The Mail Bag
TV In Singapore
Comments (13)
Response to Mark Cassin's listing (so ignore if you don't live in Singapore!)
With the new TV deal that we've all heard so much about, overseas rights were sold for GBP 625m. ESPN / Star Sports (ESS) were the incumbent, but were outbid by both SingTel and StarHub. StarHub in my opinion had no beef with ESS - they afterall are the cable channel that carries them in Singapore - but their fear was SingTel would outbid them, that's why we have to pay $15 more from October. But it's still cheap compared to Sky.
Channel 27 is the new Football Channel. It's shit. They may have Peter Reid as a pundit, but they've also got Carlton Palmer, who I admit talks a better game than he played.
But Chs 21 and 22 also show live games, and if you like your Scottish footy, tune in to Goal and Goal+ on 107, 108.
Now we have up to 3 live games concurrently, up from 2. My only remaining beef is on the opening weekend, 8 out of the 10 fixtures on Saturday and Sunday were shown live.
Us against Wigan was one of the 2 that wasn't (Derby v Pompey the other). Some things never change.
Matt Traynor, Posted 24/08/2007 at 01:42:04
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 24/08/2007 at 05:45:37
problem solved
3 Posted 24/08/2007 at 05:44:31
4 Posted 24/08/2007 at 06:12:09
5 Posted 24/08/2007 at 06:24:55
Is what you mentioned for real?
You really did that?!?
If yes, I’m next!
6 Posted 24/08/2007 at 08:21:20
And Wilson, you are spot on!!!! The pundits in ESS show ’unconditional’ biasness to the ’top 4’ and add Spurs+Newcastle.But a few brief lines on Everton. I have been observing this for the past 3 weeks. In the newly revamped Here We Go, which is called Football Forecast or something...I can’t remember..they pointed out tactical mistakes, lineups, casualty list,opponents and predictions of the ’top 4’. Then they clearly said, "these are the predictions for the matches that we weren’table to show you" And those would be the remainder 6 matches which would not include the ’top 4’. Only if Everton plays the ’top 4’ would there be a bit more coverage. This is utter biasness.
7 Posted 24/08/2007 at 09:06:21
8 Posted 24/08/2007 at 09:59:54
The quality is pretty good - especially since its free!
9 Posted 24/08/2007 at 09:49:50
greetings all you evertonians in singapore!
ironically, the opening game they didn’t show on tv here involved the current third and fourth teams in the table...
i’ve stopped tuning into espn after the first week, much as i like listening to john dykes and paul masefield or watching shabby singh talk shite.
those guys are really struggling to carry the show without showing the match footage in their analysis.
reidy on channel 27 fares as well as steve mcmahon on espn. out-of-job managers masquerading as pundits... bloody dry.
whats-his-name who hosts the channel 27 show comes across as a producer thrust into the limelight... painful to watch. owned by dubai oil money i hear, they should break the bank for Richard Keys my fave man.
yak to make his debut and score on sat,
its 2-1 over blackburn!!!
10 Posted 24/08/2007 at 10:25:35
And if you can get Supersports they have different matches than True/UBC, like the Wigan match first day of the season.
11 Posted 24/08/2007 at 10:31:30
12 Posted 24/08/2007 at 10:50:32
13 Posted 24/08/2007 at 10:52:48
Now lets move on. : )


1 Posted 24/08/2007 at 04:51:25