The Mail Bag
Kenwright moving the goal posts ?
Comments (16)
In his interview about the stadium debate he says that "if more than 50% or more than 17,500 vote No then we won't be moving to Kirkby". So, what if the vote is 49% No, 5% (spoilt votes), 46% Yes, does this mean we will still be going because the No vote is below 50% ?
Word on the street in Kirkby is that we are moving there one way or another so don't be surprised if the above becomes a reality.
Tommy Coleman, Posted 22/08/2007 at 22:33:59
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 22/08/2007 at 23:42:30
3 Posted 22/08/2007 at 23:38:10
4 Posted 22/08/2007 at 23:44:39
5 Posted 22/08/2007 at 23:52:13
Kenwright, Earl, Woods will lose a fortune if there is a no vote. One way or another the vote will be yes
6 Posted 23/08/2007 at 00:52:07
7 Posted 23/08/2007 at 09:01:16
8 Posted 23/08/2007 at 10:40:17
If it is .... and that’s a big if , then I hope we can just continue the season in a dignified manner and support the blues in what promises to be our best season for years and not let what is to happen distract from this and what ultimately is the most important thing THE MIGHTY BLUES
9 Posted 23/08/2007 at 11:01:12
My original thinking was that there had to be more ’Yes’ votes than ’No’ for us to move to Kirkby, now it seems that it has to be more than 50% ’No’ for us not to move. There is a huge difference there for me.
For the record, I’m originally from Kirkby and have lots of family there, I hope this is alright by you Mark, and Lee, please correct my English or Maths, if indeed you went to sKoOl.
10 Posted 23/08/2007 at 12:36:46
I was not suggesting that your post needed amending gramatically, merely questioning your ability to understand the spoken word and interpret its meaning. We have been told all along that the club would not move forward with the Kirkby proposal if the ballot resulted in a ’no’. Therefore, by deduction, it is sensible to assume that if a majority ’no’ result (over 50%) is reached then that will persuade the club to halt the negotiations with Knowsley and Tesco. We have never been told, as far as I can recall, that there must be over 50% of ’yes’ votes.
Further, we are now told that a ’no’ result will be reached if over 17,500 ’no’ votes are returned. That is roughly 48.5% of the ballot papers that have been issued. So it is even possible for a ’no’result to be recorded if less than 50% of votes are ’no’.
Fans have been given an opportunity to voice their opinions here. It is a fair ballot. If less than 17,500 people vote ’no’ and the remaining ’no’ votes do not equate to over 50% of the total number of returned ballot papers, then the result cannot be ’no’, and the club will continue with negotiations.
Simple.
11 Posted 23/08/2007 at 13:51:40
12 Posted 23/08/2007 at 14:05:23
Interesting how someone who does not support the Toffeeweb agenda gets censored for a remark, yet some other users use all kinds of poor language.
No wonder Toffeeweb isnt taken seriously in most parts of our support. You say we’re all entitled to our own opinion - but only when it matches yours.
Seriously Biased. Funny.
Anyway, thats me done with this pokey self-serving website.
13 Posted 23/08/2007 at 14:51:00
Forgive me if I’m wrong but isn’t that 101%?
14 Posted 23/08/2007 at 15:41:12
15 Posted 23/08/2007 at 15:43:59
I’m off to buy bigbrain academy for the Wii, RIGHT NOW!!!!
16 Posted 23/08/2007 at 16:02:54


1 Posted 22/08/2007 at 23:10:06