Seasons » 2013-14 » Rumour Mill
Martinez made deadline-day bid for Rodwell
Everton apparently tried to bring Jack Rodwell back to Goodison Park on loan in a deadline-day move but weren't able to get all of the pieces in place in time.Roberto Martinez felt the 22-year-old, who has battled injury and the sheer strength of Manchester City's squad since leaving the Blues in a £12m deal 18 months ago, could be a valuable addition to the squad.
A late effort to push through a permanent deal for Gareth Barry that would have freed up another domestic loan slot for Everton failed, though, and that, combined with Manuel Pellegrini's failure to land Fernando from Porto, meant that Rodwell stayed put.
Original Source: ESPN

Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
852 Posted 04/02/2014 at 19:46:51
As a loan it would probably have been fine but I'm not convinced we should bring Jack back permanently. We made good money on his sale and, setting aside his injury record, I think we need someone more creative.
857 Posted 04/02/2014 at 19:50:10
But to be honest, if I was Barry, I would also question the point in signing permanently for Everton for £40-60k if I was guaranteed £120k a week for another 6 months. I think he knows he will be playing for Everton for the rest of the season, and the club will probably come in for him anyway.
858 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:06:43
862 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:21:50
867 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:28:37
868 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:30:05
869 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:29:54
874 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:37:12
876 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:29:48
877 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:36:41
Rodwell thrives on confidence and Roberto is a master of installing it and I am sure he would bring out the best in him unlike Moyes who didn't install any confidence in him.
887 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:48:56
893 Posted 04/02/2014 at 20:55:30
896 Posted 04/02/2014 at 21:04:33
I thought we certainly got a great deal when he moved on, and I don't really see the point of spending what I assume would be rather large wages on someone who will probably trouble our physios more than our opposition.
It's a huge shame. He seems a decent lad. But I think Roberto needs to be looking elsewhere. It would be crazy to have Gibson and Rodwell as back-up CM's when neither seem to be fit for more than a handful of games at a time.
910 Posted 04/02/2014 at 21:43:12
Kieran the difference between Rodwell and Dan Gosling was absolutely huge, surely you can see that.
913 Posted 04/02/2014 at 21:45:46
Rodwell joined Man City because of the money. Jack wanted the big Man City wage and Moyes wanted the £12 million transfer kitty. At no point did I expect Jack Rodwell to be a big hit at a club like Man City.
A couple of years later and Jack Rodwell is pretty much on the scrap heap. His injury problems have continued at Man City and, even when fit, he cannot get first team football. Rodwell has also seen his International career dwindle and he has next to no hope of a World Cup ticket this summer.
It doesn't surprise me that he would favour a move back to Everton. But would we want him back? Let's be honest: he was never good enough to win a regular place in the Moyes midfield and the quality has improved since with the addition of McCarthy and Barry.
To be honest, I would actually welcome Rodwell back. I get that he quit Everton for money; I get that he wasn't that good to begin with... and I get that his injuries will undoubtedly continue.
But he's a young lad and he had potential and under Roberto's guidance maybe, just maybe, he could develop into the player we all hoped he was going to be 5 years ago.
919 Posted 04/02/2014 at 21:37:31
920 Posted 04/02/2014 at 22:07:25
922 Posted 04/02/2014 at 22:09:13
924 Posted 04/02/2014 at 22:34:58
Ian. Dream on mate. Martinez is after cheap aquisitions who will perform above their market value. Unwanted hungry players with great character. Dembele and Vermalen will not be on his radar.
929 Posted 04/02/2014 at 23:44:58
930 Posted 04/02/2014 at 23:45:02
931 Posted 04/02/2014 at 23:57:53
My my, his star has certainly fallen.
951 Posted 05/02/2014 at 07:46:56
In terms of Barry not signing permanently, my reading of it is that it was only necessary (in Jan) IF the Rodwell deal was going through. As Man City didn't want to let him go then there was no need to sign a contract with Barry at this time. It could wait til end of season when he is a free agent.
952 Posted 05/02/2014 at 07:55:10
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/02/04/former-89-million-everton-signing-agrees-deal-to-move-to-anzhi/
960 Posted 05/02/2014 at 09:05:28
991 Posted 05/02/2014 at 12:38:04
995 Posted 05/02/2014 at 13:10:09
Everton already have some crocks and adding another wouldn't have made any sense whatsoever. Good luck to the lad.
999 Posted 05/02/2014 at 13:25:52
001 Posted 05/02/2014 at 13:51:32
I'll get me coat.
003 Posted 05/02/2014 at 13:58:59
Also, on a similar note, would Barkley have played as often and with as much confidence under OFM? Worth a shout and he certainly has the ability and is two footed.
004 Posted 05/02/2014 at 14:03:50
With respect to Rodwell, I just echo what some others have said; he has the ability but not the fitness. A loan would have been a very safe option, but I would not be confident about his potential as a permanent signing.
Personally, given that we have Gibson returning next season, and with the likely arrival of Barry, I'd just like to see us sign another creative central midfielder. Someone who could play in a deeper role, and push Barkley in the AMC position. I'm a massive fan of Holtby, even if he hasnt worked out yet.
008 Posted 05/02/2014 at 14:26:07
The only way we could have got another loan would have been to buy one of our loanees i.e. Barry. The Club think they can get him cheaper in the Summer and, as the Porto deal fell through, everything stayed as is.
Simples !!
047 Posted 05/02/2014 at 16:12:47
RM said he needed to replace Gibson and he has not. I pray neither of our CMs pick up knocks as we will look significantly weaker.
048 Posted 05/02/2014 at 16:24:36
As for Rodwell, it would be madness to sign him unless it is accepted that the club will be lucky to get half a season out of him at most; he is too injury prone.
We've already got one midfielder, Gibson, who needs wrapping in cotton wool... so I don't see the point in getting another.
It's not as if there are no other players out there we could buy.
070 Posted 05/02/2014 at 16:10:12
086 Posted 05/02/2014 at 15:21:01
I wonder if Rodwell might not be a good addition. While it was easy to be critical of his "sideways and backwards" play, the tight passing game was not exactly Plan A under the former regime, and he might just fit into an RM midfield.
We are seeing right now the problems associated with both injuries and players becoming exhausted.While I don't know how 20 year olds get knackered playing an hour and a half of football a week, this does seem to be the case, especially for midfielders. If we are serious about Champions League (something I never watch anyway) then we need to be able to replace or rotate players with similar quality performers.
093 Posted 05/02/2014 at 18:20:47
Rodwell's style of play seems to fit far more effectively into how Martinez likes his teams to set up, versus Moyes.
Fitness concerns are a bigger issue than ability, and were he to overcome those then his age and potential quality mean he *could* be a good signing.
@Charles (086) - I think the "how can they get exhausted when they just play 90 minutes a week" is over-emphasized. It's more about peak athletic performance relative to the players they are playing against. "Exhausted" means "fatigued to the point that their athletic performance drops off", which is perfectly reasonable for professional athletes.
115 Posted 05/02/2014 at 19:20:13
Attended Chinese boxing and weight training weekly. Tennis Sunday afternoon, two girlfriends (at least.)
FATIGUE... PLAYING FOOTBALL?!?! BOLLOCKS!!!!!
146 Posted 05/02/2014 at 21:28:27
198 Posted 06/02/2014 at 10:02:29
First Alcaraz and now Rodwell on top of the injury prone Gibson and Kone.
199 Posted 06/02/2014 at 10:10:28
I agree it is insane to have to rely on Osman for anything.
225 Posted 06/02/2014 at 13:21:27
320 Posted 06/02/2014 at 19:36:17
Incidentally, "first Gibson" doesn't make any sense, given that Martinez didn't sign him, and there wasn't really any suggestion that Kone was injury prone, given he'd played in excess of 30 league games for the two seasons prior.
So, really, his "love" for sicknotes at this stage extends to signing Alcaraz on a free transfer.
327 Posted 06/02/2014 at 19:57:28
I imagine that Rodwell would come on leaps and bounds playing for Martinez and training with Barry, McCarthy and Barkley.
329 Posted 06/02/2014 at 20:03:35
930 Posted 09/02/2014 at 16:10:14
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



851 Posted 04/02/2014 at 19:46:32