Seasons » 2013-14 » Rumour Mill
Everton table bid for Stoke's Jones
Everton have made an approach for Stoke City striker Kenwyne Jones and, The Guardian and The Mirror claim, are prepared to offer £1m but the Potters want three times as much.The report claims that Jones has "gone on strike" in protest at Stoke's valuation and to force through the transfer.
If the report is true, Roberto Martinez could be looking at squad depth in the forward department following the imminent departure of Nikica Jelavic.
Jones, for his part, appeared to address the speculation with a tweet suggesting that there was little truth in the reports:
Don't believe everything you read in the papers
— Kenwyne j Jones (@KJ9nes) January 14, 2014
Original Source: The Mirror

Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
235 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:38:32
236 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:42:47
237 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:46:55
238 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:50:15
241 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:56:19
Kenwyne Jones....we are really into bargain bucket pay half buy twice stuff.
243 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:53:29
File under: What a load of s.....
244 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:00:07
245 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:01:45
249 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:53:25
Also read something that made me feel ill. Mark Hughes putting in a £5m bid for 23yr old wonder kid Aron Johannsson, the Icelandic hot shot who plays for AZ and the USA. Deadly clinical with both feet, this improving striker, selected and coached by Klinsmann is surely worth £10m plus. Come on Everton. Get the lad. Tim Howard. Say something.
Last season Swansea pulled out of Jones deal because he demanded more than £50k a week.
250 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:07:20
252 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:10:47
256 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:17:51
258 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:19:26
260 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:24:08
262 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:25:37
I was actually trying to think about any potential PL strikers who we could afford who would be a productive player for us. I'm figuring this would need to be somebody that would be a candidate to start up front next season, and I really couldn't think of anybody, at least anybody who a club would be willing to sell to us.
Harold Mathews, Johannson does look a player (and why Hughes is suddenly into US National team players I don't know). He's a much more natural goal scorer than Altidore, but I worry about Eredivisie players these days. The last few that came to the PL didn't really pan out (although Rat Boy did hail from Ajax). He'd be one for the future, but I don't think he's quite ready physically.
263 Posted 14/01/2014 at 00:35:17
272 Posted 14/01/2014 at 01:53:41
He used to be a real handful for defenders but I don't know if he ever delivered enough or whether any of that physical dynamism remains. Is £2 million a lot of money for a seasoned premier league campaigner to bolster the squad? I just hope, if the rumour is true, that he is intended to be a support act rather than the headliner.
275 Posted 14/01/2014 at 02:27:13
277 Posted 14/01/2014 at 02:14:52
The only possibles I can think of who might have the right qualities are Ba and Long. I also heard somewhere that Rickie Lambert might be moved on but he's the wrong side of 30.
I'm surprised Defoe didn't try and secure a move to a PL club, he's always good for a few goals.
So that really only leaves us with Jones who surely doesn't fit the bill. Or maybe Roberto fancies working with Hugo Rodallega again?
That's it, I'm out of ideas.
Makes that lad Jelavic at Hull look like reasonable cover.
Surely Roberto will do his shopping on the continent?
Or perhaps he's just happy with having Mirallas to cover the forward role now McGeady has come in?
... And Hibbert as 3rd choice striker.
279 Posted 14/01/2014 at 02:36:28
As for a forward to get-I honestly don't know who would help us out. We need someone who can occupy the central defenders like Lukaku can with size or movement, and open up channels for Ross, KM, etc. Does Valencia have anybody interesting? I thought we were linked with one of their forwards a while back. They always seem to be even more financially screwed than us.
280 Posted 14/01/2014 at 02:45:50
If it were down to me, I would try to bring in a very young striker. Unproven I know, but we need to look at the problem 2 fold. The money we save now might seem not worth it but the gamble of buying a big name striker might not pay for itself either, and a shorter lifespan at our club than a youngster who might grow into the position. Batsy seemed ok if not for his reputation. If we can nick him for 5 or less, I would totally try. But the same can be said of other players. I'm happy to wait till official news come. Anyone under 25 is a great add imo. Let's not forget, we still have Kone (30) on the treatment table.
281 Posted 14/01/2014 at 03:02:03
285 Posted 14/01/2014 at 03:45:27
If Jones comes in as the only striker signing, then it is beyond a joke and Kenwright is pocketing money again.
288 Posted 14/01/2014 at 04:24:12
294 Posted 14/01/2014 at 05:56:27
Bradley going from Roma to Toronto was a shock. He likens it to Yaya Toure moving to City from Barcelona because he wanted to be part of something new but I should think Yaya was more interested in the £200k a week.
295 Posted 14/01/2014 at 06:35:57
He's absolutely horrible.
301 Posted 14/01/2014 at 07:38:40
311 Posted 14/01/2014 at 08:03:42
There really is no mystery to where the money goes...it goes on wages,which is why the club runs up a loss most years.
312 Posted 14/01/2014 at 08:17:59
322 Posted 14/01/2014 at 08:27:50
Not sure this is a great move for us, but equally unsure that this truly emanates from GP either.
The summer proved that Roberto does do some of the expected (Kone, Robles, Alcaraz & McCarthy plus his backroom team) but also does the unexpected (Lukaku, Barry & Deulofeu)
Personally, I'm more inclined to believe that he will raise my eyebrows rather than lower my expectations
323 Posted 14/01/2014 at 09:06:40
We have a fantastic squad, let's keep the standard up, and moving in an upward direction.
NO WAY
325 Posted 14/01/2014 at 09:28:18
328 Posted 14/01/2014 at 09:28:57
For me, we need a younger mobile striker like maybe Jay Rodriguez of Southampton. We surely have to aim higher than this.
330 Posted 14/01/2014 at 09:44:48
332 Posted 14/01/2014 at 09:49:31
334 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:03:40
336 Posted 14/01/2014 at 09:57:47
If it is true then the question yet again needs asking 'where has all the money gone that we got during the summer?
Where is the remaining Fellaini money, the Anichebe money, getting the high wage Neville was on money, and what about the money we have just raked in from Hull for Jelavic??
If we are led to believe we are skint again, scraping around the bottom of the barrel then why?
For the record, Kenwyne Jones at 1 million would be a decent signing.
He uses his strength better than Lukaku although is not as good on the ground and wont get the goals Lukaku gets.
A battering ram type striker but for a team like ours who don't score enough from corners, or crosses, maybe thats not a bad thing to have.
While its nice to score beautiful footballing goals, we don't score enough from setpieces or crosses in the air since the talismanic Cahill or Fellaini left the club.
I was led to believe however that Martinez had at least 8 million to spend this month, thats without the Jelavic money recently coming in, so I am taking this latest gossip as newspaper fiction.
337 Posted 14/01/2014 at 09:58:57
Quite how we would have no money with the Fellaini sale, numerous other sales on previous seasons of top earning players and the extra TV money is a bit of a mystery...
339 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:09:28
"Kenwyne Jones the new Kevin Campbell"
Alistair Campbell more like.
340 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:21:03
342 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:20:03
344 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:30:38
346 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:36:17
347 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:33:23
This lad can play he's a lot more than a target man and absolutely no surprise route one Pulis and Stoke didn't work out.
Clough built a team of champions rescuing talented square pegs in round holes for the monies quoted a whole lot of footballer there.
348 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:37:51
349 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:36:54
351 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:44:17
Saw that this morning and thought what the fuck, Jelavic out and this no mark from Stoke in - may as well stay as we are!!
There has got to better front players available - what about Berbatov or even Long at WBA ... fuck it,,, Bell-Baggie at Tranmere looks more promising.
352 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:35:33
I'm certain any manager would like to look at £20m strikers, so it's no use getting worked up about who we sign. The same goes for OFM when we brought in the likes of Straqualursi, I'm sure his hands were tied.
If it works out, he's a genius, if it doesn't, we have lost a minimal amount for a P.L. signing. That's not to say any manager of Everton should be excused poor signings because we haven't paid a fortune in transfer fees.
There are available players who can make a difference if you are paying him £50k a week, so it's not all about the transfer fee.
McGeady & Jones (if he signs) will be on a very good wage here, otherwise they wouldn't have signed in the first place. One of my pet hates of the last regime was having sub's raking in fortunes for 5 minute appearances when we all know our financial position.
Just because they are not £10m or £15m transfers, it doesn't mean they should be allowed to sit on the bench taking millions out of the club each season.
Something like 75% of our entire turnover is spent on player wages, so we need to squeeze every last bit of value from our senior squad.
353 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:50:50
354 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:49:44
355 Posted 14/01/2014 at 10:57:44
358 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:06:27
Kevin, with the money that the sales of Fallaini, Jelavic, Anichebe accrued we shouldn't be looking at £1m-£2m for a forward. If these reports are to believed I for one will be disappointed. Failing to turn up for the game with the RS, and being on Twatter at 3 minutes past midnight? Not what I'd expect from a pro footballer and his 13 goals since 2010 aren't that impressive either.
No thanks.
360 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:13:05
Just seen Jones has scored 4 league goals in 2½ seasons — surely Vellios or Gueye could manage that and we can't get rid of them! I know £1M isn't a lot but when you include wages over say a 3-year deal, it all mounts up to a big heap of cash totally wasted.
Just stunned.
361 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:12:56
363 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:18:13
Long is also out of contract in the summer and he is hardly prolific but ten times better than Jones and he is Irish so would settle in to our squad immediately.
365 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:27:01
My point is, if we are paying a senior squad member millions a season, we should expect him to make a significant contribution - regardless of the transfer fee.
Any manager deserves a good shafting if they are wasting that much money in wages for a bench warmer.
If we sign Jones, I expect a return on the pitch when he gets his chance. It's the manager's call to give him a contract - so he shouldn't be excused if he's a dud because he hasn't cost a fortune in a transfer fee.
Regarding this particular player, I'm as underwhelmed as the majority on here.
367 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:33:18
Jelavic hasn't exactly come off the bench to be a match winner, he's come on to save Lukaku's legs. If we manage to sell him to Hull and replace one bench warmer we receive £6.5m for with one costing £1-2m. I say yes.
McGeady has replaced the hole in the squad left by Gibson. He's only here now because we effectively bought out the remainder of his contract otherwise he would not of appeared until June.
I don't really see Martinez doing much more, unless of course a player who is too good to refuse becomes quietly available.
No quality settled player wants to move in January.
368 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:33:18
Jelavic hasn't exactly come off the bench to be a match winner, he's come on to save Lukaku's legs. If we manage to sell him to Hull and replace one bench warmer we receive £6.5m for with one costing £1-2m. I say yes.
McGeady has replaced the hole in the squad left by Gibson. He's only here now because we effectively bought out the remainder of his contract otherwise he would not of appeared until June.
I don't really see Martinez doing much more, unless of course a player who is too good to refuse becomes quietly available.
No quality settled player wants to move in January.
370 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:44:50
""We are in a strong position financially. When you have to bring in money then it can be a real difficult position as you can be anxious and frustrated.
"The stability we have from a financial point of view allows us to make football decisions and this January window is important for us to make sure we kick on and finish stronger than we started."
Consequently I think we should be looking for a better player than Jones.
371 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:49:54
I think he's definitely talented. He was very good in his first year under Keane at Sunderland. Seems to lack one thing only and that's drive. Whether RM could instill that is open to debate.
372 Posted 14/01/2014 at 11:50:38
374 Posted 14/01/2014 at 12:00:02
375 Posted 14/01/2014 at 12:00:26
2. Jones offers a perfect plan B for if we’re chasing a game and passing sideways, and we’re shouting sling it in there!
379 Posted 14/01/2014 at 12:01:54
382 Posted 14/01/2014 at 12:22:34
394 Posted 14/01/2014 at 12:48:32
Physically, he should be the complete powerhouse package. He’s strong, mobile and good in the air... but he doesn’t seem to know how to put those attributes to good use.
Dorothy definitely would have followed the yellow brick road much fucking quicker if she had this fella in tow as he’s basically her troika of trusty sidekicks all rolled into one. "..but he could show his prowess, be a lion not a mou-ess, if he only had the nerve...a heart...a brain".
Anyone remember the game where he went down and proceeded to writhe about on the ground like he’d just been gored by a Rhino, and then just lay there waiting for someone to give him his last rites? All after going into a fifty-fifty challenge with... Leon Osman!
If this move does come off, and Martinez can actually find a player buried somewhere deep within that badly barneted bulk, then he a really is ’a wonderful wiz’. Still, I guess if anyone can, Bobby can.
In the words of Henri Beloq: "Who knows Jones? In a thousand years, even you may be worth something.â€
395 Posted 14/01/2014 at 12:42:45
396 Posted 14/01/2014 at 12:55:32
399 Posted 14/01/2014 at 13:02:33
409 Posted 14/01/2014 at 13:26:27
So, once again, we will be stronger – at little or no financial cost and looking good for the future. What is wrong with that?
And for the record, I'm getting so sick of the anti-Kenwright stuff. look at where we were when he came, then look at where we are now. Now compare that to Villa, Portsmouth, Newcastle, Sunderland, etc etc etc! Really, it's about time some of the brain dead people start to realise what we have is a great Chairman who loves our club, does the best he can. No way would I want some corrupt Russian or morally bankrupt Arab or know-nothing American running or club. COYB!
412 Posted 14/01/2014 at 13:56:58
And as for "look at where we were when he came, then look at where we are now" — can you please post your comparison of the assets and debt BK inherited and the assets and debt that we have now so we can see just how much better off we are.
413 Posted 14/01/2014 at 13:53:15
Brain dead is a strong term to use about people that don't fully agree with your views and doesn't add anything to the debate in my opinion.
416 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:05:24
Sunderland: yeah, New stadium, but they have spent tens of millions on crappy players and are once again at the bottom of the league.
Aston Villa: new owners and look at them... Boro... Forest... Pompey.
All I'm saying is that, whilst some continue to call for new owners, I've seen far too many new owners come in and do nothing to improve the club. The only two examples where any real success has been achieved are Chelski and Man City. And as I stated, one corrupt Russian and please check out those human rights records of the good people in charge at City.
Oh and then we got Cardiff playing in red! Would you accept playing in red? How about we get some idiot in who wants to change our name to the Bears or Wolves or whatever to market the club?
And as for the comparison with regards to debt and assets, well I'm not an expert but I would imagine that our current squad is worth ten times what the one he took over was. We are battling for champions league not championship.
And really do you think that Mr Kenwright is lining his own pockets? Because if you do then you would in my opinion be worthy of being called brain dead. which by the way is exactly what someone said on this forum. I was not calling you brain dead. I was saying that anyone who said that was brain dead. Hope that clarifies my position.
419 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:35:14
421 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:33:38
And as far as I can tell, everyone seems to hate Bill because he's not as rich as an oil magnate. That's not his fault. He does the best that he can, and if he were a player, yeah maybe he would be more Tony Hibbert than Seamus Coleman but we love Tony Hibbert don't we?
And as I said, remember what the club was like when that red shite hamper salesman fucked off. We were a mess. We looking pretty good now in comparison. Just saying...
423 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:43:21
At £1 million or thereabouts, it might be worth a punt.
425 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:44:19
Grant Holt??! What the actual fuck are you on? He's struggling at Wigan and about 5 stone overweight!
Kenwyne Jones looks like Lukaku. Maybe we can send him back to Chelski in the summer and Romelu can play with Jones on the back of his royal blue jersey.
426 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:56:12
428 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:00:46
I think BK is fully aware of the acute balancing act he is producing. He openly admits he doesn't have the cash to match others but yet he has to protect our club. Our history and heritage are our greatest assets and must never be comprised by corporate greed.
429 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:11:29
430 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:58:12
As for "I would imagine that our current squad is worth ten times what the one he took over was" — the nett debt has grown, meaning the total owed less the assets owned (the players) has increased. So the team may be worth ten times more more, but the debt has increased greater than the asset value.
So just how are we better off again?
Oh, because "We are battling for Champions League not Championship" — well, that's because of Moyes and Martinez getting by on the bare bones of a squad as assets are being sold off to pay the banks, not because of Kenwright.
431 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:50:40
432 Posted 14/01/2014 at 14:12:11
Earl Geofworth BiffingtonThompson, MP, London 1936 — "War? Relax, it won't happen, Churchill's full of shite!"
Geof Tompefonn the Unready, Hastings 1066 — "Don't worry, Harold, these Normans are shit-houses."
Geofkos Thompsoroki, Troy 1188 BC – "It's just a present ffs, drag it in!"
History is full of Geof Thompsons — uninformed blowhards who are absolutely 100% right.... until the moment they're wrong and the shit hits the fan (and they vanish).
436 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:12:17
437 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:11:30
It will never change, so no use us whinging!
438 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:11:31
439 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:18:25
440 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:02:30
Don't confuse a good Everton team with a financially stable club – we still had to apply for bridging loans in the BVI this season, at a cost of millions.
Even though our board have not invested a penny, you could forgive them if we had a vision for the future. There isn't one I'm afraid. We are constantly firefighting, signing poor commercial deals, and selling assets as a result.
Do you remember the council having to buy the lease on Finch Farm?
Arsenal's owners had a vision and they will be reaping the benefit of their new stadium on the pitch for another 80 years.
I hope you are as keen on Bill & Co when Barkley is sold to Man Utd to ease the pressure from the banks.
You do know we were forced into selling Arteta to pay off bank loans don't you?
We don't want any new owner – just someone who can take us forward off the pitch, so we can compete with the likes of Liverpool or Arsenal.
ps: Please don't mention Portsmouth or Cardiff as some sort of yardstick to compare Everton with. We are one of the biggest clubs in the country, even with our current board sitting on their hands.
442 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:14:12
Sunderland on Boxing Day no plan B, sometimes you can play ugly and get a result.
For those of us who are old enough remember the nightmares about signing Andy Gray, who better to show a young inexperienced Graeme Sharp how to dominate defenders and look what happened!
Kenwright needs to get off his arse and put his hands in his pockets, the league has changed since the days of Andy Gray, WE NEED ABSOLUTE QUALITY!!!!
WHERE’S THE MONEY, BILL?????????
443 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:13:50
"(I believe that Martinez can bring the best out of any player)."
Geof, if Martinez couldn't get the best out of Jelavic, I can't see how he can get the best out of Jones, a player who has refused to play against the opposition whilst at TWO different clubs in order to force through a lucrative deal or, at least, get a game. Doesn't fill me with any sort of confidence.
444 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:32:07
445 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:35:23
446 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:36:34
448 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:31:00
If we do whinge, it probably won't change anything.
However, if we don't whinge, it DEFINITELY won't change anything.
We have (all!) been lied to over and over and over again by fat-head.
That's enough for me to keep up regular (or at least intermittent) whinging until he sells up and fucks off.
449 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:23:37
And as for debt, our club's debts, when Bill took over, were equivalent to twice our annual turnover, they are now equivalent to half our turnover. Our squad has improved beyond all recognition and our manager has stated that the club is in a very healthy financial position. Are you calling him a liar too?
When Bill took over, our club was a joke – relegation fodder – and nearly bankrupt. And now somehow, despite your assertions, we are now feared by most clubs on the pitch and so respected off the pitch that we are constantly being used as a model of how to succeed by other clubs... weird that, isn't it?
450 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:10:39
Morata is no longer available neither is their fullback that OFM wants. They are down to a 20 man squad.
Good shout though. At the money they were talking we could afford him and he'd suit our playing style.
The rumours surrounding Finboggason and Batshuayi are growing.
451 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:44:46
As OFM and captain used to say, "A top half finish is good for a club like Everton."
Clearly, you are one of those who has been fooled into thinking we should be happy just to be in the Premier League.
457 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:45:35
I know that not all is rosey in the Everton garden; I'm not blind to the mistakes that have been made, nor did I ever say that Bill Kenwright was perfect. Please read what I posted more carefully before slagging me off.
What I'm saying is that to accuse someone of robbing the club to line their own pockets, as someone did on this site, is just downright wrong! That was what the brain dead comment regarded, not fans wanting a new owner; as I said, please read more carefully. He has done his best, and no-one deserves the crap he gets.
Additionally, I said that new owners aren't always the answer. And I gave examples — what's wrong with that comment? The only owners I can think of who are decent people and are doing a good job are the Coates family at Stoke. If we can get good people to come and take over who love the club and are rich as fuck, then brilliant... but, until then, better Bill than many others I could name. It's not a crime to have a reasoned opinion is it?
460 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:08:40
I think it would be worth taking a chance on Danny Ings of Burnley as he looks like a good footballer as well though Burnley would probably not want to let him go on the cheap.
463 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:06:12
I won't slag off Kenwright. He is doing his best. And I will slag off <1--the brain dead--> people on here for thinking he is not.
What these people never do is complain about the ones who do have money and never spend it rather than the one who has no money to spend in the first place.
Amazingly Woods and Earl, who own 42% of the club — one of whom sold his company for $100M and the other worth over $300M — and yet sit back and watch the value increase and never spend anything of their money. And get off scot free from the people on ToffeeWeb who only blame Kenwright. The sooner we wake up to the fact that these are the ones to moan about, the better.
467 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:26:44
469 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:20:51
470 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:24:06
471 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:24:47
474 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:01:41
But at the same time that our turnover has nearly quadrupled, so has our total debt, and our nett debt has doubled because of the selling off of assets (players) to cover losses of £20m annually.
475 Posted 14/01/2014 at 15:57:02
Iain. I've been trying to remember his name. Thanks mate. Clinical Icelandic No9. If he's available there will be plenty after him.
Actually, with Martinez being so big on character and personality, it's hard to see him handing a contract to someone he hadn't personally vetted over a lengthy period. eg McCarthy and McGeady. I suppose Jones has a shout because he is a mate of our Trinidad coach Dennis Lawrence but Martinez strikes me as a man who likes to be sure.
There again. If he's after a striker he won't be broadcasting his interest and his due diligence will be conducted under the radar. We'll just have to wait and see.
476 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:34:58
Must have been a hell of a lot if he was able to 'save' the Club using a second mortdgage from it.
477 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:35:36
Never mind the as well - they should just take the flak on their own.
Do you honestly think BK could sell without them saying so? They are the ones pulling the purse strings. Bill just takes our frustration on their behalf.
Start moaning about them.
481 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:39:50
As he doesn't get any direct financial gain from Everton FC and nobody as far as we know has put a gun to his head to be the figurehead at Everton, he therefore must by default be as responsible as the other people on the board and therefore deserves to have his motives and methods questioned.
482 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:41:09
Editorial Team
486 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:41:27
No matter how much you try to squirm out of it, that is a gratuitous insult clearly directed at all Evertonians who dare to question Kenwright's leadership of the club. While things are currently looking up, and Kenwright can be credited for that, too much water has flowed under the bridge in the opposite direction for many to simply ignore and forget going forward.
Questions remain about the management of the finances, which have been poured over year on year, and continually seem to obfuscate some hidden truth that (perhaps deliberately?) makes it a challenge to figure out what is really going on.
491 Posted 14/01/2014 at 16:50:32
492 Posted 14/01/2014 at 17:03:47
'Everton look to boost Champions League chase with Stoke striker'
Editorial Team
495 Posted 14/01/2014 at 17:04:59
And for the record, I'm getting so sick of the anti-Kenwright stuff... Really, it's about time some of the brain dead people start to realise what we have is a great Chairman who loves our club, does the best he can....
As I said, that is a blanket insult to ALL who question Kenwright. As such it is not acceptable on here under the Conditions of Use.
502 Posted 14/01/2014 at 17:41:11
Other than a forward I think, if Heitinga goes, we need a defensive midfielder to cover for Barry. Same pros and cons apply but, in Barry's case, I see the player staying with us.
Other than that we don't need anyone. Too many comings and goings in January are often a sign of panic rather than considered improvement and can impact the team negatively.
On the subject of Kenwright: I like him. Although he did pull the legs of those kittens, didn't he?
504 Posted 14/01/2014 at 17:44:08
Agree on the need for DM cover, but I think that is regardless of where JH goes. I do wonder how much we're paying for Barry at the moment. People say we're not paying 120 or 100, but how much and will that conform to our wage structure?
509 Posted 14/01/2014 at 17:42:27
516 Posted 14/01/2014 at 18:09:00
524 Posted 14/01/2014 at 18:39:19
527 Posted 14/01/2014 at 18:30:53
529 Posted 14/01/2014 at 18:50:50
530 Posted 14/01/2014 at 18:45:57
534 Posted 14/01/2014 at 18:45:23
538 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:09:35
540 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:17:07
For me Martinez has something to prove in the transfer market. Kone is flop and made no impact on our season. Alcaraz seems injury prone and has made hardly any impact. The Barcelona boy looks promising but has not been involved enough and could really only be described as an exciting cameo. Even Lukaku is struggling, the goals dried up and I agree with Jose Mouhrino's opinion with every game he plays.
In fact in my opinion only James McCarthy has been a complete success. McCarthy is really saving Martinez in the transfer market.
I can't see Kenwyne Jones changing my opinion on Roberto's transfer dealings.
541 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:28:26
542 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:28:06
You haven't changed your opinion on Martinez at all Dick, despite our good run of form.
544 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:32:45
548 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:42:10
Incidentally, if we do sign Jones. Imagine him playing together with Lukaku... They'll look like the Williams sisters.
551 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:18:13
552 Posted 14/01/2014 at 19:47:44
563 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:15:01
No idea whehter they'd be any good but they have both got thighs like Bob Latchford's
567 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:26:30
Most signings we don't hear about til they're done. Hopefully this will be the same
569 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:32:56
571 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:45:12
573 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:38:36
As I say, I know it's only a rumour, but with Stoke just signing John Guidetti from Man City on loan, it means Jones is deffo on his way out, hopefully with us swerving him.
574 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:42:59
576 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:42:15
Martinez's three loan signings have been fantastic. Barry is a rock in the midfield, Lukaku leads the line and will score plenty more before the end of the season. Deulofeu was unlucky to pick up an injury just as he was establishing himself in the starting lineup, but he will be back sbefore the end of the season and may sign for another year.
His permanent signings have been a bit less successful, although Alcaraz played well when he got his opportunity. Roberto believes in Kone and to be fair he had little opportunity to show what he could do before his injury. His attacking play looked good, but his confidence in front of goal just wasn't there. I'm really excited to see what McGeady can do once he is fully fit.
As well as his signings Martinez has got the best out of Coleman, Oviedo and Barkley and is also bringing John Stones into the first team.
I must admit that when I heard the Kenwyne Jones rumour I wasn't thrilled, but in many ways he would be a good signing if the price and wages are right. He does have many of the same attributes as Lukaku, and if the ideal big money replacement is not available right now I think Jones would be a useful addition. Then in the summer we can see where we are with Lukaku and spend our money on him or another first choice frontman. Jones would have to be at his best to prove he can cut it. If it doesn't work out we move him on!
I'm still hoping there is someone else in the frame, but if it has to be Jones I can live with that.
577 Posted 14/01/2014 at 20:34:00
Everton is littered with signings that surprised, and big signings that flopped. So I would never write any one off, nor would I have overwhelming hope either.
A trip down memory lane.
Nice and cheap surprises:-
Gough, Martyn, Campbell, Barry, Power, Weir, Gray, Kilbane, Hutchison, Bent, Carsley (in the end), Cahill, Arteta, McBride, Donovan.
Stinking over-priced Flops:-
Wright, Bilic, Samways, Williamson, Nyarko, Mo Jo, AvdM, Collins, Barmby, Beattie, Amokachi, Bakayoko, S Hughes, Alexandersson, Bily, Bernie the Bolt....
580 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:04:19
585 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:13:18
Another one for the archives there. How anyone can talk such consistent and unfathomable shite is beyond my comprehension.
588 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:27:30
Phil, you have to remember who his hero is, and that's why he always feels the need to have a pop at Martinez.
590 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:20:10
Andy Crooks, your pat on the back for BK relies on two major assumptions. 1) Only RM could improve on what OFM had done, 2) Bill Kenwright had a large list of managers who were prepared to operate under his constraints. I am not knocking Bobby M, who is doing a great job; it is just that I am not yet convinced that BK is a genius at assessing coaching / managerial ability and all his apparent cock-ups have been expunged.
593 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:34:52
I would rather give Vellios a go, he couldn't do any worse.
594 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:42:37
595 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:47:21
596 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:45:18
597 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:41:36
598 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:49:03
"The Trinidad and Tobago striker was hit with an £80,000 penalty after failing to report for Sunday's game."
Jones, who has six months left on his contract, contacted his manager on Saturday night to say he had no intention of turning up at the Britannia Stadium."
599 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:52:26
600 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:44:44
Sorry Andy if I have maligned you. The post did seem out of character but there have been a lot of posts recently which want to give him full credit for things were we don't know if it is by luck or design.
602 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:55:55
605 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:01:29
606 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:02:44
607 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:55:41
Now, if he does this on a regular basis then it is an indication of a likely character flaw. If this is the first time he has done it then maybe Hughes is the problem.
608 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:58:39
609 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:05:04
611 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:05:21
612 Posted 14/01/2014 at 21:43:59
Arouna Kone - He cost £6 million and has not even scored a debut Everton goal. I accept he's been very unlucky with an injury but you cannot claim he's been value for money so far. Maybe next season will be better for him but he'll be 31 then and the pressure will be on to justify that £6 million.
Antolin Alcaraz - Some people claim he's looked good in the 3 games he's played this season. But seriously 3 games??? And he's injured again??? And he turns 32 this year. I just don't see the point of this transfer. He needs to play some serious games in the second half of the season to impress me.
Romelu Lukaku - Scored for fun at the beginning of his Everton career but 1 goal in his last 8 games has taken the shine off. I loved Lukaku to begin with and still think he could turn it around but lately in a few games he has looked sluggish and coupled with not scoring I'm beginning to see why Chelsea don't seem to rate him. Prove me wrong Romelu get back to goalscoring ways. Jelavic scored loads of goals to begin with and then the goals dried up. Is Lukaku heading the same way?
Joel Robles - When he signed I was excited because I've never thought Tim Howard was as good as David Moyes seemed to rate him. But so far Robles has looked dodgy. I thought he might replace Howard but honestly all he's done is make Howard look good. Right now I fear any long term injury to Howard. Once again I hope Robles proves me wrong and eventually comes good but so far the £2 million we paid for this guy looks wasted.
James McCarthy - When he signed I was convinced we had overpaid for him but thankfully I am happy to admit I was completely wrong. McCarthy is a wonderful player and at 23 hopefully he'll only get better. Roberto's best signing by miles and possibly Everton's best signing since Sylvain Distin.
Gareth Barry - Another really good player and I will give some credit to Roberto Martinez. But lets be honest, its Gareth Barry. Who didn't know Gareth Barry was a good player? Its like visiting the Louvre and telling all your friends you discovered a really good painting called Mona Lisa. Big Surprise Gareth Barry is a good player. It's not exactly signing Seamus Coleman for £60,000 is it?
So yeah so far Roberto Martinez in the transfer market has been a mixed bag for me. McCarthy is better than I expected. Surprise surprise Barry is a good player. Deulofeu and Lukaku have looked exciting but still need to contribute more. Alcaraz, Robles and Kone have loads to prove.
That said Roberto is doing wonders with the players Moyes left him. Coleman is in the form of his life, Stones is coming along nicely, Oviedo is proving himself and Barkley is fulfilling his early promise. And Everton are riding high in the league. So no real complaints against Martinez.
Who knows maybe Kenwyn Jones will surprise me. I questioned Moyes when he signed Distin and was proved wrong.
615 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:07:49
So, If we could get him for the short term, and batshuayi for the long term then that could be a very astute bit of business. Get KJ scoring until May and then sell him to Hull or QPR for £10m.
616 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:18:36
617 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:14:22
You're mental Dick. I'm talking padded wall mental. Please do the honourable thing and hand yourself in to the authorities.
618 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:21:10
619 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:14:13
If RM is interested in signing him (for the right money) then I would imagine there is another side to the whole thing that hasn't been revealed.
620 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:19:07
If he was on our books and behaved like this we would be ordering his taxi straight away-steer well clear in my opinion.
621 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:23:35
622 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:22:23
623 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:26:24
624 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:29:28
625 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:31:42
626 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:30:27
Having said that, I'd like De Jong or Llorente who are both in the Everton #9 mould (like big Kenwyne) but also play for top international teams and have scored goals in top leagues.
629 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:21:28
I disagree about Lukaku, Deulofeu and Alcaraz. Alcaraz is coming back from injury and has been different class when he's played. He was rested for Norwich due to muscle fatigue, and I assume that is the club being careful with him given how long he's been out rather than anything new. There isn't any good reason to believe he won't be available for most of the remainder of the season.
Deulofeu was always going to take time to get acclimatised. Like Alcaraz he has given us something different to what we have, and like Alcaraz he is not costing us a large amount. When he has played he has won us points on his own, such as his goal at the Emirates. He will be back in a few weeks and we will have him fresh for the run in.
As for Lukaku, yes he isn't the finished article, and yes his goals have dried up, but he is still way better than Jelavic overall and we only paid £3M for him for the season. I can't think of many teams who would be able to cope with so many first team players out and still expect the rest of the lads to keep performing to the top of their ability. If Ross and Deulofeu were playing I'm sure Lukaku would probably have another half dozen goals by now.
The only disappointment has been Kone. Not because I think he's a bad player, but more that he hasn't been able to contribute anything at all due to injury....and injuries can happen to any player; I'm sure Kone wasn't known as a crock before Martinez bought him.
Overall I've been impressed by Martinez's work in the transfer market. We're getting players in on loan a world apart from those we used to get, we seem to be able to get good players in for low fees (eg, McGeady) and whenever we sell anyone we seem to get a very good price.
630 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:33:17
631 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:34:26
632 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:27:10
I remember he was once considered to be up-and-coming and I am confident RM is not going to squander money on a player he can't have a positive impact on, or one he can't trust.
I thought Dick was just making a simple distinction between the players who RM has brought in and those he has inherited. Seemed very complementary to RM regarding the players that OFM did indeed leave him. However, the thing with Gareth Barry is that very few (if any) thought he was STILL as good as he has been for us.
634 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:44:49
639 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:45:27
I have qualified every point I have tried to make rather than assuming I know it all. I am just not as ready as some to write him off as a pointless signing at the price we supposedly want to pay for him.
640 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:47:22
Also Dick, I remember RM saying we might be able to get Deulofeu for another season, not sure about more than that. Not sure if it is in the loan contract. Plus they have Messi and Neymar, both still pretty much in their prime and still have many years ahead of them. I really doubt he wants to wait THAT long to get his starting shot. Especially given his few magical performances with us. Another 10 games in that form and he might be telling Barca he wants to leave. Who knows?
642 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:45:51
He was fined 2 weeks wages for refusing to play (I agree, there is 2 sides to every story and Hughes is a tit) but it's not very professional refusing to play for his employer who is paying him £40 a week, if I refused to work for my employer I would probably find myself out of a job.
Also Si, it's more about Dick always having to somehow get Moyes into one of his posts, if you ever go on the live forum matchday you would see what I mean.
644 Posted 14/01/2014 at 22:59:28
646 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:02:30
He's a quality player and wasted on the bench by OFM.
651 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:01:09
Dick may have mentioned OFM but, as the point he seemed to be making was that RM was getting more out of them than his predecessor did, I thought he deserved a 'free pass' for that one. ;)
652 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:03:24
From Jones's Wiki pages
"This followed news that Derby County wanted to sign Jones for around £5.5 million. Jones submitted a transfer request to Southampton on 24 August 2007 and went on "strike" until a move could be agreed, requesting not to be selected for the forthcoming league match against Stoke City."
So he's been on strike twice. Some fuckin' striker HE is.
653 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:21:43
654 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:24:40
Ray, you don't get striked out for 2 strikes. Bad pun I know. I don't think he'll get his 3rd strike with us though. Good work!
655 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:19:20
Personally, I don't think we're going to move very far forward with bargain strikers from the Britain. They all come with either attitude problems, fitness problems, weight problems or quality problems. I think the best place to be looking for bargain strikers is Italy. They only have three UCL spots these days which means a higher a forward with decent quality will be looking for a way out of fair few clubs by this point of the season.
656 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:24:32
657 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:16:37
Just look at Jones's scoring record over the last couple of years, his alleged strikes when wanting a transfer, critical of previous managers; just not good enough for a top team. How would a strike force of Lukaku and Jones compare (and compete) with Suarez and Sturridge or Rooney and Van Persie I just hope that is one of those rumours without substance...
658 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:28:06
660 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:24:09
I am not particularly happy if he is likely to spit his dummy if he doesn't get his way. A player shouldn't withdraw his labour if he gets a reasonable response to his request for a transfer, but if it is blocked he may have no other way to get both parties talking. Seems better to move relatively early in a transfer window rather than run down the remains of your contract when your heart isn't in it.
661 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:31:51
664 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:44:00
"Definitely haven't seen an Everton player with that type of control for a very long time"
You don't remember Brett Angel? He could trap a ball further than you can kick it.
666 Posted 14/01/2014 at 23:46:25
If we are looking at Jones then its down to a lack of funds there is no other explanation.
Mind you some of the suggestions of players we should sign are equally as scary. Berbatov for example. Christ I hope not. The incredible sulk who plays well about 2 games a season and walks around the pitch the rest of the time. Toxic and would hardly fit in with the work ethic our players have.
As for Brady/Broby, Martinez's signings have all been top class your assessment is way off but I suppose at least your consistent with that
669 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:22:20
670 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:28:32
06-07 – 23 goals in 49
07-08 – 23 goals in 52
08-09 – 14 goals in 43
09-10 – 12 goals in 43
10-11 – 21 goals in 42
11-12 – 9 goals in 21
12-13 – 15 goals in 35
13-14 – 5 goals in 16
Slightly better than 2 games a season. And better than anything that has came near a royal blues shirt since the 80s.
Some special players don’t need to run around at 100% to make that difference. Everton have plenty of good players, but no-one especial, no-one who can win a game with one touch, no-one who we will talk about in 15-25 years time (barkley may become one). Berbatov is available, is just 32 (he can continue til he’s 35-38 if he has the motivation). He deserves to be at a better team than Fulham, and he could actually be really suited to our play.
He’s 1000 x better than effing Jones for sure.
671 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:41:53
I find it,frankly, astonishing that he is slippery enough to be lauded for being a true blue and appointing Roberto. If being a proper Evertonian and spotting the immense potential of Roberto Martinez are nearly enough then I would ask Barry Rathbone to re-mortgage his house and step forward.
672 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:50:37
673 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:50:50
I thought your historic posts had been somewhat anti-Kenwright and was a little bemused – to say the least – by your volte face!
674 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:43:52
You may well be right in your assumption James (only time will tell), but as things stand it is only an assumption unless you know that there are no plans to move for more expensive players if they become available at a fair price.
A small outlay on Jones doesn't have to the sum total of our transfer activity. If it turns out that way then I think the Bill-bashing can get into full swing. Personally, I am hoping that Jones is only the starter in a potential 3 course meal (with a defensive midfielder and a young striking prospect being the next two courses).
675 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:55:06
You criticise Johnson for his running of the Club but Kenwright's track record is worse... At least Johnson put money into the Club to build a stand; Kenwright and his pal Green's mates have not put any of their own money in except for their purchase of shares.
676 Posted 15/01/2014 at 00:59:09
Either his wage demands were prohibitive for most suitors or he wanted the bright lights of London, so unless he has had a massive change of heart he ain't going to choose us.
The US, China, Qatar or maybe even Turkey will probably be more what he is looking for; plenty of money, better weather, and the chance to be a really big fish in a small pond and relive some of his past glory.
680 Posted 15/01/2014 at 01:44:21
What's wrong with changing their name to Hull City Tigers? They have been wearing the colors all these while. They have it on their emblem.
It made perfect sense for them to change their name, in the case of Hull. And their fans are not objecting that much because it makes sense.
686 Posted 15/01/2014 at 03:18:21
By comparisons all three of Kenwright's managers have spoken very highly of Kenwright. And the two he appointed have both done very well for us.
You are right about the money though, and the main issue I have with BK is that he has not found a better equipped shareholder to take the club on.
687 Posted 15/01/2014 at 03:38:10
As for Jones, if it's £1M, probably a low risk play with limited budget. I don't disagree with the track record of Bubba, but like Si said, motivation. He's a mercenary, plain and simple. If we can get him cheap and motivated, I don't mind. Although I doubt Spurs will give us Holtby, I'd like us to try at least. Young and talented for sure.
688 Posted 15/01/2014 at 04:36:03
689 Posted 15/01/2014 at 04:44:07
690 Posted 15/01/2014 at 04:46:38
691 Posted 15/01/2014 at 05:49:11
As for who BK pays back the loans to, I don't really get what you mean on that. What do you mean it's a problem? Why is it a problem who he pays it back to? Debt in general is bad and keeping a debt alive is a bad idea when you have physical assets. Only reason I can think of is that he feels the money he owes is worth more than the assets he has. Sounds totally counterproductive imo.
I don't know much about Johnson, but his wiki is not really reflecting well of him. Shadier character if you ask me. I don't see how his marketing of our club has to do with anything. If our beloved club is so bad compared to what they signed up for, how did OFM last that long? Let's see how long RM lasts, notwithstanding the likes of Barca coming for him.
692 Posted 15/01/2014 at 05:57:54
I think Kenwright, for all his many faults, is good at direct man management - which is why his immediate subordinates speak highly of him, despite him/us being skint and having to sell top players to re-fresh the squad. He was patient with Moyes when he had terrible second full season. He does not meddle in team selection or player signings. He has not hired a director of football to compete with the manager. He has been frank about the financial situation (I believe).
Most Chairman at football clubs are terrible at man management, one of the reasons I believe we have outperformed those with similar revenue to ours (plus a bit of luck with the managers he has picked).
694 Posted 15/01/2014 at 06:34:29
A couple of years ago Apple had more cash reserves than the US government, and didn't know what to do with it. A group of greedy shareholders wanted a bumper dividend payment, which Apple acceded to, but it borrowed the money to pay it. Why? Well, with its credit rating, it was cheaper to do that than use its current reserves (which were presumably earning interest).
David #692, that's a fair comment about BK. To his credit, he doesn't intefere with a managers direction once a budget is set. We could be in a worse position. However, I remain convinced that his primary objective is personal gain, hence his "investing" into the club when he really didn't have the funds, and the publicised valuation representing a huge personal return.
695 Posted 15/01/2014 at 06:54:19
I think the last trading window should tell us the papers don't really know half of what is up RMs sleeve.
698 Posted 15/01/2014 at 06:48:12
736 Posted 15/01/2014 at 11:09:40
748 Posted 15/01/2014 at 12:11:00
Steve #698, I would think the person BK owes money to would not accept just the borrowed amount back, he would want a lot more, which is why BK has the problem. In the meantime the creditor has control over BK and by extension the Club.
750 Posted 15/01/2014 at 12:27:03
754 Posted 15/01/2014 at 12:25:48
758 Posted 15/01/2014 at 13:19:27
760 Posted 15/01/2014 at 13:22:53
766 Posted 15/01/2014 at 12:45:54
Eric (748) yes, in fact all loansharks (including your mainstream banks) would prefer everyone to pay the minimum amount every month. However, there is no adversity towards paying down debt as that proves credit worthiness, more loans in the future. If I can't pay you back £1k, ignoring the fact that you may know me well personally, why would you lend me another £1k in the future?
I would think that football clubs are financial dinosaurs in a sense that traditionally, they are not always profit making. I seriously doubt a bank, say Barclays, would want to manage a club, and if they do, would cross a lot of red tapes that is set by both EPL, laws of UK, and maybe even EU trade laws. Just guessing about the laws of course, but just my hunch on why a lender wouldn't want control over the assets of our club. IF they intend to repossess it, barring any lawful intervention, their sole intent would be to sell the club for a profit over their debt. Hence, would not fall under your "seize control" scenario either.
On Johnson, WHY would he sell our shares and not Tranmere at that time? I read that he is trying to sell right now, but as an investment, an EPL club should be more lucrative. My only guess is, he is forced out, deems us a losing cause given our relegation struggles, ie predicting us to drop within a few seasons after he sold, and deem Tranmere a better option that he can groom with little to no investments. Shady if you ask me.
Using Matt's example, its like selling Apple stock but keeping a penny stock, regardless of market fluctuations. I know someone will say look where the apply stock is after its $800 days, but penny stocks are often high risk no returns.
Sorry for the distraction into the financial markets. I think BK did a good job since 2003. I would still criticize him if I feel he makes a bad decision. But I would hope that Everton fans do just that and not slag him off for just his past failings. We can't change the past.
771 Posted 15/01/2014 at 13:54:11
That's fair enough. Let's forgive and forget.
Now, what are the board's intentions to take us forward from this point onwards?
Every other comparable club is making, or has made ground improvements, plus a club our size should be pulling in new sponsorship deals. We have admitted defeat on a new stadium, unless someone else is prepared to pay for it of course!
As far as I can ascertain, if we come under pressure from the banks, or we require funds for new players, the business model requires us to sell the next great young talent to the highest bidder (Barkley).
So, the past tells us all we need to know about our future, even if we are all prepared to forget the missed opportunities and lies.
772 Posted 15/01/2014 at 14:12:31
773 Posted 15/01/2014 at 13:54:50
As for Johnson keeping Tranmere, maybe it's an emotional attachment since he brought them from the fourth division up to the second (Championship) in the 7 years before he bought into Everton. He's now owned them for 26 years and just agreed to write off the debt that he's owed by Tranmere, i.e. his own money he's invested from his own pocket, to help attract a buyer. Shady you think?
As for not being able to change the past, do you think we should forget about all the past lies and give Kenwright a clean slate because we have a new manager and the team are doing well? Do you think he's learnt anything from the past and will stop with the BS?
And just what do you define as "done a good job"? How many players sold off to pay the banks? How many nett negative spend transfer windows? Desperation Kirkby, was that part of the good job he did?
775 Posted 15/01/2014 at 14:23:53
776 Posted 15/01/2014 at 14:27:12
778 Posted 15/01/2014 at 14:28:44
779 Posted 15/01/2014 at 14:18:57
Obviously Bill's lack of financial clout hasn't helped but he could and should have sought alternative streams of funding but he has either been unwilling or unable to secure that type of investment. I'm afraid that Bill Kenwright to my mind has no interest in selling the club - perhaps even if he could get five or even ten times what he paid for it in the first place.
He is fulfilling his fantasy and his dream but at the expense of Everton FC who will have to at some point in the future alter the way they opeate or wither on the vine - it's nothinig to do with "Ossie is Shit", RM sucks most of the people who have or do criticise Bill do so from a position of experience and they have realised many years ago that the truth is never always as simple as it should be.
780 Posted 15/01/2014 at 14:18:03
Give that man £50m to invest in the summer, and we could see a real challenge next season. That's not me daydreaming, that's £50m spent on a side who will probably lose no more the 4 or 5 games this season - title winning credentials right there my friend.
This Board don't have the will to invest, or any idea how to generate that sort of money - I fear we will have missed the biggest opportunity of all if we end up losing Martinez to the likes of Arsenal.
Another crying shame we can all look back on in 20 or 30 years.
That's what hurts Dennis, how long can we go on making excuse after excuse for unsuitable owners?
Many will say "Look at us compared to Villa."
Why do we always have to be compared the lowest common denominator?
Liverpool have won something like 11 major trophies since 2000, have they had great teams? No!
Sick of fans setting the bar as low as possible - then playing the overachieving card as some sort of warped logic as to why we should all be grateful to Bill & Co.
Martinez could put us up right back where we belong. It's a pity he will never get the chance to prove it.
786 Posted 15/01/2014 at 15:09:54
789 Posted 15/01/2014 at 15:34:03
There are two things that make me uneasy about BK
1) His tendency every transfer market to say (or at the very least imply) that sale proceeds will be available for the manager to use in future, only for this not to be the case and/or to be obfuscated by further transfer dealing. Maybe those of us wary of BK have memories that stretch across several windows!!
2) Given his supposed love for the club and his own admission that he has taken it as far as he can, I have a suspicion that he and his fellow shareholders want a rate of return that is very much more in line with a hard nosed aggressive investor than a real fan; thus making it improbable that we will ever have shareholders who will make the type of investment that Kevin alludes to.
Granted there are risks in spending money but I think there are big risks doing what we are doing now, effectively relying on player trading to muddle by. One day, we will not make that work, perhaps because the manager fails and then we truly run out of road. If RM is as good as we think he is, then at least with Kevin's suggestion, we'd have a chance of breaking the glass ceiling.
To paraphrase Kennedy, there is risk in a policy of action but nothing like the risk inherent in a policy of inaction.
798 Posted 15/01/2014 at 15:53:17
801 Posted 15/01/2014 at 15:56:21
Kevin, agree on the bar being set low there. I believe we always had the team to challenge, even as we're considered relegation fodder. However, do we really need to invest 50m for that to happen? Not saying the board shouldn't invest. I wonder which approach RM is taking, asking for bigger investment or working within the limits. I'm guessing the second. I think we cannot jump ahead of ourselves because this is probably the pacesetter season for RM to the board. Like many detractors, they can say we're not even finished with a season yet. But like many, I feel we are in the title hunt and an investment now, even in the tune of 20m would go a long way. The sad thing is, clubs tend to overpay in Jan because of the way the window is structured.
Mark, yes, actually my MU pals are thinking OFM will do the same at MU, inaction. I wonder if it is a board thing or a manager thing sometimes. However, screaming at the board right now is actually late. We should have shouted before Jan opened. I can only hope more players come in by then. Agree on his tendency past windows. The tricky part is that we're only in the middle of the window and we tend to only finish business on the last day. That is why I said in earlier comments I preferred earlier business to show intent and also allow time to assess other needs.
Patrick, I've been following since 90s but I'm not that well tuned into the off the pitch action till 2003. Too young to understand the implications before that. And certainly not as well tuned even in the early days. Players, I kinda know, history, yes, finance, not that good until recently. Sorry I over generalized again on the sentiment. I do see some of your concern actually being true. A true blue holding on to his fantasy and not knowing he's harming it. However, I also do not see many who would buy him out and grow the club the right way. Def not an excuse for him not spending but this is the first window to see whether he is willing to spend to fund RM's success. As much as I would fund RM's work in a heartbeat, the board can and will probably have a different take of his success. Sometimes, we have to wonder, does the other members even watch football?!?!?!
Eric, I know right. Why oh why? My guess is that they are misguided that the stadium is the silver bullet, OR that they are trying to find a diversion. Whatever they are, misguided and wasted effort. I would want to see how much money we wasted there. But the other measure is often, what can they do going forward, hence I'll reserve my objections to the board for the time being.
There is 2 things I hold my judgement of the board by. (1) How much will they fund RM's budget and success (this window and others) and (2) if the funds are not here, or not as much, how much of our debt is written off by our profits. Both are kinda judged only in June, though we can have an answer for (1) in Jan. I do not think RM needs to spend that much but agree with many that money has to be made available at least. If we see only bench warmers coming in for Jan, yea, let the dogs out on the board.
803 Posted 15/01/2014 at 16:30:52
804 Posted 15/01/2014 at 16:34:55
I don't think finding a buyer is that much of a problem, not even finding one with the wherewithal and inclination to invest. Lest we forget, we are talking about a club operating in the world's most prestigious league in the world's most popular sport and one that has impeccable heritage and a 'best of the rest' current position.
The problem is, I believe, finding someone to buy at the price that BK and in particular his fellow shareholders are aspiring to.
806 Posted 15/01/2014 at 16:50:21
That's where I will defend him slightly though. If you hold the shares, given what you've seen so far, wouldn't you think that you can actually hold it for, say 1-2 seasons longer, actually challenge for the title with minimal investment, and actually sell it at the astronomical value? Greed is there, not many will give it up. I just hope he will at least invest because that is the minimum need for RM to perform the magic he's done so far.
This window is interesting in many ways because of that. If he spends, most of us will almost immediately forget his past sins. If he doesn't, we'll all fear how long RM will stay. Either way, I think RM will do just fine. BK and the board should be worrying right now because if RM leaves, all of us will turn against them.
808 Posted 15/01/2014 at 16:45:10
That said, if we are getting someone of Jones quality in, I'd rather it be on loan than a permanent deal. Personally I'd prefer Mirallas up top as an option, which will be a potential now with the accelerated McGeady deal. I've heard rumours about Ince: I would be very happy if we brought him in in January for the cup price deal being suggested in the press.
And Kevin, it would require more than 50mil to make us title contenders. By the end of this season, we will be a good 12 points off the lead IMO, as the lack of squad depth begins to tell. And that's without any European football or a Capital One Cup run. We've also managed that with a striker who would probaly cost 25-30mil to replace, and two other very good loan signings who we may not get back.
Any news on Deulofeu? I think he could play in the Barkley role. Hotlby from Spurs appeals big time, although as previously mentioned, I doubt Spurs would sell to a rival.
820 Posted 15/01/2014 at 16:38:38
Your optimism - and naivity over BK - serves you well and says much for your outlook on life in general.
For me, my 50 years as a follower has been akin to a voyage on 'the sea of heartbreaks' with only Catterick and Kendal 1 providing any relief from constant disappointment.
I envy you your sunny disposition but suspect your belief that the present regime will return us to the very top any time soon will, as ever, be thwarted by inadequate resources.
833 Posted 15/01/2014 at 17:51:47
As mentioned in a previous comment on another thread, I can only support a team that I can align my vision to. My vision for us is to achieve more than what we achieve today, playing more beautiful football than we do today, with less investment than most intended. That includes having a world class academy that produces 1-2 starters every few years. It is very difficult, but it can be done, and I believe it can be done under RM.
Of course, I reserve my optimism to RM's tenure here and will judge the board critically at the end of every window and season. Still, I hope my optimism will be able to brighten everyone's day :)
Come on Bobby, where's our other new faces?!
858 Posted 15/01/2014 at 18:28:57
I have no problem with greed if that is what motivates BK and his fellow shareholders. Perhaps not entirely admirable, but I can at least understand it.
Nor do I have a problem with teary eyed emoting about utter devotion to Everton of the type seen in the 'Chairman's message'
My problem is that BK appear to do both and they are mutually exclusive. That's the root cause of my criticism.
I don't think I have ever seen a closer correlation in business and in life between budget and outcome than the EPL. Pretty much perfect correlation. Yes in theory you could do it on the cheap but you would need to have a lot of Ross Barkley's as well as Lewandowski types for the £4m or so Dortmund paid. By and large things don't work like that, hence we face the likelihood of never breaking this glass ceiling (or at least, not until the oligarch crook and the slimey oil men get bored of their respective toys)
865 Posted 15/01/2014 at 18:45:55
Also Chandli and Capoue want out, Spurs the how many midfielders have they fucked up..
877 Posted 15/01/2014 at 18:43:06
972 Posted 15/01/2014 at 18:29:49
I think Martinez wants to spend in the summer as opposed to January. I think there are better players available but this signing would do enough to round out the squad.
974 Posted 15/01/2014 at 22:19:52
It's just red top crap.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



234 Posted 13/01/2014 at 23:36:05