The Mail Bag
Kirkby welcomes Everton???
Comments (8)
I lived in Kirkby for most of my life and the last time I went there, last week, there was more than 500 people. Can somebody educate me, how to get the true feeling of 40 plus thousand residents by asking 500 people? Were half of them kopites? Did they ask at Kirkby railway station as the Wigan train pulled in? The propaganda war has started.
Let's not lose our identity.
KEEP EVERTON IN OUR CITY
Colin Malone, Posted 27/07/2007 at 15:55:51
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 27/07/2007 at 08:33:08
Should the ballot (God forbid) deliver a move to Kirkby result perhaps Everton Football Club should consider re-naming our great club to reflect the new location of our club - perhaps Kirkby Town or Knowsley United?
2 Posted 27/07/2007 at 17:53:20
3 Posted 27/07/2007 at 18:03:25
Editorial Team
4 Posted 27/07/2007 at 18:25:37
Supporters of our relocation to Kirkby will say that the protest was organised by KRAG and therefore denounce it as staged and not spontaenous while others would say that 500 people is such a small sample for a survey that it cannot be deemed representative of the views of Kirkby’s residents as a whole.
Ultimately, it’s largely irrelevant to everything except the propaganda war — it’s Everton’s fans who will be voting on the scheme not the town of Kirkby, although there will, of course, be Kirkby residents among those eligible to vote.
5 Posted 27/07/2007 at 18:06:02
In response to the Echo coverage of the ICM poll story, I wrote the following letter this afternoon (N.B. the "Ms Bailey" I refer to is Sly Bailey, CEO of Trinity Mirror, which owns The Liverpool Daily Post & Echo, which, in turn, is a commercial partner of EFC - the matchday programme, The Evertonian).
STARTS LETTER.
Re: Kirkby says yes to Everton, (website, icliverpool, Friday 27 July).
I could punch several holes in this highly tendentious piece. Instead I will underscore just one, in order to highlight the lack of accuracy and veracity in your report.
You say, verbatim: ’53pc of Kirkby residents believe the plan will improve their quality of life...’
No they don’t. Was every ’Kirkby resident’ polled? No. By your own admission just 500 were polled. In selected wards.
Therefore, you should have written: ’53pc of those Kirkby residents polled (in selected wards) believe the plan will improve their quality of life...’.
In other words just 255 people out of a population of 37,000 believe the plan will improve their quality of life. Big deal.
Conversely, 245 people out of a population of 37,000 don’t believe it. Big deal.
Therefore Kirkby doesn’t say yes to Everton. Nor does it say no.
Your headline, then, I would venture, should have pithily read something like ’Kirkby warming to Everton?’
As it is, your headline is wrong. And several ’facts’ within the piece have been (willingly?) distorted.
If ever I needed proof that, for the third time in its history (1997, 2000 and now), the Liverpool Echo is blithely and impartially doing Everton FC’s (stadium) bidding, then you have supplied it in abundance.
You’d think the title would have learned its lesson by now instead of fawning and pandering towards the wishes of the Everton executive. Then again, Ms Bailey wouldn’t take too kindly to one of the chief Trinity Mirror companies upsetting one of its leading joint venture parties.
That piece was as transparent as it gets. What’s more, I think you know it. Lame."
ENDS LETTER
6 Posted 27/07/2007 at 22:07:50
7 Posted 27/07/2007 at 22:46:04
8 Posted 29/07/2007 at 17:36:37
Everton FC must remain in the City Of Liverpool, and there is a Plan A, B ,C
Lets look at these options before voting.
Remember there is NO going back !!
VOTE NO !!

