The Mail Bag
Should we welcome Manuel Fernandes back?
Comments (105)
It's that simple.
Should we welcome Manuel Fernandes back?
Charlie Percival, Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:27:24
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:35:31
2 Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:40:20
3 Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:39:55
4 Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:44:48
5 Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:50:36
6 Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:48:50
There is something that I don’t quite like about him (APART FROM THE OBVIOUS BEFORE YOU START!) but i still believe he is a very good player and as such, I would most certainly have him back.
Looks like it is all lies though so I am going to stop thinking about right now..................................................................You never know though.
7 Posted 04/01/2008 at 21:49:02
8 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:12:31
9 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:07:50
He has a lot to add, and I’d welcome him back.
And this from a guy who wrote "let him rot" a few weeks ago :-o But I’d be cool with it if everyone else is.
10 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:21:59
11 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:28:44
12 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:27:27
I?m not too convinced by our Davey?s denial so fingers crossed. COYB
13 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:29:37
However as with all these stories and Everton believe it when it happens and then and only then.
14 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:32:26
15 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:29:30
But Lue and you folks, how do you reckon the home crowd will deal with him? It’s all well and good us on a message board going over it, but will he get barracked at GP?
16 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:28:02
People saying let him rot are just being ridiculous. So you do not want a player who will improve our squad? Of course people do as we want to see Everton progressing on the pitch. Fernandes proved last season that he could come hear and make an impact. I still believe him and James Vaughan got us into Europe in that last 6 months. He’s a quality player and I want to see quality at Everton Football Club.
What people have to realize is if we don’t sign anyone our season will crumble and we’ll end up finishing mid table. We need a player to freshen the squad up and give us more options and hopefully if Manny joins he can do this.
17 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:35:07
18 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:39:28
19 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:41:31
He’d get a good reception.
20 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:53:57
However is it possible that the powers that be at Goodison are trying to get others off the scent..... ok I will carry on drinking the wine!
Ay, if all else fails I?m happy with the midfield if our Tiny is fit and when Artetta is back.
21 Posted 04/01/2008 at 22:56:48
22 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:03:04
23 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:06:23
24 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:19:05
25 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:25:14
I don’t speak spanish, but there’s a massive picture of Fernandes getting off a plane, with ’Everton’ in the text accompanying the headline.
26 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:28:01
Miguel Ángel Ruiz, the sports director of the Valency, works " with speed " to find an exit to Manuel Fernandes, who was arrested after leading a dispute in a discotheque at high hours of the dawn. The Portuguese midfielder will go away transferred to the Everton.
27 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:29:55
Asked about the agreement for the transfer of the player Everton, Ruiz said he preferred to be "prudent" and said it will announce the agreement when it is completely closed. "The things we announced when made. In this case we are going to do things quickly, but I would not venture to say anything yet," said sports director of Valencia.
IMO, Moyes is keeping tight-lipped because of what happened last time.
28 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:30:35
I was a little disappointed to read about Moyes’ denial of the reported developments, but, thinking about it, after the debacle in August do you think he’d say anything that would even hint at Everton being after Fernandes? Thought not.
Just get the deal (permanent!!) sorted!! COYB
29 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:25:22
If a player can offer the club something beneficial whilst they arewearing the kit then so be it, bring them in and lets get some of it.
30 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:41:04
Not sure if he played for Valencia in Europe, but you are allowed to register 3 new players for the next round and 1 of those can have already played for another team in Europe.
I was as pissed off as most people when he turned his back on us and went to Spain, but the lad is class and the sort of player we need in midfield.
31 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:47:08
32 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:48:25
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/169198.html
33 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:50:56
http://www.antena3.es/a3noticias/servlet/Noticias?destino=../a3n/noticia/noticia.jsp&sidicom=si&id=13519003
Needs translating but says agent confirms move.... made up if this is true..
34 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:57:00
Apologies if I?m annoying anyone.. thought I?d let people know?!
35 Posted 04/01/2008 at 23:57:55
Asked about the agreement for the transfer of the player Everton, Ruiz said he preferred to be "prudent" and said it will announce the agreement when it is completely closed.
"The things we announced when made. In this case we are going to do things quickly, but I would not venture to say anything yet," said sports director of Valencia.
36 Posted 05/01/2008 at 00:06:26
But still... would be great to have him back...
37 Posted 05/01/2008 at 00:10:15
I think it only shows how far we have progressed when young world class players want to play for Everton (in the modern day game) instead of Valenica and other clubs.
Thats if he signs tho. If not there's plenty more fish in the sea.....I hope
38 Posted 05/01/2008 at 00:14:01
I get the impression that when part owned by third parties these players are treated like pieces of meat and have to go where their owners send them for the biggest buck.
Now's the time to offer Valencia what we were prepared to offer Benfica and get him fully owned and permanent, then we get a rested fresh class addition to the squad, who will be grateful to be here!
39 Posted 05/01/2008 at 00:21:43
i think he is, as you say, world class and could take us to another level with his energy, passing range and box to box style of play... I hope with all my blue heart Moyesey is working on this as we speak...
I am amazed with have no competition for his signature tho?.......... Can people confirm he is now ?fully owned? by valencia?... I know it is the general consensus he is but is anyone 100% sure?
40 Posted 05/01/2008 at 01:29:13
I’m of the firm opinion that if Fernandes did anything dishonourable in his transfer turnaround to valencia then Moyes wouldn’t have him back. So I think if he does arrive we can conclude the situation was completely out of his hands.
As far as the ownership goes, I’m not sure, but I believe that there is still a 3rd party issue. I was under the impression that valencia did not purchase the player outright.
41 Posted 05/01/2008 at 02:34:13
42 Posted 05/01/2008 at 02:55:04
Well maybe.
"YES YES YES YES YES "
Don?t tell anyone though.
43 Posted 05/01/2008 at 03:58:22
44 Posted 05/01/2008 at 04:10:19
It is rumoured that DM asked the team what they thought before progressing the move. So (I hope) it was tongue in cheek to deny all knowledge. He will be just what we need at the right time.
COYB
45 Posted 05/01/2008 at 04:23:26
Can I assume that the pigs are cleared for take off.
If we do sign him and the whole rotten mess comes down around our ears, a la VDM I will be the first to say Told Ya!.
46 Posted 05/01/2008 at 04:56:59
Same with Fernandes, if its true he’s coming back, he’s most welcome! :)
47 Posted 05/01/2008 at 05:25:55
48 Posted 05/01/2008 at 07:09:54
I’d take him back tomorrow - he’s class, and you can’t have enough of it.
COYB’s
49 Posted 05/01/2008 at 07:50:02
50 Posted 05/01/2008 at 08:43:40
51 Posted 05/01/2008 at 09:04:07
Look at the difference he made when he came to Everton last year without Cahill!!
Now we have Cahill back with Pienaar too.It can only better the midfield & the squad plus he knows Everton.We still need to sign a general possible Albeda but i think it will be Vogel.
52 Posted 05/01/2008 at 09:09:04
53 Posted 05/01/2008 at 09:17:41
my only problem would be that it means we would never play 2 up front which could see one or two of our strikers eventually getting sick of waiting for a chance and leaving!
54 Posted 05/01/2008 at 09:09:34
Despite what I’ve read this morning I will wait until he’s on the pitch with a Blue shirt on before I get any more excited.
And all that stuff about staying here or ther e- hands off he’s mine - if anyone is going to knit him a scarf it’s me....and I’ll learn how to cook and sow and do his washing and ironing, tidy his bedroom, match his socks, hang his clothes up in the wardrobe, make sure his girlfriend is good enough for him......
55 Posted 05/01/2008 at 09:39:20
I want you back
I want you back, gotta get it through to you
I want you back
If I can make you see
Only you can fill the need in me
If you walk away
You’ll regret it some day
Please stay....
56 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:27:31
Did I say YES?
(Class is permanent, form is temporary, and this boy belongs in a blue shirt.)
57 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:17:23
Well , I can dream , cant I ?
58 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:31:31
http://www.setantasports.com/en/Sport/News/Football/2008/01/05/Premier-League-Everton-in-talks-over-Fernandes/
59 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:30:12
60 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:25:45
I expect it will happen and it will be a "see before you buy" loan deal. That will allow Moyes to take a more measured decision on the player.
I am really sitting on the fence with this one; if he comes in and knuckles down, fantastic. However, if the rumours highlighted in this thread are true about his attitude, and his disco fightin’ is a sign of things to come, then ’no thanks’ because he will eat away at the great team spirit we have both on and off the pitch.
At least he’s free of that 3rd party crap now........
61 Posted 05/01/2008 at 09:46:56
In the aftermath of Manu’s subsequent transfer to Valencia, even here in Portugal people were shocked and the full story was not revealed. Now as you may appreciate, Benfica is akin to Man Utd in Portugal with a large, nationwide support, but speaking to supporters of other clubs about the Manu affair, they shrugged their shoulders and said "what do you expect? No morality... no integrity... they do what they want."
On the one hand, with the third party ownership and Benfica simply looking for the best deal for themselves, Manu had little or no choice in moving to Valencia. On the other hand, I refuse to believe that he knew nothing about what was happening behind the scenes during the week he trained with us and was the guest of honour on the Saturday at the Blackburn game before, within 24 hours, flying out and immediately signing for Valencia. So he is, IMO, culpable to some degree.
That said, given the nature of David Moyes if he now does take Manu back there is an implicit acknowledgement that he recognizes greater forces than Manu?s (possible) duplicity were at play at the time and that whatever happened in August can be put aside and forgotten.
As for Manu?s actual ability ? and I know Connor in particular is a big fan ? a brief potted history. When the Italian coach Giovanni Trapattoni spent a single season with Benfica, leading them to their first title in 11 years in 2005, Manu ? at just 18 years old ? was a regular. However, when the new manager ? Ronald Koeman ? arrived a combination of a hernia problem and some personality clash saw Manu completely overlooked by the Dutchman. Some unflattering public comments about the club by Manu also saw him portrayed as something of a hate figure by many Benfica fans, seeing him as an ?ingrate? to the club that nurtured him (along similar lines to how Rooney is perceived by some Blues?). He then came to England, first with Pompey than us, and did? ?OK?. Ironic, then, that having signed for Valencia Manu ends up with Koeman as his manager again. Given their history, it is no wonder Manu is now looking at the exit door.
Now on this site and even in this thread I have read some pretty extravagant claims about Manu ? that he is ?world class? ? ?the future of Portuguese football?. He is not. There are other contemporary Portuguese footballers of a similar and younger age who are much, MUCH more highly regarded than Manu. And I totally disagree with Connor in this thread who says that ?Manu and James Vaughan got us into Europe in that last 6 months (of last season).? Whilst I agree he had his moments, no way did he have THAT much influence and impact on our performance. Compare Manu?s half season with us to that of Steven Pienaar? and the latter is STREETS ahead of Manu in consistency, performance, willingness to work for the team, ability, impact and contribution.
In conclusion, if Moyes is OK with it, then that is good enough for me. He is a good player and would be a useful addition, but he is far, FAR from being a ?great? player. There is potential there. And given the structure of EFC at the moment, he could greatly benefit from the discipline and work ethic that is self-evident at David Moyes? Everton. Something Manu himself acknowledged at the end of his loan period with us.
62 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:57:31
63 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:29:35
I think he generally tells it how it is when the press approach him and thats why I?ll listen to what he tells us rather than some speculative, inaccurate and maybe at times unprofessional journalism.
That said, I?d love to see Manny playing for us again. He?s a rare talent and a creative player is just what we need with the loss of Pienaar and the Yak to the Africa Cup of Nations. COYB, seal the deal!!!
64 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:55:30
65 Posted 05/01/2008 at 11:02:32
66 Posted 05/01/2008 at 10:58:18
67 Posted 05/01/2008 at 11:20:54
68 Posted 05/01/2008 at 11:30:02
69 Posted 05/01/2008 at 11:07:36
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=535536
It sounds to me that Valencia are trying to get shot of Manny asap! They know that we wanted him and by making these sorts of comments (along with the very honest Jorges Mendes) it kind of puts the wheels in motion and all we have to do is pick up the phone!
But if we take him we will in effect by promoting him to other ’top’ European teams who will be ablw to afford his ludicrous 60mil Euro buy out clause - or whatever it was. Be under no illusion that Fernandes will ever become a permanent Everton player. Valencia are just trying to stiff us AGAIN and at the very least they will be putting him in the shop window without having to take the risk of putting him in their starting 11. Also, doesn’t he still have third party ownership? Wasn’t that one of the aspects that made got him signed to Valencia in the first place and then there will obviously be all the complications (and expense) that goes with that.
I’m not saying that he wouldn’t be a good addition to out squad but how many of you would have Barmby back? If he’d wanted to play for Everton he could have signed after he’d PROMISED Moyes and BK that he was going to. I say fuck him.
Anyway, I think its all irrelevant - as I said I see this as Valencia just trying to put a deal on us that sounds quite attractive. But, and I’ll probably eat my words on this before the end of the day, I don’t think Moyes will take him.
70 Posted 05/01/2008 at 11:18:49
71 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:08:28
It says to me that Moyes does’t blame fernandez for the end of season fiasco, which is good enough for me, especially with the African nations just about to start.
72 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:06:17
73 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:07:44
74 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:13:34
75 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:25:16
However, you can’t ignore the issues with attitude and the fact he has been ostracised at previous clubs. Add to that the 3rd party ownership crap (which I feel deeply uneasy about) and the large price tag should we want to make the deal permanent, and it doesn’t look such a sweet deal.
I still believe this lad is a talent, but a club like ours can’t afford to gamble too much. The big 4 can buy "throw away" players, spending 10m and if he doesn’t work out so what. We can’t do that.
Tread carefully Davey, this one could be booby trapped!
COYB!
76 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:28:57
77 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:43:09
"He is a great player and could be with us soon," Ross told Antena 1. "I think it will be until the end of the season.
78 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:07:42
Once bitten etc.
Hope/expect that IF it happens he has a toe curling press conference to explain his side of the story.
And IF he does come, hide your watches...
79 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:00:03
I am a big fan of Fernandes and I’d love to see him back. Its unfair to compare Pienaar and Fernandes. You fail to mention how long Pienaar took to adapt whereas Fernandes adapted well straight away. Pienaar has had 23 games to settle whereas Fernandes had 9/10 games. In those games I thought he was consistent. He had atleast 2 man of the match performances against Arsenal and Spurs and played to a good level in the rest of him matches. Thats not saying I dont rate Pienaar. I think Pienaar’s excellent and gives the team things Fernandes just doesn’t. Sign them both I say.
80 Posted 05/01/2008 at 12:59:30
81 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:20:00
If not, haven't the Premier League outlawed 3rd party ownership?
82 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:00:27
I just want to understand something here. Currently, Manny has made only a handful of substitute appearances for Valencia this season, after costing them £12 million. Valencia currently sit 7th in their league. He is certainly not in form. Given his price range, and the fact he left us (yes he did, he had a choice, nobody can be made to play for a club they dont want to play for) is this really ’the one’ who will bridge that gap?
He played for us around 8 times, and for Pompey about 8 too. I personally think we should take our time with this one, are there other midfielders out there in same price bracket who would be a better signing?
One thing I would like to point out though, is that there are some people clambering for him coming back, after him playing only a few games for us. These people also criticised other subjects on this site for ’not looking at other options’, but are willing to jump in feet first here by bringing in an expensive player on loan.
My personal belief is that we should be looking for someone else. I am not doubting Manny’s ’potential’, he has showns signs of a good player. But for £12 million, Everton want the finished article. And more importantly, someone who wants to play for Everton Football Club.
83 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:23:31
84 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:27:18
If he comes back then he has to prove himself again. I’m a big fan of his but I won’t be lenient on him. He has to perform and earn a stay. But you’ve got to give him a chance to do this.
Who else is out there? Diaby and Diarra are also potential. Fernandes is probably more experienced than both and more the finished article. Arshavin won’t join us and he isn’t proven in this league. Downing is a decent player but not in Fernandes’s league and would also cost a fortune because he is English. I just don’t see anyone. We won’t spend 12 million in January so a loan would be perfect. I actually dont think int will be 12 million. On some articles it said Valencia bought him out right for 12-15 million. Ronald Koeman hates him and will want to get rid of him as soon as possible.
No one knows the situation that happened so no one can really comment. I haven’t got any idea what happened so for me to say anything would be lying. According to our board he fucked us off but according to Alan Irvine the deal just couldn’t be done due to third party ownership. Who do you believe? I’d personally rather believe Alan Irvine but thats just my opinion.
Anyway, I’m off to the match in half an hour so we’ll leave it at that. COYB
85 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:36:54
If we lose him in the summer again but keep our form going through till may then so be it, we can then look at Asharvin and the like.
86 Posted 05/01/2008 at 13:17:58
After we signed Fernandes (at the end of January ? he did not play a single game for us in that month), our complete playing record during his time with us was:
P W D L PTS
14 6 5 3 23
Manu?s own playing history with us is actually very, VERY limited. In the NINE starts he had for us ? that is correct, just NINE starts ? he was substituted in four of them:
P W D L PTS
9 4 2 3 14
Of our four games in February, he was a non-playing sub against the ?poo and started in our other three games, being subbed in two of them, scoring against Watford. We had two games in March. He played 90 minutes in both. For most of April he was injured and missed four consecutive games. He then started the final two games of that month ? both losses away to WHU and home to United. He was subbed after an hour at the Hammers and scored against United. We had just two games in May ? home to Pompey and away to Chelsea. He was substituted on 75 mins against Chelsea.
During his time with us, WITHOUT him in the side our record reads:
P W D L PTS
5 2 3 0 9
All of this clearly indicates to me that he did NOT make the difference you claim in ensuring a European place.
Nor do I think it is unfair to compare Pienaar and Fernandes. I do, I can, I will. The criteria we are using here is how each has impacted and benefited the team ? and I am firmly of the opinion that Pienaar?s level of performance and overall contribution is far, far greater than Manu?s ever was. I do not accept your suggestion that Pienaar took longer took to adapt than Manu. Within SECONDS of coming on as sub in the opening game of the season against Wigan he was largely instrumental in setting up Victor?s winning goal. SP has clearly been one of the players of the season ? something you yourself recognized a few days ago when you described him as rapidly becoming your favourite player.
Now like you, I like them both and I would have no objections to seeing them both at the club, as OUR players, on long term contracts. But I continue to dispute your claim as to how great an impact Manu had in his time with us last year. He is a good player, not a great one. There is potential, but there is also a troubled history with Manu ? not necessarily always of his own making ? and right now (IMHO) Pienaar appears a far better prospect and asset than Manu.
87 Posted 05/01/2008 at 14:18:06
End of the season Moyes as enough money to make a few signings and keep one of his on loan players.
If Fernandes does come on loan would you want him to keep Pienaar or Fernandes?
88 Posted 05/01/2008 at 14:15:05
I really like the guy, I think what happened in the summer was not of his doing and if Moyes can get him for long enough he’ll get the best out of him like with Pienaar, Arteta, Yak etc
89 Posted 05/01/2008 at 14:39:51
I thought he was a good player but prone to moments where he would go missing during a game. We all want class in our football team but we also want the same work ethos that we have now in all our current players. We don?t want a Barton on our hands (perhaps exaggeration as I don?t think he?s that much of a fool). Let Mr Moyes and Co. work their magic as they have so far done! COYB!!
90 Posted 05/01/2008 at 16:30:00
91 Posted 05/01/2008 at 16:43:51
Oh hang on... now it?s 91!!!
92 Posted 05/01/2008 at 17:30:19
93 Posted 05/01/2008 at 17:48:30
94 Posted 05/01/2008 at 18:40:06
That Moyes is a liar? That he actually doesn’t want Manu? That this is being imposed on him by the board? That we deliberately lost to Oldham today? That he is only going to sign Manu now to deflect attention from the Cup defeat?
Jeez... the cynicism of some people...
95 Posted 05/01/2008 at 19:46:55
Pienaar has had alot more games to show his worth to the team whereas Fernandes on his few chances showed what a good player he was. Pienaar took a while to adapt. Yes he was involved in the Wigan goal but then he went missing for a few weeks. His first start against Bolton was hit and miss. He looked good on the ball but the physical side of the game definatly surprised him and his crossing was also poor. Pienaar for me only started to show his potential against Larissa AE and since then he’s shown alot of quality and consistency. Before that he was having a good game (Boro at home) and an average game (Newcastle away). Even Pienaar himself admitted on Everton TV that the pace of the football was hard for him when he first arrived and he needed time.
Fernandes’s situation was different. He came in against Blackburn at 20 and impressed straight away. He was excellent for the first 70 minutes until he tired. His next 7 starts for me where consistent. He and Carsley where excellent against Arsenal in the 1-0 win and Moyes’s was booed off for taking Fernandes off against Spurs when he was our most creative and positive player.
He was also played out of position during his spell hear. He played on the right wing against Watford and he played on the left against Chelsea and Man utd. Although being a very central played he still played well out wide. He also scored 2 goals in that time which is not bad at all.
The there’s also the fitness issue. Fernandes was not fit when he joined us. He hadn’t had a pre-season due to injury and he wasn’t allowed to play 3 games in a row with Portsmouth because of the contract agreement with Benfica. So really he was behind on fitness when he joined us and hadn’t had any momentum in terms of playing games. Pienaar had had a pre-season and had come in tip top condition.
As ive said you just can’t compare there situations. If they had both played a similar amount of games then yes but they haven’t so it would be unfair to say who had more of an impact.
I not saying Fernandes is better than Pienaar nor am I saying Pienaar is better than Fernandes. There completely different and would compliment our team in different ways. I’d love to see them linking up together along with Cahill, Carsley, Arteta and Osman. I say make it happen.
96 Posted 05/01/2008 at 22:29:42
I would love to see Manny back in an Everton shirt, but your posts today suggest someone somewhere isn?t telling the whole truth. Wouldn?t you be cynical too?
97 Posted 05/01/2008 at 22:22:08
98 Posted 05/01/2008 at 22:31:30
Anway what I came on to say was when ever we are linked with players I go on YouTube and have a look at clips of these players. The clips I have seen of Manny give the impression of a player of with real quality and class, blessed with skill and the ability to beat a man or 5 and can also score wonder goals, a raw talent of pure potentail.
However this is exactly the kind of things i would of said about McFadden when he first arrived at 19, but he never showed his full potential which is worrying if the same thing should happen to Manny for an £8 millon player, at least Faddy was only a million, its a bit too much of a gamble for my liking.
99 Posted 06/01/2008 at 00:57:27
I repeat, the criteria on which the two are being judged (in our exchange) is the IMPACT either player has made to the benefit of the team. Choose any nine games you wish that Pienaar has played for Everton and I would suggest his IMPACT to the benefit of the team has been far greater than the nine games Manu played for us. Therefore, the comparison IS a fair one. Was it you yourself who recently pointed out that SP has contributed more assists than Mikel this season??
Having earlier reminded you that within seconds of coming on in his first appearance against Wigan he set up Victor?s winner, you counter that his first start against Bolton was ?hit and miss?? but fail to mention his incisive pass set AJ away to lay it on a plate for the Yak to score on his debut. You state that Pienaar was in an out in his early games, yet claim Manu impressed straight away. I and many others disagree with that assessment and it has been widely commented on that Manu did go missing in many games after a 30 second cameo of brilliance. You are clutching at straws when you say he was not fit when he joined us. He DID have a pre-season with Pompey and DID play regularly for them.
I, too, am not saying Fernandes is better than Pienaar nor am I saying Pienaar is better than Fernandes. I am simply arguing that Pienaar HAS had a greater impact to the benefit of the team then Manu did in his time with us? and the stats, I would suggest, support my standpoint over yours.
As for Simon Templeman, your follow up post is almost as equally ridiculous as your original post. My detailed post on the Manu situation displays no cynicism whatsoever ? just a pragmatic overview of the possible position of the different parties at the time of Manu?s move to Valencia. At no point do I suggest or imply anyone lied or failed to tell the truth. I simply state that I do not find it credible that Manu did not know of moves behind the scenes to transfer him to Valencia whilst he was training with us. A perfectly legitimate observation, given the little facts we do know of his about face.
100 Posted 06/01/2008 at 02:44:25
Fernandes 8 games where against Blackburn, Spurs, Watford, Sheffield utd, Arsenal, Man utd, Portsmouth and Chelsea. Out of those eight games I would say he was a contender for man of the match in both the Arsenal and Spurs games, had good games against Portsmouth, Watford and Blackburn and was pretty average against Sheffield Utd and Man utd. I personally would say over both players eight games Fernandes impressed me more and had more of an impact on games.
And I’m saying that whole heartedly. I go to games both home and away and then I watch them on TV again. It gives me more of a perspective on the games and helps me to see how we performed as a team and as individuals. In my opinion Fernandes performed better than Pienaar.
Yes I was the one who pointed out that Pienaar has been our most creative player this season and he has been more creative than Fernandes. What you have got to understand is that there roles in the team are completely different. Pienaar plays wide left in a 5 man midfield. He’s naturally a more attacking player than Fernandes and has the option of an extra man to cover him in midfield. Fernandes is less attacking and a more all round midfielder. He played in a 4 man midfield with Lee Carsley and had to do his fair share of defensive duties aswell as start attacks. As I’ve said there different types of players who accommodate different roles in the team.
What do you expect from Fernandes? Do you expect him to dominate games at the age of 21. I’m not that unrealistic. I try to compare to our own players. Our best midfielder goes missing in games. Arteta doesn’t turn up for the majority of away games and doesn’t play well when the big guns come to town. There have also been times where he goes missing for long periods against the lower level sides. Pienaar is also not an all action midfielder and he does go missing during games. I’m not saying Fernandes doesn’t because he did on occasions like Pienaar and Arteta.
I just don’t agree with this thirty second cameo bollocks. People try and make out like all he did was a little skill against Arsenal and then went invisible..........bullshit. He had excellent distribution, he was skillful and intelligent, he got involved physically, he dictated alot of our attacks and got himself a few goals. He really impressed me in terms of all round game and judging by the majority of Everton sites and Forums most also found him to be an impressive player. We actually started to play some impressive football aswell which was down to Arteta, Fernandes and Osman.
I’m not actually clutching to straws when I say he wasn’t fit. Both he and Moyes’s admitted this themselves. I found this quote aswell:
"Fernandes signed on loan to Portsmouth with a deal agreed for a permanent transfer of approximately £7 million if he fully recovered from his groin injury. A transfer was first proposed in late July 2006 but could not be concluded as Fernandes was still suffering from the injury and failed a club medical twice. In an unusual move, Benfica allowed the player to be treated at Portsmouth in the hope that he would regain fitness before the September 1st transfer deadline. After five weeks at the club, it was projected that he still needed two months recovery and so the initial loan deal with a future fee was agreed."
101 Posted 06/01/2008 at 03:17:58
Everton should have some leverage after his disastrous stay at Valencia, so:
1. A loan with an iron clad exclusive option to buy at the end of his spell
2. Crow bar him out of this 3rd party nonsense...Lord knows how all that works
3. A fee a fair shake below that ridiculous 12 mill price tag
Anything less, not worth the risk.
Also, how do you pronounce this Manu business. Man U? I don’t think I could abide that...
102 Posted 06/01/2008 at 09:21:10
In the games you have selected to compare the two, I would call it a dead heat ? both had their moments, both were ordinary. I could also suggest that whereas Manu had the benefit of already having played half a season in England with Portsmouth, Pienaar came ?cold? having also been marginalised in Germany the previous season.
To try and bolster your argument, you state that Pienaar ?was being slated as shit and lightweight up until around the Boro game?. That was little more than throwaway, stereotypical profiling from some posters on this forum. Others were equally saying that there were glimpses in his game that we had a good footballer on our hands. Even you admit that when saying Pienaar is ?our most creative player this season and he has been more creative than Fernandes.
You ask me what do I expect from Fernandes. Let me tell you? I expect him to be technically competent as many Portuguese footballers are. I expect he would improve our squad. I expect him to conform to the ethos and work ethic that is very much part and parcel of David Moyes? Everton. I expect him to develop and improve. I do not expect him, as you again ask me, to dominate games.
Implicit in that last statement of yours ? ?do you expect Fernandes to dominate games at the age of 21? ? is an admission from you that YOU don?t expect him to dominate games. So? are you effectively agreeing with me? That Manu?s impact was not as great as you originally claimed in this thread??
I have already clearly stated that I would be very happy to have both Pienaar and Manu signed up as OUR players, so again, I am not disputing the lad?s qualities. What I do dispute is your claim that he made as great an impact as you state. You will hear no complaints from me if he returns to the fold, but I continue to say ? and this is with the benefit of my close association with Portugal ? that he is a good player, but no where near a great player. If he was, he WOULD be dominating games even at the tender age of 21 and it would be impossible to drop him (as Koeman has done).
103 Posted 06/01/2008 at 12:29:10
Some good interesting posts there mate. Keep it up.
104 Posted 06/01/2008 at 13:13:48
Cheers matey...
105 Posted 06/01/2008 at 13:25:55

