Skip to Main Content
Members:   Log In  |  Sign Up

Where Next?

By Steve Connor :  26/11/2009 :  Comments (39) :

The rejection of the Kirkby proposal will inevitably lead to a bout of soul-searching by all Evertonians, regardless of whether they supported the move or not. It leads to the inevitable question: "What do we do next?"

Listening to Elstone on various different news outlets today, it sound pretty clear that Everton are not in a position to appeal this decision through a judicial review. By all accounts, this would be a hopeless course of action given that the actual report into the decision makes it clear that the Kirkby proposal bulldozes through a whole range of government planning policies, ranging from out-of-town shopping to sustainable transport. The whole thing appears as dead as the proverbial parrot.

Where does that leave us then? I’ll put me cards on the table here and state that when the ballot took place I voted Yes... It was not an easy decision, nor one I took lightly but at the time (with the ‘information’ as it stood), with a heavy heart, I considered it a viable proposition. I was wrong. The whole debate that has continued to rage ever since has shown up pretty much every one of the club's claims made at the time of the ballot to be false, ranging from Everton’s contribution to transport solutions, even to the actual capacity of the stadium!

I don’t think I'm alone in having revised (and regretted) my Yes vote, a long time ago coming to the conclusion that the Kirkby project was not suitable or desirable. Admittedly, the emotion I felt yesterday was one of relief that my actions of two years ago had not contributed to Everton Football Club making the biggest mistake in its history.

But what now?

Staying put and redevelop? Find another site? Share? The feasibility of these are all up for discussion. Inevitably, the financial implications are huge because, in the current state of affairs, we cannot afford any of the above options without major investment or enabling partners, whether that be the council, private companies... or both.

Kenwright selling up and a new backer forking out £250 million for a stadium... I don’t think that is very likely. What BK mustn’t now do is have one of his "paddies" and throw his dummy out of the pram, complaining at the unfairness of it all because every month that now goes by without some sort of solution emerging will be another month we fall behind. Kenwright and his board have got to take imperative action to either find investors willing to buy and build / redevelop or they have to find a solution themselves, in partnership with LCC to sort this mess out.

Sharing a stadium has been the great taboo in this city for way too long. On every level, it makes economic sense for the clubs and the council to join forces, pool their resources, and develop something that is unique and world class, freeing up the resources of both clubs. The element of competition for non-footballing events is removed, and the money can be divided 3 ways. Issues over capacity, colour scheme, etc, can be resolved fairly easily and I can imagine private companies falling over themselves for a slice of the potential enabling developments, with a guarantee of 50,000 customers every single week.

Of course, none of the above addresses two thorny issues — there does not appear to be the will (although they might be forced into it) in either club to push this agenda seriously... and how would we all feel on an emotional level about sharing with them? There is little doubt that financially it is a favourable proposition for Everton but we also stand to lose the most by becoming seen as the ‘junior partner’ in any development. But there is no indication that Kenwright and Bradley would press hard enough for this.

That leaves redevelopment or relocation elsewhere. Financially, these are more problematic than the shared-stadium solution. Redeveloping Goodison would effectively require the vast majority to be self-funded, even accounting for naming rights etc and, until we have a new owner, that is not going to happen. Any piecemeal development runs the risk of reduced capacity during construction and that is besides the fact that it would require a hell of a lot of work to bring it anywhere near the standard of somewhere like the Emirates — let alone, dare I say it , the brand new Liverpool Stadium a few hundred yards away (if they ever get their act together).

Two stadiums right next to each other... one brand spanking new, the other made over old one... also doesn’t take a genius to work out where non-footballing events and corporate are going to go. Furthermore, unless it’s part of a wider redevelopment of the Walton area, we can forget local council funding or private partnerships.

That leaves moving to another site within the city and building a brand newie. Issues here are also financial. At present, we could only afford this with substantial enabling funds from private partners and city council. This means finding somewhere close to the city (KEOIC of course championed the Loop; Clarence Dock has been mentioned) that would attract the necessary funding. Walton Hall Park is a contender but the possibility of private and public investment required would be substantially reduced the further away from the City Centre we go. South Liverpool? Well this brings back into play all the arguments of being ten miles away from the city centre etc.

What today’s decision does bring into sharp relief is the missed opportunity that was the Kings Dock, with each passing year looking more and more like the biggest mistake in our history was not funding this by whatever means possible.

Kenwright is now on strike three... he has fucked up two stadium moves. He needs to get his arse into gear by finding a buyer who is prepared to take on the club and build a new stadium or developing a sustainable relationship with the council and others who can fund it. Lack of action either way will prove to be disastrous for Everton Football Club

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer

Peter Griffin
1   Posted 26/11/2009 at 16:49:43

Report abuse

The decision has been made and the fans need to come together. Regardless of which way you wanted the ruling to go, the divide it’s caused needs repairing.

The influence of any retail partners, help from the council, investors, buyers will never be as vital as that of the supporters. No fans, no club. So rather than than take petty swipes at each other on internet forums, have a think about ways of moving the club forward. I’m sure we all have diverse backgrounds, education, knowledge and areas of expertise but we share a common goal, and that’s to support our club and help make it successful again.

Karl Parsons
2   Posted 26/11/2009 at 17:42:18

Report abuse

I am a 50year old blue who voted Yes.

I too have given Goodison Park more than any other single thing in my life. I too saw the move as bitter/sweet, and blindly followed the rhetoric the Club dished out. My 18year old Son who has spent a fraction of the time sat in his Parkend seat was adamant we should not move. I said we needed to go to keep abreast of the chances the game has experienced lately. He simply says kick BK out and keep our redevelopment achievable.

Today I wonder who’s the wiser? The 50 year old who made the emotional decision to move "for the good of the Club" or the boy who refused to budge from his crumbling set simply because he was told all that glitters resides in Kirkby.

Like you rightly pointed out Steve the Kings Dock ‘ring fence’ may prove singularly the worst decision since CBS knocked back The Beatles. And what makes matters worse is Kenwright made such a Dick of himself by making yet more promises he so obviously could not deliver and that was back in 2001! (Will he never learn?)

That only adds ammunition to my Sons position, which I choose to ignore. And even though Kenwright has little sway over Government decisions he has to accept responsibility for steering his ship into troubled waters without any contingency for “What if?”

Frankly I put my faith in the Directors of the Club who ultimately have now let me and every other YES voter down! And I dread to think what this white elephant has cost us in real money, the loss of additional playing staff, our league position and 3 years of sustainable growth?

Steve, I can tell also you my Son and I nearly came to blows on many occasions because of our polorised views about this mess. Today I resigned my position with my Son, maybe Bill Kenwright should follow suit.
David O'Keefe
3   Posted 26/11/2009 at 18:08:59

Report abuse

"Today I resigned my position with my Son"


You mean aligned, don’t you?
Nick Entwistle
4   Posted 26/11/2009 at 18:26:15

Report abuse

Redevelop Goodison over the number of seasons it will take.

History and tradition are hard currency in football.

And why be a biatch to the RS in a shared stadium which they are hard up to afford it anyway. Could bring both clubs down.
Peter Griffin
5   Posted 26/11/2009 at 18:57:47

Report abuse

The board now need to find out exactly what it will take to re-develop GP. Cost, timescale, future capacity, forecasted revenues etc.
David Bryant
6   Posted 26/11/2009 at 18:58:13

Report abuse

Where Next? Indeed!!!
Although I doubt very much that KEOIC had much sway in the Government’s decision I hope they will remember this day and the small part they played the the inevitable demise of our beloved club.

Quite frankly, there has never been a Plan B to the DK project simply because it (whatever "it" might have been) is unaffordable. Even ground sharing is a non-starter because EFC couldn’t make a meaningful contribution and we’d end up as virtual tenants to the RS.

All the talk of new investors, business partnerships etc. is not for real. There is not and never will be a White Knight charging in to save us from the impoverished BK. The business case does not exist for £200+ investment in EFC . The people with that sort of money don’t tend to fritter it away.

Developing GP is a non starter. Even if the footprint were big enough (by making hundreds homeless with no school for the kids) the time period would make it far too costly and the loss of revenue over the years such a project would take would cripple the club finances.

So.........Where next?

Sadly, today rejection (whilst not altogether unexpected) signals the inevitable decline of EFC as a EPL club. There are no viable alternatives and now the ludites who opposed DK can watch us rot and slide down the leagues. Are KEIOC supporters still laughing in the City?

My guess is not for too much longer .

Will the last person out of Everton Football Club please switch the lights out. We’re all washed up.
Neil Pearse
7   Posted 26/11/2009 at 19:28:41

Report abuse

Since we really are going to have to move on now, one thing that might be worth commenting on is the things that Elstone said today which - as is often the case with rather spur of the moment comments - tell us quite a lot. Certainly about how where the club thinks we now are.

One: Revamping GP is too expensive. Means: we really can’t afford it so we are not going to do it.

Two: We need a new site, but that is all about affordability not land. Means: it doesn’t mean what sites we find, we probably won’t be able to afford them.

Three: We would consider a groundshare with LFC, although we would have to look at the financial side of this very carefully. Means: we are now desperate and maybe we could afford this if lots of money is thrown at it by the LCC etc. - but otherwise not.

Two things can be deduced from this. Elstone is a sane man who lives in the real world that our club is actually in. And (under current financial constraints absent a white knight) we are now in a pretty dark place.
Mick Gallagher
8   Posted 26/11/2009 at 19:40:50

Report abuse

Sorry David but moving to Kirkby would have been the decline of our club.Why haven’t the board been trying to put a plan B in place thats why they run the club.
David Bryant
9   Posted 26/11/2009 at 19:48:01

Report abuse

Mick - No Plan B ’cos EFC can’t afford to build a new stadium alone. Who else is likely to contribute and what would they want in exchange??

DK was a one off opportunity. For whatever reason people opposed it it was our only affordable option.

Staying at GP will mean our inevitable decline. DK would have given us some future, maybe not what most Evertonians would wish for but beggars can’t be choosers.
Ian Tunstead
10   Posted 26/11/2009 at 19:57:51

Report abuse

It has to be a shared stadium as far as i am concerned.

We started at Stanley park, played at Anfield and then moved to goodison. It would be fitting to come full circle and share stanley park. There was a time when the Everton shared a football programme with Liverpool, and when the Everton team would go to cheer on Liverpool when they brought back a trophy and vice verse.

Everton and Liverpool fans need to put this bitterness to one side and look at the bigger picture. While we squabble amongst ourselves Man Utd Chelsea and Arsenal move further a head of Liverpool and the likes of Man City and Spurs move further a head of ourselves.

Both sides are falling behind and having to fight over the crumbs left by the big spenders. Wouldn’t people rather it be like the 80s when everton and Liverpool were winning everything rather than nothing, or would they rather see there own team be relegated than see Liverpool have some success?

Everton and Liverpool could be like Inter Milan and AC Milan should they come together, if not i can see us becoming more like Sheffield Wednesday and Sheffield Utd.
Ray Robinson
11   Posted 26/11/2009 at 21:13:03

Report abuse

Surely the very real possibility of the City of Liverpool having NO world class stadium on the table for the 2018 World Cup bid means the groundshare option becomes even more compelling!

I don’t like the RS as much as any Blue but I’d have no problem sharing a stadium as long as we were equal tenants.
Steve Carter
12   Posted 26/11/2009 at 21:18:46

Report abuse

Anyone know if judicial review of the decision is available and, if so, if there’s been any talk of Tesco and/or us applying for it?
Eddy Bernard
13   Posted 26/11/2009 at 21:12:59

Report abuse

A shared stadium is not the answer.
Why should clubs in Manchester, Birmingham, Sheffield and other cities have their own grounds and Everton cant.

We would be seen as the junior partner in any joint effort and nothing more than tenants.

Advocates of a shared stadium always quote AC & Inter as a model to follow, if you look into this a little further you will see Inter are currently looking at ways of funding the development of their own ground.

Forget the ground share and look for a new site nearer the city centre or re-develop GP
Graeme Bradman
14   Posted 26/11/2009 at 21:13:50

Report abuse

One thing is for sure we need to start pulling together. I find Robert Elstones comment at the end of his BBC interview very interesting. He is clearly aware of how split the fan base has ben over DK. He seems to say that we have been more divided than at any time in our history. David we will never agree over DK, and i am not going to continue the argument. I am not part of KEIOC but please remember they are not responsible for this mess. DK failed on planning grounds linked predominently to the retail element. I am not one who thinks their is no plan B. The board have to say that their is no plan B as that is part of stretegic management. Lets look at all other potential options eg PEEL holdings in Clarence Dock, Project Jennifer in Great Homer Street, joint stadium, use 78 Million to redevelop Goodison ( we would need to knock a few houses down not hundreds and the school can be rebuilt to a better standard for a few million). Lets unite and stop blaming your fellow fans.
Ray Burn
15   Posted 26/11/2009 at 21:20:56

Report abuse

David Bryant

Blah, blah, luddites, blah blah decline, blah blah, etc

Get over it. DK is DEAD. So stop your bleating, stop talking the club and Goodison Park down and try and contribute to coming up with a solution.

Chris Butler
16   Posted 26/11/2009 at 21:53:12

Report abuse

To David Bryant. The same's virtually happening in Kirkby in recently built homes for people that spent their lives living in poor accomodation. Also Knowsley resident voted yes but can I explain Knowlsey is about a 10 min walk from my house to Halewood. Knowsley is a big place and most of the Kirkby residents were against it.

Speke would be just as stupid as I know Speke reasobly well and the only space is a small one. Also the problems evident in Speke are just the same as Kirkby except the city boundaries. Also why don't rather than having a 50 000 seater why not have what's worked for schalike and have a large standing area as that would boost up attendances. To David it was a stupid option mate and a stadium should make no difference its 1 happens on the pitch that matters if we get relegated.

Charles King
17   Posted 26/11/2009 at 21:02:37

Report abuse

In truth I hate the idea Everton FC are established as the poor relations, the second club, the also rans etc etc of Merseyside.
Now in my fifties I witnessed the transformation as Shankly inspired LFC to firstly overtake us and then everyone else.
A unholy contract appeared to be struck with our red bretheren that no matter what position they found themselves in we would dutifully follow at a significant distance behind, even during the last period of sucess in the eighties we lost cup finals to them.
My solace was our supporters, how proud I was when in the early days of SKY a report showing Everton had by far the highest percentage of attendant game fans from the local area. Absolutely nothing against people from other areas, I now live 110miles away but to me it was further proof of the genuinely unique position this club holds ,with Dixie, School of science, league founder members, our holy trinity, nil satis and on it goes.
In addition the numbers that turn up, the shade cast by the stratospheric sucess of our neighbours together with the dross on view for the majority of the time since the seventies means Goodison should have been empty.But it was’nt, I feel it was this uniqueness, this identity that has carried us through.
We have stared over the abyss today and by the grace of god have stepped back, I no longer want us to be servile to our neighbours but the first and most important we must do is find a way of influencing what our board decides, our loyalty has been a double edged sword enabling the club to survive but providing security for unchallenged management. THIS is the most important change we must have, a stadium change can wait.

Ian Tunstead
18   Posted 26/11/2009 at 22:59:22

Report abuse

Eddy Bernard

Inter may well be looking at the option of having their own ground, but having a shared ground certainly hasnt done them any harm. I thought they were the Italian Champions.

Maybe one day when Everton are English Champions and have enough money we can start thinking about having our own stadium but for now the best option is to share.
Simon Maughan
19   Posted 26/11/2009 at 22:58:12

Report abuse

Nick Entwistle: "History and tradition are hard currency in football"

Nick, if only that were true, we would be challeging for the top four consistently. Sadly, however, as the cases of Chelsea and, latterly, Manchester City show, history and tradition are meaningless in the Sky era. It’s all about the now - and who has the money to spend on players and wages. We are sadly lacking in that department so our attempt to challenge the new order is futile. A little statistic from today’s Times illuminates the position nicely. For the sell out derby game this weekend, we will take around 900,000GBP. On the same day, Arsenal will rake in close to 3 million for their game with Chelsea. Over a season, Everton are worse of by a whopping 40 million.
Robert Daniels
20   Posted 27/11/2009 at 00:00:01

Report abuse

I keep reading news about everton would like to share a stadium with the shite, well this seems to be coming from Elstone /Wyness or whatever his name is now .

Kenwrights yes man would be more appropriate, but the thing is even if the majority of blues support this and I dont what about the shite .

There is know way they or there fans would ever consider a ground share not now or not ever.

Anyone who thinks there is the remotest of chances of this happening are living in cloud cookoo land . IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN!

So why are we waisting all this time and effort discussing it on this site, because Wynstone sorry Ellness sorry whoever is Bills fools mesenger at the time says so.

Get real boys its just spin again so dont even go there.

WE need new ideas or a proper evalueation of what the redevelopment of GP will cost or a new site working with the city council [note i said city council not knowsley yippee} to find an alternative site , so lets cut the crap and drop this shared stadium idea now , the idea thats only in the mind of Bill and anyone daft enough to think it could happen.

Come on blues unless you live outside the city you would know were only going to waste more time, so dont even bother to debate it . Lets find a real project that could happen!

Frank McGregor
21   Posted 27/11/2009 at 00:37:54

Report abuse

David Bryant an excellent assessment when one looks at the non support from Liverpool council with regards to Everton wether it be a site for a new ground the rejection of the sale of Bellfield. I don’t ever recall Liverpool FC being turned away for any proposal they make in fact I am led to believe that Everton were the first club to request to move to Stanley park and had it rejected out of hand. Everton have made a first by being the first premier league club to have a ground move turned down by the government. Now we can go to that parasite Warren Bradley and share a ground with Liverpool FC . Remaining in the city will have it’s benefits as Bill Shankly said there are two teams in Liverpool namely Liverpool and Liverpool Reserves previously known as Everton .Like most busineses that are not allowed to move forward and are continually met by obstructionist tactics and constant objection usually sell of any assetts and close up shop. The current comment of, "now the decision has been made we should pull together and move forward" You must be joking.Once bitten twice shy!!
Phil Bellis
22   Posted 27/11/2009 at 01:19:33

Report abuse

David Bryant...Frank McGregor
Grow up!
DK was not ’a one-off opportunity’
Kings’ Dock was - and who fucked that one up?
Frank McGregor
23   Posted 27/11/2009 at 01:37:22

Report abuse

Phil Bellis,Wake up and face reallity and cut out the foul language does not enhance your point of view.
Eric Myles
24   Posted 27/11/2009 at 02:46:08

Report abuse

What today’s decision does bring into sharp relief is the folly of the exclusivity agreement and the out of hand rejection of all other proposals leaving us with no Plan B
Now the board are going to have to eat humble pie and review all those proposals and action one of them.
Neil Pearse
25   Posted 27/11/2009 at 06:25:39

Report abuse

Actually Eric what we will now find is that the exclusivity agreement was a complete and utter irrelevance, and has made no difference whatsoever.

We can find as many alternatives as we like in Liverpool - unless they come with a price tag for us of less than £100M (if that) we can’t afford them. I’d love to believe we can find such a thing, but it’s hardly likely is it?

As David Conn writes in today’s Guardian - ’Everton run out of options...’. We are now betting on a rich saviour.
Ed Fitzgerald
26   Posted 27/11/2009 at 07:27:21

Report abuse


Whatever David Conn says in the Guardian DK was not a viable option either as it failed just about every planning regualtion under the sun. Are you going to blame KEIOC/No voters for that. The plain fact of the matter is the it is the clubs leadership who are at fault and the man at the helm should for once admit his own culpability.

Colin Potter
27   Posted 27/11/2009 at 09:02:30

Report abuse

David Bryant,
If we could afford to go into debt to the tune of £150m for a cow shed in kirkby, we can afford to re vamp Goodison park. If you ask him nicely, I am sure Tom Hughes will spell it out for you. He’s been on this site often ehough doing so.
Colin Evans
28   Posted 27/11/2009 at 10:42:35

Report abuse

Liverpool is first and foremost a city, not a football team; we need to do what is in the best interests of our great city!

Liverpool City Council need to show some leadership here - come up with a way to build a stadium owned in some way by the City and the two clubs - it’s a 50-100+ year investment with a guaranteed annual income stream.

The poster who suggest Everton share LIVERPOOLs ground is crazy - would never work (unequal); not withstanding that LFC don’t have any money to build one either!
David Bryant
29   Posted 27/11/2009 at 10:47:11

Report abuse

My last word on this is simply this:

EFC could not justify bank borrowings of £100M+ and get a return on investment. Redevelopment of GP is far too costly to even consider. The existing footprint is way too small and we would need to get LCC to issue a CPO on all the houses in Goodison Road, Gladys St and Bullens - highly unlikely and who pays the compo?

DK was the only affordable option and the money does not exist for a new site. Likewise, LFC’s new pipe dream was costing £400M+. How could EFC possibly raise 50%?? We certainly wouldn’t want to be junior partners!

Quite simply, we’ve got no money for anything else. So please get real and accept we’re between a rock and a hard place. There will be no White Knight. Haven’t you heard? Even Dubai is skint.

I never said that the KEOIC campaign was responsible or even the anti-DK residents but they never helped. With a united front planning regs can be over ruled but no chance when lobby groups and local councils are lined up in opposition. I believe that in 10 years time all Evertonians will wish we had moved to Kirkby. I will probably be pushing up daisies by then but that doesn’t stop me regretting this only opportunity for the future prosperity of EFC.
Colin Blake
30   Posted 27/11/2009 at 11:09:36

Report abuse

One of the major factors with Premier League clubs is that, despite the fact that they rarely make money, their owners believe that they are worth far more than their asset value. This isn’t surprising when, occasionally, rich foreigners pay way over the odds for the likes of Chelsea, Man City, Liverpool, United and, more recently £85 million for Birmingham City. Bill Kenwright and his shadowy backers are, understandably, party to this belief that they will eventually find the perfect scenario by selling- up, making a personal fortune for themselvesand leave the club in the bejewelled hands of a billionaire, the perfect solution which has been modelled in East Manchester. The new investors gamble on seeing a future of pay-as you-watch matches being streamed into a billion PC’s around the world at 50p per match.

The problem at Everton, however, is that the only prospective purchasers out there are only prepared to pump money and give Kenwiright a modest return on his investment. That’s not enough for Mr Kenwright - he’s staked all his savings and pensions on this enterprise and if he wants to enjoy his retirement staying at the Sandy Lane with his pal Michael Winner, he has got to make serious money from any sale of the Toffees. But I suspect that the Manchester City model that will be followed at Goodison will be that of Peter Swales having to virtually give the club away to Francis Lee because the hole that he was in was much too deep. If Mr Kenwright is prepared to accept the modest return he has already been offered, major investment will be forthcoming.

Lyndon Lloyd
Editorial Team
31   Posted 27/11/2009 at 15:08:28

Report abuse

Frank McGregor, a reader suggested I re-post a link to Greg Murphy’s illuminating debut post on these pages which clears up some misconceptions regarding Everton’s requests (or lack thereof) to build on Stanley Park.
Stew Marsland
32   Posted 27/11/2009 at 20:21:55

Report abuse

For all those who want to stay at goodison,what part of "we have no money to redevelop "do you not understand????
Chris Butler
33   Posted 27/11/2009 at 22:02:32

Report abuse

First of all, business relies on contacts. Whatever business you own, you need to have a freind that can help you. Bill Kenwright must have had somone within Knowsley that he knew.

The fact is Bill Kenwright would not've told us that there were no other options unless he had something riding on it. The fact is many other people found this not to be true at all and quite rightly challenged him.

The greed shown by Knowsley council was despicable. Just remember that Kirkby has had a lot of money invested in it and not worked out.

I'm not sure what happens at the shared stadium... for example do the Everton owners get money from Liverpool's gates? Increasingly, Liverpool FC are causing the bitterness. Liverpool have caused this hatred between the fans. Liverpool FCs top employess lack of respect towards Everton is astounding. This is just the council in my opnion as they know Liverpool attract more visitors than Everton and are happy to let them run the city.

Eddy Bernard
34   Posted 27/11/2009 at 22:14:48

Report abuse

Stew Marsland

Chelsea had no money before Abrahmovic appeared and Man City had nothing before Shinawatra and the sheiks moved in.

Maybe the Kirkby rejection will flush out a major investor who can take us forward with a new ground built to their liking.

A ground share is not the answer, th club will lose its identity and the clubs might even merge. If that ever happens the wheel will have come full circle
John Cheetham
35   Posted 28/11/2009 at 14:09:09

Report abuse

I don’t care if we are skint and we can’t afford a new ground or do up GP. I can’t stand the thought of sharing a ground with the RS.

I don’t know if you saw the comments on Skysports website? The RS are making out we are the poor relations and they’d be doing us a big fever? There must be somebody out there with the brains to solve this?

Louis Platt
36   Posted 28/11/2009 at 21:35:01

Report abuse

I think that Tony Barrett (The Times journalist) had it right. The mention of a ground share was only a ruse to divert attention away from Kirkby’s failings. It worked.
Dennis Stevens
37   Posted 29/11/2009 at 00:20:24

Report abuse

Stew, I think we’re stuck with Goodison Park for at least the short-mid term. As far as I’m aware we don’t have any money — whether for redevelopment or for a new build. Whatever the club does, it will depend on the ability to generate additional funds & many of them will have to be paid back later.
Andrew McLean
38   Posted 29/11/2009 at 09:33:30

Report abuse

Where next? Time to focus energy and attention to resolving the problems on the pitch.

Let's start playing some decent football. If we can perform better who knows what will happen. Hopefully we can again make this club attractive for investment. Let’s just finish the season and look at the options then.

Keith Glazzard
39   Posted 29/11/2009 at 22:48:49

Report abuse

I think the biggest heap of hypocrisy I have heard in this whole debacle comes in this article. No, not from Blue Bill, but from the idea that a new stadium couldn’t be built in South Liverpool.

The sacred nature of the city boundary and surrendering the city to the RS were holy writ to who? For example, KEIOC — a perfect example of the love that dare not mention its name. Well the name was Liverpool, not OC, and as far as I can tell South Liverpool is part of OC.

Colin Blake raises interesting points about the asset value of football clubs. He obviously knows more about this than me. And seems to know who has offered Kenwright good money to buy the club, but apparently not enough. Come on Colin — name names and figures. Don’t be, what’s the word, shadowy.

It couldn’t have been Shinawatara as he was still PM of Thailand when he put in a bid for the RS, to general surprise, but in his retirement he managed to acquire Man City. He faces charges of money laundering in Thailand but to my knowledge the City deal isn’t part of that. But a banker’s cheque from Abu Dhabi into a Swiss account could just have come in handy to pay the electric bill that quarter.

Colin claims that Kenwright has staked everything he owns in his Everton venture (I paraphrase of course — the potentially libelous words are his).

Colin — how do you know? Please tell us.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to Fan Articles, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.

© ToffeeWeb

Latest News

Subscribe to The Athletic, Get 40% off

Online Football Betting with Betway

Bet on Everton and get a deposit bonus with bet365 at

Recent Articles

Talking Points & General Forum

Pinned Links


We use cookies to enhance your experience on ToffeeWeb and to enable certain features. By using the website you are consenting to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.