The Mail Bag
Right Back
Comments (20)
I feel, as an Evertonian, one of our main problems is our right back position. At the moment, we have 3 candidates to fill that role.
Tony Hibbert - A very good defender, but not very good at going forward and sometimes does the odd mistake (e.g the Liverpool penalty)
Phil Neville - Kind of opposite to Tony Hibbert in a way. Great at going forward, but an OK ish defender. Think he's better than Hibbert at right back personally, but I don't really trust him if there is a top class winger trying to dribble past him.
Phil Jagielka - Now, I think he is a mixture of both the above players. He's obviously a good defender, and proved on Sunday, he can go forward and provide some threat.
Now, personally I think Jagielka is our best right back, because he's a better all round right back, compared to the other two. Now, providing this, does anybody think we should replace them with a new right back in January or the Summer, or are the Evertonians happy with the right backs we have?
Ben Jones, Posted 31/10/2007 at 13:07:46
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:14:54
3 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:30:21
4 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:29:42
Jags will do a decent enough job there but eventually we need to buy a left back who is comfortable with ball to attack but also defend to a high level. You only have to look over to our left side to see that being done by Leighton Baines & Joleon Lescott, who is a fucking centre half no less (I love that fella!!)
Thats my two bobs worth anyway lid
5 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:39:12
6 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:41:14
7 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:52:08
8 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:50:47
I also agree we need improvement in other areas but to disregard the problem right back position just shows me how much you dont really know what your talking about. Just one of them people who thinks getting glory players in will sort everything.
Absolute shite mate
9 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:48:02
1) Being too far forward when we were attacking and he was the last defender
2) Not winning the header on the half way line to prevent the breakaway - well actually not even going for the header.
3) after making the previous two mistakes he then followed Gerrard into the box when he clearly could have tackled outside the box.
How people can continue to defend him is beyond me. Dont get me wrong, i’m sure he is a crackin lad, same with Phil Neville, but you have to call it as you see it.
10 Posted 31/10/2007 at 19:27:06
(Or thereabouts)
11 Posted 31/10/2007 at 19:23:38
Hibbo isn’t very good. Hence he is in a bad position, hence he has to commit a foul to stop the attack. What he should have done is absolutely clattered Voronin and given away a free kick in the centre circle. But again, he’s not very good so he ran around indecisively and then had to chase back and make a last ditch attempt to stop the goal.
12 Posted 31/10/2007 at 19:50:05
If Gerrard doesn’t act like the cheating skid mark that he is then Hibbert has done his job and successfully defended our goal. End of argument.
13 Posted 31/10/2007 at 21:55:39
14 Posted 01/11/2007 at 01:21:58
15 Posted 01/11/2007 at 02:15:15
16 Posted 01/11/2007 at 11:02:50
I dont know about Jagielka I am not a great fan of a player who is used to plug holes and doesnt have a natural position. Neville I think is the better right back as he can get in crosses.
17 Posted 01/11/2007 at 12:17:28
In contrast, Phil Neville is a much better defender, he is calm, composed and knows where to be, as well as being stronger in the air. When he plays right back he also looks far more comfortable on the ball and suddenly does a decent impression of a footballer, something he can’t manage in the middle of midfield with things going on for 360 degrees around him. Phil Neville is the obvious choice to be our right back, and really that’s the only position he’s ever been suited to. His career and reputation have suffered from playing left back and midfield far too often.
Phil Jagielka I haven’t seen playing right back regularly, only against Albania for England ’B’. He looked okay but I would still opt for the experience of Neville, seeing Jagielka as cover for either right back or centre back, where Stubbs’ total lack of pace affects the whole make up of the team, as has been mentioned before, particularly in response to the Kharkiv game.
18 Posted 01/11/2007 at 11:48:08
If you look at Phil Nevilles carrer at Man Utd he was primarily used as cover for either right or left back when they were down to bare bones. So the lack of a creative bone in his body meant that Sir Alex Ferguson who could quite clearly see him for what he was meant that if Phil Neville ever started or came on as a sub in midfield it was because there were no other options.
Last season at right back Phil did a good job and if you can be bothered to look at the statistics then you will find that when he started at right back Everton actually won most of their games and he actually provided quite a few assists from crosses whipped in from the by-line. Unfortunately for Evertonians everywhere and most can see it as it is that when Phil Neville plays in midfield Everton generally play poorly as the position taken by Phil means that a better suited player is usually sat on the bench because Moysie refuses to drop his ’captain marvel’. In midfield at present with players coming back from injuries means that we have more options than earlier in the season so if Everton are going to play anybody in the ’holding role’ then it has to be Lee Carsely. On the right or left at present they have got either Piennar or Mikky. Ossie has looked much better suited in the middle in the games against Larissa and Derby, Cahill just behind the front man who could be any one of five depending on who the opposition is. The 4-5-1 or 4-1-3-1-1 or 4-1-4-1 formation whichever you want to call it has been proven to be the best formation with Everton in recent seasons. Without two proper out & out wingers then Everton will not be able to play 4-4-2 effectively IMO as natural wingers give any side much needed balance.
My best 11 and bench are as follows:
GK: HOWARD
LB: BAINES
LCB: LESCOTT
RCB: YOBO
RB: NEVILLE
SWEEPER: CARSLEY
CM: GRAVESEN
LM: PIENNAR
RM: ARTETA
AM: CAHILL
CF: YAKUBU
BENCH:
WESSELS
JAGIELKA
OSMAN
JOHNSON(RAW LATENT PACE)
VAUGHAN(IMPACT PLAYER)
The reason for starting Yakubu up front is that he is the most naturally gifted forward we have on the books, the best finisher by a ong way. You would have Vaughan to come on as sub if you needed to have more presence in the air,along with his pace and harrying he does. Johnson to stretch the tired and weary legs at the back later on in the game. Jags if needed can cover most defensive positions and Leon can cover most midfield positions. Come on Davie see the light will ya fella and let us Evertonians at least watch something vergeing on the boundary of entertainment. COYB!
19 Posted 01/11/2007 at 13:19:49
He should be played at right back.
As for Hibberts defending any deep crosses from the opposition right wing you can bet your mortgage that Hibbert will be outjumped at the far post for a goal, I have lost count of how many times that has happened to us, at least with Neville and Jagielka you have a better chance of them winning the header.
Coming forward Hibbert cant attack and cant cross, he like Stubbs resorts to hoofing it to AJ or Yakubu neither of whom are target men, Yakubu for all his size doesnt hold the ball up.
I think in all honesty Hibbert is a Championship standard fullback who now that we are starting to assemble a decent squad should move on.
20 Posted 01/11/2007 at 20:30:40


1 Posted 31/10/2007 at 18:03:04
IfJags plays well in the coming games (birmingham, chelsea) then i think he will be first choice for most of the season! i wouldnt buy a RB in january. but if all 3 havnt peformed i would in the summer