-sm.jpg)
Eintracht Frankfurt are reportedly pursuing a deal to sign Nathan Patterson from Everton this summer.
The German side are prepared to offer Patterson an Everton exit as the right-back looks to revive his career, following a frustrating spell with the Blues.
Patterson played only 240 minutes of Premier League football last season, and has started only 29 league games since his arrival from Rangers in January 2022.
The Scotland international had been signed as a long-term replacement for Seamus Coleman, but a succession of injury problems have prevented him from realising his early potential at Everton. With less than 12 months to run on his current contract, a sale is expected this summer, despite the club's continued lack of depth at right-back.
Interest from the Bundesliga has been reported by The Bobble, with clubs in La Liga and Serie A also keen on the 24-year-old. Patterson made three appearances for Scotland at the 2026 World Cup this summer.
Read more - Ripple effect: Everton could face Ndiaye dilemma after record Rogers deal
Reader Comments (23)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 20/07/2026 at 17:29:45
Hope we get a decent fee (£10M?) and use that money towards buying a world class right-back.
3 Posted 20/07/2026 at 19:01:17
People quoting £30-35M for Spence... I'd take that!! Not huge when you see the fees for Rogers and Anderson.
4 Posted 20/07/2026 at 19:41:45
I watched him throughout his Rangers career and was made up when we got him. Not sure what happened but wish him good luck for his future career.
5 Posted 20/07/2026 at 19:45:08
6 Posted 20/07/2026 at 20:18:37
There's still time for Nathan to make a good career in football for himself, either back home or in Europe, going by the rumours.
7 Posted 20/07/2026 at 21:26:35
His overall total Everton appearances is 56, plus 13 for Rangers and 24 for Scotland; total: 93 senior appearances, actually means he has been a sub more than he has been a starter throughout his senior career.
A product of the modern academy system. Very good first touch, more than comfortable with the ball at his feet, but he has probably played for teams that always manipulated the ball during his teenage years, which means that nobody has ever taught the kid how to defend.
I don't mind him, he was doing okay under Lampard but he never got that proper run in the team that he badly needed because of injuries, so I just hope he goes somewhere where he is going to play every week, which is what he needs to do so he can improve.
8 Posted 21/07/2026 at 02:24:04
9 Posted 21/07/2026 at 02:53:16
10 Posted 21/07/2026 at 03:37:17
11 Posted 21/07/2026 at 04:38:28
12 Posted 21/07/2026 at 13:28:09
Although a small sample size, the stats when Patterson played are good.
Last season he started 3 (w2, d1) and was never involved in a defeat. Despite playing well, the side being better balanced with him in and results being good, Moyes replaced him with an out-of-position alternative at the first opportunity.
I can only think the issue is physical, as even when he starts, he often doesnt finish - but that seems like the kind of thing that can be worked on by a highly paid, ‘top-level coaching team.
If we do sell, well need to sign 2 right-backs.
13 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:06:17
As for keeping him till we sign a right-back, that would be a waste of time because he still won't get a game. We need to sell as soon as possible.
14 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:41:41
The right back position has been available for the last 3 years and he has not made it his.
Nothing to do with Patterson, but it's a joke at this stage that we have not filled that position.
15 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:11:03
Moyes will carry on as he always does and I still don't see big Jake starting in the middle.
If some players are sold then maybe cash can be freed up for a right back and a striker.
16 Posted 21/07/2026 at 19:24:29
Our best right back is James Garner. It is possible that Merlin Rohl may also figure in that position. The fact that both signed as midfield players doesn't change that.
In Garner's case, if he decided to switch to that position permanently it could improve his international chances. (Given the right back shambles England faced in the World Cup).
They would not be the first players to change positions and have a career playing there.
We signed Ian Snodin as a central midfield player. He was much better in the back 4. Neil MacDonald was a right sided midfielder as a youth. He filled in at left back for Newcastle and that is the position we signed him for. But he reverted at times to midfield.
Phil Neville played left back, because his brother was the better right back and also played in midfield. It is a case of using your resources.
Whatever or whoever we end up with in the position, I am sure it won't be for a lack of looking if we don't find a better option than we currently have.
17 Posted 21/07/2026 at 20:51:32
Cracking little player. But we just won't bother even trying to sign him.
18 Posted 21/07/2026 at 21:13:34
19 Posted 21/07/2026 at 21:26:40
20 Posted 21/07/2026 at 00:14:12
Yes, he's made errors, some costly, but then no one in Everton's defence has been error free. I can't help but feel he's had a raw deal with the rare outings he's had.
Personally, I'd play him before Jake O'Brien, as full back is Patterson's natural position. O'Brien is far more at home in the middle and is too often turned by pacy wingers.
Patterson is athletic and gives attacking options. He's a good crosser of the ball. Defensively his positional sense is lacking and his tackling needs to be sharper. Overall these minuses could be worked on and improved, but only with game time and a sustained run in the side.
If Moyes were to give him that chance without preconceived bias, the lad might still prove to be the answer to our right-back problem.
21 Posted 21/07/2026 at 00:19:40
So is he a right back playing out of position in midfield? Or a midfielder playing out of position at right back?
22 Posted 22/07/2026 at 16:39:25
He is a versatile player who is our best right back.
We have many options in midfield and the best use of him may be to play in another position in which he has been successful already.
Given we have a number of combinations in midfield to operate with, and rumoured to be chasing others, I would not be unhappy to see him play at right back. The question is, would he be happy?
23 Posted 22/07/2026 at 17:54:34
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 20/07/2026 at 15:16:01