The Mail Bag
Errr..... I don't think you did!
Comments (23)
Now I know that this stadium issue has been discussed / debated / argued at great lengths already, but can I just clarify one thing from all those who were eligible to vote.
Having just read Mr Wyness' comments on the icLiverpool site (see ToffeeWeb link) regarding the proposed move, he claims that the Everton Board have, I quote "gained a mandate from our own supporters to relocate to the area".
Now if I am mistaken forgive me, but wasn't the vote for a decision on whether or not EFC continued negotions with Tesco and Kirby Council about the proposed move, and ONLY that? None of this "mandate to relocate" that Wyness is spouting off.
I'm not trying to start an argument as to whether the move is right or not but surely the Board are now just twisting and manipulating things to suit their cause?
Lee Smith, Posted 14/11/2007 at 14:16:42
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 14/11/2007 at 14:53:59
people voted for the board to explore the kirkby option further (with a view to moving there)
one the one hand the club can say they have a mandate to move as presumably they are not going to hold other votes at other milestones
and on the other hand we can argue semantics
I prefer to concentrate on the football and the next home game cant come too soon
2 Posted 14/11/2007 at 15:21:06
http://www.wagstaffsdesign.co.uk/everton/
3 Posted 14/11/2007 at 15:43:36
4 Posted 14/11/2007 at 15:52:13
EFC know all about these problems that lay ahead but have to carry on as normal untill told otherwise. It's going to be a long drawn-out and very messy situation the club will find itself in so they may well have to start searching for that Plan B they never had pretty sharpish. Kings Dock revisted?Well this is EFC we are talking about...
5 Posted 14/11/2007 at 17:02:15
’’Are you in favour of Everton Football Club relocating to Kirkby?’
I don’t think it could’ve been made clearer and thankfully only 28% of those who bothered to vote voted ’no’, only a couple o’ dozen were still angry enough to ’protest’ a few weeks later. I agree with Mr.Kenrick - WE ARE going to Kirkby!
6 Posted 14/11/2007 at 17:06:51
Also the new visuals of the ground are really poor once again, it looks more like Cheshire Oaks than a stadium!
7 Posted 14/11/2007 at 16:56:49
8 Posted 14/11/2007 at 17:18:51
9 Posted 14/11/2007 at 17:24:06
Thats what happens when you vote YES to ?exploring? the Kirkby move.
I?d love to see a similar video showing what a 55,000 stadium on the loop may look like though. I bet it would be much more eye catching -firstly because of its location
10 Posted 14/11/2007 at 18:07:19
11 Posted 14/11/2007 at 18:32:46
12 Posted 14/11/2007 at 18:31:17
13 Posted 14/11/2007 at 18:46:00
14 Posted 14/11/2007 at 18:42:14
I?d like to see a video of a new stadium on the loop site as well because I have a fair idea of what it would look like. It would look like Tessy O?Shea bursting out her fucking corset and what a disconcerting sight that would be!
As for the scheme being called in by the Government, my guess is it won?t. This MP is just letting it be ?known? that he is ?bearing his constituents concerns in mind?. Just as they all do before schemes like this get the nod.
My other guess is that while Kirkby residents who live on the doorstep of the development may have serious reservations (quite reasonably) most of those who live any more than a half mile away will not share those concerns and many may actually look forward to it. In fact, most of the comments I have heard from Kirkby residents on Radio Merseyside have been supportive of the development.
As far as how the stadium looks on the video....for those who despise the idea of moving to Kirkby in any circumstances then ANY design, for them, is going to be shit. My view is that it would be a traditional stadium, just like we are used to, with scope for further development including an increased capacity if we ever needed it. It looks OK to me, better than the overturned sledge that is soon to appear on Stanley Park. I agree with one thing though, Everton should be pulling their finger out and giving us more details of the finer points of the design. But remember, this video was not intended for Evertonians as such, that mandate is in place, it was targetted mainly at Kirkby residents for many of whom Everton may not be a priority.
15 Posted 14/11/2007 at 19:08:07
Trust me, Everton will never, ever go to Kirkby, not next year, not the year after, not in 5 years, not fucking ever! ! !
You?ll be squealing - again - that you're being picked on before the nights out, stop regurgitating the same fucking babble.
16 Posted 14/11/2007 at 19:37:52
17 Posted 14/11/2007 at 20:06:58
18 Posted 14/11/2007 at 20:51:48
19 Posted 14/11/2007 at 22:05:11
15000 fans is the vast majority of Everton fans is it???
There is well in excess of ten times that amount in the UK alone!!!
Get your head out of the clouds man!!!
The vote was fuckin rigged there’s nothing more certain!!!!
20 Posted 15/11/2007 at 10:48:45
The vote was rigged, get a grip will ya. The fact is the majority of Everton fans eligible to vote who bothered to vote, voted ?yes?.
In response to Kevin Trustworthy -
??Gerard...well said! I can promise you that you?ll have plenty of elbow room and lots of space to yourself within 2 years of the move. AND it?ll be an unobstructed view. ??
Kevin you make that comment like you want it to happen. If fans like you that make me utterly sick, you?re a fuckin disgrace!!!
21 Posted 15/11/2007 at 11:55:41
There are lots of things I didn?t want to happen but that didn?t stop me foreseeing them. I?ll give you a wave from the Checkout End (or the Alt End, if that?s where the home support will be)
22 Posted 15/11/2007 at 13:25:26
23 Posted 15/11/2007 at 13:31:51

