The Mail Bag
Stevie Pienaar — Cheat?
Comments (30)
A lot was made on 5Live about this, and BBC Sports Review carried that on. I haven't seen it from him before, what was he like last night?
I don't like dishonest players, no matter how good they are. I hope this isn't the case as he is looking better by the game.
Jonny Brown, Posted 13/12/2007 at 21:26:18
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 14/12/2007 at 08:43:55
3 Posted 14/12/2007 at 08:47:57
At West Ham he and Pienaar made no attempt to stay on their feet, and being with the West Ham support on Wednesday I was agreeing with them in their protest against the actions of the two. As above, its not diving per se, it is making no extra effort to stay on your feet when you get a shove... it is a physical game after all so I don’t like what these two do. It brings us down to the level of the Gerrards and Ronaldos of this world.
Having said that, maybe Moyes knows that the difference in qualifying for Europe or CL is only a matter of a few well ’won’ free kicks around the area.
4 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:08:24
5 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:03:44
Pienaar obviously new he was being targeted by him so he turned the tables on him after all they are pro’s at this game, pienaar although I dont think dived he just played as a pro which lets face it most players in the prem do, and I for one wont knock him or arteta for it.
West Ham as usual just maoned that they aint as good as they think they are.
Everton are slowly becoming a team of serious pro’s who know how to win a game from being behind and how to turn the tables on teams who are trying all kinds to rough em up.
Take a look at the top 4 in the prem they all do what Everton did to West Ham and I hope they do it to more teams and keep the blues pushing for a cup.
6 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:22:11
What exactly do you mean by ’turned the tables on him’ and ’he just played as a pro’. If you mean to say he influenced the ref’s decisions by reacting like he had been fouled then yes, that is why I was critising both of them. So what if they have been ’targeted’, what’s wrong with a bit of rough and tumble, as long as the tumbling isn’t from conning the ref.
Oh and beleive me, i wish I was in with the blues, even a winner two minutes from time and what can I do other than have no reaction. Don’t want to Cockney fist in me face.
7 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:25:34
Anyone siding with the Hammers and that moron Alan Green just hasnt got a clue.
Unbelievable, we’re unbeaten in 11 games and we’ve got our own fans labelling Johnson and Pienaar as divers!
Give me strength.
8 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:35:46
9 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:43:06
I think as he is a sppedy well balanced player a slight knock can upset this. But his over reactions just got the Ref?s back up.
As a result - when there were a few defo free kicks we lost out.
I suggest Pienaar takes a leaf out of Lescotts book and gets on with it!
10 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:44:38
With the likes of Arteta and Pienaar being constantly fouled to break up their fluency it’s a sort of backhanded compliment and a sign perhaps of how our style has changed recently.
Curb’s team talk would have been along the lines of "Fuck them up so they can’t play it about" rather than "Battle for the hoofball we know is coming"
11 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:47:45
By doing that you are putting yourself at a disadvantage to the rest of the premiership.
Ask Andy Johnson.
12 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:46:37
However, I think Pienaar has a habit of throwing both his arms in the air before collapsing "platoon" style when he’s under a little pressure from a defender. He’s a great player little player but he went down so often and so dramatically on Wednesday night that even we started to laugh about it and we were in the blue end.
Osman is no heavier but he seems to draw a different line to Pienaar as to what’s acceptable and is more prepared to ride the rough and tumble and just get on with it.
13 Posted 14/12/2007 at 09:36:04
I don’t like to see players throw themselves to the floor when there is no contact, but buying a foul is different. Maybe Arteta (and now Pienaar by the sounds of it) do go down easy, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a foul. It’s called drawing the foul. Show them the ball, then nick it away at the last minute and fall over their challenge.
Your integrity is honorable Nick, but unfortunately the game has little place for that level of honesty these days. Generally our team hasn’t been to bad at the gamesmanship over the years, but we have lacked the flair players that are usually guilty of it. Now we have them, it’s hardly surprising that we are seeing some soft freekicks going our way.
It is clear to me that West Ham had a game plan and that was to try and knock players like Pienaar, Arteta and Osman around. They probably figured that we were physically inferior in midfield and they could bully us. On another day and with a different ref it may have worked, but this was our day, a very blue day.
COYB!
14 Posted 14/12/2007 at 10:13:32
15 Posted 14/12/2007 at 10:07:51
All players dive and the only way it will stop is when the manager of a team comes out and criticises his own players for diving, but thats not going to happen is it?
Instead we get stupid comments from so called experts saying that there was contact when minimal contact or no contact has taken place. Surely the idea should be to try and stay on your feet not fall to the floor when challenges are made.
16 Posted 14/12/2007 at 10:31:52
Mikel Arteta. The way he plays draws fouls continuously but nobody ever says he’s a diver. Its the professional game nowadays.
17 Posted 14/12/2007 at 10:26:46
In my oppinion if he is being fouled then the ref will make the decision and doesn’t need a player sprawling on the floor to assist his decision making.
You can be awarded a free kick even if you stay on your feet. If players are going to fall on the floor on the slightest contact, then I’d only start agreeing with the posts above when football becomes officially a non-contact sport.
But I guess its to be expected nowadays, and maybe I have to live with it... not though the non contact diving of Ronaldo, Gerrard etc...
18 Posted 14/12/2007 at 10:40:37
19 Posted 14/12/2007 at 11:11:04
20 Posted 14/12/2007 at 11:19:55
21 Posted 14/12/2007 at 11:18:11
In the end he was also brutally fouled and didnt get a foul, as you are complaining that he is "diving" I prefer more Wenger’s comments that he was not protected enough last night by the refferee
22 Posted 14/12/2007 at 11:51:22
was the contact on Pienaar enough for him to go down and hit the deck by itself or deed he intentionally collapse when contact happened. If he collapsed intentionally then its a dive or atleast a cheating action.
23 Posted 14/12/2007 at 12:45:39
24 Posted 14/12/2007 at 13:01:12
25 Posted 14/12/2007 at 13:03:37
Theres nothing wrong with a bit of kidology - Lucas Neill was all over him a lot of the time, fairly I might add so well done Pienaar for chancing his arm. As someone else said, we?ve been too soft over the years, its about time we wised up. Welcome to 21st century football.
26 Posted 14/12/2007 at 13:06:35
In return, our wingers should never go down, whether clattered or not. Sod the rules.
While were at it, we should also only field ten players, tie the goalies hands together and not allow our players to play the ball over head height.
27 Posted 14/12/2007 at 13:35:42
28 Posted 14/12/2007 at 15:04:52
29 Posted 14/12/2007 at 15:52:10
He is South African
He comes from far away
AND HE CAN PLAAAA-AY, AND HE CAN PLAAAAAY!
He plays the football....
PI-E-PI-E PIENAAR PIENAAR PIENAAR, PI-E-PIENAAR, PI-E - PI-E- NAAAAR!!!!
CLASS!!!!
30 Posted 14/12/2007 at 16:18:51


1 Posted 14/12/2007 at 06:32:39