FAN ARTICLES

Stadium Envy?

By Ed Fitzpatrick :  13/06/2007 :  Comments (13) :
I have followed the ground move/investment debate on Toffeeweb with interest over the past six months. Sometimes I have been irritated, occasionally perplexed and on rare occasions inspired by the vision and commitment of my fellow Evertonians.

If we are serious about attracting investment from whoever, there is one certain way of attracting it, ie, ensuring we are successful on the pitch!! Many contributors appear to be clouded by a dubious logic that if we relocate to Kirkby or wherever with a new ground replete with gleaming corporate facilities, success and financial stability will inevitably follow. This is I believe is a misguided philosophy.

Let's consider the top four clubs, all whom have had stadium redevelopments, or have built or are building new stadiums. This is because of sustained success they have enjoyed on the pitch. Although it maybe difficult to stomach, it is this factor which has attracted inward investment at these clubs. They are seen as assets by investors because they are successful and therefore generate media interest and coverage.

If Everton are to move forward, the club's leadership and management must remember their core purpose to produce ?attractive winning football?. This may seem a clichéd statement but this is the reason why we go, isn?t it? I want to see our Chairman and the rest of the Board relentlessly seeking investment to ensure we acquire the best possible players.

I feel we are being swept along by a feeling that somehow we are missing out by not moving to a new purpose-built ground fit for the 21st century. Perhaps this is borne out of envy as we look across the park, in conjunction with the feeling we are being left behind by lesser clubs. When we consider the evidence, this is not the case; we have been generally more consistent since the appointment of Moyes and there has even been traces of passing the ball to feet of late! (a welcome development after some truly dire football for the past ten years).

An analysis of those clubs outside the top four is interesting:

  • Newcastle: increased capacity to over 50,000 - more successful than us? ? I don?t think so
  • Southampton: new ground ? relegated
  • Man City: new ground (not even owned by the club) still in debt and not exactly setting new standards in the quality of football
  • Sunderland: new ground ? relegated! - Now back but will they experience sustained success?
  • Derby: New Ground ? relegated (back up now and talking about increasing capacity to 44,000 ? they did not have capacity crowds for much of last season)
  • Middlesboro: some success ? but does it bring the crowds in?
  • Bolton: again some degree of consistency in a half-full stadium
Moreover, the grounds are featureless, soulless places (Newcastle?s ground is the exception) and none would win any design awards (Good god I hope any of them have not!! Frank Lloyd Wright would turn in his grave!)

Outside the top four, there is little evidence that the construction of new stadia/or major redevelopment brings success as a result. In the case of the top four developments has been preceded by success. In some of the articles that are posted on the website there is often an air of desperation that if we don?t act now over the stadium we will never be successful and will suffer from an eternal hegemony of the current top four. The song ?If you know your history? comes to mind; when we look back over the past 40-50 years, no one team has had a stranglehold on success and this will be the case in future.

What should we do then? Well, Bill, if I were you, I would be looking for a serious investor who could buy you out to provide us with finance to help build a team that wins trophies. After all, Bill, you had the pleasure of watching Everton teams that competed, entertained and won; my 24-year-old who has been a season ticket holder for 19 years would like to experience the same. I assume that?s why you got involved too, Bill? To see the Blues winning trophies. Stop appearing to be protective and use your considerable media and business influence to attract that really big investor.

If we can achieve this goal of winning one or (god forbid) two trophies in the next five years, we will attract the investment to build a suitable replacement for Goodison. The site of the ground is all-important. ?What?s our name? EVERTON? is the chant... somehow this will have less resonance if we are singing it in the checkout end in Knowsley. Opposition players and our players have said how intimidating and inspiring the atmosphere inside Goodison can be; let's not underestimate that fact when we carp about its lack of modernity. We can and must find a suitable site within the city and to quote Corporal Jones ?Don?t Panic?. We can bide our time particularly if we are doing it on the pitch!

Keep the Faith, knowing our luck it will be Man U first game!

Reader Comments (13)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Steve L
1 Posted 14/06/2007 at 07:57:45
I have to say your idea that success results in investment is a mis-giuded one. If that’s true explain Aston Villa, West Ham, possibly Derby, Man City and Birmingham. If success attracts investors then have I been wathing the same league and cups? When was the last time any of these actually won something? The last team outside the "top 4" who won even a cup was us over 10 years ago.

I think you’ll find that investment comes in if someone sees potential. Currently they have overshadowed us so maybe being unique (only club in Knowsley) would be a help; maybe not.

No-one can predict what will happen in the future and, if anyone can do you have Friday and Saturdays lottery numbers?
Mr T
2 Posted 14/06/2007 at 08:10:58
As much as I agree with you about investment I cannot see us getting it staying at Goodison Park.
The ground is getting old and I think to get investment we need to show we are a modern team with modern facilities.
I love Goodison and have attended matches for over 25 years there but feel that the old lady needs a well earned rest (I am not getting into a debate on where we move to). It has provided us with highs and lows and a fantastic atmosphere you can find at only a few stadiums.
Bill does need to find investment and soon other wise we will fall further behind other teams in the EPL. What I cannot understand is that clubs like WHU, Man C, Villa, Birm, are considered as a better investment than us. We are more successful than all these clubs so that pours considerable doubt over your "success breeds investment" philosophy.
You make a very good point about his media and business contacts.
paul johnson
3 Posted 14/06/2007 at 08:49:13
Some good points in there but if you look at it another way then it’s a totally different picture.

Out of all the teams in the Premiership last season how many have not re-developed their existing ground or moved ground??

I can only think of 3 us ,Watford and Sheffield Utd.Even Charlton have partially re-developed and still have not finished.Some have re-developed and are still moving.

Now think about if we pass up this oppurtunity in Kirkby and don’t win anything in the next five years, where will we be then??
km
4 Posted 14/06/2007 at 10:32:27
As far as our failure to attract investment goes, I see BK?s involvement as the problem, not our ground or our level of success. Even if he genuinely does spend 24 minutes every 7 months looking who could possibly take him seriously?

I dread to think what he actually says to potential investors but whatever it is, it?s not working.

The board should be paying someone to represent the club in the search, someone with credibility and professionalism, things that seem sadly lacking in our boardroom.
Della Polozza
5 Posted 14/06/2007 at 11:39:11
2 points, why does everyone think it is impossible to build a new stadium capable of creating a good atmosphere (which is why efc are looking at cologne stadium, acoustically the design produces fantastic noise, the atmosphere is up to the fans)


Why do we NEED massive investment, it would be nice, If we could guarantee we got an invester with the clubs best interests at heart of course to have a massive cash injection but in the last 5 years we?ve done better than most without it and many of those clubs competing against us do have big bucks backers.
Richard Dodd
6 Posted 14/06/2007 at 12:45:54
What I can never understand is why Evertonians have to beat themselves up worrying about the future.The Club is in good hands both administratively and football-wise and the future is brighter than it has been for 20 years.
Just stop mithering and let Bill,Keith and Davey get on with the job!
keiron
7 Posted 14/06/2007 at 16:02:31
Success on the pitch is clearly a major factor in success of the club off the pitch. However, there comes a time when unless you act you fall behind everybody else. The clubs with new grounds have spent that money and a now collecting the rewards. I wonder why no mahor investor has looked at Everton but looked at Man City(new ground)Newcastle (as good as a new ground)Aston Villa (one of the best stadium in the country). Attracting new players is going to be easier if you have good facilities. Goodison Park is the best to us Efc fans but what does it look like to a foreign player who cares nothing of our history. As for the Kirby versus Liverpool debate the City Council should have been acting like they wanted Everton in the city 5 years ago. The Kings Dock could have been the Council’s No 1 priority but I think they wanted to help LFC more than us.
Barry Bostick
8 Posted 14/06/2007 at 17:36:47
Contrary to your statement that we have plenty of time I think we are already struggling to keep up with many clubs in the prem not just on transfer fees but also and perhaps more worryingly on wages. Untill the club starts to increase its turnover significantly we are only ever going to be able to afford 30 - 40k wages when most of the top players are looking for 60 - 90k.
Goodison can only generate so much money. we are stuck with a turnover of 40 60 million but just to keep pace with the prem we need to be in the 60 -80 million bracket.

I agree that there is no guarrantee that a new stadium will bring more wealth but in conjunction with a strong playing side (which we now have) we can harness the potential of a new stadium and maximise its productivity. The clubs like Southampton, Coventry etc etc with new grounds also have shit teams which is why they are still struggling. Whether its redeveloping Goodison or building new we NEED a new stadium and we Need it soon. In my humble opinion
anthony fielding
9 Posted 14/06/2007 at 18:23:33
Yer well said mate. Lets forget about the stadium and get a sugar daddy to bail us out of this mess - easy! Never mind the fact that Goodison is now a laughing stock and is just about ready to fall down, never mind be pulled down, but not to worry, as long as we’re at our spiritual home we’ll be ok! Get real, we’re not re-locating because we want to get a bigger attendance, we’re doing because Goodison is going to fall down around our feet and is not fit to stage top flight football in the best league in the world!
Ed Fitzpatrick
10 Posted 14/06/2007 at 18:30:44
In response to Anthonys comment, where is the evidence that Goodison is going to fall down. Granted its not going to be the bright shiny monolith the Reds will have, but then we dont reach European cup finals, or FA cup finals that attract the worldwide auidence, to attract the investment, do we. They achieved this in a ground that holds 4,000 more that Goodison, yes they are wealthier, have more backers, have generated different income streams etc because they have been far more successful than we have. So lets get real on that point!

If you read what I said, I did not advocate forgetting about the stadium, I said what happens on the pitch will determine the quality and location of the stadium we end up with. Kieron could not agree more that we lost out with regards to Kings Dock, but remember it was under Kenwrights leadership that we blew the opportunity. I would suggest that it is his reticence and need for control that is stopping the level of investment we truly need.
Paul Arthurs
11 Posted 14/06/2007 at 19:50:47
I have a terrible feeling that if Everton don’t do something positive in the next few months-both team-building and ground move are equally important -they will have missed the boat and will go into recession.
If not supported this time,Moyes will be off and if the Tesco move goes tits up we’ve had it anyway.
Brian Waring
12 Posted 14/06/2007 at 19:27:14
How the fuck can a small club like Blackburn attract a possible investor and we can't? We are talking of a club here who can't even fill their stadium,for fucks sake! Almost every day there is another club linked with possible investors,but never us. Are we that much of a risk? The more I hear about other clubs being courted by millionaires, the more I despise Kenwright & Co, because I put the blame on them.

I just can't accept we have had no-one interested in taking a punt on us. Is it just a case of Bill saying to possible buyers "you can invest money, but it's my train set and I'm keeping it that way"? Don't get me wrong, I respect him for what he has done for us but I think it's time for the man to go.

s bird
13 Posted 15/06/2007 at 16:55:36
i think bill kenwrigh is all selfish and abit of a dickhead are we going to sign any players or not this season bill do a good thing if you understand walk away from everton ok

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads



© ToffeeWeb