The Mail Bag
Manny doubts
Comments (29)
Interesting news, especially for those who, like me, are keen on signing the potential star that is Manuel Fernandes: this evening Valencia have sacked their Spanish Cup-winning manager Ronald Koeman. He has left a team that is 2 points above the relegation zone and experiencing financial difficulties in relation to their new stadium, which, incidentally, looks like a supersized doughnut (possibly designed by H. Simpson Ltd ).
Anyway, to get to the gist of my submission, all this could have implications regarding Manny's possible transfer: Would Valencia be more or less likely to reduce his valuation? Will the new manager want to retain him? Would the player be keen to join us? Interesting times ahead...
Phil Bell, Posted 21/04/2008 at 22:36:46
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 22/04/2008 at 08:27:37
3 Posted 22/04/2008 at 08:36:38
4 Posted 22/04/2008 at 08:54:01
Plus he’s still half owned by a third party company. That, plus the fact that his transfer fee would be closer to the £8m mark, plus the fact that he’s not been great this time round means it’s unlikely we’ll sign him permanently.
Ideal situation for me is to take him on a season long loan again next season, with first refusal to buy. That way they’d be no excuses about injuries causing bad form and we’d really see what he’s made of.
5 Posted 22/04/2008 at 08:59:07
I think Fernandes’s future lies either with us or someone else but not Valencia.
6 Posted 22/04/2008 at 09:44:18
He is better then Andersson at Man Utd!
7 Posted 22/04/2008 at 09:44:41
I would structure a deal that would suit both parties. 5-6 million pre-agreed fee, subject to another year long loan with us paying his wages.
If he fulfills his undoubted potential, that would be a small price to pay for a potential world class player.
8 Posted 22/04/2008 at 09:51:30
9 Posted 22/04/2008 at 11:37:59
This season was a few games in before we finished the signings which cost us points no doubt. It is bloody depressing.
10 Posted 22/04/2008 at 11:46:30
11 Posted 22/04/2008 at 12:23:59
12 Posted 22/04/2008 at 12:29:52
13 Posted 22/04/2008 at 12:45:28
But it all comes down to the budget we get. If where getting £25-30 million this season then I?d buy Manny but if it's £15-20 then it could be a gamble as we do need depth aswell.
14 Posted 22/04/2008 at 12:58:02
This guy has some talent but nowhere near enough commitment and balls to make a real go of centre mid in England. Even last season when he was fully fit and firing on all cylinders, he failed to dominate games. Anything more than £5m is extravagence that we just can’t afford. I suspect that Valencia are paying the £12m over the life of player’s contract (as is usual on the continent) so would still owe an unhealthy chunk of that fee. Therefore irrespective of how strapped they may be, Valencia wouldn’t let him go for anything less that £8m - £9m so that MUST rule us out. Please!
15 Posted 22/04/2008 at 13:06:51
16 Posted 22/04/2008 at 13:08:28
With the Eoro getting stronger I doubt whether Valencia would accept 5 million I think it would take at least 10 to get him.
IMO he’s worth that.He’ the only world class central MF I ’ve seen at GP recently and could be the catalyst for getting rid of hoofball.
If we had the money to buy him last August we should have the money with interest now plus the 5 mill plus from Faddy.
BK has no excuses this time.
17 Posted 22/04/2008 at 13:11:23
I’m also convinced that we are not gonna get much more to spend that 20 million (i.e about what we had last year) and I would concentrate on looking elsewhere. Especially since we have been linked at least two more quality midfielders who really could do the job in Arshavin and Kallstrom. I reckon they would cost about 8 million each which leaves enough to look at either Bradley or Howard. All those names tick a lot of boxes for me, especially Arshavin since he has looked good in so many different positions this season i.e striker, centre mid or wing.
I’m not too worried about the right back slot yet since a lot of people seem to think that Gosling is the man to fill that slot long term with Hibbert or Neville in reserve.
I think that is what we might see, three signings of quality rather than quantity.
18 Posted 22/04/2008 at 13:18:26
My understanding of the original Manny deal was that to buy both halves was gonna by something like 18 million. I just can’t see Valencia accepting anything less than 10-12. I also was on the the understanding that it was the Valencia chairman or someone like that who brokered the deal giving the impression that it was them that wanted him but Koeman that didn’t.
I think for all his talent he represents a risk at the moment and while his performances are been improving with some flashes of genius I’m not convince he is showing signs that Everton is where he wants to be. Arshavin and Kallstrom have both been quoted as being very interested in coming to us, more so Arshavin. I think that both would be available for 8 million and I believe that Arshavin is a more versatile player than manny (albeit he is not a direct comparison as he is more of an attacking player).
19 Posted 22/04/2008 at 13:33:38
No contest vs. MF!
20 Posted 22/04/2008 at 13:42:49
At Everton we can attract two types of players. Good experienced players like Pienaar and Arteta or potentially excellent players like Fernandes. I personally would take a gamble on Fernandes. Even if he doesn’t reach his potential he still is alot better than what we currently have.
Fernandes is the only Everton player since the 80s who has been able to dictate games when he’s in full flow. I watched the Arsenal game not so long ago of last season and there where spells in the game where Fernandes was dictating. Anyone who watched us at Goodison against Chelsea in the second half when he moved centrally would also have witnessed a midfielder demanding the ball and trying to push us forward.
Yes I agree he isn’t an aggressive player and his laid back attitude sometimes gives you the feeling that he doesn’t care but you can’t doubt the lads ability or willingness to get on the ball.
He drops deep and demands the ball of the back line and that is something we haven’t got in our team. Arteta doesn’t do it as shown in the Liverpool game when he played centrally and Osman doesn’t do it either.
He’s worth alot more than 5 million. Championship players go for 5 million and Fernandes is far from a Championship player.
21 Posted 22/04/2008 at 14:02:47
22 Posted 22/04/2008 at 13:58:13
But he doesn’t dictate games: Derby (one pass doesn’t mean he dictates games), Birmingham, West Ham, Brann etc etc.
I agree that others don’t pick up the mantle, but you can’t use that as an argument. Just because others don’t, doesn’t excuse him - he’s our playmaker after all. MF is only the player he is - if that’s controlling games consistently then he’s a PL player, if he isn’t (and he doesn’t) then he’s not the player for us at this stage in our development. We’ve already got enough of those that don’t work that way, we can’t afford to splash £8 - £9m on another.
23 Posted 22/04/2008 at 14:21:24
24 Posted 22/04/2008 at 14:16:52
The games you have mentioned there are tough to judge. For the Brann, Birmingham and Derby games he played on the wing for the majority of the games. Very few players dictate from the wing in world football. Zidane was one of the few who where able to do that. The West Ham game was also his first game back after three weeks out and he came on 15 minutes into the game.
I watch games after we play and there have been times where Manuel has dictated games. Arsenal last season for periods, Chelsea for periods in the first 60 minutes, his debut against Blackburn and Portsmouth in the second half second to last game of the season. I?m not saying he dominated for 90 minutes because he doesn?t but the signs where there that he is capable of doing it.
Considering he?s only 21/22 that is promising in my opinion. If Moyes does get him for a longer period then it will obviously be up to him to make Fernandes do it over 90 minutes instead of periods in games. If he can do then we could have an excellent player on our hands.
"We've already got enough of those that don't work that way, we can't afford to splash 8 - 9m on another."
Why not? Are we really going to be attracting major talent in the summer. I very much doubt it. Where just about going to finish in the Uefa Cup and there?s even doubts over that. People keep on going on about these two quality midfielders where going to buy but it won?t be the case. There are only certain players we are able to sign and not all of them are going to be quality.
I?m just trying to be realistic. Fernandes is a talented player and he?s got time on his side to adapt and nurture his talent. He could be one for now and the future. He?s also very realistic.
If Andy Johnson is worth £8.6 million and Leighton Baines is worth £6 million then I have no doubts that Fernandes is worth £8 million.
25 Posted 22/04/2008 at 15:05:19
My point about MF being the same as others who also don’t dictate games, is that if we are to spend a large chunk of our summer war chest on one player, then I’d like that player to be different to the rest. I just don’t see that MF fills this criteria and therefore spending that size of fee (and wages) on a ’HOPE’ is just too big a risk.
I supppose if he had shown something (anything) this season I may find it easier to accept.
Anyway, notwithstanding this, I’ll still be cheering my heart out for MF and everyone else to produce the win that is a must this Sunday.
26 Posted 22/04/2008 at 15:23:39
I have always said he is a deep lying play maker. His job is to play in front on the back four and bring people into the game with his passing. Sadly our long ball system of late has limited his chance of doing this but I definatly think its his style.
If you look at his passing he does have alot more vision than anyone in our team. The passes he fizzes from deep to the likes of Yakubu and Johnson’s feet are class and he is the only player in our squad who seems capable of passing long. Just my opinion like.
I agree it does depend on the budget really. As much as I rate Fernandes I don’t want to be spending half our budget on him unless where desperate. Where in need of depth so that would be stupid. If we get a reasonable budget and he is going for a reasonable price then I’d sign him.
27 Posted 22/04/2008 at 15:25:45
I would seriously love it if he shows any semblance over the next 3 games to demonstrate that these shortfall can be overcome but Moyes wont pay over the odds for him.
I’m sure he’s a fallback option in that if Moyes cant get a top flight centre midfield player (Arshavin mentioned today) then he would probably be willing to pay £6m ish and certainly not £12m now that he’s had another 6 months to see his shortfalls.
28 Posted 22/04/2008 at 17:33:49
29 Posted 25/04/2008 at 12:15:51
Chuffed about Peanuts ? love his vision and willingness to try something new.


1 Posted 22/04/2008 at 06:35:38
In defence of Koeman: He only joined Valencia in October so I don’t believe he has anything to do with them struggling financially. He managed to get them from Champions League contenders to relegation strugglers though.
And another off-topic remark: I love their new stadium design. You can call it a doughnut but I would take it over the standard league-one-type stadium design of the Kirkby-dome...