Seasons » 2013-14 » Rumour Mill
Rodwell could return this summer
Everton will make another attempt to bring Jack Rodwell back to Goodison Park this summer according to The Guardian.Roberto Martinez is believed to have tried to sign the 23 year-old on loan on transfer deadline day in January but was thwarted when Manuel Pellegrini's bid to land Fernando and Eliaquim Mangala from Porto fell through.
This latest report suggests that Martinez will make another move for the midfielder, on a permanent transfer this time, which would require City taking a sizable loss on the £12m they shelled out for him in 2012.
Original Source: The Guardian

Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
214 Posted 11/03/2014 at 00:13:30
Although clauses would have to be in his contract about injuries, he might be just the sort of player who would thrive under Martinez's positive, confidence-building guidance. So it's a tentative "yes" from me.
215 Posted 11/03/2014 at 00:33:13
217 Posted 11/03/2014 at 00:48:23
In this case, the soufflé didn't rise properly... even the first time! Free transfer and pay-as-you-play contract for me.
I appreciate he's a nice lad and a Blue etc, but that's not the point here.
218 Posted 11/03/2014 at 01:01:08
221 Posted 11/03/2014 at 01:15:09
226 Posted 11/03/2014 at 01:31:19
Even if he did stay fit, would he really get a game ahead of McCarthy, Barry and (if fit !) Gibson? If not then why would he swap City's bench for ours?
228 Posted 11/03/2014 at 01:40:50
I for one can't wait for Gibson to get fit again; at least he knows how to pass the ball forward and has a fierce shot on him, Something our current central midfielder pairing lacks.
I would not sign up Barry and I would definitely not have paid £13M for a average player such as McCarthy.
230 Posted 11/03/2014 at 02:15:14
231 Posted 11/03/2014 at 02:52:09
Think of Naismith, Bilyaletdinov, Cahill (when he was played on the right) and Lescott at left back and Oviedo on the wing... I think it is well justified that Moyes's judgement was shocking
232 Posted 11/03/2014 at 03:13:18
234 Posted 11/03/2014 at 03:38:20
236 Posted 11/03/2014 at 04:01:08
Didn’t know he had ever been here...
Did nothing the first time round...
237 Posted 11/03/2014 at 03:49:15
On the plus side
Age
Size
Good shot
On the negative side
Injuries
With couple of seasons with limited playing time, maybe he's over the injury bug. If the price is right, it might be worth a look.....If the price is right.
238 Posted 11/03/2014 at 00:52:49
Either way both would have to take a pay cut to come back here.
239 Posted 11/03/2014 at 04:22:38
This sort of transfer screams "Top 4 Ambition" doesn't it?
240 Posted 11/03/2014 at 04:47:01
241 Posted 11/03/2014 at 05:39:39
Forget what RM says. He's working to a budget like Moyes before him was. He's being paid £2m a year to toe the line. If surplus money is being used to pay down debt, then it's only to extract a higher price once the club is sold - money that will go to the principal shareholders.
I wouldn't be averse to either player for the right price, but I'd want to be confident both are fit to play a role. Trouble is even if Rodwell takes a pay cut, we'll still be paying him best part of £50k a week to be a squad player, albeit with more gametime than he's getting at City. He's more likely to end up at a WBA or Norwich in that sense.
That's why I think whoever our manager is, beefing up the squad is a challenge - we can't afford the wages to have these guys in bit-part roles, I think that's partly why RM has talked up the academy and the talent coming through. Ticks our boxes, lower cost and if they're any good, sell-on value.
242 Posted 11/03/2014 at 05:55:29
There's that note in our accounts that says the nett from summer transfer dealings is £4.3 mil, plus the Jelavic money from the winter window, less Traore's costs.
I think a lot of fans are going to be disappointed if they think we'll have a £30 ~ 40 mill surplus come the next window.
243 Posted 11/03/2014 at 06:54:45
Sounds perfect for us at the moment. Fits like a glove...
244 Posted 11/03/2014 at 06:58:46
247 Posted 11/03/2014 at 07:36:44
250 Posted 11/03/2014 at 07:55:52
251 Posted 11/03/2014 at 08:12:09
I am sick and tired of us being linked with mediocre players who are not wanted elsewhere, eg, Heitinga, Fellaini, Gueye, Drenthe, Vellios and Bilyaletdinov. We need to STOP shopping at charity shops and start acting like a club with ambition.
I am really dismayed to see us linked with very average players.
253 Posted 11/03/2014 at 08:29:43
255 Posted 11/03/2014 at 08:31:05
Are we really that desperate or that stupid? I really hope not.
257 Posted 11/03/2014 at 08:38:00
258 Posted 11/03/2014 at 08:49:27
259 Posted 11/03/2014 at 08:52:13
260 Posted 11/03/2014 at 08:46:58
The real issue is the injury record, with a limited budget and a small squad that's already carrying crocks like Gibson and Alcaraz plus big injuries such as Kone and Oviedo we can't afford to be taking risks on more players that are likely to be out half the time.
263 Posted 11/03/2014 at 09:07:27
264 Posted 11/03/2014 at 09:12:08
Is he hungry, with something to prove? Well, he fookin’ well should be!
Do we have the chance to bring back a top player for a bargain price? He was the best English midfielder on the pitch at Wembley, against Spain a couple of seasons ago.
Is he young enough to improve, but with experience to know where it’s gone wrong for him? Well, yes again!
For me, this is a no-brainer. And this time with a Manager who can coax (and coach) much more out of him.
265 Posted 11/03/2014 at 09:15:22
Another positive is he loves the club and we need people with that passion for us in the big games. You only have to look at the Arsenal cup game. How many really busted a gut and tried to grab the game by the scruff, especially after the penalty. Certainly not Barry, Del boy or Lukaku who's loyalties lie elsewhere. Probably Distin was the only senior player to show heart, though a couple of the younger ones did try.
After reading comments yesterday that seemed to point to Martinez not having money in January after all, and the fact he has mentioned we will mainly be looking at loans again in the summer ("to top up the core of what we already have at the club"), I think Jack, though not ideal, will fit perfectly within our budget.
266 Posted 11/03/2014 at 09:30:27
267 Posted 11/03/2014 at 09:30:16
269 Posted 11/03/2014 at 10:14:02
270 Posted 11/03/2014 at 10:12:09
Whether that is because of a belief he is some kind of faith healer or because of the constraints placed on him by his chairman that means he can only afford damaged goods, I know not, but permanently having a quarter of your squad unavailable is hardly likely to bring success, is it ?
272 Posted 11/03/2014 at 10:24:30
Moyes, Martinez, what's the common denominator?
273 Posted 11/03/2014 at 10:28:13
A bit like an impoverished person trawling through the un-labelled battered tins in a top retailers hoping that after they have made the purchase that when they get home the tin contains caviar and not baked beans.
I had a look through some old posts from the last six years and the subjects and the gripes were depressingly similar to today's concerns.
As Geoff says what is the common denominator?
Phil - I know you don't like Mr Martinez and you're entitled to your view, but can you try to see the bigger picture and realise that even if your dream comes true and RM is replaced the problems with our club will not be resolved.
276 Posted 11/03/2014 at 10:02:44
278 Posted 11/03/2014 at 11:18:57
Everton's current midfield options are not great to say the least. Who knows what next season will bring for the likes of Barry, Osman, Pienaar and Gibson?
279 Posted 11/03/2014 at 11:21:07
But own goals like signing lots of crocks and playing a dodgy keeper in a key Cup match could and should have been avoided.
Yes, we are stuck with Bill and I suppose he will endure just so long as these ’fantastic managers’ of his can maintain our Premier League status whilst dancing to his tune.
280 Posted 11/03/2014 at 11:14:51
The word 'potential' is still getting mentioned, ffs, how many years does potential apply, in a footballer's case?
It is very rare that any player, or manager, for that matter goes back to a club and turns out to exceed his former performances!
I would rather see us strengthen up front first, and then recruit some able replacements for our ageing and very thin ( in numbers ) squad !
I like Andy Crooks's ( 258 ) suggestion that if an injury-prone player is to come on loan, to get him for a season,and should he prove worthy of a permanent move,then go ahead at a pre-set fee ! Maybe that's Utopian, and I know it's not always that simple, but it's food for thought nevertheless !
Wigan proved against Man. City that it's not always about big money signings either. It was good of Uwe Rosler to deflect the credit in Roberto's direction too, in that he used RM's blueprint to defeat City once again!
281 Posted 11/03/2014 at 11:52:09
283 Posted 11/03/2014 at 12:07:29
Pity we drew Arse and not City.
286 Posted 11/03/2014 at 12:30:24
On another note if QPR don't get promoted then they will probably be forced to sell Remy for around 10m. I think he would be an excellent and more realistic alternative to Lukaku.
287 Posted 11/03/2014 at 12:36:57
It's been painfully apparent all season we need a little midfield maestro in the Arteta, Modric mould... moreso since Osman and Pienaar can no longer complete 90 minutes.
One of the things I looked forward to from Martinez becoming boss was some shrewd signings from the Spanish league? Using his knowledge to find Young and technical players for not massive fees. These kind of signings would move the team forward rather than going over old ground with Rodwell.
289 Posted 11/03/2014 at 12:52:33
290 Posted 11/03/2014 at 13:17:03
291 Posted 11/03/2014 at 13:29:02
Always thought CH was his best position. Big question mark over fitness. Can we afford the gamble?
294 Posted 11/03/2014 at 14:05:13
300 Posted 11/03/2014 at 15:26:08
303 Posted 11/03/2014 at 15:29:10
Sadly the injuries have given him little chance of doing that and with people like Yaya, Fernandinho etc. playing so consistently well for City
it’s understandable why Rodders cannot have much of a chance to stake a claim.
I believe he would be a shoe in at most other clubs.
304 Posted 11/03/2014 at 15:36:23
306 Posted 11/03/2014 at 15:50:09
Forget these players we need a much higher calibre of footballer.
I feels almost as bad as when Walter Smith was appointed as our new manager.
What happened to Everton! Harry Catterick would be turning in his grave!
307 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:05:18
Rodwell is a good player but his injury record both at Everton and Man City is awful. Players with a history of injuries very rarely go thorugh seasons clear of new injuries.
With Gibson we already have that player and Gibson stands way above Rodwell in terms of ability.
Some posters have suggested a year long loan but we would still be paying his wages as we are with all the other loanees.
I think the idea of bringing back Lescott is better, O.K. he is around 30 now but he scores goals-remember them-and he would play his socks off to get back into England contention.
If our finances are as bad as people think this makes no sense at all. Although I still expect a pot of around £20 million due to the increased Sky and BT money
311 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:18:13
Still wince now when I think about the time I turned the telly on when on holiday to see Rodwell playing right wing at Villa in another game where he got a bad injury that left him out for months. If the kid could get over his injury problems and wanted to prove people wrong then I’m sure with his undoubted ability he would be a regular for England for years to come.
312 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:31:31
When I think about that goal he scored against United, it reminds me just how much we need that type of player in the centre that can drive forward with the ball and make something happen. Whilst we certainly still have a strong need for that type of player, I think the boat has passed on Rodwell's Everton career and it would end in tears if we brought him back.
Definitely adds more in the centre than McCarthy or Barry, but his injury record is unfortunately the deciding factor on this one.
314 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:21:33
And he paid well over the odds for McCarthy.
316 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:41:52
It is all just paper talk though and we wont have a pot to piss in come summer without a few shipped out.
317 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:56:49
318 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:57:42
Quite weak in the tackle, not as skillful as the likes of Barkley, and doesn't really go past players with pace. A decent passer, but there must be better options to spend our extremely limited resources on.
No thanks.
323 Posted 11/03/2014 at 17:52:18
324 Posted 11/03/2014 at 17:43:12
325 Posted 11/03/2014 at 18:04:35
326 Posted 11/03/2014 at 18:07:24
328 Posted 11/03/2014 at 18:14:52
If the price is right and linked to appearances then he is worth a punt and I would see him as the successor to Distin- two footballing CBs in Jack and Stones. If significant money is required and not appearance linked then no. Don't forget Howard K bought Reid and Gray who were both wrecked by injury and they gave us great service,especially Reid who to my mind has never got the credit he deserves for our success in the eighties.
334 Posted 11/03/2014 at 16:47:37
We should never have re-signed Pienaar.... same goes for Rodwell.
335 Posted 11/03/2014 at 18:28:21
337 Posted 11/03/2014 at 18:32:42
338 Posted 11/03/2014 at 18:44:54
340 Posted 11/03/2014 at 18:59:29
341 Posted 11/03/2014 at 19:06:28
343 Posted 11/03/2014 at 19:38:15
"Gibson etc"? Who exactly is the et cetera? Considering Martinez has been playing a system that utilises two holding mids then I would say he's definitely short of cover in that area if he's going to persist with it beyond this season.
Since the two were teamed up, both Barry and McCarthy have been required to start every game (when available) and their effectiveness has gradually diminished as a result. Barry in particular has looked desperate for a breather for about six weeks now but is instead left shuffling his creaking carcass around the pitch like a blue shirted 'Bub' from Dawn of the Dead.
344 Posted 11/03/2014 at 19:39:05
345 Posted 11/03/2014 at 19:33:55
I want to see us going for exciting players who can really fill the fans with optimism. Not to waste our money on the likes of Rodwell who is very average.
My God, it will be Gosling next FFS! Move on and improve, stop dwelling on past players who did nothing and hope that they will somehow blossom into world class players.
346 Posted 11/03/2014 at 19:22:54
Welcome back!
Man City offer £30 million and Rodwell for Barkley?
347 Posted 11/03/2014 at 19:41:47
"Gibson stands way above Rodwell in terms of ability."
I don't agree with that statement at all but it's a moot point if neither of them are ever fit enough to stand in the first place.
I now have this image of Martinez naming his team next season and announcing that the final starting berth will go to either 'Jack or Darren' depending on who can prove their fitness first. Cut to Gibson and Rodwell spread-eagled on the dressing room floor, sweating buckets, struggling and straining (in slow motion) for what seems like aaaaaaaaaaagggges just to see who can actually haul themselves to their fucking feet for once, like a real life version of the Rocky v Apollo Creed rematch.
351 Posted 11/03/2014 at 20:05:03
I don't mind them both playing against Chelsea or City away but why are they both needed against Norwich at home? They don't contribute to our ability to score goals, and are hardly protecting our back 4 much so what exactly do they bring that helps us to win games?
We only want one 'holding mid', if we have to play any (since when did this idea that you need a defensive mid take hold of everyone?) and I'd rather it was Gibson.
In this light two players to cover in McCarthy and Barry are enough and there are far more pressing positions that need cover. We don't have anyone to replace Lukaku and no one to replace Osman and Pienaar in what they bring to the side – creation of space if you're not aware – and so all 3 of those positions need filling before finding a 4th defensive mid.
Incidentally I'd be happy bringing Rodwell back to play as a centre half, as long as that is where he'd be playing, and not just as a 3rd crab to boost our possession stats.
352 Posted 11/03/2014 at 20:24:24
355 Posted 11/03/2014 at 21:20:15
Bearing in mind he only has three players who can play that position, one of whom is on loan and another whose legs are more susceptible to snapping than a subbuteo player stranded on a pissed up sumo wrestlers settee, then you can see why the manager might be searching for reinforcements in that position.
That said, barring some sort of medical miracle or Million Dollar Man style robotic implants, Rodwell's shocking injury record should surely rule him out of the running.
363 Posted 11/03/2014 at 21:23:55
He played in an attacking role in his full England debut, when hes played for City hes played more advanced and hes described himself as a box to box mid. Ive seen him run midfields for the under 21's.
He isn't strictly a holding player but he can play in there. But he cant express himself in that position. Its not a showy position and is all about recycling and continuity of possession and covering. And yes, you will knock a lot of square balls playing there.
In my opinion he was done no favours by Moyes constantly being played so deep. Hes got a lot more than that. But then thats just my opinion, theres others who think hes a centerhalf and that Gibbo head and shoulders above him in talent!
Lets just say that if Rodwell played centre half hed make Agger look like Vidic at his peak.
Anyway, based on his injury record......no way, please. Its a shame as I think he has a lot of ability, but he is never fit.
367 Posted 11/03/2014 at 22:46:21
The permanent signing of Lukaku would be a mistake.... and why on earth did we spend £13/15 million for McCarthy??? — He is a good Championship player at best.
Martinez is saying we need to buy if we get into Europe; if we had BOUGHT IN JANUARY, we would have had every chance of getting there instead of being humiliated by the Ladies in RED!
Maybe Uncle Ken may have the answers?
379 Posted 12/03/2014 at 00:50:45
380 Posted 12/03/2014 at 00:43:42
387 Posted 12/03/2014 at 04:18:12
As to why we play two defensive midfielders every game, probably because there is no-one else to fill a different position.
450 Posted 12/03/2014 at 16:31:07
If we can get him on the 'cheap' and his wages are relatively low, maybe a pay as you play kind of deal, then I guess its one more body in the squad, age is certainly on his side. Maybe Martinez can get more out of him than Moyes.
I'd like to know what his best position actually is. When he first came on the scene everyone was saying he was the next Rio Ferdinand but I cannot ever remember him playing CB - not sure if he's nasty/hard enough to make a good CB tbh.
Maybe we can loan him from city for a season with an option to buy?
523 Posted 13/03/2014 at 04:37:49
On loan.
At Wigan, apparently - who have made an emergency loan request. Not quite sure how that works as I thought only goalkeepers could come in on emergency loans and then only in the case of severe injuries.
525 Posted 12/03/2014 at 14:42:44
526 Posted 13/03/2014 at 07:54:50
Surely we only need one defensive midfielder
527 Posted 13/03/2014 at 08:47:16
530 Posted 13/03/2014 at 09:32:10
533 Posted 13/03/2014 at 09:52:33
538 Posted 13/03/2014 at 10:49:12
Talk of him going to Italy, I would guess is from his agent, but with the state of footy at Club level there, staying in England is probably a better bet.
Remy might just be out of our price range. Holtby, who Spurs got for almost nothing, could well be well in it.
541 Posted 13/03/2014 at 11:22:23
542 Posted 13/03/2014 at 12:29:07
544 Posted 13/03/2014 at 12:24:46
Rodwell would be a similar pick to McCarthy and Barry. If we need something a bit more purposeful and progressive from deep then its time to look abroad. Could we get Andrea Pirlo on a free?
545 Posted 13/03/2014 at 12:37:07
546 Posted 13/03/2014 at 12:37:44
Off the top of my head: Got us back on level terms in the most recent match against Arsenal with a lung bursting solo run 3/4 the length of the pitch; won us the game against Swansea with a spectacular late free kick; changed the complexion of the derby game at Goodison when he moved back into a central midfield role; put in a superb performance in the league game at the Emirates; ran rings around a shell shocked Newcastle for 45 mins; scored a screamer first game of the season to earn us a point.
None of those were just products of an ordinary, run of the mill plodder.
550 Posted 13/03/2014 at 13:22:36
It's not like he's a player lacking in technical ability or tactical acumen. It's just that the poor sod's youthful potential has been eroded by his own body turning against him. A bit like Seth Brundle being forced to keep his dead, dropped off, cock in a dirty pickle jar in the bathroom cabinet.
553 Posted 13/03/2014 at 13:43:57
For all those examples though, how many resulted in wins? Not saying the guy isn't good of course, but its seen in flashes, as it would be for a guy his age, and isn't going to be the main man probably until after next season.
Rodwell is one of those talents where injury will get the better of his potential unfortunately. If he came back and into the deep two Martinez persists with, it would be more of the same.
Roberto is for all his pass pass pass is a fan of the rigid formation. Wingers stay wingers and the deep two remain put and everyone including the opposition know where everyone else belongs. When I see Chelsea, City and Arsenal, Spurs even, mixing it up on the edge of the box, something we do not do, Rodwell doesn't get me excited.
554 Posted 13/03/2014 at 13:42:03
Of more interest to me would be how RM could improve him and benefit the team in future – I suspect that he would respond much better to Roberto who could develop him into a really good multi-purpose player who could play in attack, midfield or defence as needed during a match until he eventually settles as a centre-half.
Also, he probably needs a bit more 'devil' at present – à la Tim Cahill.
627 Posted 13/03/2014 at 22:15:13
FFS Noooooooooooooooooo!!!!
This rumour just reminds me of where we are and our ambitions under Boys Pen Bill.
633 Posted 13/03/2014 at 23:20:12
If he was THAT good at centre half he would have been playing there from the get go, in a Rio Ferdinand "your going to be playing for England" way. However, as far as I know he has never played there for any senior side.
The decision seems to have been taken a good few years ago that with his ability, hes massively two footed, physique, can join on, shoot, finish, create, good in the air, quick, that he was going to be top class mid.
Hes got too much to be playing centre half. But no one knows it as he was never allowed to show it here. He can play in a more attacking mid role, which is something Moyes just didnt let him do.
Hes a very talented footballer who never had the chance to show what he can do for us due to injuries, being played way too deep by Moyes and he now he seems to be branded as this bland crab because of it. I just wish we had let him off the leash and let him open up a bit.
He was straight into an attacking mid role for the full England side and looked very good, free of the straightjacket Moyes had him in. I don't think he could express himself or influence games from so deep and yes, games seemed to drift away from him in that role. Although if you are constantly getting over injuries you will never show what you have.
Martinez is so much more his kind of manager its untrue, much more flexible.
Even if he played him in a two in front of the back 4, Martinez would have him playing to his strengths and he could show what he had instead of being cocooned in front of the back 4 and playing virtually as a third centre half. Man marking Silva? Bet he loved that.
We would get him for about £4 mill. The only reason I don't want him back here is the injury record, its too risky.
635 Posted 14/03/2014 at 00:32:14
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



213 Posted 11/03/2014 at 00:09:11