Fan Article The end of an error: PSR has been good for Everton Everton were hit hard by PSR point deductions. But season ticket holder Chris Smith believes PSR actually did the Toffees a favour. Chris Smith 29/08/2025 17comments | Jump to last Alleged breaches of the Premier League's Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) brought Everton to within minutes of relegation. It made the Premier League a sworn enemy at Goodison Park. The PSR vendetta against Everton became the most devoured conspiracy theory amongst a fanbase that genuinely believes every decision in Liverpool’s favour is the result of a Faustian pact. (It is!) But whisper it quietly… PSR has been good for Everton. During David Moyes’s first Goodison reign, two loaded terms encapsulated the also-ran era: shoestring budget and glass ceiling. Everton were good but not good enough, and worse still, fans only realised how good Everton actually were in retrospect, after they became terrible. Enter Farhard Moshiri, whose reign of error gave the Toffees a new, unwanted identity. Wasteful, reckless, clueless, desperate. A laughing stock. The laughing stock. The go-to punchline when anybody needed to refer to a shit football club. But what stopped Moshiri in his tracks? It wasn’t results. It wasn’t Bill Kenwright. It wasn’t even signing Wayne Rooney, Gylfi Sigurdsson, Davy Klaassen, and Nikola Vlasic in the same summer. It wasn’t the knowledge he was risking the club’s future. It was PSR. The red terror of PSR’s arbitrary limitations was the line in the sand for the Blues. If not a point of no return, a point of several Championship seasons before return, you would have thought… if Everton were lucky. PSR had the power to tell the new emperor he was completely exposed and everybody could see it. Ahead of the 2019-20 season, Everton burned £101M on Alex Iwobi, Moise Kean, Andre Gomes, Jean-Philippe Gbamin, and Fabian Delph. Before wages. A year later, they incinerated £64M on Ben Godfrey, Allan, and Abdoulaye Doucoure, and made imaginary room for James Rodriguez. But by the summer of 2022, the end of Everton’s sowing era was apparent; the time to reap was upon us. Salomon Rondon, Andros Townsend, Asmir Begovic, Dele Alli, and Demarai Gray were acquired for £1.7M. Bargains, you may suggest; a random haul from an expired goods supermarket’s reduced section, you should conclude. The Toffees’ first PSR charge arrived in March 2023, but the message was clear at this point: Everton weren’t just tightening their belts, they were wrenching the tourniquet to cut off the circulation. Let’s skip forward to the present day. This summer, Everton have signed Tyler Dibling, Thierno Barry, Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, Carlos Alcaraz, Adam Aznou, and Mark Travers on permanent transfers for a total sum of around £110M. Last year, they bought Iliman Ndiaye, Jake O’Brien, Tim Iroegbunam, and, irrelevantly, Begovic again, for £42M. Excluding backup goalkeepers – because I simply do not care about them – that’s eight players signed for an average of £19M at an average age of 22. They’re smart signings. They’re Brighton and Bournemouth signings. They’re all players who improve the squad immediately and seem likely to increase in value. More planning, lower risk, better value. This is a sea change in policy. And then of course, there is hefty expenditure on one of Jack Grealish. This is no doubt a considerable departure from the penny-pinching pragmatism that informed Everton’s focus on youth, but even a spreadsheet needs colour. We’re talking about a genuinely thrilling player who’s been tested at the highest level and emerged with a treble. Grealish will cost Everton a galling amount… but he’ll be indifference insurance for the new owners as they navigate the Toffees’ first year in their new home. His two-assist Man of the Match debut against Brighton underlined this point immediately. Even the frustrating aspects of Everton’s summer transfer policy have been encouraging. The Toffees had been desperate to strengthen the right side of their attack which had essentially become a haunted position in recent years. Francisco Conceição, Malick Fofana, and Tyler Dibling were identified as main targets; James McAtee, Omari Hutchison, and Abdul Fatawu as backups. Eventually, Dibling signed for £40M including add-ons, a fee lower than a bid previously rejected by Southampton with a sell-on clause reportedly much lower than the 25% they had demanded. Everton held their nerve, took the flak, and made a very sensible investment, further hinting at a club finally getting to grips with itself and with the market, understanding where ambition and budget intersect, at last appreciating value and acknowledging cost. Everton’s transformation from stupidity to efficiency took root in the decomposition of Moshiri’s vision, through Kevin Thelwell. It has grown in the optimistic bloom of the Friedkin era, but the seeds were planted by PSR. Everton were forced to stop being shortsighted, irresponsible, and profligate, and to start pinching pennies, to sober up, to slap themselves around the face, and to learn how to be a proper football club. That won’t happen overnight, it may take a while – but, for the first time since Farhad Moshiri sank his teeth into the club, Everton are on the right track. PSR signalled the end of an error. You can argue this is all in spite of PSR, that the Premier League dealt with Everton in an excessive and unfair way, and that would be reasonable – it was proven on appeal after all. You could highlight the indefinite can-kicking policy more affluent clubs enjoy and imagine how useful that would have been as Bournemouth’s Matias Vina lined up an Instant Relegation Volley in the dying seconds of the 2022-23 season. By all means despair at a system which enables accountants to drastically impact on-field performance with selling-hotels-to-yourself loopholes. It’s flawed, it’s poorly-written law, and it will negatively impact Everton and similar level clubs in future without doubt. But this is not a moratorium on PSR, it’s an assessment of its impact on Everton. And the before and after shots look digitally altered. The grey misery and shame of Goodison’s final days have been replaced by the gleam of a bright, new dawn and the renewal of hope that seemed extinct. Of course the new stadium, new owners, and new old manager are big factors, but so too are the consequences of PSR. Everton arrive at this decisive moment in good health – Moyes has been given a competitive budget to rebuild a club that ought to be capable of testing the glass ceiling’s robustness. Like it or loathe it, PSR forcing Everton to confront reality has been vital in reaching this point. Reader Comments (17) Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer () Michael Kenrick 1 Posted 28/08/2025 at 21:22:24 Nice piece of writing, Chris, but I think you are making a common mistake of conflating correlation with causation.I could equally well argue that all Everton's problems with PSR came about through a combination of a huge slice of managerial incompetence from the regime then in power, and the huge ultimately unfunded cost of the new stadium — which was supposed to be exempt from PSR.The 'benefit' we now see has come about because those incompetents have been ousted (or killed off) and the new owners have refinanced borrowing against the now completed stadium — nothing at all to do with PSR.And going forward, the vastly improved management of the club by a highly professional American business venture is what has enabled Moyes to rebuild his threadbare squad — not PSR.But let's not spoil a nice piece of prose with some boring fact-checking, eh? Ged Simpson 2 Posted 28/08/2025 at 21:29:44 Lol MK Kieran Kinsella 3 Posted 28/08/2025 at 21:42:04 The canary in the coal mine with Everton's claims of not being in violation of PSR came from Carlo Ancelotti just a month before he left the club when he said (and this was prior to us being charged with anything):“The Premier League has to solve different problems than the financial fair play of Everton. For the fact that six teams wanted to go in the Super League, first of all they have to take care of this and then, maybe, they can have a look at Everton. But we are going to look at ourselves.“If they looked at us, with the problem they had with the top six that wanted to join the Super League, that would be funny. Of course we will take care of our financial aspect but we can buy without selling players this summer for sure. Were all agreed on the plan we have to improve the squad and there is no doubt we are totally focused on this. We are totally agreed, from the manager, the club and the technical director, Marcel Brands.”Essentially, the Moshiri era view was that "we can do what we want cause it is not as bad as what they did." But, the EPL disagreed. So I don't believe we stumbled into non compliance, or made accounting mishaps that prevented us from seeing our problem. The club simply decided to do what it wanted and assume they'd get away with it. Obviously, things were compounded when Usmanov was sanctioned. Meaning no more 15 million training ground sponsor. No further development on the 10 million first option for naming rights on the stadium -- laughable when the actual deal has netted us just 6 million from our actual sponsors. We couldn't just keep bailing ourselves out with ludicrous cash injections from Usmanov. But the penny must have already dropped some time after Carlo's statement in May, and perhaps that is the real reason he suddenly upped and left? Matthew Johnson 4 Posted 28/08/2025 at 21:44:02 Its not PSR it was the Ukraine war and the sanctions on Alisher Usmanov - lets be real he was funding the club and he had limitless pockets and would of done all the dodgy deals Man City did, I mean come on who sponsors millions for a training ground.As soon as he was sanctioned the money tap shut, which nobody was expecting, that crippled Everton who suddenly had to be solvent on there own Paul Kernot 5 Posted 28/08/2025 at 21:51:08 I just saw Landon Donovan on one of those celeb SAS programmes where they they torture you for 3 weeks to see if they can break you. Think you're tough Landon? We just supported Everton for the last 3 seasons & are still here. Andrew Keatley 6 Posted 28/08/2025 at 22:00:47 And its a bullseye from Matthew Johnson (4) Don Alexander 7 Posted 28/08/2025 at 22:01:52 PSR exemplifies the massive hypocrisy of the blazers allegedly in charge of the Premier League who have long since kow-towed to their own self-interest and the self-interest of the "top" clubs they now actively prevaricate from making themselves accountable, as well as those hugely more bent clubs, Citteh being just one case in point, than (in their skewed opinion) the lowly clubs such as us and Forest who they castigated very publiclyPSR might've been a wake-up call, but many inside the shady business of football, including the blazers in charge, had for decades identified Everton as a basket-case when it came to credibility, and they therefore had no compunction in selecting us for a public trouncing. Peter Moore 8 Posted 28/08/2025 at 22:02:02 And, allegedly of course lol, Moshiri just being the puppet of his boss Usmanov...After Putin invaded Ukraine, the oligarchs were black-balled by the British Govt meaning we got shafted financially as we returned Usmanov's significant sponsorship dosh. The Hill Dickinson Stadium may well have been the USM Stadium instead and we also returned other monies such as his sponsorship of Finch Farm.I agree with MK, PSR is not the biggest factor behind the change of approach and Moshiri running out of money for Everton Football Club. Had Russia not invaded Ukraine I don't believe we would have new ownership.Anyway, we are where we are. I have much more faith in TFG than Moshiri/Usmanov.If we were not constrained by PSR though, we could compete more easily with the sides who have the biggest budgets now due to being already on the financial gravy train of Champions League footy and the related windfalls that come directly and indirectly from that. Tony Abrahams 9 Posted 28/08/2025 at 22:05:21 I remember hearing a rumour, that the club had been told by people from within Manchester City, that they shouldnt be worrying about PSR, Kieran🤷♂️Its an article that anyone who wants to be serious could pick a lot of holes out of imo Chris, but whats the point because its quite funny! Ian Bennett 10 Posted 28/08/2025 at 22:15:40 A nice bit of writing chris. Don't be put off. It has a Lyndon quality to it. Brendan McLaughlin 11 Posted 28/08/2025 at 22:22:38 We spent what...£500 million under Moshiri and narrowly avoided relegation.If he've had another £250 million to spunk... and lasted... we would have gone down. Christine Foster 12 Posted 28/08/2025 at 23:27:38 Well that's a new slant on reality... PSR was a good thing for Everton Football club? Keep taking the tablets Chris.. there might be one or two holes in that argument. Usmanov and Moshiri wanted a club after bailing out of Arsenal, Everton and in particular BMD, gave them an opportunity to expand along the waterfront for what aim we will never know. The application of PSR against Everton in such a vindictive example of two faced hypocrisy by the PL (The Super league fines, never paid, now a goodwill contribution of 3.5m each, not even a point deducted, the Man city charges etc) the damaged cause to reputation, fans, the game, the political maneuvering Ah the re-writing of history is such a wonderful exercise.. Si Cooper 13 Posted 28/08/2025 at 23:27:46 Agree entirely with what MK posted at (1). You can present these things any way you want. Dale Self 14 Posted 29/08/2025 at 00:28:07 It seems a fallacy that PSR hastened the end of Moshiri and the eventual sale of the club, which would be the basis for the OP conclusion. PSR at the same time limited what buyers would consider the risk, also obscuring the value of the club as future penalties hung over us like the sword of Damocles. So it also kept Moshiri in position to pick sketchy potential buyers whom he hoped would fail ownerships tests while supplying loans to the club.Moshiri was waiting for the stadium completion and the property development was his exit plan. Only when interest rates blew up and Usmanov was sanctioned did he likely plan to leave for real. Good shot Matthew and good take Michael. Dupont Koo 15 Posted 29/08/2025 at 00:41:20 Despite the subject firmly settled at Glasgow, the Thelwell Brigade still operates globally with regular meetings for those who would like to appreciate the underrated work of his in navigating our beloved club through 3.5 years of existential turmoil, egos and cluelessness. Andy McNabb 16 Posted 29/08/2025 at 01:45:46 Few things are ever as simple as they at first appear but I really enjoyed that article, Chris and it made me think.This is an excellent article. Well crafted and designed to create the back and forth of discussion. Ian Bennett # 10, you got there before me. Chris, I was wondering if you ghost write for Lyndon and that is high praise indeed. Alan J Thompson 17 Posted 29/08/2025 at 01:50:21 Is it possible that the Premier League are about to announce that they've found Man City guilty but as they are going to abandon PSR no penalty will be applied and thus no massive future legal bills, win-win? Plus the advantage that there will be no need to look into the buying and selling of hotels and absolutely no government involvement whatsoever.Fleming and Le Carre would be proud of this; Russians, Americans and oil rich Arabs and Bill would probably have made a musical out of it. Add Your Comments In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site. » Log in now Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site. How to get rid of these ads and support TW © ToffeeWeb