The Mail Bag
Think Hard, Think Deep
Comments (13)
Until recently, I have been 20% for the ground move and 80% against the move. Then I heard the club's point of view and it made me think even more on the subject. "If EFC leave our beloved Goodison and move to Kirkby we can take on Real Madrid, etc" Join the elite!
Think about that sort of statement. Think hard about it. What has Everton's history been, past, recent and present? Yes we have had short spells in our history (5-10yrs) where we have been top dogs in England but never in Europe. Everton has mostly been about being in the top 5 or 6 with a good chance of winning something.
If it was that important to us to win or at least challenge for the Euro Cup/Champs League, we could easily support the other shower or even another close club. Is being super rich, etc, what it is all about? Being an Evertonian is much deeper than just being the biggest, richest club in the world. The reason my 12- and 5-year-old kids love EFC as much as I do and walk around with their heads held high and proud to be Evertonians is our history, our heritage, our culture.
Going to Goodison knowing about Dixie, Young, Ball, Harvey & Kendall, Sharp, Tricky Trevor... Bayern Munich, Rooney at Leeds... knowing we will win something again. They know about Tiger Darracot ,Big Mick Lyons, Jim Person, Brett Angel, FA Cup Semis at Main Road, getting knocked out at Shewsbury coming home on the coach after getting wacked at Boro. But, no matter what, they always have not only their club's history to fall back on but EFC's & Goodison's culture. They know that even these 100,000 seater stadiums cannot generate the passion of Goodison on vital match nights.
They know they can tell their mates in school that they would rather be in the 4th division, than have their club hawked around like a prostitute. First the Arabs, then the Tia's and Finally the Yanks. Do we want a foreign manager and staff ? not to mention half the Spanish team. We going to throw all that away to cling onto the tails of Real Madrid.
We can well make Goodison a 55,000 capacity. What's the big thing about more corparate facilities? Most of the money comes from TV etc. Once it's gone we can't get it back. To move we have to be certain it's for the right reasons and to cling to Real Madrid's shirt tails is not one of them. We're more than that, we're deeper than that. Remember there's no going back.
Gary Rimmer, Posted 01/08/2007 at 22:04:49
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 02/08/2007 at 08:36:40
2 Posted 02/08/2007 at 08:59:20
3 Posted 02/08/2007 at 09:14:43
I want Everton to play with verve, swager, skill and commitment
To do this we need the best players and to get these we need more money
What interests me most about Evrton is what happens on the pitch rather than off it and therefore I support Kirby because the move represent the best method of having a great team
I THINK THIS ARGUMENT IS EFFECTIVELY SPILT BETWEEN THOSE WHO?S 1ST CARE IS ON THE FIELD (PRO KIRBY) VERSUS THOSE WHOSE PRIORITY IS OFF THE FIELD (ANTI-KIRBY)
SIMPLE
And I want what?s best to produce a great team on a Saturday at 15.00
4 Posted 02/08/2007 at 09:19:47
However, in spite of our shared passion that does not automatically mean that we all agree. And I cannot agree with your piece at all. I am very well briefed on my club?s history ? the highs, the lows, the awesomely great players that have graced Goodison down the years, and the comical dross that we still take to heart and remember fondly.
I am also well aware that, until very recently, Everton FC has been a great power house in English football and more, a great innovator in the game. That is currently no longer the case. I wish it to be so again.
Much is made of the club?s motto. Unfortunately, it does tend to get misappropriated in my opinion, but I feel it is appropriate to apply it here. To imply that you and others would rather the club languished in the fourth division to demonstrate how ?True Blue? you are than strive to compete with the best in Europe is to be completely contrary to the words ?Nil Satis Nisi Optimum?.
And as for Greg and your comments, being a passionate football fan whilst simultaneously being pragmatic and realist about the finances of modern day football are not mutually exclusive as you wish to imply. You can be both.
5 Posted 02/08/2007 at 09:41:15
Ideally we would all like to stay at a re-vamped stylish government. The point and ultimately it seems to have escaped you is that we cannot afford to renovate it or add in more corporate facilities.
Your attitude although commendable is one that shows no understanding of the hard facts that we are broke and need to move before Goodison falls down around us.
6 Posted 02/08/2007 at 09:54:36
Sorry i meant goodison! Too much newsnight last night!
7 Posted 02/08/2007 at 10:56:21
8 Posted 02/08/2007 at 11:17:46
9 Posted 02/08/2007 at 12:46:12
10 Posted 02/08/2007 at 13:21:54
Without a future, Everton’s history will be forgotten. I personally can’t square the argument some are offering that BK and KW have failed to find investment in the club when they have potentially tied up a very advantangeous deal with the UK’s biggest retailer, without selling the club out, whilst still maintaing control.
Or is that what sticks in the throat of some? That BK retains control?
And please, don’t fire back that you don’t trust them or that they are incompetent. The Kirkby deal on the table shows their competency and the fact that they are allowing the Everton family a vote shows their integrity.
King’s Dock was a missed opportunity for which the club was ill-prepared. It did not happen on KW’s watch, nor did the ntl sponsorship deal which fell through which others - inclduing yourself, I believe - offer as evidence of BK’s lies. My memory of that is different. It was not a lie by BK. It had a helluva more to do with the stock market crash at the time with the bursting of the dot.com bubble. ntl got badly burnt in that one at a time, if you recall, that they already had interests in such clubs as the barcodes, Leeds and Celtic. Unfortunately, EFC were victims of bad timing and extenuating circumstances - not lies and deceits by BK.
It is the same with the FFS. Was it really a grand deceit perpetuated by BK as a means to retain control of the club in the face of Paul Gregg’s challenge? From all the evidence I’ve seen its collapse had more to do with the elusive Mr Samuelson than any alleged pantomime by BK.
But such a view doesn’t get as much mileage as simplistic tabloid conspiracy theories, does it...?
11 Posted 02/08/2007 at 13:48:30
12 Posted 02/08/2007 at 14:13:40
Its about the future not the past - time to let go Gary. You’re setting your kids up for a life of footballing dissapointment with that attitude.
No offence.
13 Posted 02/08/2007 at 14:17:51
That in modern age the club left the city boundaries and again claimed their independence and moved on to better things.
Imagine your kids telling your grandchildren about the Dixie Deans, Labones, Balls, Kendalls stories, and then telling them about the new era, the legends of recent days (whoever they may be). Telling of great nights in Europe, the best entertainment at a new lavish stadium, and Still a club that stands by its values and is still something to be proud of.
I am proud to be an Evertonian, have been since birth. My children are evertonians and any future children will be too. My grandchildren will be evertonians and they will all know of the great story of the club.

