The Mail Bag
Reality Bites
Comments (25)
Now I know everyone would love us to be signing the best players in the world and I would love that as well, but reality has to step in a some stage right?
Everton are not a top European club and never have been. Domestically we're historically successful but not for many years, and as a result top European players know nothing about us and don't have any much inclination to want to join us as a result.
Any player coming to this country would prefer to live in London or play for Utd or Liverpool due to their more illustrious history.
I'm increasingly finding that an awful lot of Evertonians are quite short-sighted when it comes to transfer targets and the reality that Everton are not the big club that we like to think we are, at least not in European terms.
On that basis, players like Cahill, Arteta, Neville & Jagielka are the best we can hope for at this stage. Some European exposure next season will help to raise our profile on the continent and hopefully attract more attentnio/players for the following season.
It's time we all took a step back, stopped thinking with the heart and realised that without seeing the bigger picture we'll never reallt attain the level that we'd like.
Everton are an ex-Big Club moving in the right direction, we just have to be patient. We have a fine young manager who I believe does everything with the right intentions; sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't ? either way, he and the team should be roundly supported on all fronts.
Allan Hobbs, Posted 06/07/2007 at 12:22:33
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 06/07/2007 at 13:34:21
3 Posted 06/07/2007 at 13:23:54
think of us as being a big club any more and certainly not on the European stage.
My main gripe is not about how big we should or could become but the way we go about things when opportunities arise for us to move up the ladder a rung or two.
There is no doubt that Kenwright
is holding the club back in one of the most important era,s in English football.The money and foriegn investors coming in to the game is giving the teams out side the big 4 a chance to gate crash the party
As for David Moyes he has done a decent enough job in making things more stable but for me lacks the killer instinct to make him a top manager.The 04/05 season being painfull example.
The truth is unless Kenwright goes and we get some real money coming in to the club and a manager who is a winner we will always be going sideways instead of forwards.Thats why I personally get so frustrated.
4 Posted 06/07/2007 at 13:31:24
5 Posted 06/07/2007 at 13:51:57
6 Posted 06/07/2007 at 13:44:31
In the past couple of seasons I think BK is starting to come out of his shell a bit. He splashed descent money on AJ and is putting money out their for improved contracts for Arteta and Cahill. We now have a very good nucleus in them and the likes of Lescott, Yobo, Jagielka even if you’re not overly thrilled by the signing, and some good youngsters. Lets hope he continues to come out a bit further, Riquelme maybe? I’m only joking on that last point, but maybe that proves you right somewhat Marsh. We do need to push on a bit, but I’m comfortable knowing that we are improving, maybe just not as quickly as you would like, but it is happening.
7 Posted 06/07/2007 at 13:53:47
8 Posted 06/07/2007 at 14:12:55
Am I the only one who is really glad that we’re not taken over by foreign investment?
9 Posted 06/07/2007 at 14:07:48
10 Posted 06/07/2007 at 14:12:10
Being a relative newbie to Toffeeweb i have looked on and read with great interest the comments posted in the mailbag for a month or so now.
I’ve already started noticing certain peoples point of view and their ways of expressing (Tony Marsh and Bluenose to name but a few!!!)
Tony, that is best comment you have made that i have read on here and i totally agree with you.
BK i feel has done a good job upto now but if foreign or english investment is knocking on the door lets take the next step to at least start to be a big club again.
11 Posted 06/07/2007 at 14:24:52
All of these investors are in it to line their pockets, simple as.
How gratifying will it be when we finish above the likes of Spurs & Newcastle despite having less resources than them!
12 Posted 06/07/2007 at 14:53:15
13 Posted 06/07/2007 at 14:57:44
14 Posted 06/07/2007 at 15:00:04
15 Posted 06/07/2007 at 15:15:49
Chelsea.Russian Billionaire takes over Bingo.
Man Utd..Yankee Billionaire takes over.Bingo
Liverpool.Yankee Billionaires take over .Getting ready to shout Bingo.
Aston Villa,Man City. I dont see thier fans complaining to much either.
The truth is Eric takeovers are happening throughout the Premier League to all the big clubs and its these clubs that are doing the buisness on the pitch by bringing home the trophies.
Do you want us to miss out yet again?
Who were Chelsea before Abramovich came along?
The break away Man Utd fans who predicted doom and gloom for the club when Micheal Glazier took over look rather silly now after the Mancs lifted the league title again.
And to our lovely nieghbours with a brand new stadium on the way and signing world class strikers for £27 million. I bet those RS fans are hating every minute of this Yankee take over dont you?
I only wish we had those sort of problems to worry about mate.
16 Posted 06/07/2007 at 15:16:59
Agree that EFC remains a big club with a proud (if ya know your) history. What matters now more than ever is the future of our club. We see other clubs sell their soul to rich men from all four corners of the world in pursuit of short term quick returns. I like the fact that our Chairman is a lifelong fan, but time and again (as TM says) he misses the opportunity to take the club to the next level, close the gap just a bit on the Champions League Four. This is not just about cash, far from it. He lacks the commercial skill and the vision to make it happen and then tries to con us all with his quotes on "The Everton Way". As he’s proven he can’t do it himself, BK’s job has to be to find the right investor to take the club forward whilst protecting the history and tradition we all hold dear. I just don’t think he can or wants to let go, so for now "Nil satis nisi Top 6".
17 Posted 06/07/2007 at 15:46:35
18 Posted 06/07/2007 at 15:43:46
WHAT? Renember us finish 17th, 13th 11th..... come on we are going players, but obviously we dont have as much money as some clubs. We are going to spent more money this season, no doubt. Last season we spent 15 million...
Have you forgotten that we with a silly squad actually managed to be in the top four three seasons ago?
We may not play the nicest football but im sure that will come I saw great improvement last season.
Foreign investment? does anyone actually know were it will all end? Lets just get a new stadium inside Liverpool with some capacity, keep our manager and chairman, sign some more Evertonians AND NR.1 get a european scouting network that actually works!
19 Posted 06/07/2007 at 15:51:32
The only example were a takeover immediately improved results ON THE PITCH is Chelsea. And if I am to believe all the stories, Chelsea have massice debts, if Abramovich would leave today, they would go bankrupt tomorrow.
We needed investment some five years ago. I really do not see the urge now. And I really do not see one of the clubs you mentioned bringing home trophies except for Chelsea, wo were the first club taken over by a billionaire. They just used their jump-start.
I don’t know if BK is the right thing for us right now, but I do know that I will feel fucked up when someone takes us over just to increase his own wealth. Or well, increase his own wealth in an unhealthy way. Earning a decent return on your investment is nothing but normal business, it’s the ’grab all you can and leave huge debts’-scenario that I fear.
20 Posted 06/07/2007 at 15:40:41
Having read his posts for some considerable time now, no one can doubt his passion for the club. Furthermore, you have to say he has been consistent too. Laudable in this flim-flam age.
Talking of flim-flam, I don’t agree with the majority of his views on Moyes but do stand squarely behind his comments on Kenwright.
It astounds me that people still view this man as a benign patrician - an admirable custodian of the club. I have no issue with him not having the money - we know multi-millionaires can’t cut it these days - that’s not his fault.
Moreover, it’s the duplicity and deceitful spin he regularly dishes out to the people that really matter - the fans. Done in the name of him keeping the keys.
Kings Dock, selling Rooney (saying it would never happen for less than £50M)NTL,Fortress, Russian Oligarchs, finding the one American billionaire who will not put serious money into the club - Kirkby potentially on the way...the list is endless.
With regard to Kirkby, to say that Kenwright is acting in anything other than self-interest is delusional. As for seeking investment 24/7 - I guess the naive amongst us ought to be made aware that this is an annual event taking place on the 24th July...not long now...but don’t hold your breath folks.
21 Posted 06/07/2007 at 16:18:14
22 Posted 06/07/2007 at 16:48:58
These people will come in piss their money against the wall, leave, and when we’ve got huge wage bills and adminstration costs we’ll end up bankrupt.
The way forward is to do it the way we are doing it. Buy players we can afford, under the wage structure we can afford and no more. If we can’t afford them we can’t buy them simple as.
Do we need a sugardaddy who is gonna ply loads of money into the club and then leave when he realises he isn’t making any cash? I think not.
23 Posted 06/07/2007 at 16:56:47
24 Posted 06/07/2007 at 16:13:05
"Investment" seems to cause the main culprit. The local butcher, baker etc used to make illegal payments to attract and keep players. I’m not sure how they could have expected to make a profit from that - what you (all of us) would normally hope for from an investment. Mind you, they might have wasted that money by paying it in tax, if they’d kept records, that is.
The term money-laundering (putting ill-gotten gains into respectable looking enterprises), came after these pillars of the community moved to the Costas. Just as asset-stripping was a mark of the Thatcher era. None of that these days, thanks be.
So what do we mean by investment? The right to make money from the deal, or a gift to the agents, solicitors and other pondlife that thrives around the game?
There’s nobody meaner than a rich man - that’s how he became, or stays, rich.
25 Posted 06/07/2007 at 18:18:36
It may not be fashionable to say but before the big red took over, Chelsea were often partakers in the champions league, championship contenders on a number of occaisions, European winners and semi finalists, had players such as Viali, Gullit, Zola, Desailly, Weah, Poyet, Le Bouef, Petrescu... erm Chris Sutton. Could take on the likes of AC Milan and win and also won the league cup and fa cup a few times as well. Oh and played some great football.
I’m not defending Chelsea on anything, but lets not talk bollocks...


1 Posted 06/07/2007 at 13:13:34
Yes, I know what Nil Satis Nisi Optimum means, but I also see other teams like Newcastle pumping out money and sacking managers left right and centre to "satisfy the fans". Christ you only need to look at Leeds to see what can happen when the board overstretches.
DM can be frustrating, but he’s also done brilliantly given the resources at his disposal.
I have been worried about lack of size in the squad and signings but I still stand by IMWT and can’t wait for the season to start (with hopefully a couple of other players in).