The Mail Bag

Everton Going Nowhere

Comments (27)

KEIOC this week reported that the demise of the planned St John`s Shopping Centre on the grounds of over-provision of retail in Liverpool inevitably means that Everton`s latest search for enabling partners to help them construct a new stadium, a la Tesco and Destination Kirkby, is doomed.

The surfeit of such provision in the City was no doubt the reason why the club had to look beyond its boundaries to build a new stadium and it is abundantly clear that only with the help of an outside partner will Everton EVER be able to afford such a move.

As KEIOC reports, there is absolutely no appetite within the Club for the `phased` re-development of Goodison Park given all the reasons — primarily financial — for rejecting that `solution` in favour of Destination Kirkby three years ago.

So where does this leave us?

Going nowhere, I'm afraid. Most of us have long given up the hope that a sugar daddy will arrive to work alongside Bill Kenwright for the good of our club... indeed, the chances of a sugar daddy arriving at all are now almost dead in the water!

So Bill Kenwright will soldier on, providing as much money as comes available for Davey to continue his team building — and few of us will quibble with that policy.

But the dream of a home fit for the 21st century is, to my mind, as far off as it has ever been in the 20 years of my support — and it`s still fading!

So, for me, the ONLY solution is a municipal stadium on the Stanley Park site in which both the City's clubs are tenants/partners. But then, I'm a Sefton ratepayer, so it`s easy for me to suggest such a plan...

The reality, of course, is that that too will never happen. As I said, Everton are going nowhere!
Richard Dodd, Freshfield     Posted 21/05/2010 at 08:46:46

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Steve Robinson
1   Posted 21/05/2010 at 14:49:03

Report abuse

Ah, god I love a nice wave of optimism!
Kevin Gillen
2   Posted 21/05/2010 at 15:02:52

Report abuse

Take a chill pill, Doddy. Who said we were going anywhere anyway? Until the Premier League come into the real world, only Saudi Princes and Russian Oligarchs were likely to invest in the pit of despair that is British Football. There is the outside chance of a World Cup bid being the catalyst for development but most Evertonians are likely to be waltzing to the Old Lady for some time to come.

One route might be to sell all our talent and waddle about near the foot of the table but that is hardly palatable either. In the meantime I'll be straining round that post in the Lower Bullens to see Arteta smack another one in from 30 yards! COYB

Phil Bellis
3   Posted 21/05/2010 at 15:21:52

Report abuse

What a pity your hero couldn't have corralled the `ring-fenced' money around a stockade. I can't pass by the Kings Dock without feeling angry and sad.
Mike McLean
4   Posted 21/05/2010 at 16:01:53

Report abuse

Prepare for another Kirkby bid.
Dennis Stevens
5   Posted 21/05/2010 at 16:07:38

Report abuse

Maybe the Board will consider relocating the club to a city that doesn't boast a top flight team — across the Irish Sea, perhaps?
David O'Keefe
6   Posted 21/05/2010 at 16:28:31

Report abuse

Poor Doddy, ignoring the elephant in the room as all apologists must do.

"KEIOC’s has made its position clear; firstly, despite a change in council no retail based enabling development will happen particularly at their favoured central location. Secondly, it’s now accepted that the type of stadium that this model would deliver is grossly inappropriate for a club with ambition, as even with near capacity crowds and non-existent events a mere £6m would be generated for the club. Finally, it is now apparent that this "at all costs" move from Goodison is for the benefit of another company. "

Gavin Ramejkis
7   Posted 21/05/2010 at 16:26:48

Report abuse

Doddy, DK was wrong on almost every level and a complete farce that it was allowed to progress anywhere near a project initiation, it was then allowed to continue in a doomed state despite it repeatedly losing it's ability to match it's intentions; you remember those sparklers — access, non-match day activities such as concerts, guarantees to provide a war chest of an additional £10m per season any of which should have cause even a half-witted project manager to pull the plug.

Given the club had no alternative plans whatsoever, the ability to create a new plan would only happen with a change from the top down; unless that happens, we won't be seeing any new thinking or proposals soon.
Dennis Stevens
8   Posted 21/05/2010 at 16:55:29

Report abuse

Indeed, it seems that Everton are going nowhere in so far as the current Board are going nowhere & are taking the club with them.
Ciarán McGlone
9   Posted 21/05/2010 at 16:56:49

Report abuse

The problem is — and always was — that the people in charge are incapable of delivering what is required. An infinite regression.

I struggling to find what's sad about the demise of this latest 'hair-brained scheme'... We should not be the planning enabler for some corporate fuck-fest... It'll end in tears.
Colin Garland
10   Posted 21/05/2010 at 17:44:05

Report abuse

It genuinely hurts to say on this occasion, I told you so. Although I love my club, its history and Goodison Park, in order to move on, we had to force the issue of Kirkby. Investment will never come while we languish in Walton. Big investors, unfortunatley need more than just a football club. (Why do you think London clubs can attract that finance and even City with their posh new stadium?)

Talk of hotels and shops in Walton just could never have worked and with the failing of the Kings Dock opportunity, the prospect of Kirkby appeared to be our best option. There were many of us Blues that, thinking with our heads and not our hearts, realised that the redevelopment of Goodison was not an option to move the club forward. Sadly any time we stuck our heads above the parapit, we were verbally and often abusivley shot down by KEIOC supporters.

Everton need to be bold and press the government to reconsider the option. I want to see first class football, played on a first class ground, with Everton winning everything. Sadly we will not now get that without investment and we will not get that without a new ground away from the terraced back drop of Walton.

Dave Roberts
11   Posted 21/05/2010 at 18:15:33

Report abuse

Hear, hear Colin. But nothing will convince some people that Kirkby was all we had. Some of us have been trying to do that for the last three years to no avail.

In the end, it will not matter how many miracles Moyes can perform with the few bob he finds down the back of the couch, in the end he will go for the sake of his own ambition. People say (as above) that the board is going nowhere... but where can they go? There are no billionaires on Everton's board. The death of this club will be long and tortuous and has probably already begun. By death I do not necessarily mean we will cease to exist, but as the cashflow in football continues to shrink we will be left behind without a hope of returning to the great days.

Kirkby was never the perfect solution, but we were never in a position to expect perfection. It was the best and only option that we had to show any potential investor that we meant business.

Any investor who might one day show an interest in our club (which is doubtful in the current climate and which might not change for a generation if at all) could well be turned away by the knowledge that Kirkby may have stood a chance if the clubs own supporters had bitten the bullet and confirmed that they would get behind the club in whatever decision it made.

It was a much easier decision for the inquiry to make when a large portion of the negativity was emanating from the clubs own supporters. That is not an easy pill for a potential investor to swallow.

And all for the sake of four miles.
David O'Keefe
12   Posted 21/05/2010 at 18:33:43

Report abuse

Mr Garland, aren't you being a little bit negative, if you want a better Everton you have to be positive and creative.

We can have new owners if the current shareholders put the club up for sale.

The current state of Walton and Anfield is no barrier to redevelopment, in fact quite the reverse. The football quarter idea has at its heart new stadiums, hotels and educational, sport, health and tourism facilities. I don't find the idea of far eastern tourists visiting Walton/Anfield to visit a FQ risible, it could be part of the city's tourism strategy.

The only barriers are the big business interests that have held both clubs back.
Paul Gladwell
13   Posted 21/05/2010 at 21:37:28

Report abuse

Dave all for four miles, what about the £75M we would of had to stump up.
And I would have to say as the cashflow in football has begun to sink this has increased our chances of getting back up there and not made it harder.
Chris Wright
14   Posted 21/05/2010 at 22:16:32

Report abuse

Sorry, wasn't Kirkby turned down because of poor transport links? Poor planning on behalf of the planners stopped this. Everton never actually had the funds in place if you read Bobby Elstone's blog. So £75-90 million still had to be raised. There is no evidence that backers had been in place. People give KEIOC too much credit for this bid failing. It had very little to actually do with them.
Gavin Ramejkis
15   Posted 21/05/2010 at 22:18:18

Report abuse

Dave Roberts — and anyone else claiming the death knell if anyone sticks in Walton — remove the blinkers for just a moment and ask yourself where the RS are looking to build their new stadium if they ever get the investment?

Given that four miles and how inaccessible the planned stadium was and how it was never going to provide the income touted, how would that have made the club more attractive for a buyer with increased debt and a fundamentally flawed business plan in that the core job is to host football matches and fill it?

It's not the location, it's the business and it's failure to develop any strategy beyond short termism.

Rob Hollis
16   Posted 21/05/2010 at 22:51:00

Report abuse

I know this is not realistic going forwards but after voting for Kirby I then visited for the first time City of Manc Stadium and Wembley.

No soul, plastic, atmosphere-free holes.

I am now firmly with the spit and sawdust brigade. Re-develop Goodison but not too much. A three tier Park End will do it.

Let's be honest, we would have to be CL Champions for a few years before we got 60,000 with any regularity and they would be there for the catering (maybe not for long).

I hate the idea of a new ground now.
Dennis Stevens
17   Posted 21/05/2010 at 23:35:28

Report abuse

I can understand people wanting to believe the Board when they saw the nice brochure full of "inaccuracies" & so supporting DK at the outset. However, I do find it both sad & a little comical that the same folks, who seemed incapable of understanding why DK was not the solution to Everton's future stadium requirements, now seem to think that the lack of drive & vision on the part of the current Board somehow validates their own intransigence on this issue.
Brendan O'Doherty
18   Posted 22/05/2010 at 01:52:56

Report abuse

"...all for the sake of four miles".

No, all for the sake of a projected £6m per year and the chance to look appealing to some overseas investor — and who knows where that could end up? I'd rather share with El Shite myself than that. How could anyone want something which was so divisive among supporters?

Richard, I can't agree with your gloomy prognosis for EFC. Let's just hang on a minute and see where we are after this whole world financial crisis has settled down a bit before we get saddled with an unmanageable debt.

Whether or not you are supportive of the present board it cannot be denied that they are, and will forever be, tainted as far as the ground issue is concerned. Having messed up badly on the Kings Dock, they cannot be trusted again to get it right. We need new owners to do this and it doesn't have to be the 'elusive billionaire'.

As mentioned above,the board should put the club up for sale before trying to sort out the ground issue.

Eric Myles
19   Posted 22/05/2010 at 02:40:48

Report abuse

It's being reported on other websites that Everton are looking at a site on Edge Lane.
Eric Myles
20   Posted 22/05/2010 at 02:42:56

Report abuse

Colin #10; You want to see first class football played on a first class ground and you STILL support the move to Kirkby? So you beleive that stadium proposed for Kirkby is first class do you?
Chad Schofield
21   Posted 22/05/2010 at 09:18:25

Report abuse

How much would have the beautiful Kinky plans been stripped back thanks to the global recession? Exactly who was going to lend us our share given we're not in Europe? Perhaps we could have got a Greek construction firm to build our new Mecca.

Frankly, if we want change ("real change"), we need a new Board, and while that can be scary at this time of uncertainty, with Bill at the helm is the surest way for the club.

Richard Dodd
22   Posted 22/05/2010 at 09:24:59

Report abuse

It seems I am alone in NOT gazing wistfully every time I pass Kings Dock. The truth is that the Club never had the money to go there and Blue Bill was right to reject the terms on which his colleague Paul Gregg would have provided it. It would have meant a complete takeover by the entrepeneur who never had any interest in football and the inevitable sell-on to some cockney spivs who eventually took over another club to achieve less than stellar success.

Yes, KD would have been an ideal solution — in hindsight — but not at the price of Everton becoming a laughing stock!

Chad Schofield
23   Posted 22/05/2010 at 09:35:10

Report abuse

...to languish.

If the club refuse to examine a phased redevelopment with any seriousness then they are simply not doing their jobs.

Any new stadium could be deemed as "soulless"... But I'm not anti anything new. I was very anti-Kirkby because it was shit... Poorly planned, thought through and designed.
David O'Keefe
24   Posted 22/05/2010 at 13:26:05

Report abuse

Richard the club is currerntly being run by two cockney "Spivs" at the moment, so your previous comment is a moot point.

Phil Bellis
25   Posted 22/05/2010 at 14:54:45

Report abuse

Doddy, you appeared to be on the mend recently but have now suffered a bad relapse:
"... the Club never had the money to go there" — then why did Kenwright lie to us? What was the point of the artists's impressions and the retractable ptch? Like Bullseye Bowen... "let's show you what you could've won" — All bollocks.

What were Gregg's terms, then? Was the primary one `clear out your desk before you sling your hook, Bill'?

Ste Traverse
26   Posted 22/05/2010 at 15:59:15

Report abuse

Too right, Phil, if Gregg had put the money up for KD it would of meant Kenwright going and Mr Ego was never going to do that was he?

This should have put paid to the plonkers who claim he "has the club's best interests at heart".
Gavin Ramejkis
27   Posted 22/05/2010 at 18:11:59

Report abuse

Doddy, care to comment on who on the board let the club down?

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/everton-fc/everton-fc-news/2002/10/30/d-day-for-dock-deal-100252-12324596/

Just one example of many threads out on the web about Desperation Kirkby:

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=165846.0;wap

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb