The Mail Bag
Oh to be useless again
Comments (9)
Is it just me or wasn't it so much easier when we were actually rubbish? When we knew we had inferior players in the team and had to shop in the next division down for "bargains" like Carl TIler, Mitch Ward, Brett Angel, Paul Holmes etc. Or even when we used to pinch players off West Ham just before they had a career finishing injury like Williamson or Bilic (the latter managing to injure himself despite being suspended continually!) And we've had our share of rough diamonds ? rough being the word ? like future World Cup winners like Materazzi and big league journey men like Dacourt. But, we always knew we weren't that good. Complaints were genuine ? we knew what was wrong, we knew how many players weren't good enough and there wasn't much disagreement.
Then there's now. We've a cracking goalkeeper, potentially a future England left back, an England central defender (or left-back!), the Nigerian captain, one of the best uncapped Spanish players, Australia's best player, an England striker, Scotland's best striker (don't laugh please), another striker with almost as good a record as Henry in the Premier League. Two of the best striking prospects in the league.
OK, aside from Hibbo looking the weak link at the back (as others have improved rather than him being poor) and aside from needing a little more creativity in midfield, what's the solution? We asked Bill to give Davey money to spend, which he has done. I now find it much more difficult though to pinpoint exactly what to complain about!
Mark Pendleton, Posted 21/10/2007 at 16:35:24
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 22/10/2007 at 08:49:27
2 Posted 22/10/2007 at 08:52:29
If you want to discover what the fans thought of things for most of the time,just look at the attendance figures-far too often below the 20,000 mark.Why, in the glorious days of 1982,the opening home game attracted all of 24,000.Guess who was manager then!
This weekend I have been slated for daring to suggest that even a 10th position average would be an improvement on any other five year period in our modern history (fact)-the regretable truth is that if we make that average 5th the aged moaners will still find fault. I think they regard the term Evertonian as another word for self-flagellation!
3 Posted 22/10/2007 at 10:58:52
4 Posted 22/10/2007 at 11:06:54
Anyways, what you say Richard is all perfectly true but you need to put those facts into context. The old division one may well have been on a par with todays Championship (although I dont agree with this cos i dont see too many Hoddles or Dalglish’s down there) and Catterick and Kendall may have only had a couple of decent seasons (although I disagree hugely with this aswell as they did more in a few seasons than moyes has done in...well ever) AND we may have got low attendences in ’82 (can’t deny that but at that time most football clubs where happy to break 25,000) BUT in that respect you could also say...
When Liverpool won all those nice big European Cups in the 70s and 80s, football was dead shite really and they all had big taches and silly perms.
When England won the world cup in ’66 with a full back who only ever used one foot, a dirty short sighted midget in midfield and a baldy fella just next to him who did nothing but kick the ball from long range.
And as for those big attendences of 60 or 70 thousand in the pre war years...well the accountancy practices obviously werent as good back in them days...old people always exaggerate things down the years don’t they.
Part of the reason why a club strives to be successful is that it compares itself to its former self...its called standards :)
Im not having a go at you Richard because if we all said the same thing this would be a boring website, but that is where Im coming from and I suspect that is why fans like me will always disagree with fans like you. .
5 Posted 22/10/2007 at 11:08:19
I am sick and tired of all the negativety on this board, we could "debate" for hours on end but lets face it there are three types of posters on her, the ones who for some reason really hat Moyes and expect him to be playing like Arsenil every week, the ones who think he is doing a decent job and then you have the floaters who sometimes include the knee jerk reactionists.
The two groups of anti and pro (ish) Moyes will never agree.
6 Posted 22/10/2007 at 11:14:30
Kendall’s 80’s finishes were 8-7-7-1-2-1,extremely creditable but they have to be sen in the context of a purely domestic competition.When he was tested in the more competitive age,he was seen as a very average manager,indeed.
I still maintain that it has never been harder to win trophies (or to finish 10th!) than it is now.
7 Posted 22/10/2007 at 12:52:49
Yes,Kendal,Ball and Harvey did play in an entirely British competition but THEY WERE VERY GOOD,both as individuals and collectively. In fact,I’d venture to say they were better than Neville,Jagielka and Osman or even Arteta,Graveson and Cahill on whom our season may come to depend!
Your second post spells out for us how effective Kendal was in his first spell as manager and it was a great pity that he was tempted back to the job when distracted by personal problems.But he will always be revered as the last manager with whom we touched greatness.
Thank you,Richard for keeping us old beggers entertained;perhaps one day you will come to respect our sacred memories.Who knows,as you mature ,you may even have memories of your own- a season we finished tenth,perhaps?
In the meantime ,please forgive me for adapting a very old saying-’What do they know of football who only Moyes they know’.
8 Posted 23/10/2007 at 15:36:38
9 Posted 23/10/2007 at 15:36:38

