The Mail Bag
Howard: Shot-stopper
Comments (44)
There?s not a lot of debate on these pages about the goalkeeper. I think Howard is piss-poor. As a shot stopper he?s ok, but that is it. Virtually every other aspect of goalkeeping finds him wanting. Afraid of crosses, terrible kicker, will never save a penalty, quick to point the finger at those around him,etc...
Don?t laugh, but I think P Robinson is at the same stage of his career that D James was when he acquired the Calamity tag. Robinson has deservedly lost his job at Spurs this year, but I am sure he will bounce back. In the past he has proven to be a fantastic keeper on his day, and I find it hard to believe that he has completely lost it.
I don?t think for a second that DM will change his No1 in the summer, but in the long run the Yankee is going to cost us...
On a related note...I am still scratching my head wondering how in the hell Richard Wright ever made it to the professional ranks. Thank fuck he?s not still at GP!
Sean Condon, Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:03:39
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:18:14
3 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:20:08
Howard has been class for us!
4 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:16:38
Robinson is a joke.
Nuff said.
5 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:24:21
6 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:25:28
Richard Wright was a good keeper when he played week in week out. He is a confidence player and if memory serves may still hold the club record for consecutive clean sheets in the season that we finished fourth. Injury lost him his place and Martyn and Howard with the young signings meant that better keepers came along and he never had a chance to regain his place.
7 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:35:02
8 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:41:43
9 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:49:22
It’s you who is ’piss poor’. Howard equalled Big Nev’s record number of clean sheets last season. If that makes him ’piss poor’ then my name’s Fred Fanakapan.
10 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:52:45
YOU FUCKING BEAUTY! Unlucky Yak and Joey, you did your country proud, but thank fuck you’re coming back!..now let’s charge toward top 4 finish and CL glory!
11 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:57:52
How can anyone question Tim Howard (except his dodgy kicking which no-one can argue but I don?t really care how dodgy as long as goes away from our 18 yard box).
Sean, you compare Paul Robinson with David James and seem to presume he will automatically have a similar turnaround. Howard has already had his turnaround and we are the beneficiaries of his dodgy spell at Man Utd.
I had my doubts we could get someone as solid a Nigel Martin (the first really solid ?keeper since Big Nev) but am glad to say Howard is an utter legend for us.
I?ve seen some of your posts here before Sean and they?re not usually this absurd so I don?t believe you are a RS in toffee?s clothing but seriously mate, better go to Specsavers!
12 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:13:30
In 11 league games he’s conceded just 7 goals - 2 against Man Utd, 4 against Arsenal and an Own Goal!!
I say get Steve Simonsen back he’s doing a fine job at Stoke I think!
I honestly think some of these people are wind-up merchants!
13 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:15:58
14 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:12:37
We haven’t particularly had a settled back four this season have we? We started with Yobo and Stubbs, then Yobo and Lescott, then Yobo and Jagielka and now Lescott and Jagielka. There’s been no consistency in either the centre back or fullback positions but all in all we have coped and Howard has been very good.
Always looking to blame others? A goalkeeper is supposed to be your second captain therefore if the back four make a mistake they get bollocked. Its called leadership and Howard is excellent at it. The Metalist Kharkiv game springs to mind where he was absolutely excellent at controlling his back four. Stubbs and Yobo where dire as where pretty much the whole team and Howard calmed them down and made some excellent saves.
An underrated keeper in my eyes and one of the best in the Premiership. How is he going to cost us? Hasn’t made alot of mistakes this season or last and I hope that continues.
15 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:17:32
I like him, but he needs to improve his decision making on crosses or I think he’ll remain a UEFA class keeper when we want to be getting Champions League class in.
16 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:18:50
17 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:10:16
Yes he's a good shot stopper, but he won?t go for crosses, his kicking is poor and his positioning for back passes is awful - Lescott won?t pass back because Howard doesn?t inspire confidence. He won't kick even a yard outside his area.
Watch him next time ? look at his weaknesses and then think again. He does not dominate his penalty area as a class keeper should.
18 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:23:28
Unless of course he was talking about Frankie Howard
19 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:27:35
20 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:28:06
Seriously, to call Tim piss poor is a bit much?
Perhaps I would agree that he?s not so keen on coming out for crosses but that?s about it.
Yak and Yobo are coming home! After the stomach churning events at Blackburn, some good news at last and Simon Davies did us a big favour down at Fulham too! Come on you Blues
21 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:52:12
Now I know I´m not alone.
Terrible on crosses,ask SWP´s.
Clean sheets,check the form of Yobo,Lescot,Jags,Cars.Well said Dave.I hope this us not the Peter Fearon I went to school with ´cos that is garbage.
Mr Talbot,have you alredy forgotten about N.Martin?
22 Posted 03/02/2008 at 19:57:23
You have my total sympathy.Howard is the Duncan Ferguson of Goalies - a legend before he’s a keeper.
I said before the transfer window that a top class goalie should be our priority to get us to the next level and was similarly castigated.
Those people obviously never saw Neville Southall at his best who was almost singlehandedly at times responsible for us winning a lot of games.
Howard is a great shot stopper and usually quite good but far too inconsistent and erratic for me.
I know he’s kept a good few clean sheets but when you have a good back four and five in midfield you’re entitled to keep clean sheets.
23 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:09:17
24 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:10:36
PS In the meantime, let’s stick with the goalkeeper that Man U. reluctantly let go and didn’t want to face on his first season with us.
25 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:36:34
26 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:33:26
27 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:29:33
Better yet, why don’t we go for Kenny from Sheffield United?
28 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:36:48
Ok, his kicking is poor and he can SOMETIMES be indecisive with crosses but what about his spring, agility, anticipation, reactions and safe hands?
For God’s sake - who is better in the PL? Cech maybe? Can’t believe this post!
29 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:33:07
I watch him every week mate home and away and I can tell you he’s a very capable keeper.
JayHarris, thats got to be one of the worst posts I’ve ever read. Howard a legend? Get a grip of yourself lad. He’s our first choice keeper and one that the majority of Evertonians rate. Its not like where over rating him or giving him the status of legend is it?
Comparing him to Neville Southall is just not fair at all because Southall was one of the best keepers ever in his prime and played in our best ever team. Howard isn’t at Neville Southall’s level and never will be but few are.
Who would you have bought in then to get us to the next level? And be realistic because the best in the world wouldn’t join Everton.
If Howard is erratic then he’d make alot of mistakes and the fact of the matter is he doesn’t. If he was erratic then he wouldn’t keep those clean sheets. Don’t give this bollocks about his defense keeping all the clean sheets because its a team effort and everyone does there job.
30 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:49:16
i actually blame toffeeweb for allowing that ridiculous post to be placed on the site.
howard has been fantastic for us, apart from the arsenal game i can not remember him making a mistake whilst in goal for us. and that arsenal mistake was debatable to as wether lescott made the shout
31 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:59:10
Robinson has no command of his area, reads the game poorly, cannot organise his back line & has loss the confidence of every defender in the country.
Robinson was a flash in the pan, who took advantage of a lack of English goalkeepers. The past two years Robinson?s been found out and he cannot cope at Howard?s level.
Another slow news day! Viv is right this thread is rubbish!
32 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:58:26
oh and his kicking is very good
33 Posted 03/02/2008 at 20:42:38
34 Posted 03/02/2008 at 21:54:09
"Do I trust Tim Howard in goal?"
Yes, absolutely. As much as any goalkeeper we have had since Nev, with the exception of Nigel Martyn.
35 Posted 03/02/2008 at 21:49:52
Oh I forgot; we?re not supposed to examine the abilities of our players quite so closely, are we....
FFS, this is a discussion forum. If you not interested in discussing the topic, please just refrain from contributing. Okay!
36 Posted 03/02/2008 at 21:53:40
The clean sheets? That?s Lescott and co..
37 Posted 03/02/2008 at 21:57:45
’Cause that’s the only way to explain this outrageous post......
38 Posted 03/02/2008 at 21:55:00
39 Posted 03/02/2008 at 22:57:17
40 Posted 03/02/2008 at 23:28:57
41 Posted 03/02/2008 at 23:51:43
Sadly there?s no filter to show a true blue. I know a couple of blues who go on the RS sites and stir them up while pretending to be reds - how sad is that . . . .
Keep up the great site
42 Posted 04/02/2008 at 00:15:08
Michael, I know you like to say you support all views on this site but time and again you come out swinging when a positive majority disagree with a negative poster. There seems to be two sets of rules - anyone being critical can say what they like (including the name-calling and slagging you supposedly disbar) and anyone who disagrees gets bollocked by you as being oversensitive. You say it?s a forum. Are the responding posters not afforded the same freedom of speech?
Recently this has stepped up a notch, with a long list of things "Moyes apologists" - seemingly anyone who doesn?t agree with Tony Marsh - aren?t allowed to mention - including where we were before he arrived, where we are now, the financial lay of the land in the premiership and pretty much anything that puts our current position (sorry, not supposed to mention that either, am I?) into any type of context.
If someone describes Tim Howard as piss-poor why get haughty when people use the same language in response? Why is the dripping sarcasm fine when employed by you and Tony (?brainless knee-jerk merchants??) but rude and ?off-topic? when people respond in kind?
43 Posted 04/02/2008 at 12:34:50
44 Posted 04/02/2008 at 17:53:48


1 Posted 03/02/2008 at 18:16:01
Utter rubbish