
Just when you thought the global geopolitical landscape couldn't get any more surreal, Evertonians have somehow managed to establish a firm grip on the highest echelons of Western democracy.
When Mark Carney pulled off a stunning political comeback to be sworn in as the Prime Minister of Canada, we at ToffeeWeb rightfully celebrated. Finally, a proper Blue — a man who spent his time as Bank of England Governor casually mentioning his allegiance to the Gwladys Street — was running a G7 nation.
But lightning, as it turns out, does strike twice.
Following a rapid political ascent that saw him secure a return to Parliament, Andy Burnham has officially taken up residence in No 10 Downing Street. In doing so, he becomes the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, sealing a truly unprecedented reality: two of the world's G7 superpowers are now led by card-carrying, long-suffering, dyed-in-the-wool Evertonians.
From the Greater Manchester Mayoralty to the Ultimate "No 10"
For years, Burnham has been arguably the most high-profile, vocal Evertonian in British public life. Whether he was enduring the standard Goodison existential dread from the Directors' Box or fighting tirelessly for justice for the Hillsborough families during his days in cabinet, his footballing DNA has never been in doubt.
When he left Westminster in 2017 to become the "King in the North" as Mayor of Greater Manchester, many assumed his days of aiming for the top job in British politics were done. Yet, following his victory in the Makerfield by-election, his unopposed march to the Labour leadership has put a proud scouser (raised just outside the city) into the ultimate hot seat.
Forget the traditional tactical setups: Burnham aims to be the new No 10 that some quarters of British politics have been crying out for.
The Blue G7 Summit
One can only imagine the scenes at the next G7 summit. While the rest of the world leaders are busy discussing global trade tariffs, security pacts, and fiscal policy, Burnham and Carney will inevitably be huddled in a corner of the room, intensely debating whether Everton's summer friendly victory over Dundee is a sign of a top-half finish or if the Hill Dickinson Stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock will finally yield some silverware.
Optimism in High Places
To be an Evertonian is to understand the concepts of resilience, managing expectations, and surviving against the absolute heaviest of odds. Perhaps those exact traits are why Carney and Burnham have managed to scale the heights of international leadership. If you can handle a cold December afternoon watching Everton drop points from a winning position, steering a major nation through a global crisis is a walk in the park.
From all of us at ToffeeWeb, congratulations to the new Prime Minister... even if some of us are slightly concerned about his leaning in towards yet bigger government and even more welfare support provided for the people, with a doomed wealth tax of one form or another set to destroy any entrepreneurial spirit that might be left amongst the country's high fliers.
The country faces massive challenges, but at the very least, we know the man at the helm understands the true meaning of the club motto: Nil Satis Nisi Optimum. Let's just hope his cabinet selections are a bit more inspired than some of our recent transfer windows…
Reader Comments (128)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 20/07/2026 at 15:14:19
Onward and upward.
3 Posted 20/07/2026 at 15:30:50
Then up the tax rate for the superich and the likes of Starbucks, 1,400 Starbucks locations in the UK. £550 million annual turnover. Never paid £1 in Corporation Tax last year.
4 Posted 20/07/2026 at 16:03:27
"Some of us" meaning the Daily Mail readers on here?
5 Posted 20/07/2026 at 16:07:48
6 Posted 20/07/2026 at 16:09:02
Starbucks paid £5M in UK Corporation Tax last year, based on £95m profits. Still not enough as they are allowed, as many companies are, to pay 'sister' companies huge dividends across the globe.
Sadly, the global tax system needs changing and it's not what the UK can do on their own. Even George Osbourne tried to change this!
7 Posted 20/07/2026 at 16:10:00
You either box off the oligarchs or you're toast.
8 Posted 20/07/2026 at 16:10:22
(Living in Austin, TX, there's a very poor and incomplete public transport system here and you shouldn't take the ones in the UK for granted, just like the NHS, warts and all... careful what you wish for!)
Wealth tax to me is a must, I don't believe for one minute that it will dissipate entrepreneurship except perhaps by driving some to move elsewhere ... so be it. They move their money offshore already anyway.
9 Posted 20/07/2026 at 16:18:38
Backwards and downwards!
14 Posted 20/07/2026 at 17:16:32
15 Posted 20/07/2026 at 17:29:31
I don't read The Mail but I am more than a little concerned about bigger government and increased welfare spending.
18 Posted 20/07/2026 at 17:46:43
If you are in work benefits to that for employers who refuse to pay a decent day's pay for a day's work, which bits actually concern you?
19 Posted 20/07/2026 at 18:14:45
20 Posted 20/07/2026 at 18:16:17
21 Posted 20/07/2026 at 18:51:37
Looks photoshopped, as think it's from when Smith was caught re: Sandpaper-gate!
22 Posted 20/07/2026 at 19:43:45
23 Posted 20/07/2026 at 19:52:26
The top 1% hold 50% of the world's wealth. Bezos's wealth increases $2 -$7M per hour.
The political figures don't hold the power anymore when there's people with more money than countries.
How can the energy companies increase the price cap when Eon made £9.8B last year? How can we let them?
It needs someone to separate firms like Amazon or Facebook from things that you have no choice but to buy, like gas, petrol, electricity, buses, trains, water...
Water! How, in this country where it never stops raining, are we getting bummed by companies for water bills?
Come on, Andy, show there's a choice, a different way, not the Farage way, but a difference between politicians.
24 Posted 20/07/2026 at 20:37:47
25 Posted 20/07/2026 at 20:41:43
26 Posted 20/07/2026 at 20:43:46
Still millions of kids can't get a drink of clean water. Obscene.
27 Posted 20/07/2026 at 21:15:56
Never have, never will.
28 Posted 20/07/2026 at 21:31:57
29 Posted 20/07/2026 at 21:38:37
Did you see the video of Bezos smirking about human's water consumption competing with data centers' needs in the near future. That is not the behavior of a healthy man.
30 Posted 20/07/2026 at 21:46:35
Money buys power, money buys silence, and money buys corruption, and the thought of money becoming completely digital, is such a terrifying thought to me.
We are nearly there anyway I hear people say, with my own view being that these people are completely unaware of the consequences if the day ever arrives.
31 Posted 20/07/2026 at 21:53:17
32 Posted 20/07/2026 at 23:21:53
It's not business men going to politicians for favours, it's now politicians needing favours and the money of these super rich individuals and corporations.
I've got no problem with people getting rich, entrepreneurs, innovators deserve their rewards.
But there's got to be a fairer way, people who work their arses off are just scraping by,.
The issues are so big, so complicated, so intertwined with other countries now the world is so connected that it's not 1 PM or leader that can solve these issues.
So I hold zero Hope in anything getting any better ever !
Basically the world's fucked, the Internet needs switching off, that's the root cause of it all.
33 Posted 20/07/2026 at 23:30:06
Needs to lay out all (any) new big ticket policy directions - with costings, let them be discussed, then call an Election before the end of the year.
34 Posted 20/07/2026 at 23:33:47
35 Posted 20/07/2026 at 23:39:14
Peter Reid -- yet another champagne socialist.
36 Posted 20/07/2026 at 23:43:15
You really need a long look in the mirror.
37 Posted 20/07/2026 at 23:46:10
39 Posted 21/07/2026 at 02:44:38
I would not have accepted him as a carer for my own mother and would have played hell with the council. Fair play to him though, he looked up the rules and regulations and got himself assigned to one particular like minded individual (he liked a drink and a smoke) and did a good job in the end, and yes, actually cared.
40 Posted 21/07/2026 at 03:25:40
41 Posted 21/07/2026 at 04:14:15
Before that they made him go on a sandwich making course ffs! He makes a mean chip butty now though.
42 Posted 21/07/2026 at 06:33:29
A truly bizarre streams of consciousness like or Coltranes sheets of sound like from a few flaky sentences on Bangladeshi immigrants like to a crazed digression on uniform clothing like.
Mr. Kearns writes modestly like about his political acumen like: ‘Just wondering like as Im not much into politics.
But how could someone with low and shallow IQ like write this following on from his conclusive four lines on ‘invaders like:
‘Why is England just one big game of follow the leader? Like all the fellas now wearing the same shirts with two pockets on the front etc? Every lad in town looks the same like little minions 😂 its so cringe! Everyone dresses in the same gear and looks the same for fear of being cast out.
Cutting. Incisive, like. Concise. Piercing. Acerbic, like. Necessary. Urgent, like.
The diagnosis we have long waited for like, bringing together in one decisive and insightful conception like the age-old related issues of immigration and ‘same gear at long last like.
All good things must come to an end like, and Mr. Kearns signs off like reminding us like that:
‘… fortunately now im the US and have a wonderful thing called freedom of speech
A fair number of Blighty-based ToffeeWebbers like will doubtless agree like that they are ‘fortunate like that Mr. K like is in the USA like.
Sadly for them like and unlike Mr. K. like, they dont have freedom of speech on their side of the ocean like, unlike in 'merica like. Yet more profound heuristic like razor-sharp political analysis like from Mr. K. like.
N.B. like. If any of you wish to catch a glimpse like of the real Kearns like, go to the Beto/Fans thread like and read his vile racist anti-Semitic post #51 like.
43 Posted 21/07/2026 at 08:39:25
I have more of a problem with disability benefit. We cant have the number of people, including a lot of youngsters, claiming it for ADHD, anxiety and stress. The last 2 have become the 21st centurys bad back.
In my line of work I advise and coach businesses on working more efficiently. Many of these businesses are struggling under the weight of Starmers increases to employer NICs, NMW increases and introduction of employee rights from day one. Most have halted hiring, many are cutting staff, off-shoring work and a good number of the owners are struggling to make enough to pay themselves a salary. We cant keep loading more and more onto business.
We need people to take more responsibility for themselves, not immediately turn to government when life gets tough.
No doubt Ill be damned as a small government, low tax Tory. All true, but I honestly believe that that route is far better for everyone than the socialism that many on here, and elsewhere, are calling for.
44 Posted 21/07/2026 at 08:45:10
And photographers and lip readers shocked as Andy Burnham seen to sing “We don't care what the red shite say”.
45 Posted 21/07/2026 at 09:05:46
Pay for it by using the funds put aside to finance the ID card Bill that Andy scrapped. A good start.
46 Posted 21/07/2026 at 09:15:36
Look after the people. The working class. Without them we'll be fucked.
Defund the Monarchy.
47 Posted 21/07/2026 at 09:18:43
To clarify, the VAT cut is on electricity only; gas and standing charges are not included -- and it is initially for only 6 months.
The government has admitted that ID cards are unfunded so no money has been put aside.
48 Posted 21/07/2026 at 09:22:54
49 Posted 21/07/2026 at 09:41:37
And I'd bet that those struggling businesses you are helping out are not Amazon, Nestlé or Microsoft et al who can afford to put more back into the economies they're leeching from.
Instead, they just make their billionaire owners multi-billionaire owners.
50 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:04:33
Geoff has mentioned business constraints and bad back syndrome, these do need sorting out. I don't think southern voters will warm to Andy, not the South East anyway.
Devolution in practice will be interesting, look at Birmingham council for instance? Local "chiefs" will need to be accountable to someone.
Nationalising industry is a massive challenge, huge cost, to taxpayers, and obviosly will lose outside investment. But if private business shareholders don't live here, the profits go abroad and are not reinvested here, and if British shareholders are already rich, then they line their own pockets. Look at British Steel, Thames Water...
Big jobs need big ideas and balls to match; let's see how we are this time next year.
51 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:12:21
As a country, we are owned and controlled by a faceless and unelected minority of wealthy and powerful people who are totally unaccountable for their actions. Politics and politicians are merely the smokescreen behind which they hide.
His major problem will be the same one all his predecessors have had since Thatcher sold off the family silver back in the '80s. Namely the vast amount of debt that is spiralling out of control year on year.
As a country we are constantly spending more than we earn and the difference can only be funded by increasing government income through tax manipulation or borrowing at exorbitant interest rates.
We simply cannot afford to fund the welfare state in its present form but unfortunately it remains such a sacred cow that politicians are all afraid to raise the issue.
As Prime Minister, he will be able to fiddle around the edges of the problem but the ultimate power lies with those people and institutions who control the real wealth of the country.
Get too close to making them pay and some scandal or other will be found to discredit Burnham and kick him back up north.
It's where the real power lies and has worked consistently for hundreds of years, highlighted by the way the distribution of wealth in this country has remained roughly unchanged over the centuries.
Good luck, Andy -- you are going to need it!
52 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:24:33
Save us billions.
53 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:28:17
54 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:29:05
Stop inheritance tax, deport illegals straight away.
55 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:32:33
But we still give aid to China apparently.
56 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:36:29
57 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:37:58
Couples / households with children (Inside London): £486.98 per week
Couples / households with children (Outside London): £423.46 per week
Single adults (Inside London): £326.29 per week
Single adults (Outside London): £283.71 per week
58 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:41:36
Step away from the Daily Mail and/or GB News Paul. They rot the brain.
59 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:44:03
That's just one welfare. People can claim all sorts now a days.
The maximum you can earn from all your claims should not exceed the average working person.
60 Posted 21/07/2026 at 10:57:54
The additional benefits are mainly sickness and disability. Unless you want to be the arbiter of who's sick or disabled enough that's a dangerous road. Remembering of course much of that comes from in work benefits for people who couldn't work without them.
61 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:02:53
Sean, in my day, if my parents could not afford whatever, we never got it! From the age of 12 or 13, we were all out washing cars, cleaning neighbours windows, doorsteps, anything for a few bob -- no fucking handouts. These fraudulent scroungers (millions) who complain about everything are a huge burden on all of us who work.
A "single mum" who got her front windows smashed in where she lived because she didn't like it and wanted to get into a new build of houses -- she was successful, the new build of this brand new home cost £800 a month -- she pays £50 quid a month.
So taxpayers are paying £9 grand on her behalf a year -- god knows what else she gets! Examples such as this have to stop. Politicians are cowards totally.
Andy will be no different -- will he chase the likes of Amazon, Google and the super rich? Will he fuck -- he will chase small businesses for every pound they make everywhere.
Multiply the above example by thousands -- you have "advice centres" all over the UK funded by local government advising people how to apply for fucking everything, if they are turned down, they go back and they learn how to beat the system another way! -- that's a fact!
These "advice" experts will tell you they do not encourage fraudulent or untrue claims -- they just present the facts of outcomes for this or that... total bullocks.
There are genuine people out there receiving and in need of benefits and help many thousands are suffering -- going on for years and years and getting worse every year... more benefits paid out than tax taken in?
62 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:06:21
63 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:11:33
To clarify: a budget of £1.8B was set up to run the ID cards.
A right-wing agenda by Starmer, royally fucked off by Andy.
64 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:13:48
65 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:21:49
Guess it's the working person's job to do that.
66 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:22:13
"We simply cannot afford to fund the welfare state in its present form but unfortunately it remains such a sacred cow that politicians are all afraid to raise the issue.
Depends what you are defining as the 'welfare state'...
If your Mum had a heart attack, would you be able to pay for her treatment? Or if your Dad had dementia, would you be able to pay for his care home? How much do you pay for your children's education?
These are all 'welfare state' costs. I don't live in UK and there are eyewatering costs involved in paying for this out of your own pocket. I don't think anyone in England would vote for paying for it themselves.
67 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:26:41
In front of Murdoch is a plate piled high with cookies. In front of the workman is a plate with a solitary cookie. Murdoch is saying to the worker, "Careful, mate. That foreigner will take your cookie".
There are people who are abusing the benefit system, I agree. We probably all know people but they are soft targets. Why don't we go after Michelle Mone and the like who defrauded taxpayers out of tens of billions?
Most benefits are in-work payments because work no longer pays enough.
68 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:31:44
69 Posted 21/07/2026 at 11:44:41
Not every person on benefits are scroungers like you're precieving. I've worked all my life since leaving school at 16 and like millions of others have paid my taxes. Unlike you, I don't have this bitter attitude to people who find themselves in the benefits system.
70 Posted 21/07/2026 at 12:11:42
Whatever party gets to govern, they are prevented from doing the really unpopular decisions that need to be done because they won't be voted for in the next election.
The country as a whole needs to compete in the world market. We have been doing badly for as long as I can remember. Anything that impedes that is bad news for us all.
The reality is business needs workers and workers need successful business. Really, the problems comes down to who gets what. Both sides think they are worth more.
As far as taxing businesses more, that seems the easy answer but, if they don't think it's worth the risk of starting a new venture or investing more in an existing company because it's over-taxed, they won't do it. That means less jobs.
I think what is bad news for everyone is the domination of more and more very large companies dominating individual markets, the choice is getting less and less.
To a lesser degree, look at supermarkets for food, they have us all over a barrel now, you have a choice of realistically 4 or 5, it's no wonder their prices keep rising way above the inflation rate.
71 Posted 21/07/2026 at 12:15:02
I'm not advocating getting rid of the welfare state, just suggesting that the demographic and economic background has changed dramatically since its inception and a complete and thorough review of society's needs today may allow us to come up with a more manageable and efficient service which is more fit for purpose.
I notice some people are taking the view that the majority of people receiving benefits are all scroungers living off the backs of the rest of us. No doubt some are... but the vast majority are not choosing to live off benefits, they have to by necessity. In fact, the majority of people receiving benefits (around 80%) are actually in work.
Maybe unscrupulous employees should be paying a living wage and not relying on zero hours contracts?
A G8 country which has food banks in every town, and homeless people living on the streets should say it all, but too many people rely on lazy Daily Mail thinking and blame the easy target, the victims.
Didn't the Nazis blame the Jews for all their economic and social problems between the wars? And look where that got us!
Great idea, deflect all our society's problems onto the unemployed and sick so the real culprits remain unchallenged.
72 Posted 21/07/2026 at 12:21:18
Divide and conquer. The nearly have fuck-alls being encouraged to look down their noses at the ones who do have fuck-all.
73 Posted 21/07/2026 at 12:22:28
What twaddle.
74 Posted 21/07/2026 at 12:43:06
The paid tool of the billionaire classes for 25 years.
75 Posted 21/07/2026 at 2026/07/21 : 12:54:20
We now have an Evertonian as Prime Minister.
How will he do? Will there be a 'Honeymoon' period? How long will it last?
If I remember correctly, Starmer's lasted all of 6 months before there was a very large petition to ditch him. I'm actually amazed he lasted as long as he did.
Anyway, how will Andy Burnham cope with the one thing that prevents leaders from implementing their policies -- those dreaded 'Events'?
76 Posted 21/07/2026 at 12:55:53
Answers on a postcard.
77 Posted 21/07/2026 at 13:42:56
Well read my last paragraph - keep up !
There are genuine people out there receiving and in need of benefits and help many thousands are suffering - going on for years and years and getting worse every year, more benefits paid out than tax taken in ?
78 Posted 21/07/2026 at 13:57:34
79 Posted 21/07/2026 at 14:10:41
With my views on immigration making me sound like a far right thug, it was gratifying to read John saying that trying to force through ID cards, was a right wing agenda, because I am totally against ID cards, and actually believe that Digital Currency, is the biggest single most worrying aspect of modern times.
So Im sometimes left, and sometimes Im even right….The Black Eyed Peas, come to mind! (What was that, I shouldve just stayed out of this discussion👍!)
That is an incredible stat, if true what craig@69 has just written, last sentence.
80 Posted 21/07/2026 at 14:22:13
The fact that we are slowly being pushed into a cashless society is my biggest fear. Just another way that governments can control what you spend. And have.
81 Posted 21/07/2026 at 14:32:40
82 Posted 21/07/2026 at 14:37:54
Im with you on doing away with the plan, not because it is right wing but because it is plain wrong
83 Posted 21/07/2026 at 14:41:41
The last sentence of my first paragraph makes in clear that I want help targeted at those who need it, through pension credits, UC etc
84 Posted 21/07/2026 at 14:48:28
It will come from the same area the ID budget was coming from.
I would take it a step further by taxing the super rich, and passing their money on to benefit the people who keep the wheels turning in the country.
85 Posted 21/07/2026 at 14:57:13
We need people to take more responsibility for themselves, not immediately turn to government when life gets tough.
86 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:03:56
There's none as blind as them that won't see!
87 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:06:55
ID Cards the thin end of the wedge mate.
Digital Currency is the main one, Tony. The powers that be will be looking to limit certain foods and goods consumed per month by the general public.
I went for a coffee a week or so ago. Ordered, coffee put on counter, and I was presented with a card machine. I got a tenner out to pay. Girl said, "We don't take cash."
Me: "I don't use credit cards."
She went blank and called the manager over.
"You will have to pay with card."
I told her "I don't own cards, you will have to put the coffee back in the machine."
She changed her mind and took the tenner.
88 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:12:01
Also, when you use cash, the government can't track what you like and force advertisements down your throat through your mind control device (smartphone)…
See the studies the US government did on low-frequency radio waves back in the day and mind control with TVs. The low-frequency radio waves that come through our TVs and phones can alter our moods and emotions, albeit very slightly…
It's also causing many people to get mental illness and depression or anxiety etc... but the benefits for Big Brother outweigh the negatives for us.
89 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:13:50
90 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:23:58
The pension credit & UC comment referred to recipients of the state pension and the self reliance comment related to the anxious and stressed claiming disability benefit. But you knew that
91 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:26:01
92 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:27:33
93 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:40:47
94 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:53:44
Cash is still useless then.
95 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:53:59
96 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:54:29
97 Posted 21/07/2026 at 15:56:28
Putting an end to the clear and obvious bias and corruption would be great.
98 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:02:02
Let's get back to football, and when are we going to sign a right-back.
99 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:10:57
Back to footy then
100 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:20:24
Less and less cash machines, small businesses having to pay a percentage of everything that goes through their accounts for having to use something which is being forced upon them. Everything is easy, until it stops being easy, and like I say to anyone who listens, I struggle to think how my city, would have survived The Thatcher era, if we would have never had a black economy.
We did survive though and its because of our own experience, that I ask the question to everyone. I have yet to get an answer from anyone who can explain to me how Liverpool, would have not only survived but came out the other side stronger, and Ive asked a lot of intelligent people since we started living again after COVID, which makes me think that the so called cynical people who rejected the pandemic, were actually more aware than the rest?
101 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:29:13
I remember when Liverpool were taken over by FSG and the American that used to come on ToffeeWeb, called Jamie Crowley, telling us that they were winners.
I haven't heard anyone from America telling us anything similar about TGF. They just tell us that they are very good at making money and they don't really like talking about it.
Without trying to offend anyone, I am beginning to feel like Dr Harold Shipman when he ran out of patience!
102 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:31:38
https://youtu.be/2eq2YoBYIDc?si=TCflb9UNzBoStaLq
Sound familiar?
103 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:35:08
104 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:38:24
The movie's called "Keeper of the Flame" and it's about how the Bezoses of that day, in league with politicians and media folk, sought to divide the population into mutually antagonistic hatreds against each other whilst the rich got richer and richer.
Plus ca change!
105 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:39:47
"we are waiting for the engineers"
I asked "if the card readers went down 3 weeks ago would the cash machines be working"
He went red.
As for the covid issue.
Given the detrimental medical episodes due to vaccine,and the verdicts from medical boards some of the vaccines were not fit for purpose,I consider the cynics intelligent people.
106 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:51:38
107 Posted 21/07/2026 at 16:54:32
Frightening mate.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1197444662487491/?mibextid=ZZyLBr
108 Posted 21/07/2026 at 17:36:18
109 Posted 21/07/2026 at 17:57:40
My experience is that advice agencies provide advice and representation to those who mostly cannot afford to buy it themselves. Certainly at Citizens Advice work was closely checked.
The advisers work within and according to a system and rules set up by elected government and their civil servants.
I mostly represented people in judges' chambers County Court at repossession hearings. Plenty were an inefficient system did not pay housing benefit or mortgage help..that people (many working on very low wages) were legally entitled to
It was not my job to decide if client kept their house in the end but to present their case in best way possible within the law.
For me and welfare rights advisers, the reps and lawyers from many banks, councils and government were well practiced at spinning a yarn.
Occasionally the Tribunal or District Judge would point this out but despite what was disgusting behaviour, there was little consequence and fees and wages were of course paid.
Without any representation, many of our clients would just be dogs to the wolves.
The amount of people who reached out for help and went through a frightening appeal or defence process that were blaggers was much smaller than you are implying.
But hey. For the small amount who do manage to pull off a con, then the tax payer has lenders, local and national government and most of the media to ensure the fire of their paranoia and hysteria is properly stoked.
I blame Everton's owners!
110 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:27:59
I wish I had the talent to download the great Dylan song about the Masters Of War, because sometimes it feels like we are in the middle of a different kind of war right now.
111 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:34:06
Watch the talent that graced Goodison. I was fortunate to be around then. Great memories!
112 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:34:13
There you go Tony.
Direct from the Genius.
In decades of listening to music Bob wrote my all time favourite song.
113 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:49:10
114 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:53:27
"Give them bread and circus, they will never riot."
We've just had the circus
115 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:57:40
Finally, folks, this thread has gone way off the site's purpose! If you want to talk polítics, you should look for the comments sections of the Daily Mail... apoarently the most popular paper among Toffees!
ps: Don't forget, bring back the old Liberal Party if you do love your country! ;-)
116 Posted 21/07/2026 at 18:57:56
117 Posted 21/07/2026 at 19:08:47
His closest friends were black-men because they seemed to understand - what its like to be in a society with a shackle on their hand.
Definitely the master of the lyrics for me was Mr Zimmerman, and he brought us some luck playing in Liverpool, pictured near Bramley Moore, on Dublin St - on the same day as one of the greatest FA Cup final comebacks in 1966!
118 Posted 21/07/2026 at 19:12:29
Like I posted earlier mate,pure genius.
119 Posted 21/07/2026 at 19:18:31
Read a story where Alan Ginsberg cried when he read the lyrics to Like a Rolling Stone for the first time.
120 Posted 21/07/2026 at 19:42:08
121 Posted 21/07/2026 at 19:46:14
They used the song in the campaign.
122 Posted 21/07/2026 at 21:01:16
Ah 1966... watched it outside a tele shop in Wembley high street and Eddie Cavannagh has still got my autograph book.
In case anyone doesn't know who he is, he's the bloke who got rugby tackled by a copper running across the pitch. Did a brilliant job by letting his jacket off with the first copper. Worth watching.
123 Posted 21/07/2026 at 23:59:28
"Dont Blame The Fans"
It will be interesting to see how close the Club hierarchy gets to the new incumbent, but there again knowing Labour he may just have his seat longer at BMD than at No 10 !
124 Posted 21/07/2026 at 00:52:34
125 Posted 22/07/2026 at 01:03:56
126 Posted 22/07/2026 at 05:49:21
You might want to check first before posting David. This thread is on Andy Burnham.
127 Posted 22/07/2026 at 05:54:11
What a critical and valuable role you have devoted your life to.
And what a valuable corrective you have provided to the uninformed and bigoted fella who claimed with no support that you and your colleagues just advised 'the cheating great unwashed' on how to play the benefits system.
132 Posted 22/07/2026 at 09:42:04
With this much power now behind the club, international law could now decree that we win the Premier League every year, go straight to the Champions League Final without qualifying, and ban the word 'red'.
133 Posted 22/07/2026 at 10:37:46
134 Posted 22/07/2026 at 15:44:35
Anyway, hopefully the aforementioned Mr Burnham can find us a right back.
135 Posted 23/07/2026 at 06:29:30
If I agree that these 'insults' are indeed 'insults', apologies that
they are 'lazy. tiresome and dated'.
Did you mean this - 127 'Top man Ged Simpson - 109. What a critical and valuable role you have devoted your life to?
136 Posted 22/07/2026 at 07:54:54
Fair dos, vote for and believe what you like, and I'll get on with most people, (and some of the comments about use of cash were reasonable, although good luck at HDS which is cashless) but I draw the line at the rubbish spouted about Covid and vaccines.
As a registered nurse who worked in Intensive Care during Covid, I think I'll go with the world class consultant who headed up our temporary unit and said he'd never seen X-rays like them, or the previously fit and healthy man who, just before he was intubated in an effort to save his life and then never woke up, said he wished he'd had his vaccine.
All medications, without exception, have potential side effects, including vaccines. They save far, far more people than they harm. So could the amateur virologists shut their holes please.
Now, about that right-back...
137 Posted 23/07/2026 at 08:17:11
138 Posted 23/07/2026 at 08:20:10
139 Posted 23/07/2026 at 09:24:03
It works both ways. Good and bad. But I still have an opinion. You are in no position to tell anyone to shut their hole.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 20/07/2026 at 14:35:59