17/07/2026 33comments  |  Jump to last

Harrison Armstrong’s return to Everton in January divided opinion.

I had written before Christmas that it would be better to leave Armstrong where he was, thriving out on loan at Preston North End. 

However, injuries and the Africa Cup of Nations-enforced absence of Idrissa Gueye meant that when January did roll around, Everton really had little choice but to recall Armstrong.

And it worked. Armstrong, after a substitute appearance in the 4-2 home loss to Brentford, came straight into the team, and retained his place in it heading into February.

His best performance probably came in the 1-0 win at Aston Villa on January 18. After that, he struggled slightly against Leeds United, when playing as an advanced midfielder, then he was shoehorned out wide as David Moyes clearly trusted him, but not enough to start him centrally over other options such as the then fit-again Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall and the back-available Gueye.

He was then eventually faded out of the team and was limited mainly to brief substitute cameos.

Between his return to the club and the end of the 2025-26 season, Armstrong featured in 13 matches. Of those, 12 came in the Premier League, in which the 19-year-old made 6 starts.

While there is a strong case to be made that Armstrong should have perhaps returned to Preston after his month back at Everton, Moyes was seemingly keen to keep the teenager around the first team, not only as an option to use, but also to keep a closer eye on his development day in, day out.

This is the crux with Moyes, too. He views everyday training as a huge part of a young player’s development. That can be frustrating, for fans and especially those players, who should be getting minutes, but Moyes has his methods and ways. I’m not here to say those are right or wrong; it’s doubtful, though, he will suddenly shift gears completely, but one thing with Moyes is that if a player is trusted, they will feature. The issue has always been how long it takes to earn Moyes’ trust.

But, Armstrong did end up featuring for 527 minutes in the top flight between January and the end of May. While it could and perhaps should have been more, it’s worth noting that the only player younger than Armstrong to play more Premier League minutes in that same timeframe was Wolves’ Mateus Mané.

However, Everton are now approaching something of a crossroads with Armstrong.

The midfielder penned a three-and-a-half-year deal in January 2025, and then immediately joined Derby County on loan.

Now, Everton have to consider whether they do similar with Armstrong for 2026-27, or retain him as part of the first-team squad.

But whatever method Everton choose, they need to ensure the communication with Armstrong is clear.

If he is to go out on loan again, then this move needs to be his final, temporary switch away from the club. It needs to be at a level that is an improvement on the Championship, and where he will play — think Jarrad Branthwaite’s move to PSV, who were competing in Europe at the time.

This needs to be a finishing school, and the plan must then be for Armstrong to be a first teamer at Everton in 2027-28. He is ambitious, driven and a big talent — one that plenty of other Premier League clubs have an eye on.

And if Everton are to go down the loan route, then Armstrong must be handed a new contract, or at the very least an extension. They cannot allow a situation where he enters the final 18 months of his current deal while being out on loan.

But, if Everton see Armstrong as being ready to make an impact now, then they must be willing to ensure Moyes holds up his end of the bargain.

If Armstrong stays, he simply has to get minutes. Not 500 minutes, but well over 1,000, ideally 1,500. He needs to be in the position where he is one of the trusted substitutes, at the very least.

This is a worry for Everton, because they are well stocked in central midfield, at least numerically. However, they still lack the out and out number 6 profile of player that this team badly lacks.

Sure, Tim Iroegbunam could leave and Idrissa Gueye is not an Everton player as it stands, but the Toffees need to address the requirement to bring in a number 6, which would in turn potentially knock Armstrong down the pecking order.

As exciting an addition as Hayden Hackney is, it’s why some — myself included — have question marks as to whether he was really the profile of midfielder Everton should have been prioritising.

Everton can’t afford to get it wrong with Armstrong. They are not in a bad place with it, by any means, but they need to make sure that one way or another, his path to becoming a regular first teamer is clearly mapped out.

Then, it’s up to him to deliver.

 

 

Reader Comments (33)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Gregory Shaw
1 Posted 17/07/2026 at 12:33:22
This lad is more than good enough for the Premier League but he must be allowed to play. Our stubborn manager won't allow it.

That's why he needs to be replaced by a younger manager with fresh ideas like Carsley or Barry. He ruins young players with his stubbornness.
Ian Wilkins
2 Posted 17/07/2026 at 13:57:22
A young man much in demand in the Championship and having spent a season and a half there should really be knocking on the Premier League door.

Needs game time to make his mark.
Adrian Phillips
3 Posted 17/07/2026 at 13:58:01
While you have doubts about Hackney, I think the driving force is to open up revenue streams through player trading.

Otherwise, even with stadium income, the club will face SCR issues and continue to be loss-making while servicing high debt.

I think the priority is the continued restructuring to develop a self-sustaining business model.
Patric Ridge
4 Posted 17/07/2026 at 14:13:08
1# Gregory, for Moyes' faults I think that's very harsh. He played Armstrong when he came back. As I say in the piece, only one player younger than Armstrong played more PL mins between Jan and May.

Moyes rates Armstrong very highly. The issue is Everton have just invested in a £20M midfielder in Hackney, currently have Rohl and Tim and Charly also on the books, and Garner and KDH are rightly starters if fit and firing.

Now I think Charly and Tim will leave, but that still doesn't leave Armstrong as a clear first choice (and if Tim and Charly do leave, they'd still need that No.6 profile too)
Christy Ring
5 Posted 17/07/2026 at 14:24:17
Patric, it’s up to Moyes to deliver. Armstrong was outstanding in midfield against Villa, two games later he was on the left wing, then bench, that’s the problem with Moyes, you can play well in your proper position, and he’ll go back to his old school principles. Harrison has to be trusted and and be given a run of games, he’s good enough to play Premiership football and one of the best prospects in English football. He’s skilful, athletic and strong physically, and way better than Tim, and if Moyes doesn’t give him a chance this season, you can see him run down his contract, and have no problem signing for one of our top clubs, who know what a talent he is.
Raymond Fox
6 Posted 17/07/2026 at 14:24:19
Patric, I think only Alcaraz will be sold as Moyes doesn't seem to be an admirer and that still leave us strong in the midfield.
What I've seen of Hackney I've liked I think he will turn out to be a good buy.
Alan J Thompson
7 Posted 17/07/2026 at 14:33:06
If Armstrong has to be sent out on loan to improve then it says little for Moyes's coaching skills and never mind "trust" he doesn't recognize ability when he sees it and might soon be without it.
Kevin Molloy
8 Posted 17/07/2026 at 14:48:43
I'd rather Armstrong gets a full year in a good league (German or Spanish) than ten games with us next year.

Look what it did for Branthwaite.
Terry Downes
9 Posted 17/07/2026 at 15:08:58
Just stretching the topic a bit... never in my 55 years of supporting the Blues have I seen such shit like this...

How long does it take to buy a right-back? Jesus, nothing since Patterson.... it's unbelievable! Any other team just goes and buys one but not us, we just keep being linked with them!!

Also, how many years does it take to replace Lukaku? Will we ever just buy a fucking striker who can score and play like a centre-forward? It's like Mensa to our scouts, god help us!
John Collins
10 Posted 17/07/2026 at 15:11:10
There are none available, Terry. Anywhere.

According to posters on ToffeeWeb.
John Brooks
11 Posted 17/07/2026 at 18:21:45
For God's sake... I say this every year listen/watch/read all the rumours that are put out about Everton's transfer strategy, and believe what you wish. However, so many go off on one putting down the transfer situation at Everton saying that we're not signing anyone/we're being linked with over the hill players/we're not filling needed positions in the team. Unless you have a source that is sitting in with the strategy meetings, and can categorically state what is happening, it's all supposition. Wait until the window closes, then decide thumbs up or thumbs down.
John Pickles
12 Posted 17/07/2026 at 18:44:45
Now we have Hackney, I think a loan to a newly promoted Premier League side or a top Continental league would be the best option.

He seems a good all-round midfielder who likes to get forward. The problem is, so does Hackney, Dewsbury-Hall, Garner and Rohl.

Only defensive midfield is an issue, with Gueye approaching pensionable age, and Iroegbunam not trusted, rightfully in my opinion, to be the regular starter there. I don't see him as a defensive midfielder though, so barring injury, he faces another wasted season on the bench if he stays.
Mike Gaynes
13 Posted 17/07/2026 at 18:56:36
Gregory #1, so which of our current starters should sit to make room for Armstrong in the 11? Dewsbury-Hall or Garner?

And we should hire Carsley, a youth coach with virtually no adult managerial experience, to run our club? Why?

I look forward to your replies.
Darren Hind
16 Posted 17/07/2026 at 19:37:51
Gregory @1,

Interesting call on Barry. I never considered him.
Darren Hind
17 Posted 17/07/2026 at 19:39:00
Now it would appear I can't stop talking about the fucker!
Mike Gaynes
18 Posted 17/07/2026 at 19:56:26
Missed that.

Which Barry? Gareth? Anthony? Thierno?
Tony Abrahams
19 Posted 17/07/2026 at 20:56:05
Football is now a sport in which the manager can use five substitutions every single game.

Being in the starting eleven simply does not have to be as important as it used to be just as long as you have got a manager who trusts enough players in his squad to utilise them all.
Annika Herbert
20 Posted 17/07/2026 at 20:58:29
Barry the England assistant coach.

Keith Andrews had no adult managerial coaching experience either, but he didn't do too badly in his first season did he?

Any manager is a gamble as we all know, but they all have to start somewhere.
Kevin Molloy
21 Posted 17/07/2026 at 20:59:03
Gnonto linked with £15M Leeds exit.

Maybe our £25M bid a couple of years ago wasn't such a good idea after all. I suppose we should be grateful Leeds held out for the £30M they never got.
David West
22 Posted 17/07/2026 at 21:09:03
Barry's had some great experiences in coaching, highly regarded for his analysis and set-piece coaching.
Been with England at World Cup, Portugal too.

He was with Tuchel at Chelsea and Bayern Munich and could make a great manager, but would be huge gamble. He is a scouser too, but a bad Kopite.
Dave Abrahams
23 Posted 17/07/2026 at 21:18:20
Annika (20) Yes Anthony Barry former Accrington Stanley footballer has been the England manager’s assistant with quite a few teams including Bayern Munich and Chelsea not bad for a Scouser who played in the lower grades of football.
Tom Bowers
24 Posted 17/07/2026 at 22:07:16
Despite the striking problems last season it seems, sad to say that they are ready to go with Barry and Beto again.

These two have shown their limitations all to often and no other alternatives are on the horizon.

Also the right back situation is not resolved. Will that be more of the same with Jake filling in ?
Paul Griffiths
26 Posted 18/07/2026 at 02:44:21
John (11): it is pure 'supposition' in your word to assume that we are having 'strategy meetings' in your words.
Eric Myles
27 Posted 18/07/2026 at 03:03:18
Isn't that what committees do Paul? Otherwise how are they going to select and agree on targets?
Steve Brown
28 Posted 18/07/2026 at 04:00:27
We have brought in one new face since the transfer window opened over a month ago.

The first game of the season is 22nd August, and the manager will want new signings in at least 2 weeks before that.

So that is 3 weeks away. If we have no new signings over the next 2 weeks then it is time to get seriously concerned. I fear Pammy will be getting it in the ear as she serves Davie his neeps and tatties if that happens.

As for Hackney, Rohl or George, I’ll row up the Mersey on a bubble if Moyes picks them to start the season.
Steve Brown
29 Posted 18/07/2026 at 04:06:50
Gregory @ 1,

Anthony Barry as manager is easily the most interesting thing I’ve read on here this summer.
Ajay Gopal
30 Posted 18/07/2026 at 04:44:59
The worst thing that Moyes did last season was to recall Armstrong from his loan. Armstrong then didn’t get enough game time at Everton and I am sure that decision has stunted his development. If he had stayed back at PNE, our scouts would have seen his ability develop and instead of spending on Hackney (who is more of the same, I believe), could have got in a more experienced midfield general. Just my opinion, and I hope that Hackney proves me wrong by developing into a Declan Rice!
Paul Griffiths
31 Posted 18/07/2026 at 07:10:24
Eric M spot on. But unlike say Roma where Saint Daniel-the-Absent's son is heading up transfer 'strategy meetings', we have not heard a whisper from their second club.

So, I'm being a tad mischievous mate.
Paul Griffiths
32 Posted 18/07/2026 at 07:11:19
You twat Steve Brown, two great posts, one after another.
Phil Roberts
36 Posted 18/07/2026 at 11:26:45
Sadly we cannot play with 18 players.

Team for Palace is hopefully
Pickford
New RB, O'Brien, Branthwaite, Mykolenko
Garner, Röhl
George, Dewsbury-Hall, Ndiaye
Beto

[Don't go down the rabbit hole of the left-back slot arguement as that is not what this comment is about.]

But that means on the bench: (Patterson), Tarkowski, (Keane), Anzou, Armstrong, Irogebunam, (Alcaraz), Dibling, (McNeil), Barry and possibly Grealish, Graham, Papa Gueye.

The ones in brackets seem to be either back-up waiting for their contracts to expire or to be sold. But that leaves 9 players. Which of those players would you bring into the team above and who would they replace?

And apart from when one or more of that first eleven get injured, when would you change the team to bring in one of these 9 and would it be for one game or for a run of 4 or 5 and then revert back to the first choice player?

All well saying Armstrong should play, Dibling should play, but in place of who?
Steve Brown
37 Posted 18/07/2026 at 11:40:32
Haha you are welcome Paul @ 32, hope all is well with you and yours.
Mark Steers
38 Posted 18/07/2026 at 11:55:00
Phil 36,

Sadly, you're dreaming, mate. Tarkowski is a cert to start. Hackney and Garner you can bet your bottom dollar start.

As for George, you have a better chance of starting than him. Grealish will be here soon, guarenteed... either loan or cheap buy -- bank on it.
Phil Roberts
39 Posted 18/07/2026 at 18:40:15
Okay, Mark, so your answer to my question is:

Drop O'Brien for Tarkowski
Drop Rohl for Hackney
Drop George for Gealish

And you want to not play O'Brien, George, Rohl, Armstrong, Dibling, Anzou, Irogebunam or Papa Gueye if we sign him?
Why? Because they are too young?

Or not as good as the players in that team?

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb