-sm.jpg)
Nottingham Forest are briefing it’s £130M. Manchester City are briefing it’s £116M.
Either way, one thing is certain: Man City are paying Forest well over £100M for Elliot Anderson.
Now don’t get me wrong: Anderson is a good player. He is the all-round package in midfield — energetic, good on the ball and brilliant at disrupting play and getting possession back.
Anderson contested a Premier League-leading 430 ground duels in 2025-26, 36 more than any other player. He won 231 of these, 32 clear of next-best João Gomes.
His 104 tackles attempted was bettered by only three players, while Anderson won possession a whopping 306 times. That was 94 more than any other player in the top flight.
He also ranked extremely highly for passes attempted (4th, with 2,383) and passes completed (6th, with 2,038). Plenty of those were in the final third, too.
Throw in that he is just 23 and now one of the first picks in Thomas Tuchel’s England team, then you can see why he has attracted interest, not just from Man City, but from Manchester United and even some of Europe’s biggest clubs.
Yet is that really worth what could be a record-breaking fee, which will rank in the top 10 all-time biggest transfers? Come on…
It shows the madness of the transfer market, particularly in the Premier League, when a half-decent young player is going for such a big sum.
Anderson did register 8 Premier League goal involvements last season (4 goals, 4 assists), but surely, for such a huge amount, a player should be world class? He didn’t look particularly world class as England struggled to move the ball with any pace through midfield against Ghana on Tuesday.
Yes, Man City have a fantastic track record, and yes, Anderson is clearly a big talent, but let’s not forget that he won’t be going into a team managed by Pep Guardiola.
No, instead it’ll be Enzo Maresca who gets his hands on Anderson, and while the Italian is a good coach, he is nowhere near Guardiola’s level, and it remains to be seen how Man City will fare now the great man has left.
How does this all link to Everton, though?
Well, it shows the madness of the market they are operating in.
Earlier this week, there were reports of Newcastle United — who will surely be kicking themselves for selling Anderson in the first place, even if it was down to PSR needs — holding an interest in James Garner.
Coincidentally, Garner’s stats tally up well against Anderson. They are comparable players. Anderson is a better dribbler and ball-carrier, but otherwise there’s hardly much in it. As I’ve written previously, Garner should be in the England squad.
Everton are unlikely to consider selling, but just as Anthony Gordon’s £70M move from Newcastle to Barcelona has set the market for Premier League wingers (i.e. Iliman Ndiaye), this move for Anderson sets the bar for combative, energetic, central midfielders entering their prime years.
That can be seen as a positive for Everton, of course. I highly doubt there is any plan to sell Garner, especially since he signed a new deal last season, but every player has a price. The Toffees could now feasibly demand towards £100M for a player they signed for just £12M four years ago.
And as good as Garner is, he shouldn’t be a £100M player.
On the flip side, though, it makes the jobs of CEO Angus Kinnear and Head of Trading Nick Hammond that much harder when it comes to getting bang for Everton’s buck.
Look at the Hayden Hackney deal.
Everton, and more pertinently, Hackney’s agency, were confident a deal could be struck for the midfielder in the region of £15M, which would probably represent fair value for a player that has never played above the second tier and only has a year left to run on his contract.
Yet Middlesbrough have so far been unwilling to budge on a valuation that is said to be more like £20M+.
There’s always going to be some give and take in negotiations, but this market is now, frankly, insane. Finding value, especially in England, is getting tougher by the minute.
It’s not impossible, and at the end of the day there are highly paid professionals who make a living in making deals happen at the right price.
But throw in that there should be a need for urgency, to have players in the door for pre-season, and that’s where the powers that be must weigh up the pros and cons of trying to eek out maximum value.
It is also why Everton must be firm with David Moyes. Looking for Premier League experience should not be a prerequisite, because simply put it makes those players too expensive.
Instead, it should be about what attributes any targets can bring to this squad, and if that means shopping abroad and giving those players a bit more time to settle, so be it.
If you can strike gold and get a player from abroad who has previous Premier League experience, or experience of English football (a bit like Ndiaye when he signed from Marseille) then brilliant. But the manager will have to be flexible.
This market is crazy, and Everton are going to have to be adaptable.
All stats via Opta Analyst
Reader Comments (34)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 26/06/2026 at 14:29:21
Remember when we paid Watford £40M for Richarlison. Paul Merson went off on one. I wonder if he'll do the same thing about this transfer. I doubt it. How dare he criticise Man City?
According to TransfrMarkt, we are sniffing around Papa Gueye of Valencia. Valued by them at £40M and aged 27. Senegal CM at the World Cup.
Well having the Granpapa Gueye for several years it would seem to be a natural progression.
3 Posted 26/06/2026 at 14:43:35
To compete at the very top level, you need to have some eye watering budgets; to compete at all, you need a competitive squad of players.
We cannot contemplate such astronomical sums, so our crack scouting team need to be all over the world, digging up gems... the three Bs do it every year!
nb: The lower leagues still find pleasure in the game without ultra riches!
4 Posted 26/06/2026 at 14:47:03
But nothing surprises me anymore in football land.
5 Posted 26/06/2026 at 15:04:35
I also wouldn't take a penny less than £70m for Ndiaye.
6 Posted 26/06/2026 at 15:25:35
If you wait too long they just become out of reach.
I really think we should buy George because if we don't and he progresses then its another one out of reach.
It annoys me and I am sure it does with fellow Evertonians that we take so long to sign players, the saga runs on longer than Bill Kenwrights plays, yet Liverpool or City fancy a player and bang, its done in a day, whereas with Everton its one big protracted wrangle.
I really hope we get Hackney over the line and pay the extra few quid and get it done. We have lost out on Wilson already but maybe, just maybe were are hopefully of a Bowen filling the right side berth ?
I live in hope that we start the season with a proper right back, Hackney signed, a decent striker and Bowen and Grealish on either flank, I can dream cant I ?
7 Posted 26/06/2026 at 15:29:02
No thanks, we need pace -- not walking football.
8 Posted 26/06/2026 at 15:39:43
9 Posted 26/06/2026 at 15:48:24
Pace would be the first requirement for me.
10 Posted 26/06/2026 at 15:52:40
The increase in player costs shows why owners no longer leave transfers to managers or coaches and in everyons case, not to individuals. Everton have a team of specialists at every stage of the transaction - scouting, analysis, AI analytics, finance, investment, risk assessment, transfer negotiation, player contract negotiation.
Managers and head coaches have to adapt to the fact they may need to take what they are given, not what they want. Coaches beneath them need to concentrate on academy and squad development, which is a failure of most Premier League teams.
Most of all, transfer teams need to be creative and sharp. Outside the Top 6, not many clubs can absorb multi-million flops. But that is not an excuse for avoiding risk and sitting out the window.
11 Posted 26/06/2026 at 16:09:18
12 Posted 26/06/2026 at 17:07:47
Up there with Steve Daley.
13 Posted 26/06/2026 at 17:30:15
Both these transfers were made by Man City too.
14 Posted 26/06/2026 at 17:35:50
The other lot are prepared to pay in excess of £100M for a player that last year was playing in his first season in the German league, and before that, four Premier League teams turned him down, including Chelsea. Two of them described him as clueless, in as far as he has no idea of what is expected in a training session.
He then went back to America to play in the fourth division. Now, after two games in the World Cup, he's worth over £100M. Madness!!!
15 Posted 26/06/2026 at 17:49:52
Ohhh, that's what he is... I've watched him a few times, and in the World Cup, he's none of them.
16 Posted 26/06/2026 at 18:49:12
The money paid for Daley and Gray were record fees at the time I think and a lot more than the previous record.
17 Posted 26/06/2026 at 21:00:17
Everton can never compete again.
18 Posted 26/06/2026 at 21:08:14
Hackney is a steal for the asking price, let alone £15M shy.
19 Posted 26/06/2026 at 21:32:38
It only seems like yesterday when the fans of the club paying this dosh were saying the same thing.
It's amazing how quickly 'never' can come around in football.
20 Posted 26/06/2026 at 21:52:42
We signed John Bailey, Eamonn O'Keefe, Martin Hodge, Garry Stanley, Asa Hartford, and John Gidman in 1979.
21 Posted 26/06/2026 at 21:58:55
22 Posted 26/06/2026 at 22:32:39
Mind you, I dont see Anderson as that much of a stand-out player but I havent seen that much of him.
Papa Gueye scored a couple of belters so that may have added another £5 million to his price tag. Senegal were very poor in first half and Iraq were certainly there for the taking after the early red card.
23 Posted 26/06/2026 at 22:42:15
But, more problematically, Anderson is a better player than Garner. It would be nice to have both of them, but if we could only have the one it would be Anderson all day long for me.
24 Posted 27/06/2026 at 09:59:58
Darren, spot on about Man City, they've had worse times than us before their sugar daddy turned up to transform them. Never say never.
25 Posted 27/06/2026 at 10:32:10
I think that £1M signing, Trevor Francis, was actually sold for one pound less than £1M so he wouldn't be tagged as the first million pound player.
Brian Clough had something to do with the price!
26 Posted 27/06/2026 at 11:09:11
Dave, didn't Jimmy Greaves move to Spurs for a £1 under £100,000 for the same reason?
27 Posted 27/06/2026 at 12:06:07
Dave didn't Jimmy Greaves move to Spurs for a £1 under £100,000 for the same reason.
28 Posted 27/06/2026 at 12:06:07
Dave didn't Jimmy Greaves move to Spurs for a £1 under £100,000 for the same reason.
29 Posted 27/06/2026 at 12:07:03
All the media were saying it was £1M which I suppose it was really.
30 Posted 27/06/2026 at 12:12:00
31 Posted 27/06/2026 at 12:44:01
“Instead, it should be about what attributes any targets can bring to this squad, and if that means shopping abroad and giving those players a bit more time to settle, so be it.”
Here is one for you, no spotters fee required -- Bos of Australia and Feyenoord. Shhh;)
32 Posted 27/06/2026 at 12:44:30
Not sure... quite possible though.
33 Posted 27/06/2026 at 19:32:30
You can't make this shit up!! Is it entitlement or delusion?….
Keep your hopes up lads, I respect your optimism. We might get Vini Jr and Michael Olise this summer, fingers crossed, eh!
34 Posted 28/06/2026 at 15:46:15
The point of him being a very ordinary player, a water boy, a water carrier, a hod carrier is still the same. You want him instead of Garner?
Give your head a very big wobble Paul, you really shouldn't stay out in the sun too long, they will have to call for the water boy to get you rehydrated, don't worry if they can't find the water boy, a water carrier will do.😀
ps: Anderson is a water carrier.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 26/06/2026 at 14:09:17
It just puts up all players' value overnight, which is okay but now we will also have to pay more for signings.