Seasons » 2013-14 » Rumour Mill
Fresh talk of new contract for Baines
Everton will make good on their pledge to offer Leighton Baines a new contract that will increase his compensation by 50%, reports Andy Hunter in The Guardian.The club are seeking to reward the defender for his loyalty in the face of sustained overtures from Manchester United while also fending off more advances from the Champions in the New Year when the transfer window reopens.
Speculation suggests that the club will offer the defender, who turns 29 this season, terms of £75,000 a week and terms that would extend his current deal beyond its current expiration in 2015.
Roberto Martinez is quoted by the Daily Mail saying: "Now the window is closed, we are going to look into all of the players in the squad and see where their contracts are up to. It would have created more instability if we had done that while the window was open."
Original Source: The Guardian

Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
936 Posted 04/09/2013 at 23:42:33
With a decent run of results and performances, between now and then, we could put a run together, and be knocking on the door of the Champions League. Or, I am being too optimistic?
940 Posted 04/09/2013 at 23:52:58
944 Posted 05/09/2013 at 00:26:07
If he signs a new contract, he effectively ends any chance of getting that move at all. The club is still right to try and tempt him but, for me, if he doesn't, he should still be lauded as a world class player who is a very rare example of integrity in an industry which has none. I hope I am wrong but, if not, I'll just enjoy a great player at our club while we still have him.
950 Posted 05/09/2013 at 02:56:39
954 Posted 05/09/2013 at 05:35:58
955 Posted 05/09/2013 at 06:06:26
956 Posted 05/09/2013 at 06:04:40
And put the kybosh on any chance of transfer.
958 Posted 05/09/2013 at 06:17:44
But that was then and this is now
Lord Leighton of Baines has remained loyal to Everton and Roberto
Though I'm sure that improvements to his contract will be appreciated by this "Royal Blue King of Style & Dignity"
Consider this if you will
He has already been managed by Roberto, and had he stayed at "The Leg Emporium", would last season have collected an FA Cup Winners Medal (and most likely Wigan would not have been relegated)
He has already played under mufc's new manager
Maybe this intelligent and considered, stylish and dignified, genuine and honest professional footballer looked at the possibilities and thought "11 years but no silver, 4 years and FA Cup Winners !"
Never mind £75K a week, give him the ton, 6 year contract and and loyalty bonuses paid annually
And get him on the Goodison Timeline as "The Man Who could neither be bought not sold ! "
Lord Leighton Of Baines !
959 Posted 05/09/2013 at 06:38:20
No he hasn't.
961 Posted 05/09/2013 at 06:43:44
Aww bum, you're right. Even with his degree of talent he still hasn't mastered time travel
Guess that's me just poured cold piss on my own strawberries
Nevertheles, the contract bit IS justified
962 Posted 05/09/2013 at 07:17:47
974 Posted 05/09/2013 at 08:00:20
975 Posted 05/09/2013 at 08:16:07
Best left back in Europe.
Lets not start giving the bollocks out about "contract negotiations would have upset the stability"
The club kept its options open re the sale of Baines,hence the delay in contract negotiations.
Do yourself a favour Roberto,don't start spieling the company line for Billy Liar
979 Posted 05/09/2013 at 08:34:32
Fellaini's departure was sadly inevitable with his Champions League clause, but at least Moyes ended up looking pretty stupid after his disgraceful attempt to sign both players on the cheap, as late as possible in the window.
Can it be too much to hope that Moyes has been told in no uncertain terms that Everton won't ever be selling to him again?
980 Posted 05/09/2013 at 08:55:26
982 Posted 05/09/2013 at 08:51:59
They're watching Barkley now as the next bumper harvest.
985 Posted 05/09/2013 at 09:20:38
If we look like we're going to qualify for Europe next season, that might make a difference. Also, if he can get in - and stay in - the England side while with us then that would remove another reason for moving. I've a feeling he'll start against Moldova but not against Ukraine. (Unlike most on here, I do actually care how the England team does! Apart from which, it makes me proud that we have three players in the squad.)
989 Posted 05/09/2013 at 09:34:30
996 Posted 05/09/2013 at 09:59:24
I just wish that suitors would come in for Heitinga....but I reckon that is a pretty forlorn hope.
000 Posted 05/09/2013 at 10:13:31
001 Posted 05/09/2013 at 10:30:34
Why are we drumming up the interest?
We should be the ones pleading for these lads to be given new 5 year contracts - not suggesting where they might fit into other people's teams.
002 Posted 05/09/2013 at 10:25:24
007 Posted 05/09/2013 at 10:46:33
I must admit, I'm in two minds about Ross getting a run out against Moldova tonight. I don't want him to attract suitors just yet, thank you very much.
008 Posted 05/09/2013 at 10:51:11
Sorry to disagree but it was RM who said that Barkley would be another player who will attract interest from other clubs, although I haven't heard him say anything about Stones. So I would suggest that RM doesn't encourage anybody to show interest in any of our players.
012 Posted 05/09/2013 at 11:20:15
024 Posted 05/09/2013 at 12:17:27
Can someone please convince me that the £27.5 mill didn't include a down-payment for a deal to take Baines in a bargain booze swoop in January? That would be consistent with our board who exist hand-to-mouth and just scraped approval for a so-called successful transfer window.
It's a conspiracy theory born out of observing how our board operate and also spending too much time reading ToffeeWeb. I am more than open to it being debunked. Perhaps the value of the new contract will help prove me wrong.
025 Posted 05/09/2013 at 12:36:13
Bainsey, great player, what can I say, marvellous.
026 Posted 05/09/2013 at 13:06:33
034 Posted 05/09/2013 at 13:39:14
A West Ham fan once said to me "you can't consider yourself a fan of a club until you've supported them when they've struggled." so I'm looking forward to seeing how many cockney reds there are come next season!
041 Posted 05/09/2013 at 14:07:29
Good post, confirming what most of us norveners knew along ! With reference to the last line ' so I'm looking forward to seeing how many cockney reds there are come next season! '
Even with the charismatic new manager they now have ?
043 Posted 05/09/2013 at 14:33:12
Also, anyone from Berkshire or (insert any home County here) who supports Utd or the shite, won't be able to name any player from the pre-Sky era - try it, great fun watching them squirm.
048 Posted 05/09/2013 at 15:12:17
056 Posted 05/09/2013 at 15:35:13
061 Posted 05/09/2013 at 16:00:16
068 Posted 05/09/2013 at 16:36:41
Come on, Bill.
083 Posted 05/09/2013 at 17:14:14
Given the market and his ability, 75k a week is very cheap. Thank god he's not a mercenary and hasn't got a c*nt of an agent, otherwise he'd be long gone!
Pay him whatever he wants and then sell to Manu for 30m next summer!
085 Posted 05/09/2013 at 17:29:59
Next summer he will be facing into his 30th birthday and no club is going to pay anywhere near the fee we would be looking for him. I think this was the reason why he looked for a move, even if he didn't put in a formal transfer request.
090 Posted 05/09/2013 at 17:31:06
On SSN last night, some presenter was almost shooting his tatty water about how "He GAVE UP a loyalty bonus of SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFF-TEE THOUSAND POUNDS!"
He was trying to make out big bird was a cross between Mother Theresa and Bob Geldof, but I was thinking, well his wages are probably better now and no doubt there will be plenty of added sponsorship as he's with 'the biggest club in the world' - he'll be 'giving up' fuck-all and anything he 'lost' he will more than get back.
"Sky Sports News - telling it in a very uncomplicated way so the pea-brained can get it, for 20 years" (or whatever)
095 Posted 05/09/2013 at 17:41:48
Yes he is a great player and also seemingly a man of principles in a business which generally lacks them, but he is almost 29. Very, very soon he will be worth a fraction of the current valuation.
I've been very critical of the board re the financial position- and noted that yet again, we've had a transfer window that banked big amounts of cash, despite the positives in the short term, but the truth is, if our business model relies on asset stripping, we can't afford to watch the value of a prize asset disintegrate in a matter of months. I'd sooner keep the likes of Barkley- or even buy the likes of Lukaku. And yes, unfortunately I do see that as an either/or, while the current board is in control.
100 Posted 05/09/2013 at 18:36:39
Personally I think we should keep him until he's ready to coach, and then see how good he is at that too.
107 Posted 05/09/2013 at 18:53:48
We do not. For better or worse, our club's business model appears to demand £5m plus per season net transfer income.Not selling Baines when the time is ripe, is likely to mean selling another, younger prize asset e.g Barkley at some point.
This is about the lesser of two (or more) evils. I don't deny all are 'evils' but I can't help that. In an ideal world, we'd keep Baines and use all of Fellaini's money to buy one or both of Lukaku or Delboy, if they turn out to be good. That's actually what BK promised, use all funds generated. All I'm saying is, he's lying, that won't happen, so we might as well deal with reality and figure out which sale hits us worst.
My view is that selling Baines is the least bad option.
108 Posted 05/09/2013 at 19:00:01
109 Posted 05/09/2013 at 18:54:34
His contribution to our team could not be replaced and his behaviour over the whole summer has been exemplary.
Aside from turning draws in to wins getting Leighton to sign a new contract should be a priority for Roberto Martinez. But as someone has already said the money is not the real motivation the lad wants to be proven at the highest level and wants European football.
We must wait and hope he signs.
113 Posted 05/09/2013 at 19:03:07
116 Posted 05/09/2013 at 18:53:17
Ross, we love you and want you to stay. You stay for your career or get dumped for cash by Bill's landlords, give us your best until "you stay for your career or get...."
126 Posted 05/09/2013 at 19:53:42
It was easy to cherry pick Southampton's quality young players when they were in the championship. Chamberlain and Bale got picked up for peanuts. How much would it cost to prize Luke Shaw off them now, especially now that they are in the PL and are looking to develop a squad good enough to stay there? If Wigan were still in the PL, would we have gotten McCarthy.
For me, selling Baines next summer and increasing the overall quality of the squad makes sense. The reason for this for me is that the age profile and quality of the squad has not been this healthy in a long time. Selling Baines would continue this upward trend.
I know it sounds like complete heresy to advocate selling Baines, especially after the running battle we had over the summer with Utd. I just think that losing both him and Felliani at once would have been a disaster and sent out all the wrong messages, regardless of the wad of cash it would have brought in. Instead, we have reinvested the Felliani money wisely on players and have been rightly lauded for it and also for how we handled Utd in relation to making a stand on Baines.
Next summer, Baines will be facing into his thirtieth birthday. Regardless of the loyalty a club and a player show each other, there is always a right time to sell a player. If we sell Baines next summer before his powers start to wane, we can make good use of a transfer fee that it still hugely important for us, regardless of the extra t.v money
135 Posted 05/09/2013 at 20:52:53
I think value for money is crucial and is in part how Tottenham have moved forward in the last few years, clever dealings by levy. Hopefully RM will bring through some young players and find a few more bargains as he did at Wigan.
164 Posted 06/09/2013 at 00:08:14
According to the Sun, Everton had refused to drop below £27.5m and Manure would not go above the release clause figure and it was going to go tits up until Fellaini stepped in, asked for a transfer, which gave Everton more money and made his 'amazing gesture' vomit, vomit. As he was still getting another £15k a week above what he's been earning, it's difficult not to reply to that amazing gesture with an amazing gesture of the two-fingered variety of your own isn't it?
168 Posted 06/09/2013 at 00:28:31
Firstly Kenwright has come out of this window with a profit of £10m. Will it be forthcoming in January?
And Football is a greed ridden trough with just about every snout clamouring to get its share. Would any other business be throwing vast sums of money around recklessly like Monopoly money on what is essentially a gamble with just minutes to go to a deadline in media orchestrated casino? It may make interesting entertainment for us but it smacks of an industry with Wild West values and morals. Anything and anyone is fair game including us fans, who are seen as either mugs or a nuisance by many in the game.
169 Posted 06/09/2013 at 00:32:20
184 Posted 06/09/2013 at 06:33:49
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/504013/20130905/tottenham-transfer-news-tom-ince-everton-blackpool.htm
452 Posted 07/09/2013 at 08:43:28
Hopefully with the squad we have now we can push on for the Euro spots — and a good cup run wouldn't go amiss!!!
620 Posted 07/09/2013 at 16:32:21
How many times have we seen this with our highest paid player?
621 Posted 07/09/2013 at 16:38:29
827 Posted 09/09/2013 at 09:25:05
833 Posted 09/09/2013 at 09:28:25
Those rumours will probably continue to grow too.
Just depends who is in control at "the theatre of prawns" by then.
As to the issue raised earlier regarding whether if Baines joined in Jan he would be eligible to play in CL, my incling was that he would not.
However, I took a peep at the UEFA regulations and first impression was that my understanding did seem to be the case, but the further I read the more my eyes glazed over.
I left with the impression that "under no circumstances can a new player be added to the registered squad" (unless the club & UEFA feel that it suits them).
Those interested should read "XI Player Eligibility, Article 18, General provisions" (about 1/3 way down) of this document:
http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/Regulations/competitions/Regulations/01/94/62/34/1946234_DOWNLOAD.pdf
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



934 Posted 04/09/2013 at 23:47:08