Season 2011-12
The Mail Bag
Effete Evertonians...
I can't believe some still defend Kenwright, if he'd spoken to supporters at the start and said:
"Look lads, I've got just enough to buy the shares and my Spurs mates who are minted say they'll help me through choppy business waters... whaddya say?"
How much are they putting in, Bill ? and what's in it for them?
"Nothing...... they're financial geniuses...... they reckon I can just keep remortgaging against the assets and flog players, it won't cost me a bean beyond the shares.....clever eh?......and get this.....they reckon we can move to a shopping arcade in Kirkby with new chippies an' everything!"
Err..... a new production is it Bill? A shakespearian spoof...."The Taming of the Blue"?
It's nonsense and we're reaping the rewards of sowing this crap, chase him and his cohorts out and someone will come.
£300 or 400 mill to people who want real high profile that only a handful of clubs ? AND THIS IS ONE ? can provide is piss all to them... BUT THEY WON'T DEAL WITH FOOLS!!! Stop making excuses for him, anyone with eyes in their head can see he's the obstacle ? he has to go.
Trevor Mackie, Posted 04/09/2011 at 20:57:44
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Even if his inept handling of this club took us all the way to the Conference they'd still defend him.
I can't attend any meetings of the blue union as I'm based in Australia but I was dissappointed to see it only drew 500-600 people.
Considering the state of our great club I expected thousands upon thousands to voice their anger. Fans of any other so called big club would have done it. Because they still think like a big club and demand more than most of us seem to.
Up the Toffees.
Who is "defending" Blue Bill on this thread?
Bill's strongest point is he hasn't led the club to a quick demise. He does love the club so he doesn't want to see it go bottom up, hence the recent player sales but other than that he is a failure, just to many stuff ups now to have any chance of making the club successful.
Not many are 'defending' Kenwright in this thread but others do on other threads, other fansites, in the pub, or at the match.
And this idea that there are plenty of people ready to throw "£300/400m" at Everton, but they are put off by Kenwright being a bit of a tit? Come on, if someone really wanted to buy Everton then they would deal with the devil for the short period required to get the club.
Trying to be as even as possible, the only thing like that that could be putting people off is if Kenwright has some unreasonable demand, i.e. being kept as chairman, although, if the Blue Union meeting is to be believed (which I guess it should) then he doesn't want to be around the club much longer, at least not in an official capacity.
I'm not for one second saying that Kenwright has done everything right at Everton, and without a doubt, his big failure has been on the stadium front. But, that aside, I think he's done a half-decent job of running the club, with limited resources (albeit linked with his previously stated stadium failures).
A lot of us are saying we did well out of the Arteta deal, and I think our squad is at a pretty similar level to last season, but with £20m having come in. So, if this goes to the debt (and I know we don't know for sure yet where it is going/has gone), then we would be in a much better financial state all round, especially considering £21.1m of the debt isn't yet due for repayment.
Obviously the money could get spirited away, and that would be terrible, but I guess we've got to assume that Barclays will take what is rightly theirs, and wipe it off the debt.
Maybe I'm being too optimistic, but oh well.
The squad isn't pretty much the same as last season now either, Tom ? it's now at a record low of 18 first team members. The banks will call in their debts but who got the club into the spiral of debt it's now in?
Precisely.
I have been asking on here and elsewhere for a good while now for a coherent defence of Kenwright. The only points in his favour seem to be:
1 ? He's an Evertonian like us.
2 ? He has run the club prudently with minimal debt
3 ? Be careful what you wish for, better the devil you know.
Well 1 is irrelevant, 2 is not true and 3 is based on fear and not rational analysis.
So would someone please post a defence of Kenwright and why he is a suitable Chairman for our club?
He's a delusional idiot with no grasp of what's going on, or he's a marvellous actor hell bent on leading Evertonians up the garden path to safeguard his own investment?
The facts are the current board invest no money into the club. So we don?t need someone with £400 million. Someone willing to put even a few million in would be a step in the right direction. As would someone with some business sense and a solid strategy for progress.
Look at the track record. Yes, Bill has no money but the business plan over the last few years has been to survive by selling off some of our best players. We may be able to survive for quite some time with a strategy like that but its hardly going to turn us into a footballing force again is it?
Bill isn?t the worst chairman we could have. He won?t run us into the ground quickly. We won?t come to a crashing fall under him. Make no mistake ? under his leadership the club is going under but he will do it bit by bit, step by slow step. It's like watching a slow car crash.
Dont worry over in Oz, there is not a single Evertonian who is happy with the current situation and what was so great about the meeting was the unity amongst the fans. We want change and to arrest the decline of this great club.
Keep criticism to what we know for a fact.
Richard and Dave use the computer when their carers' backs are turned.
They've been warned before...
BK and his cronies are running EFC into the ground. Fans of other clubs are starting to see how knackered we are, why can't fellow blues?
Jesus H Corbett, what a mess we are in...
But it's no good accusing BK of being delusional (even if he is) and then spouting equally delusional nonsense about such a buyer being somewhere out there ready to pounce.
I am afraid we come right back to the stadium issue here. Without a stadium more in tune with the modern business of football, nobody will entertain buying the club. The stadium of any football club is the primary generator of income and without one attuned to that generation of income in the modern football world, and the Grand Old Lady certainly isn't, we are on a loser.
We are disadvantaged by being one of two clubs in a relatively small city with a relatively small catchment area. That alone is not insurmountable. We are also disadvantaged by our lack of recent success and kudos when compared to our local competitor and consequent much smaller brand. That is also not insurmountable. But these disadvantages, when added to the straw which broke the camel's back, the stadium, makes the situation of finding a new owner very difficult at best and perhaps even impossible.
Find a way of getting the stadium issue resolved and you will have probably solved the problem. Until then, you can march around Walton all you like but it aint going to make any difference.
Getting rid is one thing but no-one has put any names forward as who should take over the interim board? In fact, who would want the job?
We need a new owner, we all know that, but you just have to be realistic ? in the current climate, why would anyone want to throw round 100s millions of pounds on a football club that does not have a worldwide following and hence is not a great investment, and that's before we get started on the ground!!!
And you cannot compare our prediciment with Liverpool, they even have Libyan rebel fighters wearing the latest home kit as seen on the BBC news!!!
As for protest marches before games, well that's not going to help the atompshere at the ground or the team. Why not have the protest after the game?? Or are people worried we might win the game and that will take the sting out the tail??
Gate receipts = £19.2m.
Broadcasting revenue = £ 49.6m.
Proof that matchday income is dwarfed by TV revenues.
Maybe that's the reason why this board are holding out for top dollar?
As soon as pay-per-veiw PL matches are shown across the globe, Bill & friends stand to make a fortune if they sell at the right time.
Wake up, this is big business.
I think Fernandes said something along the lines of "The appeal of owning a London football club was to hard to resist". I'm afraid I doubt he looked past the Watford Gap.
"We need a new owner, we all know that but you just have to be realistic ? in the current climate, why would anyone want to throw round 100s millions of pounds on a football club that does not have a worldwide following and hence is not a great investment, and that's before we get started on the ground!!!"
Apply all that to QPR then ask how much they will need to spend just to stay in the division, upgrade the dire Loftus Rd, and try and work out how much thier 'brand' is worth compared to ours?
Then ask how much they will need to spend to get anywhere near us in the Premier League and you have a total of hundreds of millions.
Everton need a phased update to our stadium and the ability to go and buy upcoming players who can develop. Probably £10-15m a season.
This money could be generated by the ground improvement and boosting our commercial dept alone. That means any investor needs to come to the table with the money to buy the shares and a modest pot to improve the business.
Even a leveraged buyout wouldn't be disastrous for the club assuming some working capital and business acumen was brought to the club in return.
Depending on what the sale price of the club was (???), the total investment could be around £150m or less. Nothing to sniff at but certainly nowhere near what's gone into other, some may say lesser, clubs.
We are currently being dumbed down, QPR have been out of the top-flight for 15 years, they have more illustrious local neighbours with a bigger fan-base / revenue streams / stadiums
When Wayne Rooney was at Everton he put bums on seats, the row in front of me in the Upper Bullens road was filled with 4-5 kids and a couple of Mum's who in my opinion shared the excitement and came along for the ride with the excitement generated. The following season when Wayne was gone - you guess so had the floating fans.
Everton has a fantastic tradition, remarkable history, commited and loyal fanbase. Although the stadium is dilapidated it is still referred to as a 'proper football venue' - Alex Ferguson, Harry Redknapp etc etc
We need to harness these qualities, break the mould and regenerate Goodison Park, fusing the old with the new sympathetically. We need vision not stagnation, we are Everton - a grand old team. Sack the Board, Support the Team
We are currently being dumbed down, QPR have been out of the top-flight for 15 years, they have more illustrious local neighbours with a bigger fan-base / revenue streams / stadiums
When Wayne Rooney was at Everton he put bums on seats, the row in front of me in the Upper Bullens road was filled with 4-5 kids and a couple of Mum's who in my opinion shared the excitement and came along for the ride with the excitement generated. The following season when Wayne was gone - you guess so had the floating fans.
Everton has a fantastic tradition, remarkable history, commited and loyal fanbase. Although the stadium is dilapidated it is still referred to as a 'proper football venue' - Alex Ferguson, Harry Redknapp etc etc
We need to harness these qualities, break the mould and regenerate Goodison Park, fusing the old with the new sympathetically. We need vision not stagnation, we are Everton - a grand old team. Sack the Board, Support the Team
We are currently being dumbed down, QPR have been out of the top-flight for 15 years, they have more illustrious local neighbours with a bigger fan-base / revenue streams / stadiums
When Wayne Rooney was at Everton he put bums on seats, the row in front of me in the Upper Bullens road was filled with 4-5 kids and a couple of Mum's who in my opinion shared the excitement and came along for the ride with the excitement generated. The following season when Wayne was gone - you guess so had the floating fans.
Everton has a fantastic tradition, remarkable history, commited and loyal fanbase. Although the stadium is dilapidated it is still referred to as a 'proper football venue' - Alex Ferguson, Harry Redknapp etc etc
We need to harness these qualities, break the mould and regenerate Goodison Park, fusing the old with the new sympathetically. We need vision not stagnation, we are Everton - a grand old team. Sack the Board, Support the Team
You do have a point there, Peter, we should be stressing the POSITIVES of Goodison...first purpose built football stadium in the world, first stadium with dug outs, nets, corner flags,etc., ANYTHING that puts it in a positive light. Even try and get listed status if possible.(after we do some obvious improvements) It's pretty obvious everyone thinks Goodison is a millstone around our necks but if we market it correctly and make the best of a bad lot thenit might work.
Living off our history has cost us, and continues to cost us. We do live off the past, and no matter how much it means to you or I, it means little or nothing to anyone outside the club. People really do use this as a stixk to beat us with, and we've become an absolute laughing stock with our 'if y'know yer 'istory' bullshit. It's time Evertonians woke up and let history go.
Goodison is a crappy stadium, in a crappy location, run by a crappy board with only a half decent team these days - tell me one good reason why anyone would want to buy Everton?
I can't think of any.
I was always brought up to cherish my heritage and Everton and it's home are very much a part of the City's heritage. The problem is that it isn't marketed well by the Club and you get the impression that the LCC and local / national media would rather we weren't there and ignore us and our contribution to the City's culture in favour of the other lot; who in real terms may have won more trophies but have been a top division side for less than 50 years.
just keep to the facts..
Why does having a traditional stadium matter so much? I know why it matters to you, and I love Goodison too - but to outsiders why would they care? The future of EFC is NOT about its history, its about its future.
Lol which planet?
Never mind that potential investors don't give one about it being a "grand old lady", neither do other football supporters. I know an Ipswich Town fan, who said that Goodison Park is the worst stadium they've ever been in. All the people, outside of the Everton fanbase, who laud the stadium as one of the "great footballing stadia left" are managers, or journalists, who don't experience the same side of the stadium as normal fans, both home and away.
And yeh, potential investors would quite like some history that they can exploit to comercial gain, but if you look deep enough, they can find history in anything, just look at Man City, with their retro kits and the like. The difference is that retro kits still sell for modern day prices, whereas old battered stadia like Goodison, don'r bring in modern levels of income.
EFC have anongst the lowest number of corporate facilities in the premieship.
I believe we have about 10 boxes whereas Villa and Spurs have about 40.
I may be wrong on the actual numbers but the point is we have so much opportunity on that alone.
There cant be many who disagree that our merchandising effort is woeful at best with the Chairman stating that only Newcastle supporters buy shirts.
There are few initiatives to generate extra income by having special events and organising package deals.
A small amount spent on increasing capacity at the Park end would certainly give a good return on investment.
The creation of a football museum and heritage tours would also add potential.
STICKING your head in the sand and doing nothing like this board are doing is not an option.
The globalisation of football presents so much opportunity but we need vision to reap rewards not an inactive ineffectual board.
I'm not suggesting that if we "market it correctly" anyone will believe it is anything other than what it really is, an old stadium requiring some modernisation to it's facilities. But you have to go with what you've got and if all we've got is an historic old stadium than that's it. Big up any positives that you can.Personally, I don't give a flying furk about Ipswich or it's fans. Ipswich is a one horse town if ever I've seen one, but the people there like it. And why not? I'd like to see Goodison dramatically improved but I'd also like to see the basic, original architectural designs by Archibald Leitch remain, I'd hate to go to a soulless stadium like the Reebok every other week. But that doesn't make me a Luddite.
James Marshall.
"The future of EFC is NOT about its history, its about its future. " Correct up to a point, but I'd rather have investors who would respect our history than someone who would come in and sweep it all away. Change can be good up to a point but would you rather look at some of the dreadfull 60's rubbish that replaced some of the beautiful Edwardian/Victorian buildings? I wouldn't.
Onward Evertonians
It shouldn't take long!!
We already have a cause:
Kenwright Out.
Sorry for the late reply.
London has always been a special case. Every London Borough is a virtual city in terms of population. There is a huge catchment area and there is also the special attraction of being not only in the south but in the Capital.
Greater London can accommodate many football clubs. With the best will in the world Walton does not have the same attraction. Why do you think West Ham got a buyer just when they needed one? Because the buyers thought they were getting a free stadium, that's why. That's how important stadia are nowadays. That's why we have a problem.
And, Ray, you said that you would "rather have investors who would respect our history than someone who would come in and sweep it all away." I completely agree with that, but my issue is that people seem to want Kenwright out at any cost, and if that is pursued, and is successful, then we could end up with just anybody, and it is likely to be someone who doesn't respect the history.
Kenwright has stated many times that his aim is to keep Everton above water, until someone can come in who has enough money, and who will treat Everton the way he thinks we should be treated. This seems to be exactly what you, and I, are after.
I'm not for one second saying he's done a great job of this, as he obviously hasn't found anyone suitable yet, but maybe if whatever group could help find alternatives, be it buyers, investors, or stadium solutions, then that would be a start, and would be something I personally would get fully behind.
The focus on the campaign is NOT "Kenwright Out" but rather "bring someone in with the business sense to take the club forward" . (Note to non-Evertonians: They don't have to be a billionaire!!)
You may think I'm splitting hairs but it's a "glass half-empty/full" thing. A "Kenwright Out" campaign makes us look like Neanderthal idiots with no clue, but a "We want change" campaign makes us look like we've thought this through seriously (which we have!)
I like BK... met him, nice bloke... but the failings of him and his board have raised concerns that someone else may be better in this financial climate and era of football, to lead the club forward.
Dave many thanks for the response, I' still confused as to this London at all costs malarkey when Everton seem to remain the only club not to have a buyer, they aren't all in London and there are other clubs that share their home city with another team.
An earlier poster mentioned renovated grounds and Ibrox in particular, if you've never been go and take a look at the place. Most of the surrounding area has been flattened for awhile now but think back to Trainspotting and the moment Renton (Ewan McGreggor) gets dragged into the road by his smackhead supplier having overdosed and made to wait for an ambulance, well ladies and gents that was right behind Ibrox and it did look just like that.
Goodison might not be a shiny plastic tub and the facilities are shite but they will be not having had any form of overhaul or upgrade for as long as I can remember. Piecemeal upgrades of Goodison Park over trying to find money for a new very expensive stadium is a no brainer - if you cant afford a Bentley then you make do, the club cant currently afford more debt and it needs to be looking to walk before it can run.
But yeh, in the whole, I agree with you, and I agree with the campaign stated aims of the campaign, I just worry with how that is translating down to the masses.
Sorry, Tom, I didn't intend to be all "arsey" about Ipswich, I was just getting a bit protective about Goodison. And you're right, we do appear to be in agreement about investment/investors.
Couldn't agree more.
Superb point.
I suspect most who dislike Kenwright believe that we should be challenging for honours and competing for top quality players as well as leading the way in other areas.
I personally expect improvement every season which just isn't happening when you're selling your best players and other assets the club had. Kenwright and board have sold things off without having silverware to back the decision.
What would you suggest a new owner could come in and do that's so terrible that Kenwright hasn't already done to the club?
I think it would be silly to rush into the market when we're now at a point where the youngsters are coming through anyway. If the money has to be paid back then so be it, at least we'll have an extra £1.3m a season from there on. For good or for bad, the transfer bubble has burst, prices are coming back down and unless we pay this off sooner rather than later it may come back to bite us on the backside.
I love Everton and the fact that it's run as a level ship is a point of which I am majorly proud, obviously to be champions of Europe wouldn't go amiss but the main thing is that we can remain proud. Kenwright can't win basically, you have people on here saying he failed on the stadium front yet KEIOC didn't exactly make that easy did they.
The way I look at it, that £12m loan is what we paid for Fellaini, a strong young central midfielder, if they paid off the loan and spent the interest on re-signing him and improving his contract, I believe that would be great business and allow us to move forward with a more solid squad than ever.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 04/09/2011 at 22:40:25
Report abuse