
The summer transfer carousel has barely begun to turn, but the whispers surrounding our midfield engine room are already growing louder. The latest name to emerge from the endless churn of the gossip columns is James Garner, with reports from the North East suggesting Newcastle United are casting admiring glances his way.
According to Tyneside journalist Ross Gregory, the Magpies are actively monitoring the 24-year-old as Eddie Howe looks to bolster his squad's depth ahead of their return to European football.
Garner, of course, was one of the standout performers during Everton's first season at Hill Dickinson Stadium. His composure, tactical versatility, and relentless work rate have made him an absolute cornerstone of David Moyes's system. It’s really no surprise that his form caught the eye of Thomas Tuchel, earning him spots in the pre-World Cup training camps for the national side.
But what does this reported interest actually mean for us?
On the pitch, losing Garner would be a significant blow. As we head into season 2.0 at the new ground, the priority has to be retaining the core group of favourites that Moyes has meticulously assembled. We need to be adding quality to the ranks — not auctioning off our most reliable assets to domestic rivals at the first sign of avarice. A player of his intelligence and commitment — someone who signed a contract extension when he didn't have to — is exactly the type of character we need to build around.
Off the pitch, however, the financial realities of modern football always loom large. While there’s no indication that the club is under immediate pressure to sell, the ever-present spectre of compliance with Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) and Squad Cost Ratios (SCR) means that practically every player has a price tag. If Newcastle — backed by their immense sovereign wealth resources — decide to test our resolve with a substantial formal bid, The Friedkin Group will undoubtedly have a decision to make.
For now, this remains strictly in the "monitoring" phase. No formal approach has been lodged, and there's no sense that Garner is agitating for a move.
Ultimately, this summer window needs to deliver real, credible signings that prove Everton are genuinely moving forward. If the evidence around him suggests progress, Garner isn't going anywhere. But, if it delivers another window of hesitation and compromise, the Geordie whispers might just turn into something more concrete.
Read more: The Tyrique George Situation: Short-sighted or sensible?
Reader Comments (38)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 25/06/2026 at 15:54:26
Nah, Everton wouldn't do that.
3 Posted 25/06/2026 at 16:01:21
Going cynical on this one. Deal him for anything above 40mill with match time and Champions League incentives. At worst, Moyes pays for not playing a deeper squad last season and is out by Christmas.
Additionally, factor in that some player performances may fade under the thrill of serving Moyes. Key players like Illi leaving could also affect future value.
4 Posted 25/06/2026 at 16:04:45
5 Posted 25/06/2026 at 16:11:46
Would be a bad sign though moving forward.
6 Posted 25/06/2026 at 16:54:22
I think he's one who will now want the club to kick on like he has... or he will probably want out if we are just lingering 12th -10th position.
This first couple of months of the season, Moyes has to be doing something amazing or the crowd will be on him!
7 Posted 25/06/2026 at 16:55:17
Dirty cash, I want you, dirty cash, I need you, oh
Money talks, money talks
Dirty cash, I want you, dirty cash, I need you, oh
We will soon know what EFC means to TFG.
8 Posted 25/06/2026 at 17:03:59
9 Posted 25/06/2026 at 17:05:22
As others have noted, we'd have great difficulty spending the money anyway ('Guess what, he doesn't want to come!')
10 Posted 25/06/2026 at 17:24:47
I was reading a post from Robert Tressell on Evertonia and he was saying Forest have just turned down an offer of £120M for him. Elliot Anderson might be easier on the eye but I personally think that James Garner is a more complete midfield player.
So, on that basis, whoever is trying to buy James Garner is going to have to pay a lot more money than what people are prepared to sell him for on this thread! Football is all about different opinions!!
11 Posted 25/06/2026 at 17:30:35
If he stays, good... but, if he wants out, it won't harm us, I can tell you.
12 Posted 25/06/2026 at 17:33:23
Agree on the slowing down the game as well. He will annoy a couple of the established players if he keeps pointing to where he thinks they should be.
14 Posted 25/06/2026 at 18:02:59
It would be naive to think that playing for Everton had no bearing on him missing out on the World Cup... so he will be looking elsewhere.
15 Posted 25/06/2026 at 18:23:17
He signed a new contract last year -- what happened to building a team?
16 Posted 25/06/2026 at 18:29:06
Structuring a deal that expects to return £55-60M would be good business since we aren't going anywhere with Moyes.
17 Posted 25/06/2026 at 19:08:14
18 Posted 25/06/2026 at 19:14:19
Very unlikely.
19 Posted 25/06/2026 at 19:36:30
Oh... hang on.
20 Posted 25/06/2026 at 22:03:21
We all know why Milan sold him to Newcastle, and he got banned for 10 months? Isn't it a sad day he can move on and doesn't give a shit?
21 Posted 25/06/2026 at 22:57:11
This still seems to be the haven't a fuckin clue Everton we've seen for 25+ years and, as stated above, if we do get decent money, can you trust our Transfer Committee to spend it wisely or get Moyes to actually play the new guys?
As always with our Regent Road Ramblers -- more questions than answers.
22 Posted 26/06/2026 at 01:11:15
Tell the prison bars strongly to GGF!!
23 Posted 26/06/2026 at 02:34:20
Not saying we should, but we might. £50 million buys you a decent quality premier league player now, while £100m + buys you top quality.
Even if our available transfer spend is £150 million per revenue, we will probably need to sell also this summer.
24 Posted 26/06/2026 at 02:43:47
25 Posted 26/06/2026 at 02:54:06
He wouldn't be cheap but a good player.
26 Posted 26/06/2026 at 03:02:55
I'm thinking Branthwaite £20-25M (if he passed a medical), Garner realistically £40M, Ndiaye (awful World Cup so far) £45M-£55M (possibly, possibly £60M at a real stretch).
27 Posted 26/06/2026 at 04:35:33
Branthwaite has had his injury problems but I could see us setting a price of £50M+ given Man Utd have bid that amount for him before.
Garner had a good Premier League season and would fetch £40M. Despite his poor form recently, Ndiaye has been a standout player for 2 seasons, so £60M-£70M?
So £150-160M? Not that bad considering the 3 of them cost us £27M.
The question is: What does that money buy you in terms of replacements? It can't be young talent as Moyes will never play them. My guess is that he would spend or waste the money on experienced pros aged 28 or over.
28 Posted 26/06/2026 at 04:44:27
Let's say £60M for Ndiaye and £40M for Garner.
29 Posted 26/06/2026 at 08:46:22
30 Posted 26/06/2026 at 09:08:48
He's not worth £70m Steve, its a question if anyone would take a chance on him, it's a great pity for the lad but I think that's the reality. Our poor luck looks like it has struck again, but hopefully something can be done to him to put him right.
31 Posted 26/06/2026 at 09:14:17
32 Posted 26/06/2026 at 09:54:02
More bullshit from the media, who are always trying to unsettle our better players.
33 Posted 26/06/2026 at 11:42:17
34 Posted 26/06/2026 at 11:43:54
35 Posted 26/06/2026 at 13:47:26
36 Posted 26/06/2026 at 13:52:28
38 Posted 26/06/2026 at 23:45:58
39 Posted 30/06/2026 at 02:41:51
Has he ever actually said he wants to go? And what do we expect to achieve by selling our best players? And lastly, but perhaps most importantly, when have we ever sold a player for big money and reinvested that well?? I'll wait.
40 Posted 02/07/2026 at 16:39:29
We have to stop being screwed over. If clubs are selling similar players for around a hundred million, then why would we give them a replacement for 40. Clubs wouldn't replace a player with another that's less than half as good, so the price should reflect that
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 25/06/2026 at 15:47:31
It still remains, though, Everton wouldn't have a clue on how to spend those funds if we did sell him.