The Mail Bag
Super Lee ....
Comments (7)
I really think that we should hand Lee Carsley a longer deal in the summer, rather than risk losing him to a lesser club who will offer longer terms. Like Wigan last year, there will be plenty of clubs willing to offer him at least a 2-year deal.
I hope we dont keep giving him a year extensions and run the risk, He has proved for the last 3 years how vital he is for us and there is no-one we have that is it fit to lace his boots in the position he plays. I cant even think of a player we could get who is either....
I'd give him a new 2-year deal without any questions asked as there is no sign at all of him starting to show his age, you'd think he was in his mid 20's the shifts he puts in, he loves the club and I think we should keep this squad together for as long as we can. (if you have Evertontv look at his interview from the Wigan game, HILARIOUS!!)
I think he's a legend and he is as important to us and the way we play, as Joleon, Tim, Yak etc is ........
Ben Nichols, Posted 22/01/2008 at 09:08:06
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 22/01/2008 at 14:28:44
But, I’m also a fan of the policy that older players (over 31) only get a year contract, keeps them on thier toes, ensures we dont keep dead wood. If the player is good enough (and fit) enough then they will sign it.
Win win situation
3 Posted 22/01/2008 at 14:37:58
I agree that at his age a one-year extension is sufficient......if he wants to stay and Everton want him then another club coming in doesn’t mean that’s a problem...as was the case last year with Wigan/Carsley.
That said, he does put in terrific performances....and he won’t be easily replaced whenever that time comes.
4 Posted 22/01/2008 at 16:19:44
I'd say yes.
5 Posted 22/01/2008 at 15:53:59
The Guardian’s Andy Hunter gave him MoM on Sunday - "his influence in both attack and defence enabled Everton to wrest control in the second half ... That tenacious attitude proved key to his side’s victory." Sounds about right.
Policy or not, I would trust Moyes to do everything necessary to keep Cars with us for the next two years at least.
6 Posted 22/01/2008 at 18:17:44
The case for Carsley is he has proved it for us over 5 years, and like Parky, it shows how important he is when he is injured. Just look at his stats:
? 01/02 8(0) league games at the end of the season ? finished 15th
? 02/03 21(3) league games, scored 3 ? finished 7th
? 03/04 15(6) league games, injuries and in/out of the side ? finished 17th
? 04/05 35(1) league games, scored 4 ? finished 4th with Carsley a key player
? 05/06 3(2) league games, injured and come coincided with a late surge ? finished 11th
? 06/07 38(0) league games, ever present, finished 6th
? 07/08 18(1) league games, currently 4th.
Is it coincidence that every time Carsley has long consistent runs we are right up there, I think not.
The case for Parkinson includes something that Lee will probably not obtain: an FA Cup winners medal (well there?s always next year I suppose). Parky?s stats:
? 94/5 32(2) league games, finished 14th (22 teams), and won the FA Cup
? 95/6 28 league games, scored 3 goals, finished 6th (20 teams)
? 96/7 28 league games, finished 15th
The 96/7 season cemented Parkison?s legend. In 1996, the calendar year, only Man Utd got more points than us. At Christmas we were flying and looking at another top 6 finish. But then, Parkinson, Kanchelskis and Hinchcliffe all got injured and we went into free fall. Parkinson did come back, but we now know he was playing with injections and that explains why he was not the same player. The knee broke down again before the season was out and Big Slow Joe?s career was over at 26.
Both have to some extent been plagued by injuries; in six seasons Carsley has got past 30 games twice and in three seasons Parky did it once. Parky was perhaps stronger in the tackle, bigger and more physically imposing. He also filled in more at the back and rarely crossed the half way line despite having a lethal shot (Norwich in the Cup anyone?) Carsley has done it over a greater period of time and has been the driving force in a team that has surged to 7th, 4th, 6th and once again finds itself back in 4th. He may have the chance tomorrow to get himself to Wembley and get his hands on a winners medal.
Joe Parkinson was a great player, he would have got better, but these type of players who are big, strong, tenacious, ferocious, tireless, and more, rarely retire without being plagued by injures. Hard tackles usually result in picking up many knocks, and they take their toll. These kind of players usually do go the way of Parkinson if they are any good. So in some ways you have to hand it to Carsley and applaud the way he?s dealt with injuries and particularly the way he?s come back from injuries. At the start of last season I really did doubt whether lee would be able to be as good. Surely at the back of his mind is that one stray boot or one mistimed tackled would result in a injury and retirement and as Parkinson knows to well these type of players, key as they may well be, are low down on the list of remuneration. So I have to give it Carsley, who I?d describe as a smaller, leaner, faster more mobile version of Big Joe, but obviously lacks Parkinson?s ability to injure players (Juninho in the four nil demolition anyone). But both are great players in their own right.
7 Posted 22/01/2008 at 18:29:19


1 Posted 22/01/2008 at 14:26:23