it gets called out in the i news story:

Everton borrow more money from 777 Partners to cover wages and stadium costs

For Farhad Moshiri, as still the owner of Everton, and seemingly a civilized and well-mannered person, it should be an unquestionable responsibility to come forward and answer the questions presented to him.

I would also like to think that Mr Moshiri is concerned or interested how he is regarded in the history of Everton, and if he wants to avoid the label of "total failure", apart from instigating our new stadium project, he should act in the best interest of Everton, and indeed himself, especially in the takeover issue.

So step forward, Mr Moshiri, your reputation and integrity in their entirety are at stake!

Non-attendance of games including the last one at Goodison, no cosy chats with the mighty Jim White? No meetings with anyone but 777?

I can see us losing the grand title of The People's Club at this rate…

Apologies, but apparently I was misinformed. The PL have contacted us tonight to say that they hadn't received the letter (for genuinely acceptable reasons) so that has been sent again.

We received replies from 777 (non-committal) and apparently from Moshiri, just before our meeting tonight, but we can't get access to the Moshiri letter at the moment. The intention is to publish all of the responses if we can.

Like many, I would just like this resolved one way or the other so we know where we stand and can move forward.

Brian #3 could be right that 777 Partners is in a contractual agreement with Moshiri which is exclusive.

A risk worth taking in someone's eyes. I Wander 👀

Mismanaged to death, or a bright new future with a fantastic new stadium that is growing out of the river, almost complete. Let's hope it's a brighter future for a very loyal (if somewhat gullible) fanbase who have definitely stood the test of time.

But even then if the terms are not met does the Premier League announce that? I would not put it past 777 Partners launching legal action against the Premier League in such a scenario. They have been in numerous courts across the world.

I'm still waiting for a response.

Not so fab, the FAB.

"It is pretty well confirmed that 777 Partners have an exclusivity agreement with Moshiri."

Not according to some posters on this site, including The Esk.

But it's pressure on the owner and that's what matters. They're dead right when they say an absent owner is not acceptable, never mind the situation that we're in.

Time to stop calling the Premier League corrupt and turn the focus back to Moshiri.

There's an argument that it's reasonable for him to seek the best return possible on his investment.

But he deserves to lose money for the way he's run this business. I believe we should be making his current tenure as uncomfortable as is possible, within obvious boundaries.

There will be buyers. The terms will dictate how many.

Not sure that is really within their remit. I think they have bigger fish to fry.

Perhaps the Fans Forum, or certainly the club themselves would be the ones to contact.

Sometimes I think the league has got it in for Moshiri/Usmanov, rather than Everton, but this is just me thinking out loud.

Like a fox, he seems to have gone to ground.

That's without any comment on their reasons for doing it, which I doubt are anything other than avoiding too much government intervention in their business.

I look at the run Leicester City have been on since February and although their bad form might just be one of those things, I think they were flying before those whispers started against their club, and things haven't improved since they have been charged.

We have ended up with a six-point deduction so far but nobody could convince me that the pressure of that initial cynical 10-point deduction hasn't worked against us; I do sometimes get the feeling it might be because of our silent owner.

Our on-paper owner has now spoken but he doesn't leave me with any confidence even if he was just replying to a letter from the FAB. I'm aware that he's just paying lip-service and probably can't wait to get away from Everton for good.

Not sure if this is for this thread or not.
Can you look in to whether Everton have a case for Unfair Prejudice against the Directors of the Premier League. I'm not a legal person but as a minority shareholder EFC do seem to be being prejudiced against

Unfair prejudice claims arise where a company has, is or will be conducted in such a way that unfairly prejudices the relevant interests of the members, or some portion of the members (for example, the shareholders), including the petitioner. These cases frequently involve the majority shareholders (who are often the directors) from acting in a way that unfairly prejudices the interest of minority shareholders. In these circumstances, the courts have a wide range of powers to regulate the affairs or the business if they are found to have unfairly prejudiced the members involved.

Yes, I'm bitter and twisted, and this probably has limited or no merit whatsoever, but can someone with knowledge have a look?

Moshiri doesn't care.