The Mail Bag
Wakey Wakey Time
Comments (11)
Sorry to harp upon about my concerns but lets get back to this season realities ? forget the bloody ground issue . Now what am I talking about? See these facts :
Spurs 30
Villa 25
West Ham 28
Bolton 25
Blackburn 23
Man City 21
Everton 19
The numbers refer to their numbers of players they have in their current 1st team squad ? and only taking into account players who have regularly played in Premier League or equivalent overseas.
Now whilst we can say quality vs quantity we got to face the fact that unless we sign at least another 4-6 players hopefully (but no chance) by Aug 11th than we could be in deep shit by I'd say 1st round UEFA cup. Other than Blackburn the rest are still buying or are showing that they want to continue to buy, but all we have is done is to say dont worry we'll find the faces before the deadline, and in the meantime Moyes is over in USA with his fit 15 players.
Kirkby or Liverpool ? couldn't give a damn because at this rate we'll only be in Coca Cola or whatever they call it now.
I'm not normally this down, and as I said yesterday I rate Moyes and Co, but for Christ's sake lets see some half-decent buys in next few weeks.
Mike Oates, Posted 23/07/2007 at 17:18:08
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 23/07/2007 at 19:42:55
3 Posted 23/07/2007 at 20:23:44
You cannot fail to include the likes of Vidarsson, Ruddy and Jutkiewicz, they have been issued a number and are a part of the squad. I’m sure Spurs and the others have fringe players too.
So that 24 squad players and you can add to that Pineaar and hopefully Vogel which would make 26.
Not as bad as you make out.
4 Posted 23/07/2007 at 20:47:41
i think the quality in our squad is far better than those mentioned above except Spurs.
however, every season we always here comments of how we are gettin relegated due to small numbers an guess wat...it hasnt happened so far. it wnt happen this yr either. for a team who’s fans ask for quality we must sign quality.
it wasnt too long ago ppl wer askin for quality wen we had to make do with radz, jeffers etc in our squad. for the first time in yrs our squad is no longer full up of ’work horse-like’ players.
moyes basically had to build from scratch. another few yrs an we will be confidently calling for 4th spot. it is then that we can call for masses of signings.
in yrs to come evry1 will be sayin ’Everton wasnt built in a day’.
come on the blues!!!
5 Posted 23/07/2007 at 20:57:35
6 Posted 24/07/2007 at 09:35:52
7 Posted 24/07/2007 at 10:36:11
put it this way, if arsenal lost toure and fabregas (jus 2 players!) theyd be in more trouble than us.
if liverpool lost carra, gerrard, alonso and agger theyd find it much harder. if united lost ronaldo, giggs, scholes and rooney.
evertons squad deserves more credit than wat most fans giv it.
8 Posted 24/07/2007 at 11:04:19
If Vaughn and AJ got injured Victor would probably start with Beattie or McFadden. count how many goals they’ve got between them. If Arteta got injured who’d replace him? Ossie? Phil neville? Da Silva? I’m sure you see my point. A good squad should have a good replacement for every position. Chelsea will lose Kalou and Drogba to the African nations, they’ve only got Shevchenko and Pizarro to replace them though(!)
We have Europe, the domestic cups and league to think about this season, we should have a big enough squad to be able to play a different 11 two games on the trot. We’ll struggle if we don’t have that kind of strength in depth. Remember, we’re also losing Joey Yobo to the African Nations.
9 Posted 24/07/2007 at 14:01:12
guess u cud say nani and anderson for man utd now but arsenal wud clearly be overwhelmed by a lack of quality. who wud liverpool replace gerrard, carra, agger an alonso with? sissoko, hyypia, kewell or pennant? they wud also struggle.
but really i think it is typical of a lot of ppl who come on this site to imagine the most unimaginable occurance and use it as evidence to support the ideology that our squad is of poor quality and thin on numbers.
moyes must be amazin to get the prems worst team to 6th place then.
10 Posted 24/07/2007 at 14:08:49
2nd of all you’re exagerrating and twisting my words.
where up there did i say we had the worst team in the Premiership?
I said we’re thin on QUALITY players. We’ve got plenty workhorses, plenty guys who’d knock their pan but just aren’t quality. Beattie runs about continually, he’s not much fucking use though is he?
We’re supposed to be a top 6 side, our squad doesn’t reflect that. You should have a quality replacement in each position and we don’t have that.
11 Posted 24/07/2007 at 15:23:12
i bet ud find that we do infact hav better quality than most teams besides last yrs top 5.
QUANTITY:fulham hav signed lots of players an i can guarentee that we will finish above them.
QUALITY:man city hav spent big on 3 players and i can guarentee we will finish above them.
in order to compete we hav to take note of other ppls teams, that way we can see if our team is in as bad a condition as many think.
but personally i wud like to see better players on the pitch, like fernandes, but who wudnt.
the comment about everton bein the worst team in the league was not directed at u but at those who seem to think nxt yr will be a CRISIS season.


1 Posted 23/07/2007 at 19:41:48