The Mail Bag
Double Standards
Comments (13)
Compliant in respect of Mr Mark Clattenburg Premier League Referee:
I would like to register my utter disgust and disbelief that a Premier League official whom is considered to be at the top of his profession can be allowed to get away with absolutely shocking decisions (listed below) and bias towards Liverpool Football Club. These decisions have been played out over the last couple of days since the Merseyside Derby (21/10/07) in the national media, however the lack of information that has came from yourselves and the FA is scandalous.
1. Sending off of Tony Hibbert after words from Steven Gerrard, Q is it not against the rules to sway an official?s decision??
2. Penalty Claim(1) Steve Finnan manhandles(bear hugs) Joleon Lescott, no penalty.
3. Tackle by Dirk Kuyt on Phil Neville ? Q ? What is the difference between the tackle made at Old Trafford by Jon Obe Mikel who received a straight red, or was it because Dirk Kuyt said I quote ?I did not mean that?, the player was over 2 ½ feet in the air whilst making that challenge, again this is indirect conflict to your refereeing rules.
4. Penalty claim (2) Jamie Carragher assault on Joleon Lescott ? The referee was no further that 10 feet way and gave no penalty, however he gave the penalty on Tony Hibbert from at least 3 times that distance!!
I refer to the Liverpool vs Chelsea game, Rob Styles gave a penalty against Liverpool that day and was rightly castrated in the media and by his own organisation (Keith Hackett), he was forced to apologise to Liverpool FC. If indeed their is no bias towards the so called ?Big 4? why has no action been taken against Mr Clattenburg or Steven Gerrard. If these incidents had have happened at Anfield and towards the Liverpool team, I and possibly the majority of Everton FC fans and neutral supporters would be in no doubt that action would be swift against the official in charge.
If the EPL is to be transparent and not be classed as the same as the Corrupt Serie A League, then blatant mistakes should be punished, if it happened to the Big 4 this matter would have been dealt with swiftly as per the Liverpool vs Chelsea Game.
All I ask for (and I meaning the entire Everton Supporters) is that you provide answers on why no action has been taken against the referee.
His non-inclusion is nothing to do with the game last weekend but due to a UFEA Game on Thursday 26 Oct 07.
Yours Sincerely,
Tommy Hesketh, Posted 23/10/2007 at 14:58:30
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 24/10/2007 at 08:54:26
Don’t get me wrong I applaud yopu for putting your feelings to the FA, but we all know that Barfly the red will do absolutely nothing about it.
I did laugh at one point when you said Syles was castrated, a bit harsh I thought for a poor decision, possible you meant castigated.
All in all a very good and fair letter, a pity it won’t get amswered
3 Posted 24/10/2007 at 08:41:47
4 Posted 24/10/2007 at 10:01:45
5 Posted 24/10/2007 at 11:19:34
Unfortunately (for us at least), that just is not the case. The days of impartial and unbiased officials, if indeed they ever existed, are no more. I remember in the recent past liverpool were playing and some referee, cant remember the name, actually punched the air when the shite scored! - 100% true.
6 Posted 24/10/2007 at 11:38:02
7 Posted 24/10/2007 at 12:00:39
8 Posted 24/10/2007 at 12:22:37
9 Posted 24/10/2007 at 13:00:21
They were far more difficult decisions for the referee to spot but Tony Hibbert should have conceded (another!) penalty for handball and as much as I love him for it, anyone who was there will remember Cahill’s headlock on Alonso which led to a goal for us. The fact that we played better than Liverpool means these incidents may be forgotten because we deserved to win the game.
I’m not trying to compare it to the travesty that was Clattenburg’s performance but let’s not pretend we won last season fair and square.
10 Posted 24/10/2007 at 15:15:49
Arteta and Lescott only half-decent - your’e having a laugh cockles aren’t you.
You either can’t spell your own surname i.e. Johnson or its some weird Scandinavian spelling and that figures - most R.S. supporters don’t come from the Pool. Everton supporters watch their team at the game.... Red Shite watch it in the Pub.
11 Posted 24/10/2007 at 15:32:17
To: rasa.dmcm@apc.army.mod.uk
Subject: RE:
Dear Thomas,
Thank you for your email regarding the referee?s performance at the weekend fixture. We are sorry that you were disappointed with the performance in that match.
There is not a formal mechanism for individuals to complain about referees? performances and decisions. However, I thought it would be helpful for you to know the process undertaken by the Professional Games Match Officials, the body which employs all the referees, to monitor, scrutinise and improve the referees performances throughout the season.
Please be assured that the performance of the referee in this fixture, together with all performances by the Select Group Referees, will be reviewed with him in detail in a number of different ways. There is constant monitoring of referees? performances, with a view to improving their performance from week to week. Referees are given both positive feedback and are appropriately criticised if it is felt that decisions were wrong.
The referee?s technical performance in a match is assessed by the Independent Assessor, and their overall handling of the match is reported on by an Independent Match Delegate, who is often a former player, manager or coach. These reports focus on the referee?s fitness, his control of the match, the way that he deals with key incidents as well as the way he communicates his decisions. These reports are shared with the referees on both a formal and informal basis. The aim is to help the referee to improve his performance, taking into account the scrutiny of each performance.
There are a range of tools available to help referees, including coaching, fortnightly feedback sessions and technology. In addition, the Select Group of Referees meet on a fortnightly basis, giving all the referees an opportunity to communicate and discuss issues of concern and ensure a greater consistency of performance.
The aim of the Professional Game Match Officials is to help referees to improve their performance from week to week.
I do hope the above helps clarify how we are constantly trying to improve and maintain standards of refereeing.
Thank you for taking the time to make us aware of your views.
Kind regards,
Communications Team
Was it worth it, probably not but it made me feel better!!!
12 Posted 24/10/2007 at 16:26:49
Kopites just rob and riot for the most part as far as my experience suggests.
Eric, you must have suffered for the past 13 months since we trashed your team at Goodison and if the referees assistance on Saturday ensured your frustration was somewhat appeased then I am glad you feel happier.
I understand, Eric, that there are a few long words in this post which I know Evertonians will not have a difficulty with, but which I know you will not understand. May I recommend the Ladybird Dictionary for pre-school children to assist you. In the meantime I will help you with two words:-
Simian= Apelike.
Cerebral= With intelligence and thoughtfulness
Evertonian= Worth 20 Kopites
Now Fuck Off.
13 Posted 23/10/2007 at 10:25:40
Inept - Yes
Overawed - Yes
Intimidated - Yes
Flawed - Yes
Mistaken - Yes
Professional - No
Biased - Probably
Corrupt - Possibly
CLATTENBURG, PROBABLY THE BEST LIVERPOOL # 12 EVER


1 Posted 24/10/2007 at 08:14:06